scholarly journals 1006. Do Antibiotic Choices Made in the ED Influence Inpatient Therapy?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S354-S354
Author(s):  
Travis M Jones ◽  
Elizabeth Dodds Ashley ◽  
Melissa D Johnson ◽  
Rebekah W Moehring ◽  
Christina Sarubbi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inappropriate antibiotic use (AU) is common among inpatients and may begin in the emergency department (ED). ED clinicians often make the first antibiotic decisions in patient care, but it is unknown whether or not these decisions influence inpatient AU. Understanding prescribing practices at transitions of care is critical for implementing effective stewardship initiatives. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of AU in patients admitted to Duke University Hospital through the ED between July and December 2018. Included encounters had a minimum 2-day length of stay and received an antibiotic in both the ED and inpatient setting. Individual encounter IDs were used to link ED and inpatient AU reports generated from the DASON Antimicrobial Stewardship Assessment Portal. We compared the last ED administration date/time to the first inpatient unit administration for each agent. An antibiotic started in the ED was considered continued upon admission if the first inpatient administration occurred within 30 hours following the last ED administration. Demographic, clinical indication on order entry, length of therapy, and prescriber data were also collected. Results We included 3,336 encounters and 2,940 unique patients in the analysis. The median (IQR) patient age was 60 (42–72) years, and the most common indications for AU in the ED were sepsis (23.1%), pneumonia (17.8%), ABSSSI (15.5%), and intra-abdominal infection (12.8%). At least one antibiotic initiated in the ED was continued upon admission within 30 hours in 2,495 (74.8%) encounters. The most common antibiotics continued upon admission were piperacillin/tazobactam (32.8%), vancomycin (24.9%), and ceftriaxone (13.7%). The most common indications for agents continued upon admission were pneumonia (18%), intra-abdominal infection (15%), and ABSSSI (15%). Two or more antibiotics were continued upon admission in 916 (27.4%) encounters. Conclusion In our retrospective review of ED antibiotic encounters resulting in admission for at least 2 days, three out of four encounters had at least one antibiotic continued upon admission. This finding highlights the importance of initial appropriate antibiotic selection and suggests stewardship interventions should target EDs as well as inpatient prescribing. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
ToarJean Maurice Lalisang ◽  
Yarman Mazni ◽  
WifantoSaditya Jeo ◽  
VaniaMyralda Giamour Marbun

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Mostowfi Zadeh ◽  
B Praveen

Abstract Aim To uncover the practical efficacy of intra-operative peritoneal fluid sampling and the impact on antibiotic prescription and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing emergency surgery due to intra-abdominal infections. Method Our retrospective study included all patients undergoing emergency surgery for intra-abdominal infections at Southend University Hospital over 6 months (January – July 2019). Data was collected from electronic patient records, case notes and microbiology reports and included the following information: patient age demographics; type of infection; peritoneal fluid sampling indication; samples taken; details of swab culture report including organisms grown and antibiotic sensitivity; clinical course and incidence of subsequent intra-abdominal infection to include readmission and/or further procedures; the type, duration and route of antibiotic prescribed and duration of hospital stay. This audit was approved by the Departmental Audit Lead. Results 441 patients undergoing emergency surgery for intra-abdominal infection were identified. After exclusions, intra-operative peritoneal fluid samples were indicated in 77 patients (mean age 39.4 years). Of these only 3 had samples taken (3.9%). The most common organisms isolated were mixed anaerobes followed by Streptococcus angiosus. The most common antibiotic sensitivity was Metronidazole and Penicillin. One readmission occurred due to an intra-abdominal tubo-ovarian abscess. Conclusions The study shows that the current practice in our hospital regarding intra-operative peritoneal fluid sampling in intra-abdominal infections reflects the present widely held attitudes regarding its reduced practical utility. Abandoning routine sampling had no significant impact on the clinical course and may be more cost-effective. The study may help surgeons reflect on changing perspectives on this traditional practice.


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Ibrahim ◽  
Zeinab Bazzi

Despite the frequent alarms that have been published about the adverse effects of antibiotic use and misuse, physicians prescribe to patients approximately fifty percent of unnecessary antimicrobials. In an attempt to decrease the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and increase awareness, a team approach is required to address this prescribing phenomenon in a feasible manner. A retrospective study was done at a one-hundred-forty-bed hospital with a representative sample size of 368 patients. Patient data was collected and analyzed by a stewardship team. The overall antibiotic inappropriate rate was 45.8%, which is relatively high and consistent with the findings of other studies mentioned in the literature. This study aimed to provide baseline epidemiological data on the use of antibiotics in a Lebanese hospital and has revealed several notable patterns of antibiotic prescribing practices among Lebanese physicians such as the use of antimicrobial drugs example penicillin was consistently high. Strong correlations were identified between the type of attending physician and antibiotic appropriateness. These findings will be important in constructing an antimicrobial stewardship program to reduce antibiotic misuse.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S97-S97
Author(s):  
Christina M Kaul ◽  
Eric Molina ◽  
Donna Armellino ◽  
Mary Ellen Schilling ◽  
Mark Jarrett

Abstract Background Overutilization of antibiotics remains an issue in the inpatient setting. What is more, many protocols geared toward curbing improper antibiotic use rely heavily on resource- and personnel-intensive interventions. Thus, the potential for using the EMR to facilitate antibiotic stewardship remains largely unexplored. Methods We implemented a novel change for ordering certain antibiotics in our EMR: ceftriaxone, daptomycin, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam. When ordering one of these antibiotics, providers had to note a usage indication, which assigned a usage duration as per our Antibiotic Stewardship Committee guidelines. Pre-intervention, manual discontinuation was required if a provider did not enter a duration. The intervention was enacted August 2019 in 13 hospitals. Data was collected from January 2018 to February 2020. Antibiotic usage was reported monthly as rate per 1000-patient days. Monthly pre- and post-intervention rates were averaged, respectively. Paired samples t-tests were used to compare pre- and post-intervention rates per unit type per hospital. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Units with minimal usage, as defined by a pre- or post-intervention mean of 0, were excluded from analysis. Example of Ordering an Antibiotic Prior to Intervention Example of Ordering an Antibiotic After Intervention Results Ertapenem was noted to have a statistically significant decrease in utilization in seven units at three hospitals. Piperacillin-tazobactam was found to have a decrease in utilization in 19 units at eight hospitals. Daptomycin was found to have a decrease in utilization in one unit. Significant decreases in the utilization of ceftriaxone, imipenem, and meropenem were not noted. Example of Statistically Significant Decreased Utilization in Piperacillin-Tazobactam on a Medical-Surglcal Unit Conclusion Our study showed a statistically significant decrease in use of ertapenem, piperacillin-tazobactam and daptomycin using a simple built-in EMR prompt that curtails provider error. This should allow for an increased ease of integration, as the protocol does not require a host of resources for maintenance. Of note is decreased utilization of piperacillin-tazobactam and ertapenem across multiple hospitals, most notably on the medical and surgical wards. Thus, usage of the EMR without personnel-intensive protocols is a viable method for augmenting antibiotic stewardship in health systems. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 303
Author(s):  
Kevimy Agossa ◽  
Kadiatou Sy ◽  
Théo Mainville ◽  
Marjolaine Gosset ◽  
Sylvie Jeanne ◽  
...  

The aim of the present survey is to investigate the use of antibiotics during periodontal therapy among French dentists with a focus on exploring potential differences between various groups of practitioners. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to different groups of practitioners including members of (i) the French Society of Periodontology and Implantology; (ii) the College of University Teachers in Periodontology and, (iii) private practitioners participating in the French general dental practice-based research network. 272 questionnaires were included in the analysis. Prescription patterns were globally in line with the current recommendations. Systemic antibiotics are most frequently used as a first-line therapy in necrotizing periodontitis (92%) and aggressive periodontitis (53.3% to 66.1%). However, malpractice still exists, including in the management of periodontal abscesses. Antibiotics are prescribed (i) less frequently for periodontal abscesses and (ii) more frequently for generalized aggressive periodontitis by members of the periodontal society and University college (p < 0.05). Amoxicillin (59.9%) and the amoxicillin + metronidazole (59.6%) combination were the most frequently prescribed molecules. Providing a high number of periodontal treatments per week, being more recently graduated, having a post-graduate certificate in periodontology and holding or having held an academic position/hospital practice were all factors associated with a better knowledge of and/or more adequate antibiotic use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document