scholarly journals Antibiotic Use in Periodontal Therapy among French Dentists and Factors Which Influence Prescribing Practices

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 303
Author(s):  
Kevimy Agossa ◽  
Kadiatou Sy ◽  
Théo Mainville ◽  
Marjolaine Gosset ◽  
Sylvie Jeanne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Aggressive Periodontitis ◽  
Periodontal Therapy ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
French Society ◽  
Private Practitioners ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Practice Based Research ◽  
Systemic Antibiotics

The aim of the present survey is to investigate the use of antibiotics during periodontal therapy among French dentists with a focus on exploring potential differences between various groups of practitioners. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed to different groups of practitioners including members of (i) the French Society of Periodontology and Implantology; (ii) the College of University Teachers in Periodontology and, (iii) private practitioners participating in the French general dental practice-based research network. 272 questionnaires were included in the analysis. Prescription patterns were globally in line with the current recommendations. Systemic antibiotics are most frequently used as a first-line therapy in necrotizing periodontitis (92%) and aggressive periodontitis (53.3% to 66.1%). However, malpractice still exists, including in the management of periodontal abscesses. Antibiotics are prescribed (i) less frequently for periodontal abscesses and (ii) more frequently for generalized aggressive periodontitis by members of the periodontal society and University college (p < 0.05). Amoxicillin (59.9%) and the amoxicillin + metronidazole (59.6%) combination were the most frequently prescribed molecules. Providing a high number of periodontal treatments per week, being more recently graduated, having a post-graduate certificate in periodontology and holding or having held an academic position/hospital practice were all factors associated with a better knowledge of and/or more adequate antibiotic use.

Opioid prescribing practices of members of the national dental practice based research network

2015 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. e145
Author(s):  
Jenna L. McCauley ◽  
Valeria V. Gordan ◽  
Joseph L. Riley ◽  
Roger B. Fillingim ◽  
Sonia K. Makhija ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Network ◽  
Dental Practice ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Opioid Prescribing ◽  
Practice Based Research

scholarly journals 24. Antibiotic Use in Hospital Emergency Departments and Observation Settings from 2012–2018 in a Large Cohort of U.S. Hospitals

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S12-S13
Author(s):  
Leigh Ellyn Preston ◽  
James Baggs ◽  
Sarah Kabbani ◽  
Melinda M Neuhauser ◽  
Laura M King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Care Process ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Healthcare Database ◽  
Systemic Antibiotic ◽  
Frequent Use ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Systemic Antibiotics

Abstract Background While discharge antibiotic prescriptions from emergency department (ED) visits have been reported, systemic antibiotic use during ED and hospital observation (OBS) visits have not been well assessed. We conducted a descriptive analysis of antibiotic use in these settings. Methods We identified ED and OBS visits not resulting in hospitalization, and systemic antibiotics administration charges during these visits from January 2012-December 2018 using the Premier Healthcare Database, representing at least 600 hospitals annually. Antibiotics prescribed after discharge were excluded. We reported the proportion of visits with antibiotic use, and described antibiotic use by class, agent and route stratified by location. We also examined trends in antibiotic use over time using a multivariable logistic model. Results We assessed 161,291,011 ED visits and 15,660,062 OBS visits from 2012–2018. Systemic antibiotics were identified in 9.0% of ED visits and 25.2% of OBS visits. Parenteral (IV) antibiotics were received in a high proportion of ED and OBS visits in which a systemic antibiotic was received (52.6% and 87.6% respectively). In the ED, 3rd/4th generation cephalosporins were the most commonly identified (32.7%) while in the OBS, 1st/2nd generation cephalosporins were most commonly identified (38.9%), Fig. 1. The most common agents in the ED were ceftriaxone, azithromycin, and cephalexin while the most common agents in the OBS were cefazolin, ceftriaxone, and levofloxacin. Any systemic antibiotic use in EDs declined slightly from 2012–2018 (9.2%-8.9%, p&lt; 0.0001) while use in OBS settings saw the largest increase from 2017- 2018 (25.4%-30.4%, p&lt; 0.0001), Fig. 2. Fluoroquinolone use decreased in both ED (41.3%) and OBS (31.2%) (both p&lt; 0.0001) beginning in years 2012 and 2016 respectively. Figure 1: Antibiotic use in emergency departments and observation settings by antibiotic class, Premier Healthcare Database Hospitals, 2012–2018 Figure 2: Overall antibiotic use in emergency departments and observation settings by year, Premier Healthcare Database Hospitals, 2012–2018 Conclusion Hospital ED and OBS settings are uniquely positioned to improve appropriate antibiotic use across the spectrum of healthcare. Frequent use of IV antibiotics and recent increases in antibiotic use in observation settings call for evaluation of appropriateness of their use and presence of transition-of-care process. Further evaluation of diagnoses to evaluate the appropriateness of IV administration may highlight additional opportunities for optimizing prescribing practices. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

A retrospective audit of antibiotic prescriptions in a Lebanese Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Ibrahim ◽  
Zeinab Bazzi
Keyword(s):  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Team Approach ◽  
Strong Correlations ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Antimicrobial Drugs ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Attending Physician

Despite the frequent alarms that have been published about the adverse effects of antibiotic use and misuse, physicians prescribe to patients approximately fifty percent of unnecessary antimicrobials. In an attempt to decrease the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and increase awareness, a team approach is required to address this prescribing phenomenon in a feasible manner. A retrospective study was done at a one-hundred-forty-bed hospital with a representative sample size of 368 patients. Patient data was collected and analyzed by a stewardship team. The overall antibiotic inappropriate rate was 45.8%, which is relatively high and consistent with the findings of other studies mentioned in the literature. This study aimed to provide baseline epidemiological data on the use of antibiotics in a Lebanese hospital and has revealed several notable patterns of antibiotic prescribing practices among Lebanese physicians such as the use of antimicrobial drugs example penicillin was consistently high. Strong correlations were identified between the type of attending physician and antibiotic appropriateness. These findings will be important in constructing an antimicrobial stewardship program to reduce antibiotic misuse.

scholarly journals Implementing interventions to reduce antibiotic use: a qualitative study in high-prescribing practices

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra J. Borek ◽  
◽  
Anne Campbell ◽  
Elle Dent ◽  
Christopher C. Butler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focus Groups ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
Clinical Uncertainty ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Clinical Tools ◽  
The Many

Abstract Background Trials have shown that delayed antibiotic prescriptions (DPs) and point-of-care C-Reactive Protein testing (POC-CRPT) are effective in reducing antibiotic use in general practice, but these were not typically implemented in high-prescribing practices. We aimed to explore views of professionals from high-prescribing practices about uptake and implementation of DPs and POC-CRPT to reduce antibiotic use. Methods This was a qualitative focus group study in English general practices. The highest antibiotic prescribing practices in the West Midlands were invited to participate. Clinical and non-clinical professionals attended focus groups co-facilitated by two researchers. Focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Results Nine practices (50 professionals) participated. Four main themes were identified. Compatibility of strategies with clinical roles and experience – participants viewed the strategies as having limited value as ‘clinical tools’, perceiving them as useful only in ‘rare’ instances of clinical uncertainty and/or for those less experienced. Strategies as ‘social tools’ – participants perceived the strategies as helpful for negotiating treatment decisions and educating patients, particularly those expecting antibiotics. Ambiguities – participants perceived ambiguities around when they should be used, and about their impact on antibiotic use. Influence of context – various other situational and practical issues were raised with implementing the strategies. Conclusions High-prescribing practices do not view DPs and POC-CRPT as sufficiently useful ‘clinical tools’ in a way which corresponds to the current policy approach advocating their use to reduce clinical uncertainty and improve antimicrobial stewardship. Instead, policy attention should focus on how these strategies may instead be used as ‘social tools’ to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use. Attention should also focus on the many ambiguities (concerns and questions) about, and contextual barriers to, using these strategies that need addressing to support wider and more consistent implementation.

scholarly journals Systemic Antibiotics and Obesity: Analyses from a Population-Based Cohort

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2601
Author(s):  
So Young Park ◽  
Morena Ustulin ◽  
SangHyun Park ◽  
Kyung-Do Han ◽  
Joo Young Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Adult Population ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Obesity Risk ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Korean Adult ◽  
Korean National Health Insurance ◽  
Gram Negative Organisms ◽  
Systemic Antibiotics

Background: In this study, we analyzed the association between antibiotic use and obesity and metabolic syndrome (MS) in a Korean adult population. Methods: Subjects using the Korean National Health Insurance Service sample cohort were retrospectively analyzed in 2015. The differences in obesity and metabolic syndrome (MS) status were compared and analyzed according to duration of systemic antibiotic treatment in the previous 10 years (non-users, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd tertile). Results: Subjects who used systemic antibiotics for longer periods were older, satisfied more criteria for MS, and had more comorbidities than non-users (non-users vs. 3rd tertile, p < 0.0001 for all). After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk of obesity was higher in subjects who used systemic antibiotics for longer periods than in non-users (non-users vs. 3rd tertile, OR (odds ratio) (95% CI (confidence interval)); 1.20 (1.12–1.38)). The criteria for MS were more satisfied in the 3rd tertile than in non-users. A higher obesity risk was also found in subjects treated with antibiotics targeting Gram-negative organisms than in those targeting Gram-positive organisms. Conclusion: The risk of obesity was higher in subjects who took systemic antibiotics more frequently. The risk was more prominent when they took antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacteria.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Interventions to Optimize Treatment of Infections in Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 073346482110182
Author(s):  
Sainfer Aliyu ◽  
Jasmine L. Travers ◽  
S. Layla Heimlich ◽  
Joanne Ifill ◽  
Arlene Smaldone
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Antibiotic Stewardship ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Meta Analyses

Effects of antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) interventions to optimize antibiotic use for infections in nursing home (NH) residents remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess ASPs in NHs and their effects on antibiotic use, multi-drug-resistant organisms, antibiotic prescribing practices, and resident mortality. Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using five databases (1988–2020). Nineteen articles were included, 10 met the criteria for quantitative synthesis. Inappropriate antibiotic use decreased following ASP intervention in eight studies with a pooled decrease of 13.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: [4.7, 23.0]; Cochran’s Q = 166,837.8, p < .001, I2 = 99.9%) across studies. Decrease in inappropriate antibiotic use was highest in studies that examined antibiotic use for urinary tract infection (UTI). Education and antibiotic stewardship algorithms for UTI were the most effective interventions. Evidence surrounding ASPs in NH is weak, with recommendations suited for UTIs.

scholarly journals Prescribers’ Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors on Antibiotics, Antibiotic Use and Antibiotic Resistance in Jordan

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 858
Author(s):  
Reema A. Karasneh ◽  
Sayer I. Al-Azzam ◽  
Mera Ababneh ◽  
Ola Al-Azzeh ◽  
Ola B. Al-Batayneh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Resistance ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Attitudes And Behaviors ◽  
And Behaviors ◽  
Ease Of Access

More research is needed on the drivers of irrational antibiotic prescribing among healthcare professionals and to ensure effective prescribing and an adequate understanding of the issue of antibiotic resistance. This study aimed at evaluating prescribers’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviors about antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance. A cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing an online questionnaire and included physicians and dentists from all sectors in Jordan. A total of 613 prescribers were included (physicians n = 409, dentists n = 204). Respondents’ knowledge on effective use, unnecessary use or associated side effects of antibiotics was high (>90%), compared with their knowledge on the spread of antibiotic resistance (62.2%). For ease of access to the required guidelines on managing infections, and to materials that advise on prudent antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance, prescribers agreed in 62% and 46.1% of cases, respectively. 28.4% of respondents had prescribed antibiotics when they would have preferred not to do so more than once a day or more than once a week. Among respondents who prescribed antibiotics, 63.4% would never or rarely give out resources on prudent use of antibiotics for infections. The findings are of importance to inform antibiotic stewardships about relevant interventions aimed at changing prescribers’ behaviors and improving antibiotic prescribing practices.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document