Experimental Test of the Pulse Perturbation Method for Determining Causal Connectivities of Chemical Species in a Reaction Network
For an experimental test of the pulse perturbation method we choose a part of glycolysis shown in fig. 6.1. There are similarities and some differences between the model in fig. 5.12 and the reaction system in fig. 6.1. The reaction system has reactants, enzymes, and some effectors. One point of interest in choosing this system is the test of detecting and identifying the split of the reaction chain, from glucose to F1,6BP, at the aldolase reaction into two chains, one terminating at G3P and the other at 3PG. The experiments were run in a continuous-flow stirred tank reactor (CSTR) with the reaction system at a nonequilibrium stationary state, such that the reactions run spontaneously from glucose to G3P and 3PG. The concentrations of the species at this state are close to those of physiological conditions. The metabolites G6P, F6P, F1,6BP, DHAP, G3P, and 3PG were detected and analyzed by capillary electrophoresis. Typical relative errors were 4% for G6P, 11% for F6P, 15% for F1,6BP, 9% for DHAP, 6% for 3PG, and 3% for G3P. Figure 6.3 shows the responses of the species to a pulse of G6P, in a plot of relative concentrations versus. time during the relaxation, after the pulse, back to the stationary state. Complete relaxation took about half an hour. As seen from the amplitudes of the responses in the plot, the temporal order of propagation of the pulse is: G6P, F6P, DHAP, G3P, and 3PG. The time ordering of the maximum deviations agrees with this ordering except perhaps for G3P and 3PG. In some experiments, as in this one, the species F1,6BP could not be measured adequately and is not shown. It is possible to extract qualitative information on rates but difficult to derive quantitative information. Following a pulse of F1,6BP, the temporal order of propagation in the maximum relative concentrations is F1,6BP, DHAP, and with similar amplitudes G6P (slightly higher), G3P, 3PG, and F6P (slightly lower). These small differences were within errors of measurement and are therefore not significant. In this experiment the measurements of F1,6BP are reliable.