The Delegated State
Shreveport serves as the representative case for municipalities without a local government level supportive housing policy. Shreveport is a case where the Continuum of Care, municipal policy goals, decision-making, and implementation remain very separate. The separation is evident in policy decision-making and implementation, where the municipal government has little to no involvement in homeless policy aside from coordinating pass-through federal funding. Limited involvement by Shreveport’s municipal government presents direct barriers to supportive housing policy design and implementation by restricting authority and resources available to the Continuum of Care to coordinate policy activities. Policy activities constrained by the limited municipal authority for the Continuum of Care include challenges reducing policing of persons experiencing chronic homelessness and severe mental illness and limited ability to participate in municipal decision-making, which disadvantaged the Continuum of Care in debates over new shelter or low-income housing constructions compared to economic elites in the Downtown Development Authority.