Curved Space

Author(s):  
Nicholas Manton ◽  
Nicholas Mee

This chapter develops the mathematical technology required to understand general relativity by taking the reader from the traditional flat space geometry of Euclid to the geometry of Riemann that describes general curved spaces of arbitrary dimension. The chapter begins with a comparison of Euclidean geometry and spherical geometry. The concept of the geodesic is introduced. The discovery of hyperbolic geometry is discussed. Gaussian curvature is defined. Tensors are introduced. The metric tensor is defined and simple examples are given. This leads to the use of covariant derivatives, expressed in terms of Christoffel symbols, the Riemann curvature tensor and all machinery of Riemannian geometry, with each step illustrated by simple examples. The geodesic equation and the equation of geodesic deviation are derived. The final section considers some applications of curved geometry: configuration space, mirages and fisheye lenses.

Author(s):  
David D. Nolte

The metric tensor uniquely defines the geometric properties of a metric space, while differential geometry is concerned with the derivatives of vectors and tensors within the metric space. Derivatives of vector quantities include the derivatives of basis vectors, which lead to Christoffel symbols that are directly connected to the metric tensor. This connection between tensor derivatives and the metric tensor provides the tools necessary to define geodesic curves. The geodesic equation is derived from variational calculus and from parallel transport. Geodesic motion is the trajectory of a particle through a metric space defined by an action metric that includes a potential function. In this way, dynamics converts to geometry as a trajectory in a potential converts to a geodesic curve through an appropriately defined metric space.


Author(s):  
Michael Kachelriess

This chapter introduces tensor fields, covariant derivatives and the geodesic equation on a (pseudo-) Riemannian manifold. It discusses how symmetries of a general space-time can be found from the Killing equation, and how the existence of Killing vector fields is connected to global conservation laws.


1971 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.R. Burman

This paper deals with the motion of a point test charge in an external electromagnetic field with the effect of electromagnetic radiation reaction included. The equation of motion applicable in a general Riemannian space-time is written as the geodesic equation of an affine connection. The connection is the sum of the Christoffel connection and a tensor which depends on, among other things, the external electromagnetic field, the charge and mass of the particle and the Ricci tensor. The affinity is not unique; a choice is made so that the covariant derivative of the metric tensor with respect to the connection vanishes. The special cases of conformally flat spaces and the space of general relativity are discussed.


1967 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1328-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Ehlers

The transition from the (covariantly generalized) MAXWELL equations to the geometrical optics limit is discussed in the context of general relativity, by adapting the classical series expansion method to the case of curved space time. An arbitrarily moving ideal medium is also taken into account, and a close formal similarity between wave propagation in a moving medium in flat space time and in an empty, gravitationally curved space-time is established by means of a normal hyperbolic optical metric.


Author(s):  
Jean‐Pierre Luminet

This chapter notes that the twin paradox is the best-known thought experiment associated with Einstein's theory of relativity. An astronaut who makes a journey into space in a high-speed rocket will return home to find he has aged less than his twin who stayed on Earth. This result appears puzzling, as the homebody twin can be considered to have done the travelling with respect to the traveller. Hence, it is called a “paradox”. In fact, there is no contradiction, and the apparent paradox has a simple resolution in special relativity with infinite flat space. In general relativity (dealing with gravitational fields and curved space-time), or in a compact space such as the hypersphere or a multiply connected finite space, the paradox is more complicated, but its resolution provides new insights about the structure of space–time and the limitations of the equivalence between inertial reference frames.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document