Introduction

2019 ◽  
pp. 3-18
Author(s):  
David Erdos
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Public Discourse ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
European Economic Area ◽  
Normative Study ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
General Data ◽  
Professional Artists

This chapter introduces the tension between European data protection regulation and freedom of expression, including the heightened form this tension assumes as regards the activity of professional journalists and other traditional publishers. These actors not only play a central role in public discourse but also often possess a disproportionate ability to gather, process, and disseminate personal data. It is therefore important both to examine how these interactions have played out at different times, in different places and contexts, and to consider how they might best evolve across the European Economic Area (EEA) under the new European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The concept of traditional publishers is often equated to professional journalists and the institutional media but should also encompass professional artists and writers including academics. The chapter delineates the scope of this empirical and normative study, explores the key concepts deployed, and elucidates the methodological approach adopted.

European Data Protection Regulation, Journalism, and Traditional Publishers

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Erdos
Keyword(s):  
New Media ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Academic Disciplines ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
European Data ◽  
General Data ◽  
Professional Artists ◽  
Normative Perspective

This book explores the interface between European data protection and the freedom of expression activities of traditional journalism, professional artists, and both academic and non-academic writers from both an empirical and normative perspective. It draws on an exhaustive examination of both historical and contemporary public domain material and a comprehensive questionnaire of European Data Protection Authorities (DPAs). Empirically it is found that, notwithstanding an often confusing statutory landscape, DPAs have sought to develop an approach to regulating the journalistic media based on contextual rights balancing. However, they have struggled to secure a clear and specified criterion of strictness as regards standard-setting or a consistent and reliable approach to enforcement. DPAs have appeared even more confused as regards other traditional publishers, largely abstaining from regulating most professional artists and writers but attempting to subject all academic disciplines to onerous statutory restrictions established for medical, scientific, and related research. From these findings, it is argued that balancing contextual rights has value and should be both generalized across all traditional publishers and systematically and sensitively developed through structured and robust co-regulation. Such co-regulation should adopt the new code of conduct and monitoring provisions included in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as a broad guideline. DPAs should accord strong deference to any codes and monitoring bodies which verifiably meet the accredited criteria but must engage more proactively when these are absent. In any case, DPAs should also intervene directly as regards particularly serious or systematic issues and have an increasingly important role in ensuring a joined-up approach between traditional publishing and new media activity.

scholarly journals Can the GDPR and Freedom of Expression Coexist?

AJIL Unbound ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 31-34
Author(s):  
Nani Jansen Reventlow
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Data Privacy ◽  
Freedom Of Expression ◽  
Personal Information ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Individual Data ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
General Data ◽  
The Right

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) imposes important transparency and accountability requirements on different actors who process personal data. This is great news for the protection of individual data privacy. However, given that “personal information and human stories are the raw material of journalism,” what does the GDPR mean for freedom of expression and especially for journalistic activity? This essay argues that, although EU states seem to have taken their data protection obligations under the GDPR seriously, efforts to balance this against the right to freedom of expression have been more uneven. The essay concludes that it is of key importance to ensure that the GDPR's safeguards for data privacy do not compromise a free press.

The Risk-Based Approach to Data Protection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raphaël Gellert
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Management Tools ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Regulation Theory ◽  
Régulation Theory ◽  
General Data ◽  
Data Protection Law ◽  
The Way

The main goal of this book is to provide an understanding of what is commonly referred to as “the risk-based approach to data protection”. An expression that came to the fore during the overhaul process of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)—even though it can also be found in other statutes under different acceptations. At its core it consists in endowing the regulated organisation that process personal data with increased responsibility for complying with data protection mandates. Such increased compliance duties are performed through risk management tools. It addresses this topic from various perspectives. In framing the risk-based approach as the latest model of a series of regulation models, the book provides an analysis of data protection law from the perspective of regulation theory as well as risk and risk management literatures, and their mutual interlinkages. Further, it provides an overview of the policy developments that led to the adoption of such an approach, which it discusses in the light of regulation theory. It also includes various discussions pertaining to the risk-based approach’s scope and meaning, to the way it has been uptaken in statutes including key provisions such as accountability and data protection impact assessments, or to its potential and limitations. Finally, it analyses how the risk-based approach can be implemented in practice by providing technical analyses of various data protection risk management methodologies.

scholarly journals Application of Blockchain in Education: GDPR-Compliant and Scalable Certification and Verification of Academic Information

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4537
Author(s):  
Christian Delgado-von-Eitzen ◽  
Luis Anido-Rifón ◽  
Manuel J. Fernández-Iglesias
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Certification System ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Different Types ◽  
International Regulations ◽  
Innovative Solution ◽  
General Data ◽  
Academic Information

Blockchain technologies are awakening in recent years the interest of different actors in various sectors and, among them, the education field, which is studying the application of these technologies to improve information traceability, accountability, and integrity, while guaranteeing its privacy, transparency, robustness, trustworthiness, and authenticity. Different interesting proposals and projects were launched and are currently being developed. Nevertheless, there are still issues not adequately addressed, such as scalability, privacy, and compliance with international regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation in Europe. This paper analyzes the application of blockchain technologies and related challenges to issue and verify educational data and proposes an innovative solution to tackle them. The proposed model supports the issuance, storage, and verification of different types of academic information, both formal and informal, and complies with applicable regulations, protecting the privacy of users’ personal data. This proposal also addresses the scalability challenges and paves the way for a global academic certification system.

scholarly journals Algorithms that remember: model inversion attacks and data protection law

2018 ◽  
Vol 376 (2133) ◽  
pp. 20180083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Veale ◽  
Reuben Binns ◽  
Lilian Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Theme Issue ◽  
Future Directions ◽  
Model Inversion ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
General Data ◽  
Inference Attacks ◽  
Use Of Models

Many individuals are concerned about the governance of machine learning systems and the prevention of algorithmic harms. The EU's recent General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been seen as a core tool for achieving better governance of this area. While the GDPR does apply to the use of models in some limited situations, most of its provisions relate to the governance of personal data, while models have traditionally been seen as intellectual property. We present recent work from the information security literature around ‘model inversion’ and ‘membership inference’ attacks, which indicates that the process of turning training data into machine-learned systems is not one way, and demonstrate how this could lead some models to be legally classified as personal data. Taking this as a probing experiment, we explore the different rights and obligations this would trigger and their utility, and posit future directions for algorithmic governance and regulation. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Governing artificial intelligence: ethical, legal, and technical opportunities and challenges’.

Regulatory Challenges of Data Mining Practices: The Case of the Never-ending Lifecycles of ‘Health Data’

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-307
Author(s):  
Giovanni Comandè ◽  
Giulia Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Data Mining ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Health Data ◽  
General Level ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
The Face ◽  
General Data ◽  
Level Of Analysis

Abstract Health data are the most special of the ‘special categories’ of data under Art. 9 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The same Art. 9 GDPR prohibits, with broad exceptions, the processing of ‘data concerning health’. Our thesis is that, through data mining technologies, health data have progressively undergone a process of distancing from the healthcare sphere as far as the generation, the processing and the uses are concerned. The case study aims thus to test the endurance of the ‘special category’ of health data in the face of data mining technologies and the never-ending lifecycles of health data they feed. At a more general level of analysis, the case of health data shows that data mining techniques challenge core data protection notions, such as the distinction between sensitive and non-sensitive personal data, requiring a shift in terms of systemic perspectives that the GDPR only partly addresses.

scholarly journals Data Sharing Under the General Data Protection Regulation

Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 1029-1035
Author(s):  
Antonia Vlahou ◽  
Dara Hallinan ◽  
Rolf Apweiler ◽  
Angel Argiles ◽  
Joachim Beige ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
The European Union ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Personal Data Protection ◽  
Protection Legislation ◽  
General Data ◽  
Almost All

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) became binding law in the European Union Member States in 2018, as a step toward harmonizing personal data protection legislation in the European Union. The Regulation governs almost all types of personal data processing, hence, also, those pertaining to biomedical research. The purpose of this article is to highlight the main practical issues related to data and biological sample sharing that biomedical researchers face regularly, and to specify how these are addressed in the context of GDPR, after consulting with ethics/legal experts. We identify areas in which clarifications of the GDPR are needed, particularly those related to consent requirements by study participants. Amendments should target the following: (1) restricting exceptions based on national laws and increasing harmonization, (2) confirming the concept of broad consent, and (3) defining a roadmap for secondary use of data. These changes will be achieved by acknowledged learned societies in the field taking the lead in preparing a document giving guidance for the optimal interpretation of the GDPR, which will be finalized following a period of commenting by a broad multistakeholder audience. In parallel, promoting engagement and education of the public in the relevant issues (such as different consent types or residual risk for re-identification), on both local/national and international levels, is considered critical for advancement. We hope that this article will open this broad discussion involving all major stakeholders, toward optimizing the GDPR and allowing a harmonized transnational research approach.

scholarly journals The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Privacy Regulation ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Data Protection Directive ◽  
Ongoing Work ◽  
Protection Legislation ◽  
Recent Reform ◽  
General Data ◽  
The Eu

This new book provides an article-by-article commentary on the new EU General Data Protection Regulation. Adopted in April 2016 and applicable from May 2018, the GDPR is the centrepiece of the recent reform of the EU regulatory framework for protection of personal data. It replaces the 1995 EU Data Protection Directive and has become the most significant piece of data protection legislation anywhere in the world. This book is edited by three leading authorities and written by a team of expert specialists in the field from around the EU and representing different sectors (including academia, the EU institutions, data protection authorities, and the private sector), thus providing a pan-European analysis of the GDPR. It examines each article of the GDPR in sequential order and explains how its provisions work, thus allowing the reader to easily and quickly elucidate the meaning of individual articles. An introductory chapter provides an overview of the background to the GDPR and its place in the greater structure of EU law and human rights law. Account is also taken of closely linked legal instruments, such as the Directive on Data Protection and Law Enforcement that was adopted concurrently with the GDPR, and of the ongoing work on the proposed new E-Privacy Regulation.

scholarly journals Location Privacy in the Wake of the GDPR

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yola Georgiadou ◽  
Rolf de By ◽  
Ourania Kounadi
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Location Privacy ◽  
Cultural Theory ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
The European Union ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Digital Ecosystem ◽  
Protection Legislation ◽  
General Data ◽  
Conducting Research

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) protects the personal data of natural persons and at the same time allows the free movement of such data within the European Union (EU). Hailed as majestic by admirers and dismissed as protectionist by critics, the Regulation is expected to have a profound impact around the world, including in the African Union (AU). For European–African consortia conducting research that may affect the privacy of African citizens, the question is ‘how to protect personal data of data subjects while at the same time ensuring a just distribution of the benefits of a global digital ecosystem?’ We use location privacy as a point of departure, because information about an individual’s location is different from other kinds of personally identifiable information. We analyse privacy at two levels, individual and cultural. Our perspective is interdisciplinary: we draw from computer science to describe three scenarios of transformation of volunteered/observed information to inferred information about a natural person and from cultural theory to distinguish four privacy cultures emerging within the EU in the wake of GDPR. We highlight recent data protection legislation in the AU and discuss factors that may accelerate or inhibit the alignment of data protection legislation in the AU with the GDPR.

Minding the Machine v2.0

2019 ◽  
pp. 248-262
Author(s):  
Lee A Bygrave
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Automated Processing ◽  
General Data ◽  
Technical And Organizational Measures

This chapter focuses on Articles 22 and 25 of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation 2016/679). It examines how these provisions will impact automated decisional systems. Article 22 gives a person a qualified right ‘not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her’. Article 25 imposes a duty on controllers of personal data to implement technical and organizational measures so that the processing of the data will meet the Regulation’s requirements and otherwise ensure protection of the data subject’s rights. Both sets of rules are aimed squarely at subjecting automated decisional systems to greater accountability. The chapter argues that the rules suffer from significant weaknesses that are likely to hamper their ability to meet this aim.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document