Where is morphological complexity?
A number of approaches have been taken to defining complexity in language. The issue is important, since underlying some theoretical models has been an assumption, sometimes explicit, sometimes unconscious, that the simplest formal description of a language naturally matches speaker knowledge. But it is not clear that complexity is the same for the analyst, the speaker, and the learner. Here the issue is explored in two languages with relative morphological complexity, but of different types, Central Pomo and Mohawk. First the speech of bilinguals with varying degrees of English dominance is compared. Next, the development of morphological complexity is traced in children learning Mohawk as a first language. The results indicate that complexity is indeed not the same for analysts, speakers, and learners, findings more in tune with abstractive models of morphology than constructive ones.