Meaning and Value Across the Generations

Author(s):  
Samuel Scheffler

This chapter argues that our relations to our successors are richer, more varied, and more complex than is sometimes recognized. Although we cannot in any straightforward sense interact or form personal relationships with people who will live long after we have died, future generations nevertheless matter greatly to us and in a variety of ways. These facts, which reflect our underappreciated historicist sensibility, must be taken into account in developing an adequate theory of intergenerational ethics. They are also facts of great motivational significance. To ensure the survival of humanity, sufficient numbers of people must be strongly and stably motivated to solve the problems that threaten future generations, and people’s sense of moral obligation may not, by itself, be sufficiently robust or reliable to provide all the necessary motivational support. So one challenge we face, in seeking to address problems like climate change and nuclear proliferation, is to overcome this potentially disabling motivational deficit. Yet once one appreciates the complexity of our attitudes toward future generations, one can see that we have a variety of reasons for caring about the fate of our successors. These reasons provide additional motivational resources that may complement and cooperate with our distinctively moral motivations for addressing threats to future generations.

Author(s):  
Anja Karnein

This chapter reviews two prominent debates about institutions and intergenerational ethics, one held at the time of the founding of America and the other held today in the context of climate change. These two debates have more in common than may, at first, appear. On the face of it, the historical debate was about whether institutions, specifically the constitution, may bind future generations or whether the latter should be left maximally unencumbered. By contrast, proponents of climate change mitigation today would like institutions to be more inclusive of future generations’ interests. But, this chapter suggests, the new debate ought to be understood along the same lines as the old one, namely as being about avoiding disenfranchisement, that is, about preventing a situation in which previous generations determine too much of the context of future generations’ choices.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew K Palmer

Collective action is incumbent to avert the worst effects of climate change. This study takes a qualitative approach to investigate the motivations for engagement in climate change activism. Focusing on group dynamics and affective responses to climate change, interviews with eighteen participants reveal that anticipated guilt, sadness and anger are all salient emotions in the chosen context. Important factors eliciting these responses were the threat to future generations and the destruction of nature. These findings all appear to be underpinned by a moral obligation or personal responsibility to act. Moreover, distrust and anger regarding government inaction appear to propel individuals to take contentious forms of politics to achieve social change. It is argued that the personal goals and motivations of individuals may be the most crucial factors concerning engagement with collective climate change action.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 995-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanne M. Watkins ◽  
Geoffrey P. Goodwin

Tackling climate change presents an intergenerational dilemma: People must make sacrifices today, to benefit future generations. What causes people to feel an obligation to benefit future generations? Past research has suggested “intergenerational reciprocity” as a potential driver, but this research is quite domain specific, and it is unknown how well it applies to climate change. We explored a novel means of invoking a sense of intergenerational reciprocity: inducing reflection on the sacrifices made by previous generations. Our studies revealed that such reflection predicts and causes a heightened sense of moral obligation towards future generations, mediated by gratitude. However, there are also some downsides (e.g., feelings of unworthiness), and perceptions of obligation do not substantially affect pro-environmental attitudes or motivations. Thus, while reflecting on past generations’ sacrifices can generate a sense of intergenerational obligation, it is limited in the extent to which it can increase pro-environmental concern.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanne M Watkins

Environmental problems such as climate change present formidable psychological barriers because they require action now to produce advantageous outcomes many years hence. Accordingly, it is important to understand how to motivate moral concern and a sense of moral obligation towards future generations. Some past research has explored whether encouraging “intergenerational reciprocity” might increase such a sense of obligation. However, this research is limited either in its robustness, or in its direct applicability to general environmental problems such as climate change. In the present research with U.S. residents recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk, we explored a novel means of invoking this sense of intergenerational reciprocity: Asking individuals to reflect on the sacrifices made by previous generations. An initial correlation study showed that perceptions of past generations’ sacrifices correlated with a sense of moral obligation towards future generations. Subsequent experimental studies showed that reflecting on such sacrifices increased a sense of moral obligation towards future generations. A within-paper meta-analysis suggests that the overall effect is Cohen’s d = .352, 95% CIs [0.227, 0.477]. In all studies, this effect was statistically mediated by gratitude. However, this sort of reflection carries a potential downside – it also generates a feeling of being unworthy of past generations’ sacrifices, which suppresses the overall effect on moral obligation. And it is limited in not directly translating into pro-environmental behavioral intentions and attitudes. In sum, the present studies report a novel means of invoking intergenerational reciprocity, while also calling attention to limiting factors that warrant further attention.


Author(s):  
Stephen M. Gardiner ◽  
Simon Caney ◽  
Dale Jamieson ◽  
Henry Shue

This collection gathers a set of seminal papers from the emerging area of ethics and climate change. Topics covered include human rights, international justice, intergenerational ethics, individual responsibility, climate economics, and the ethics of geoengineering. Climate Ethics is intended to serve as a source book for general reference, and for university courses that include a focus on the human dimensions of climate change. It should be of broad interest to all those concerned with global justice, environmental science and policy, and the future of humanity.


2021 ◽  
pp. 108602662110316
Author(s):  
Tiziana Russo-Spena ◽  
Nadia Di Paola ◽  
Aidan O’Driscoll

An effective climate change action involves the critical role that companies must play in assuring the long-term human and social well-being of future generations. In our study, we offer a more holistic, inclusive, both–and approach to the challenge of environmental innovation (EI) that uses a novel methodology to identify relevant configurations for firms engaging in a superior EI strategy. A conceptual framework is proposed that identifies six sets of driving characteristics of EI and two sets of beneficial outcomes, all inherently tensional. Our analysis utilizes a complementary rather than an oppositional point of view. A data set of 65 companies in the ICT value chain is analyzed via fuzzy-set comparative analysis (fsQCA) and a post-QCA procedure. The results reveal that achieving a superior EI strategy is possible in several scenarios. Specifically, after close examination, two main configuration groups emerge, referred to as technological environmental innovators and organizational environmental innovators.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Lovejoy

One of the fundamental challenges of climate change is that we contribute to it increment by increment, and experience it increment by increment after a considerable time lag. As a consequence, it is very difficult to see what we are doing to ourselves, to future generations, and to the living planet as a whole. There are monumental ethical issues involved, but they are obscured by the incremental nature of the process and the long time frame before reaching the concentration of greenhouse gases and the ensuing accumulation of radiant heat—and consequent climate change—that ensues.


Author(s):  
Marion Hourdequin ◽  
David B. Wong

This chapter explains how early Confucianism can ground a distinctly relational perspective on intergenerational ethics. The Analects of Confucius foregrounds intergenerational relations by rooting ethics in relationships between parents and children and presenting as moral exemplars sage-kings from generations ago. From a Confucian point of view, persons are understood as persons-in-relation, embedded in networks of connection across space and time. Self-cultivation thus involves taking one’s place in a community where one’s own identity and welfare are deeply bound to those of others. In this view, gratitude and reciprocity emerge as central values. A Confucian understanding of gratitude and reciprocity involves not only dyadic relations but broader connections within a temporally extended social web. Thus, Confucian reciprocity might involve honoring one’s parents by nurturing one’s own children in turn or expressing gratitude for what past generations have provided by ensuring that future generations can flourish. Genuine ethical relations between current and future generations reflect care and concern for ongoing human communities; for the triad of heaven, earth, and humanity; and for realization of the Dao in the world.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Mittler

Many in the environmental movement have argued in recent years that in order to speed up climate actions we should take the ethics out of the climate change debate. Focusing on the moral obligation to act or on the effects of climate change on the most vulnerable was often judged to render the discourse too “heavy,” “negative,” or “difficult.” Many also deemed it unnecessary. After all, renewable energies, better designed cities that allow for reduced car use, and power plant regulations that lead to cleaner local air—to take just three examples—all have real and substantial benefits unrelated to the fact that they are “the right thing to do” in the face of climate change. They create jobs, reduce health problems and costs, and make society fitter.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document