scholarly journals Chemical Weapon Functional Exercise—Cincinnati: Observations and Lessons Learned from a “Typical Medium-Sized” City's Response to Simulated Terrorism Utilizing Weapons of Mass Destruction

2003 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denis J. FitzGerald ◽  
Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer ◽  
Todd J. Crocco

In the wake of the September 11, 2001, attacks and the subsequent anthrax scare, there is growing concern about the United States' vulnerability to terrorist use of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). As part of ongoing preparation for this terrible reality, many jurisdictions have been conducting simulated terrorist incidents to provide training for the public safety community, hospitals, and public health departments. As an example of this national effort to improve domestic preparedness for such events, a large scale, multi-jurisdictional chemical weapons drill was conducted in Cincinnati, Ohio, on May 20, 2000. This drill depicted the components of the early warning system for hospitals and public health departments, the prehospital medical response to terrorism. Over the course of the exercise, emergency medical services personnel decontaminated, triaged, treated, and transported eighty-five patients. Several important lessons were learned that day that have widespread applicability to health care delivery systems nationwide, especially in the areas of decontamination, triage, on-scene medical care, and victim transportation. As this training exercise helped Cincinnati to prepare for dealing with future large scale WMD incidents, such drills are invaluable preparation for all communities in a world increasingly at risk from terrorist attacks.

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Avery

As Zika emerged as a major global health threat, public information officers (PIOs) at local public health departments across the United States prepared for outbreaks of the virus amid great uncertainty. Using the crisis and risk emergency communication (CERC) model to inform this study, PIOs (n = 226) at public health departments were surveyed to assess how community size, perceived control over health agenda, and other considerations such as resources and federal influences affected their satisfaction with Zika preparedness in their departments. These contextual, indirect factors may moderate planning efforts for Zika and other health emergencies and thus should be considered in crisis management and planning models such as CERC.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 432-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori Uscher-Pines ◽  
Corey L. Farrell ◽  
Jacqueline Cattani ◽  
Yu-Hsiang Hsieh ◽  
Michael D. Moskal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s132-s132
Author(s):  
Ariella Dale ◽  
Meghana Parikh ◽  
Wendy Bamberg ◽  
Marion Kainer

Background:Clostridioides difficile remains a pervasive issue throughout healthcare facilities in the United States. Currently, no national guidelines exist for healthcare facilities to notify public health about suspected C. difficile transmission. Identification of a threshold for public health notification is needed to improve efforts to target prevention in facilities and to contain the spread of C. difficile.Methods: We analyzed C. difficile data reported by acute-care hospitals (ACHs) during October 2017–September 2018 via the CDC NHSN in Colorado and Tennessee. Threshold levels of ≥2, ≥3, and ≥4 C. difficile infections per calendar month per unit were assessed to identify ACH units that would trigger facility reporting to public health. Values meeting thresholds were defined as “alerts.” Facilities were further stratified by size and medical teaching status. Recurrent alerts were defined as meeting the threshold at least twice within 12 months. Presence and recurrence of facility alerts were compared to facility-specific standardized infection ratios (SIRs) and cumulative attributable differences (CADs). Results: Of 105 ACHs in Tennessee and 50 in Colorado, 46 in Tennessee (44%) and 28 in Colorado (56%) had alerts with a threshold of ≥2 cases per calendar month per unit; 20 in Tennessee (19%) and 19 in Colorado (38%) had ≥3 cases per calendar month per unit; and 7 in Tennessee (7%) and 10 in Colorado (20%) had ≥4 cases per calendar month per unit. Most alerts with each threshold were in facilities with ≥400 beds and in major teaching hospitals. Using a threshold of ≥2, 64% of Tennessee and 79% of Colorado alerts were associated with recurrent alerting units. Using an alert threshold of ≥3, 85% of Tennessee facilities (17 of 20) and 75% of Colorado facilities (15 of 20) with the highest CAD values had at least 1 alert. Using state-based CAD values, 79% of the CAD value for Tennessee (356 of 449) and 91% of the CAD value for Colorado (309 of 340) were attributable to facilities with at least 1 alert. Facilities above a threshold of ≥3 had a pooled SIR of 0.92 in Tennessee (range, 0.46–7.94) and 1.07 in Colorado (range, 0.74–1.74). Conclusions: Using alert threshold levels identified ACHs with higher levels of C. difficile. Recurrent alerts account for a substantial proportion of the total alerts in ACHs, even as thresholds increased. Alerts were strongly correlated with high CAD values. Because NHSN C. difficile data are not available to public health departments until several months after cases are identified, public health departments should consider working with ACHs to implement a threshold model for public health notification, enabling earlier intervention than those prompted by SIR and CAD calculations.Disclosures: NoneFunding: None


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215013272199545
Author(s):  
Areej Khokhar ◽  
Aaron Spaulding ◽  
Zuhair Niazi ◽  
Sikander Ailawadhi ◽  
Rami Manochakian ◽  
...  

Importance: Social media is widely used by various segments of society. Its role as a tool of communication by the Public Health Departments in the U.S. remains unknown. Objective: To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social media following of the Public Health Departments of the 50 States of the U.S. Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were collected by visiting the Public Health Department web page for each social media platform. State-level demographics were collected from the U.S. Census Bureau. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention was utilized to collect information regarding the Governance of each State’s Public Health Department. Health rankings were collected from “America’s Health Rankings” 2019 Annual report from the United Health Foundation. The U.S. News and World Report Education Rankings were utilized to provide information regarding the public education of each State. Exposure: Data were pulled on 3 separate dates: first on March 5th (baseline and pre-national emergency declaration (NED) for COVID-19), March 18th (week following NED), and March 25th (2 weeks after NED). In addition, a variable identifying the total change across platforms was also created. All data were collected at the State level. Main Outcome: Overall, the social media following of the state Public Health Departments was very low. There was a significant increase in the public interest in following the Public Health Departments during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: With the declaration of National Emergency, there was a 150% increase in overall public following of the State Public Health Departments in the U.S. The increase was most noted in the Midwest and South regions of the U.S. The overall following in the pandemic “hotspots,” such as New York, California, and Florida, was significantly lower. Interesting correlations were noted between various demographic variables, health, and education ranking of the States and the social media following of their Health Departments. Conclusion and Relevance: Social media following of Public Health Departments across all States of the U.S. was very low. Though, the social media following significantly increased during the early course of the COVID-19 pandemic, but it still remains low. Significant opportunity exists for Public Health Departments to improve social media use to engage the public better.


2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Michielutte ◽  
Louise E. Cunningham ◽  
Penny C. Sharp ◽  
Mark B. Dignan ◽  
Virginia D. Burnette

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document