scholarly journals Herbal Topical Analgesic for Pain Management: Perspectives from Cancer Patients

Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin T Liou ◽  
Connie Chen ◽  
Nicholas Emard ◽  
Kathleen A Lynch ◽  
Yen Nien Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Natural Products ◽  
Program Evaluation ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Skin Irritation ◽  
Patient Experiences ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Medicine Physician ◽  
Topical Analgesic

Abstract Objective Herbs and natural products are increasingly used by cancer patients for pain management, but few studies have examined their integration within conventional cancer care. This study describes the characteristics, experiences, and perspectives of cancer patients who were prescribed a herbal topical analgesic for pain management. Design and Setting Program evaluation of a pilot herbal dispensary at a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated comprehensive cancer center. Subjects Cancer patients who were prescribed the Tibetree Pain-Relieving Plaster (PRP) by an integrative medicine physician. Methods Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of patients were abstracted from medical records. Semi-structured phone interviews were conducted 1–2 weeks after PRP prescription to evaluate patient experiences with using PRP for pain. Interviews were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Results From February 2019 to February 2020, 50 patients were prescribed PRP. Median age (range) was 63 years (21-86), 37 (74%) of patients were female, 14 (28%) were non-White, and 38 (76%) of patients were using oral analgesics. During interviews, the majority of patients reported that the PRP improved pain and health-related outcomes, was convenient to use, and addressed pain management needs that were not fulfilled by oral analgesics. However, a few patients described adverse experiences with PRP, including skin irritation. Conclusions Understanding patient experiences and perspectives is a critical step towards evidence-based integration of herbs and natural products into cancer pain management. Findings from this program evaluation will inform the design of a randomized clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of PRP for pain in patients with cancer.

Increasing non-opioid pain management in the cancer patient presenting to the emergency department.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 237-237
Author(s):  
Adriana Wechsler ◽  
Ngoc Vu
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Preference ◽  
Comfort Level ◽  
Easy Access ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Opioid Analgesia ◽  
Opioid Use

237 Background: The opioid epidemic is claiming more than 115 lives daily in the US (1). Pain is commonly the chief complaint of cancer patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) and aggressively managed with opioids. A recent study of cancer patients presenting to the ED showed they were also at high risk for opioid misuse (2). Non-opioid analgesia is often avoided from concerns of masking fevers, intolerance due to nausea/vomiting, or bleeding risk in thrombocytopenia. Our aim was to identify opportunities to reduce opioid use while safely alleviating pain in patients presenting to the Emergency Department of a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: Following the PDSA model, baseline data on current opioid use was obtained and perceived barriers to non-opioid analgesia were identified through questionnaires. Comfort level with non-opioid analgesia in cancer patients and current pain management practice was also queried. Patients eligible for non-opioid analgesia (solid tumors, no fever, pain score < 7) were then identified through retrospective chart review and the prevalence of contraindications for non-opioid (renal/liver failure, thrombocytopenia, oral intolerance) and patient preference for opioids was calculated. This data and opportunities to use non-opioid analgesia was shared with providers in education sessions. Medication order panels were modified to provide easy access to oral and intravenous acetaminophen (APAP) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). After two months the change in opioid prescribing was calculated. Results: Providers self-reported barriers to prescribing opioids as: low platelets, patient preference, and poor oral intake. Of 237 patients presenting to the MDA Emergency Department with complaints of pain between January 2018 and May 2018, 76 (32%) were eligible for non-opioid analgesia. Only 3 patients had absolute contraindications to both APAP or NSAIDs. After provider education, order entry simplification and prescribing guidance, the use of non-opioid analgesia rose from 3.9% to 9.4%. Patient satisfaction with pain control rose from 57.4 to 60.4 % following the intervention based on Press Ganey results. Conclusions: There is opportunity for non-opioid acute pain management in the solid tumor patients. Contraindications to non-opioid analgesia are uncommon. In the emergency department, safe pain relief can be provided by non-opioids such as NSAIDs and APAP.

scholarly journals Changes in fatigue, barriers, and predictors towards physical activity in advanced cancer patients over a period of 12 months—a comparative study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Frikkel ◽  
M. Beckmann ◽  
N. De Lazzari ◽  
M. Götte ◽  
S. Kasper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients ◽  
Psychological Conditions ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Purpose Physical activity (PA) is recommended to improve advanced cancer patients’ (ACP) physical functioning, fatigue, and quality of life. Yet, little is known about ACPs’ attitude towards PA and its influence on fatigue and depressiveness over a longer period. This prospective, non-interventional cohort study examined ACPs’ fatigue, depression, motivation, and barriers towards PA before and after 12 months of treatment among ACP Methods Outpatients with incurable cancer receiving treatment at a German Comprehensive Cancer Center reporting moderate/severe weakness/tiredness during self-assessment via MIDOS II were enrolled. Fatigue (FACT-F), depression (PHQ-8), cancer-related parameters, self-assessed PA behavior, motivation for and barriers against PA were evaluated (T0). Follow-up data was acquired after 12 months (T1) using the same questionnaire. Results At follow-up, fatigue (p=0.017) and depressiveness (p=0.015) had increased in clinical relevant extent. Physically active ACP did not show significant progress of FACT-F (p=0.836) or PHQ-8 (p=0.799). Patient-reported barriers towards PA remained stable. Logistic regression analyses identified motivation as a positive predictor for PA at both time points (T0, β=2.152, p=0.017; T1, β =2.264, p=0.009). Clinically relevant depression was a negative predictor for PA at T0 and T1 (T0, β=−3.187, p=0.044; T1, β=−3.521, p=0.041). Conclusion Our findings emphasize the importance of psychological conditions in physical activity behavior of ACP. Since psychological conditions seem to worsen over time, early integration of treatment is necessary. By combining therapy approaches of cognitive behavioral therapy and exercise in interdisciplinary care programs, the two treatment options might reinforce each other and sustainably improve ACPs’ fatigue, physical functioning, and QoL. Trial registration German Register of Clinical Trials, DRKS00012514, registration date: 30.05.2017

Routine HIV Screening in Cancer Patients in the Emergency Department

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-95
Author(s):  
Terry W Rice ◽  
◽  
Patricia A. Brock ◽  
Carmen Gonzalez ◽  
Kelly W Merriman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Linkage To Care ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Hiv Screening ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Routine Hiv Screening ◽  
Incident Cases

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus(HIV) in cancer patients improves outcomes and reduces transmission of this oncogenic virus. HIV testing rates of cancer patients are similar to the general population (15-40%), despite the association with cancer. Our aim was to increase HIV screening in the Emergency Department(ED) of a comprehensive cancer center through a quality initiative. Testing increased significantly during the intervention (p<0.001; 0.15/day to 2.69/day). Seropositive HIV rate was 1.4% (12/852), with incidence of 0.3%. All patients were linked to care. Incident cases were between 36 and 55 years of age. Barriers encountered included confusion regarding the need for written consent for HIV testing, failure to consider ordering the test, and concerns regarding linkage to care.

Viral associated diarrhea in immunocompromised and cancer patients at a large comprehensive cancer center: a 10-year retrospective study

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Ghosh ◽  
Farida A. Malik ◽  
Roshni G. Daver ◽  
Jakapat Vanichanan ◽  
Pablo C. Okhuysen
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center

Length of Survival in Hospice for Cancer Patients Referred From a Comprehensive Cancer Center

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tallal Younis ◽  
Robert Milch ◽  
Nawal Abul-Khoudoud ◽  
David Lawrence ◽  
Amy Mirand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center

The experience of pain among cancer patients at the University of the Philippines: Philippine General Hospital Cancer Institute—A cross-sectional study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24078-e24078
Author(s):  
Harold Nathan C. Tan ◽  
Rogelio Nona Velasco ◽  
Lance Isidore Garcenila Catedral ◽  
Michael Ducusin San Juan ◽  
Corazon Ngelangel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
The Philippines ◽  
Pain Interference ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Adequate Pain Management

e24078 Background: Pain is one of the most common and dreaded sequelae of cancer, occurring in approximately 55% of patients. The experience of pain takes a toll on the patients’ quality of life. However, many patients do not receive adequate pain management. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of pain, its severity, and the adequacy of pain management among cancer patients in the Philippines. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at a representative cancer center in the Philippines, enrolling 351 cancer patients. Pain severity was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Filipino. The BPI evaluates pain severity and its impact on daily functioning (pain interference). To ascertain the adequacy of pain control, the pain management index (PMI) was calculated by subtracting the subtracting the severity of pain reported by the patient from the type of analgesic treatment received. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the factors associated with worst pain and adequacy of pain management. Data were analyzed using Stata version 16.0, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Three hundred three cancer patients (86.3%) experienced pain. Approximately 3 out of 5 patients (n = 208) did not receive adequate pain control, and one-third of patients experienced severe pain (n = 121). Patients who reported severe pain interference (n = 110) had three times greater odds to experience severe pain (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.82-5.61, p < 0.001). Those patients who had regular follow up were 65% less likely to experience severe pain (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.16 – 0.78, p = 0.01). Patients who used pain medications (n = 196) were 14 times more likely to experience adequate pain management (OR 14.19, 95% CI 6.53 – 30.83, p < 0.001). Patients who were referred to pain service (n = 25) were seven times more likely to report adequate pain control (OR 6.62, 95% CI 2.50 – 17.56, p < 0.001). Conversely, those patients who reported a severe rating on total pain interference were 75% less likely to experience adequate pain management (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.17 – 0.35, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Unexpectedly, there was a high prevalence of pain among cancer patients at a representative cancer center in the Philippines. Pain exerts a heavy toll on patients, affecting daily functioning. The undertreatment of pain discovered in this study (59% of cancer patients) is alarming. Timely pain evaluation can help identify the presence of pain and the need for appropriate use of analgesics. The assessment and management of pain is a critical component of cancer care that should not be neglected.

Intrapersonal Factors Impact Advance Care Planning Among Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
pp. 104990912096245
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Palmer Kelly ◽  
Brent Henderson ◽  
Madison Hyer ◽  
Timothy M. Pawlik
Keyword(s):  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Advance Directive ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Intrapersonal Factors ◽  
Advance Care

Background: Cancer patients infrequently engage in advance care planning processes. Establishing preferences for future medical treatment without advance care planning may not be patient-centered, as it fails to consider important factors that influence these important decisions. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of patient intrapersonal factors including race, religion, level of depression, and cancer stage on overall preferences for future medical treatment, including the presence of a (DNR), power of attorney, and advance directive. Design: A retrospective chart review design was used. Patients were included who were diagnosed with cancer at The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center from 01/2015 to 08/2019. Results: A total of 3,463 patients were included. Median age was 59 years (IQR: 49, 67) and the majority of the patients was female (88.7%). Compared with no religious preference, patients who identified as religious had 61% higher odds (95%CI: 1.08-2.40) of having a DNR and approximately 30% higher odds of having a power of attorney (95%CI: 1.08-1.62) or advance directive (95%CI: 1.02-1.64). Patients with clinically relevant depression had more than twice the odds of having a DNR versus patients with no/lower levels of clinical depression (OR: 2.08; 95%CI: 1.40-3.10). White patients had higher odds of having a power of attorney (OR: 1.57; 95%CI: 1.16-2.13) and an advance directive (OR: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.95-4.93) than African-American/Black patients. Conclusions: Understanding the factors that affect preferences for future medical treatment is necessary for medical professionals to provide proper care and support to patients diagnosed with cancer and their families.

scholarly journals Active Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection at a comprehensive cancer center, 2006–2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joumana Kmeid ◽  
Prathit A. Kulkarni ◽  
Marjorie V. Batista ◽  
Firas El Chaer ◽  
Amrita Prayag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Average Rate ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Infection ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Disseminated Disease

Abstract Background Morbidity and mortality from Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection remain significant in cancer patients. We evaluated clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes in patients with active Mtb infection at our institution who had cancer or suspicion of cancer. Methods We retrospectively examined medical records of all patients with laboratory-confirmed active Mtb infection diagnosed between 2006 and 2014. Results A total of 52 patients with laboratory-confirmed active Mtb infection were identified during the study period, resulting in an average rate of 6 new cases per year. Thirty-two (62%) patients had underlying cancer, while 20 (38%) patients did not have cancer but were referred to the institution because of suspicion of underlying malignancy. Among patients with cancer, 18 (56%) had solid tumors; 8 (25%) had active hematologic malignancies; and 6 (19%) had undergone hematopoietic-cell transplantation (HCT). Patients with and without cancer were overall similar with the exception of median age (61 years in cancer patients compared to 53 years in noncancer patients). Pulmonary disease was identified in 32 (62%) patients, extrapulmonary disease in 10 (19%) patients, and disseminated disease in 10 (19%) patients. Chemotherapy was delayed in 53% of patients who were to receive such treatment. Eleven patients (all of whom had cancer) died; 3 of these deaths were attributable to Mtb infection. Conclusions Although not common, tuberculosis remains an important infection in patients with cancer. Approximately one-third of patients were referred to our institution for suspicion of cancer but were ultimately diagnosed with active Mtb infection rather than malignancy.

scholarly journals Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use at a Comprehensive Cancer Center

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianlai Luo ◽  
Gary N. Asher
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Medicine ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Medicine Use ◽  
Energy Medicine ◽  
Cam Use ◽  
After Cancer ◽  
Oncology Providers

Background. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use is common among cancer patients, but the majority of CAM studies do not specify the time periods in relation to cancer diagnoses. We sought to define CAM use by cancer patients and investigate factors that might influence changes in CAM use in relation to cancer diagnoses. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of adults diagnosed with breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer between 2010 and 2012 at the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Questionnaires were sent to 1794 patients. Phone calls were made to nonrespondents. Log binomial/Poisson regressions were used to investigate the association between cancer-related changes in CAM use and conversations about CAM use with oncology providers. Results. We received 603 (33.6 %) completed questionnaires. The mean age (SD) was 64 (11) years; 62% were female; 79% were white; and 98% were non-Hispanic. Respondents reported the following cancer types: breast (47%), prostate (27%), colorectal (14%), lung (11%). Eighty-nine percent reported lifetime CAM use. Eighty-five percent reported CAM use during or after initial cancer treatment, with category-specific use as follows: mind-body medicine 39%, dietary supplements 73%, body-based therapies 30%, and energy medicine 49%. During treatment CAM use decreased for all categories except energy medicine. After treatment CAM use returned to pretreatment levels for most CAMs except chiropractic. Initiation of CAM use after cancer diagnosis was positively associated with a patient having a conversation about CAM use with their oncology provider, mainly driven by patient-initiated conversations. Conclusions. Consistent with previous studies, CAM use was common among our study population. Conversations about CAM use with oncology providers appeared to influence cessation of mind-body medicine use after cancer diagnosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document