scholarly journals Medical Students First Experience in Human Cadaver Dissection Across Culture

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jickssa M. Gemechu ◽  
Inaya Hajj Hussein ◽  
Jason A. Wasserman ◽  
Eiman Abdel Meguid ◽  
Mallikarjuna Barremkala ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jickssa Gemechu ◽  
Abay Zenebe ◽  
Jason Wasserman ◽  
Malli Barremkala ◽  
Inaya Hajj Hussein

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 917-919

Background: Students get their first experiences of dissecting human cadavers in the practical classes of anatomy. These experiences may help in their profession, but may also create some problems for students Aims: To find out the attitudes and reactions of medical students to the dissection room. Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted on 309 first year MBBS students at the local college of Lahore with no previous experience of cadaver dissection. Students were filled a questionnaire. The questionnaire designedwas based to identify the feelings and problems faced by the students in their first exposure to the human cadaver. Results: Almost 25% students experience no symptom on first entry into the dissecting room. The commonest symptoms of 75% students were insomnia, dizziness, sweating, loss of appetite and palpitation. Other symptoms reported were breathlessness, skin irritation, irritation of the eye, etc. Focusing on task was the main coping strategy used by majority of students. Conclusion: The majority of the students initially experience nausea and fear that may reduce with time while excitement and interest had increased on ensuing exposure to dissection.Study concluded that the negative effect of dissection room on students is less than the benefits of dissection of cadaver. Anticipation felt by the students to learn dissecting the cadaver was relatively high. Keywords: Cadaver, Dissection room, Medical students.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
Jickssa Gemechu ◽  
Abay Zenebe ◽  
Jason Wasserman ◽  
Malli Barremkala ◽  
Inaya Hajj Hussein

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (29) ◽  
pp. 7989-7997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sivaraman S ◽  
Bharathi Prabakaran N S ◽  
Ismail M ◽  
Thirumalaikolundu Subramanian P

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
N C Aghukwa

<p><strong>Background</strong>. This study determined and compared responses of 5th- and 6th (final)-year medical students on their attitudes to psychiatry as a profession. Also elicited were their choices of area of future medical specialisation.</p><p><strong>Method</strong>. A prospective and cross-sectional study using an adapted 27-item self-administered questionnaire to obtain responses from 91 5th- and 6th-year medical students at Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Results.</strong> More than 60% of the students’ first choices for future specialisation were surgery, obstetrics/gynaecology or internal medicine. Psychiatry was the first preference for less than 2%. More than 75% of the students’ views on the overall merits and efficacy of psychiatry were positive, although they felt that psychiatry had low prestige and status as a profession. In addition, the same proportion considered that psychiatry was scientific, making advances in the treatment of major mental disorders, and helpful in liaison practice. More than 50% stated that psychiatry would not be their choice of last resort for residency education and the same proportion felt that friends and fellow students rather than family members would discourage them from specialising in psychiatry. More than 50% would feel uncomfortable with mentally ill patients, felt that psychiatry would not be financially rewarding, and did not think that psychiatrists abuse their legal power to hospitalise patients. Attitudes of the two groups of students to psychiatry as a profession were not significantly different (p&gt;0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion.</strong> A clinical clerkship in psychiatry did not influence the students’ choice of future specialisation.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74
Author(s):  
Carmina Shrestha ◽  
Sajan Acharya ◽  
Jasmin Joshi ◽  
Nahakul Shahi ◽  
Raksha Sharma ◽  
...  

Dilemmas regarding whether medical students’ participation ‘as doctor’ in disaster response is ethical remains unanswered. Although they prove to be an important addition to the workforce during such settings, their limited competency and likeliness to harm themselves and the patients in the process raises questions. Here we present our views on medical students’ involvement in disaster response based on our experiences at Patan Hospital, Patan Academy of Health Sciences (PAHS) during the Nepal earthquake 2015. Medical students play a crucial role in disaster management; however, they are not proficient in care for mass disasters. Nonetheless, being involved offered students first-hand experience on disaster response and also helped the disaster response by providing extra manpower. With more training, medical students can serve as a skillful workforce during disaster. The impact of regular drills strategically placed during medical school training in the curricula can be of immense help to build capacity for medical disaster response.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document