The fiber cells of eye lens communicate directly with each other by exchanging ions, dyes and metabolites. In most tissues this type of communication (cell coupling) is mediated by gap junctions. In the lens, the fiber cells are extensively interconnected by junctions. However, lens junctions, although morphologically similar to gap junctions, differ from them in a number of structural, biochemical and immunological features. Like gap junctions, lens junctions are regions of close cell-to-cell apposition. Unlike gap junctions, however, the extracellular gap is apparently absent in lens junctions, such that their thickness is approximately 2 nm smaller than that of typical gap junctions (Fig. 1,c). In freeze-fracture replicas, the particles of control lens junctions are more loosely packed than those of typical gap junctions (Fig. 1,a) and crystallize, when exposed to uncoupling agents such as Ca++, or H+, into pseudo-hexagonal, rhombic (Fig. 1,b) and orthogonal arrays with a particle-to-particle spacing of 6.5 nm. Because of these differences, questions have been raised about the interpretation of the lens junctions as communicating junctions, in spite of the fact that they are the only junctions interlinking lens fiber cells.
Interplay between gap junctions and K2P‐channels: the switch from PDBu‐elicited contraction to the dilation of the thoracic aorta
