scholarly journals Nutrient deprivation regulates DNA damage repair in cardiomyocytes via loss of the base‐excision repair enzyme OGG1

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 2117-2124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Siggens ◽  
Nichola Figg ◽  
Martin Bennett ◽  
Roger Foo
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory A. Breuer ◽  
Jonathan Bezney ◽  
Nathan R. Fons ◽  
Ranjini K. Sundaram ◽  
Wanjuan Feng ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTDNA repair deficiencies have become an increasingly promising target for novel therapeutics within the realm of clinical oncology. Recently, a number of inhibitors of Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerases (PARPs) have received approval for the treatment of ovarian cancers with and without deleterious mutations in the homologous recombination proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2. Unfortunately, as over a hundred clinical trials are actively underway testing the utility of PARP inhibition across dozens of unique cancers, the mechanism of action for such inhibitors remains unclear. While many believe PARP trapping to be the most important determinant driving the cytotoxicity found in such inhibitors, clinically effective inhibitors exist which possess both strong and weak PARP-trapping qualities. Such results indicate that characterization of inhibitors as strong and weak trappers does not properly capture the intra-class characteristics of such small molecule inhibitors. Using a novel, targeted DNA damage repair and response (DDR) CRISPR/Cas9 screening library, we describe a new classification scheme for PARP inhibitors that revolves around sensitivity to key modulators of the base excision repair (BER) pathway, unrelated to trapping ability or catalytic inhibition of PARP. These findings demonstrate that inhibition of PARylation and induction of PARP trapping are not the only factors responsible for the clinical response of DDR-deficient cancers to PARP inhibition, and provide insight into the optimal choice of PARP inhibitor to be used in the setting of additional DNA repair deficiencies.


DNA Repair ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Suzuki ◽  
Kazuo Yamamoto ◽  
Hideyoshi Harashima ◽  
Hiroyuki Kamiya

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 794-807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyra M. Griffiths ◽  
Dan Swartzlander ◽  
Kellen L. Meadows ◽  
Keith D. Wilkinson ◽  
Anita H. Corbett ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT DNAs harbored in both nuclei and mitochondria of eukaryotic cells are subject to continuous oxidative damage resulting from normal metabolic activities or environmental insults. Oxidative DNA damage is primarily reversed by the base excision repair (BER) pathway, initiated by N-glycosylase apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) lyase proteins. To execute an appropriate repair response, BER components must be distributed to accommodate levels of genotoxic stress that may vary considerably between nuclei and mitochondria, depending on the growth state and stress environment of the cell. Numerous examples exist where cells respond to signals, resulting in relocalization of proteins involved in key biological transactions. To address whether such dynamic localization contributes to efficient organelle-specific DNA repair, we determined the intracellular localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae N-glycosylase/AP lyases, Ntg1 and Ntg2, in response to nuclear and mitochondrial oxidative stress. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that Ntg1 is differentially localized to nuclei and mitochondria, likely in response to the oxidative DNA damage status of the organelle. Sumoylation is associated with targeting of Ntg1 to nuclei containing oxidative DNA damage. These studies demonstrate that trafficking of DNA repair proteins to organelles containing high levels of oxidative DNA damage may be a central point for regulating BER in response to oxidative stress.


2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Maynard ◽  
S. H. Schurman ◽  
C. Harboe ◽  
N. C. de Souza-Pinto ◽  
V. A. Bohr

Biochemistry ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 51 (18) ◽  
pp. 3919-3932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agathi-Vasiliki Goula ◽  
Christopher E. Pearson ◽  
Julie Della Maria ◽  
Yvon Trottier ◽  
Alan E. Tomkinson ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (50) ◽  
pp. 5630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka-Ho Leung ◽  
Hong-Zhang He ◽  
Victor Pui-Yan Ma ◽  
Hai-Jing Zhong ◽  
Daniel Shiu-Hin Chan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document