Intralesional Resection of Primary and Metastatic Sarcoma Involving the Spine: Outcome Analysis of 59 Patients

Neurosurgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 1277-1287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark H. Bilsky ◽  
Patrick J. Boland ◽  
Katherine S. Panageas ◽  
James M. Woodruff ◽  
Murray F. Brennan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Spinal Instrumentation ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Intralesional Resection ◽  
Locally Recurrent

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Surgery plays an important role in achieving local tumor control and cure for primary and metastatic tumors of the spine. As has been established with regard to sarcomas at extraspinal sites, these goals may best be achieved by en bloc resection with negative histological margins. Unfortunately, sarcomas of the spine often present with tumor patterns that are amenable only to intralesional resection, if neurological preservation is a priority. This study is a retrospective analysis of the long-term outcomes of patients who had operations for sarcomas of the spine using modern surgical approaches, intralesional resections, and spinal instrumentation. METHODS Between 1985 and 1997, 59 patients had spinal operations for sarcoma involving the extrasacral spine. Data regarding tumor histology, grade, surgical indications, patterns of spinal tumor involvement, and neurological and functional outcomes were reviewed at presentation and at tumor recurrence. RESULTS Thirty-five patients underwent a single operation, and 24 patients required reoperation for locally recurrent tumors. At presentation, only nine patients (15%) had tumors that were amenable to marginal or wide resections. Functional outcomes after initial spinal surgery and after operations performed at first tumor recurrence showed that 95% of patients had maintained or regained ambulation. Intradural extension of tumor was seen in 5 of 12 patients who had three or more operations for locally recurrent disease. The median survival from first spine operation was 18 months, and the median event-free interval between the first and second spine operations was 13 months. CONCLUSION Surgery for sarcoma of the spine is useful for maintaining or improving neurological and functional outcomes, but local tumor recurrences are common. Because of the anatomy of the tumor at presentation and concern for neurological preservation, few patients are candidates for marginal or wide resections.

LOCAL TUMOR CONTROL WITH SALVAGE CRYOTHERAPY FOR LOCALLY RECURRENT PROSTATE CANCER AFTER EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY

2001 ◽  
Vol 165 (3) ◽  
pp. 867-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
JONATHAN I. IZAWA ◽  
PAUL PERROTTE ◽  
GRAHAM F. GREENE ◽  
SHELLIE SCOTT ◽  
LAWRENCE LEVY ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Recurrent Prostate Cancer ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Salvage Cryotherapy ◽  
Locally Recurrent

Gamma Knife surgery combined with resection for treatment of a single brain metastasis: preliminary results

2010 ◽  
Vol 113 (Special_Supplement) ◽  
pp. 90-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Yashar S. Kalani ◽  
Aristotelis S. Filippidis ◽  
Maziyar A. Kalani ◽  
Nader Sanai ◽  
David Brachman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Data ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Median Survival Time ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Systemic Control ◽  
Cranial Metastasis

Object Resection and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) have classically been the standard treatment for a single metastasis to the brain. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) as an alternative to WBRT in patients who had undergone resection and to evaluate patient survival and local tumor control. Methods The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of 150 patients treated with a combination of stereotactic radiosurgery and resection of a cranial metastasis at their institution between April 1997 and September 2009. Patients who had multiple lesions or underwent both WBRT and GKS were excluded, as were patients for whom survival data beyond the initial treatment were not available. Clinical and imaging follow-up was assessed using notes from clinic visits and MR imaging studies when available. Follow-up data beyond the initial treatment and survival data were available for 68 patients. Results The study included 37 women (54.4%) and 31 men (45.6%) (mean age 60 years, range 28–89 years). In 45 patients (66.2%) there was systemic control of the primary tumor when the cranial metastasis was identified. The median duration between resection and radiosurgery was 15.5 days. The median volume of the treated cavity was 10.35 cm3 (range 0.9–45.4 cm3), and the median dose to the cavity margin was 15 Gy (range 14–30 Gy), delivered to the 50% isodose line (range 50%–76% isodose line). The patients' median preradiosurgery Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score was 90 (range 40–100). During the follow-up period we identified 27 patients (39.7%) with recurrent tumor located either local or distant to the site of treatment. The median time from primary treatment of metastasis to recurrence was 10.6 months. The patients' median length of survival (interval between first treatment of cerebral metastasis and last follow-up) was 13.2 months. For the patient who died during follow-up, the median time from diagnosis of cerebral metastasis to death was 11.5 months. The median duration of survival from diagnosis of the primary cancer to last follow-up was 30.2 months. Patients with a pretreatment KPS score ≥ 90 had a median survival time of 23.2 months, and patients with a pretreatment KPS score < 90 had a median survival time of 10 months (p < 0.008). Systemic control of disease at the time of metastasis was not predictive of increased survival duration, although it did tend to improve survival. Conclusions Although the debate about the ideal form of radiation treatment after resection continues, these findings indicate that GKS combined with surgery offers comparable survival duration and local tumor control to WBRT for patients with a diagnosis of a single metastasis.

Petroclival meningiomas: long-term outcomes of multimodal treatments and management strategies based on 30 years of experience at a single institution

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 1675-1682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Wook Kim ◽  
Hee-Won Jung ◽  
Yong Hwy Kim ◽  
Chul-Kee Park ◽  
Hyun-Tai Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Years Of Experience ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Petroclival Meningiomas

OBJECTIVEA thorough investigation of the long-term outcomes and chronological changes of multimodal treatments for petroclival meningiomas is required to establish optimal management strategies. The authors retrospectively reviewed the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with petroclival meningioma according to various treatments, including various surgical approaches, and they suggest treatment strategies based on 30 years of experience at a single institution.METHODSNinety-two patients with petroclival meningiomas were treated surgically at the authors’ institution from 1986 to 2015. Patient demographics, overall survival, local tumor control rates, and functional outcomes according to multimodal treatments, as well as chronological change in management strategies, were evaluated. The mean clinical and radiological follow-up periods were 121 months (range 1–368 months) and 105 months (range 1–348 months), respectively.RESULTSA posterior transpetrosal approach was most frequently selected and was followed in 44 patients (48%); a simple retrosigmoid approach, undertaken in 30 patients, was the second most common. The initial extent of resection and following adjuvant treatment modality were classified into 3 subgroups: gross-total resection (GTR) only in 13 patients; non-GTR treatment followed by adjuvant radiosurgery or radiation therapy (non-GTR+RS/RT) in 56 patients; and non-GTR without adjuvant treatment (non-GTR only) in 23 patients. The overall progression-free survival rate was 85.8% at 5 years and 81.2% at 10 years. Progression or recurrence rates according to each subgroup were 7.7%, 12.5%, and 30.4%, respectively.CONCLUSIONSThe authors’ preferred multimodal treatment strategy, that of planned incomplete resection and subsequent adjuvant radiosurgery, is a feasible option for the management of patients with large petroclival meningiomas, considering both local tumor control and postoperative quality of life.

Intradural tumor recurrence after resection of extradural metastasis: a rare but potential complication of intraoperative durotomy

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 734-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish K. Kasliwal ◽  
Lee A. Tan ◽  
John E. O'Toole
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Spinal Metastasis ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Intramedullary Tumor ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
Local Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Tumor Dissemination ◽  
Intradural Tumor ◽  
Clinical Consequences ◽  
Clinical Awareness

Spinal metastases are the most common of spinal neoplasms and occur predominantly in an extradural location. Their appearance in an intradural location is uncommon and is associated with a poor prognosis. Cerebrospinal fluid dissemination accounts for a significant number of intradural spinal metastases mostly manifesting as leptomeningeal carcinomatoses or drop metastases from intracranial tumors. The occurrence of local tumor dissemination intradurally following surgery for an extradural spinal metastasis has not been reported previously. The authors describe 2 cases in which local intradural and intramedullary tumor recurrences occurred following resection of extradural metastases that were complicated by unintended durotomy. To heighten clinical awareness of this unusual form of local tumor recurrence, the authors discuss the possible etiology and clinical consequences of this entity.

scholarly journals Is the Rationale of Anatomical Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Universally Adoptable? A Hypothesis-Driven Review

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 131
Author(s):  
Young-Jen Lin ◽  
Cheng-Maw Ho
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Tumor Recurrence ◽  
Hepatic Metastases ◽  
Vascular Supply ◽  
Tumor Ablation ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Margin Width

Surgical resection is the first-line curative treatment modality for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Anatomical resection (AR), described as systematic removal of a liver segment confined by tumor-bearing portal tributaries, may improve survival by reducing the risk of tumor recurrence compared with non-AR. In this article, we propose the rationale for AR and its universal adoption by providing supporting evidence from the advanced understanding of a tumor microenvironment and accumulating clinical experiences of locoregional tumor ablation therapeutics. AR may be advantageous because it completely removes the en-bloc by interrupting tumor vascular supply and thus extirpates the spreading of tumor microthrombi, if they ever exist, within the supplying portal vein. However, HCC is a hypervascular tumor that can promote neoangiogenesis in the local tumor microenvironment, which in itself can break through the anatomical boundary within the liver and even retrieve nourishment from extrahepatic vessels, such as inferior phrenic or omental arteries. Additionally, increasing clinical evidence for locoregional tumor ablation therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation, predominantly performed as a non-anatomical approach, suggests comparable outcomes for surgical resection, particularly in small HCC and colorectal, hepatic metastases. Moreover, liver transplantation for HCC, which can be considered as AR of the whole liver followed by implantation of a new graft, is not universally free from post-transplant tumor recurrence. Overall, AR should not be considered the gold standard among all surgical resection methods. Surgical resection is fundamentally reliant on choosing the optimal margin width to achieve en-bloc tumor niche removal while balancing between oncological radicality and the preservation of postoperative liver function. The importance of this is to liberate surgical resilience in hepatocellular carcinoma. The overall success of HCC treatment is determined by the clearance of the theoretical niche. Developing biomolecular-guided navigation device/technologies may provide surgical guidance toward the total removal of microscopic tumor niche to achieve superior oncological outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document