Grounded Theory and Constant Comparative Analysis

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 403???404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Reed
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Constant Comparative ◽  
Constant Comparative Analysis

scholarly journals Perilaku Remaja Putri Menghadapi Menarche Berdasarkan Nilai Budaya Batak

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 421
Author(s):  
Merida Simanjuntak ◽  
Suryani Manurung ◽  
Tri Riana Lestari ◽  
Payung Hasibuan
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Reproductive System ◽  
Adolescent Girl ◽  
Behavioral Pattern ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Constant Comparative ◽  
Constant Comparative Analysis

Masa remaja merupakan masa transisi dari masa kanak-kanak menuju masa dewasa yang ditandai oleh perubahan fisik, intelektual, seksual,dan emosional. Menarche pada remaja putri menjadi pertanda memasuki tahapan sistem reproduksi dewasa. Sesuai dengan nilai dan budaya masyarakat, peristiwa menstruasi pertama yang fisiologis itu mendapat respons yang berbeda. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengembangkan kerangka teoritis tentang pola perilaku remaja putri dalam menghadapi menarche sesuai dengan nilai dan budaya keluarga Batakdi Jakarta. Penelitian kualitatif ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan grounded theory dengan metode pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi, dan studi literatur. Enamoranginforman direkrut dengan cara purposive sampling di wilayah Jakarta Timur. Data yang dikumpulkan di analisis dengan menggunakan constant comparative analysis sampai tercapai saturasi data. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perilaku remaja putri menghadapi menarche sesuai dengan nilai dan budaya Batak di Jakarta dipengaruhi oleh informasi yang diterima, pola asuh dalam keluarga, dan pandanga norangtua terhadap menarche. Oleh sebab itu, perawat diharapkan dapat memberikan informasi yang komprehensif kepada remaja tentang proses perkembangan reproduksi dan perawatan saat menarche dengan mengikutsertakan orang tua dalam pemberian pendidikan kesehatan pada anak.Adolescence is a phase that lies between childhood and adulthood. There are some changes occur due to this transitional phase including physical, intellectual, sexual and emotional changes. Menarche phase in woman shows that a more developed reproductive system has started. There are different responses according to culture and community value in encountering the menarche phase. The purpose of this study was to develop a theoryb about adolescent girl behavioral pattern encountering menarche phase. This qualitative study was conducted using grounded theory approach, by collecting data from interviews, observation and literature study. Six respondents were recruited using purposive sampling in East Jakarta. The collected data was analyzed using constant comparative analysis until data saturation was achieved. Result of this study showed that adolescent girl behavior encountering menarche phase according to Batak’s culture and traditional value was influenced by information adopted, mothering pattern in the family and parent’s angle of view about menarche phase. Regarding this, a nurse is expected to be able to give comprehensive information to adolescent girl aboutits reproductive system development and nursing in menarche phase. In addition, parent’s involvement is recommended in health education giving to children.

scholarly journals The Constant Comparative Analysis Method Outside of Grounded Theory

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheila Fram
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Naturalistic Inquiry ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Conceptual Frameworks ◽  
Theoretical Frameworks ◽  
Constant Comparative ◽  
Emic Perspective ◽  
Constant Comparative Analysis

This commentary addresses the gap in the literature regarding discussion of the legitimate use of Constant Comparative Analysis Method (CCA) outside of Grounded Theory. The purpose is to show the strength of using CCA to maintain the emic perspective and how theoretical frameworks can maintain the etic perspective throughout the analysis. My naturalistic inquiry model shows how conceptual frameworks and theoretical frameworks can be integrated when using the CCA method.

scholarly journals Determining Competency for Entry to Nursing Practice: A Grounded Theory Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Patrea Rose Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Competency Assessment ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Nursing Assessment ◽  
Assessment Of Competence ◽  
Glaserian Grounded Theory ◽  
Constant Comparative Analysis

<p>Critical Comparative Nursing Assessment (CCNA) is a theory about how the competence of completing Bachelor of Nursing students in New Zealand is determined. Semi-structured, audio-taped interviews and field notes were used to collect data from twenty-seven nurses with experience in undertaking competency  assessment. A Glaserian grounded theory approach was used to guide the data collection and analysis. This utilised the processes of constant comparative analysis, theoretical sampling and saturation to generate a middle range substantive grounded theory. This is presented as a model consisting of four emergent categories that explain how nurses formulate professional judgements about competence. These are a) gathering, which describes the processes used to collect evidence of practice to inform decisions; b) weighing up, which explains how evidence is analysed using the processes of benchmarking and comparative analysis; c) judging brings into focus the tensions inherent in making professional judgements about competence and how nurses formulated these, and d) moderating, which describes the processes nurses use to validate decisions and ensure that professional responsibilities and public safety are upheld. The basic social psychological process of comparing integrates these categories to explain how nurses resolve the tensions associated with making decisions about competence. This research presents a new way of viewing and understanding how nurses assess competence. It identifies where the challengers and tensions related to the assessment of competence lie and suggests strategies that if implemented could further enhance the validity and reliability of assessment outcomes.</p>

scholarly journals ANALISIS EFEKTIVITAS DAN EFISIENSI PELAPORAN TENAGA KERJA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN SISTEM MANUAL DAN SISTEM ONLINE (STUDI KASUS BPJS KETENAGAKERJAAN CABANG GRESIK)

MANAJERIAL ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Sasongko Budi Laksono
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Effectiveness And Efficiency ◽  
Constant Comparative ◽  
Comparison Of Effectiveness ◽  
Constant Comparative Analysis

This study aims to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of employment reporting in the office BPJS Employment Ketenagakerjaan Gresik. Using 6 informants from BPJS Ketenagakerjaan employee and 4 informants from the participant to know comparison of effectiveness and efficiency of reporting in BPJS Ketenagakerjaan of Gresik. The analysis was done by using constant comparative analysis technique. The results show that Online reporting application meets the indicators of effectiveness and efficiency.

scholarly journals Determining Competency for Entry to Nursing Practice: A Grounded Theory Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Patrea Rose Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Nursing Students ◽  
Competency Assessment ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Nursing Assessment ◽  
Assessment Of Competence ◽  
Glaserian Grounded Theory ◽  
Constant Comparative Analysis

<p>Critical Comparative Nursing Assessment (CCNA) is a theory about how the competence of completing Bachelor of Nursing students in New Zealand is determined. Semi-structured, audio-taped interviews and field notes were used to collect data from twenty-seven nurses with experience in undertaking competency  assessment. A Glaserian grounded theory approach was used to guide the data collection and analysis. This utilised the processes of constant comparative analysis, theoretical sampling and saturation to generate a middle range substantive grounded theory. This is presented as a model consisting of four emergent categories that explain how nurses formulate professional judgements about competence. These are a) gathering, which describes the processes used to collect evidence of practice to inform decisions; b) weighing up, which explains how evidence is analysed using the processes of benchmarking and comparative analysis; c) judging brings into focus the tensions inherent in making professional judgements about competence and how nurses formulated these, and d) moderating, which describes the processes nurses use to validate decisions and ensure that professional responsibilities and public safety are upheld. The basic social psychological process of comparing integrates these categories to explain how nurses resolve the tensions associated with making decisions about competence. This research presents a new way of viewing and understanding how nurses assess competence. It identifies where the challengers and tensions related to the assessment of competence lie and suggests strategies that if implemented could further enhance the validity and reliability of assessment outcomes.</p>

scholarly journals Bullying in Graduate School: Its Nature and Effects

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Gentry ◽  
Bernard Whitley
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Graduate Students ◽  
Graduate School ◽  
School Context ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Grounded Theory Methodology ◽  
Bullying Behaviors ◽  
Constant Comparative Analysis ◽  
Insight Into

Does bullying exist in graduate school? If so, what does it look like? Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 graduate students from various departments at a medium-sized, Midwestern U.S. university. Grounded Theory methodology (Glaser, 1978) was utilized to gain insight into the terms and behaviors students used to define bullying in the graduate school context. Through constant comparative analysis (Stern, 1980), categories emerged that provided an understanding of the different perspectives inherent in a bully system, and the meanings attached to bullying behaviors. These findings can provide administrators and counselors with the information necessary to conduct preventative training to help students interact in a more professional, inclusive manner.

scholarly journals A Study of Hybridization Understanding from Algorithmic to Conceptual – Is Algorithmic an End Point for Students?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianna J. Manchester ◽  
Julia Winter ◽  
Sean P. Hickey ◽  
Sarah Wegwerth
Keyword(s):  
Grounded Theory ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Atomic Orbitals ◽  
End Point ◽  
Coding Schemes ◽  
Constant Comparative Analysis ◽  
Assessment Questions ◽  
Hybridization Theory

<p>This paper details the results of a qualitative study examining the reasoning students use to solve common hybridization theory assessment questions and their mental images of hybrid and atomic orbitals. The data were collected through think-aloud interviews as students worked through a five-question questionnaire. Prior to recruitment, the study was deemed to be exempt from IRB review by Sterling IRB. Prior to start of interviews participants provided verbal consent. The resulting transcripts and answers were analyzed following the practices of grounded theory and constant comparative analysis. Coding schemes can be found in the Supplementary Information section. Results, conclusions, and implications for teaching are presented in the manuscript.</p>

scholarly journals Phenomenological Study of Shariah-Compliant Films as Da’wah Medium

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Rosmawati Mohamad Rasit ◽  
Nur Hazriani Razali
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Phenomenological Study ◽  
Group Discussion ◽  
Banking System ◽  
Muslim Students ◽  
Center Stage ◽  
Constant Comparative ◽  
Constant Comparative Analysis ◽  
Husband And Wife

The discussion of Shariah compliance in film provides the opportunity for the delivery of the message of da’wah (Islamic evangelism) through filmart. Nevertheless, the term sharia compliance in the film field is a newly discussed matter compared to sharia compliance in the banking system. Therefore, this study aims to analyze film audience’s perception towards the concept of sharia compliance. This study also examined the role of sharia compliance film as the medium of da’wah. It employed the phenomenology design that involved sampling with the aims to obtain study respondents. The 10 samples were UKM undergraduate and postgraduate Muslim students who like watching Malay films. The data were collected via focussed group discussion. This study employed constant comparative analysis in comparing data that convey meaning in answering the questions and objectives of the study. The findings showed that from the audience’s perception regarding sharia compliance, there were two categories of audience, which are negotiated reading and oppositional reading in interpreting meaning. The findings stated the respondents’ perception regarding the concept of sharia compliance that was discussed - ‘’Actions in film, socializing limit...the acting should preserve them but not too stiff...for example the scene where husband and wife sleeping together on a bed should be avoided. Frankly, the absent of such scene does not flaw the film.’’ The findings also found that the respondents agreed with the role of sharia compliance film as the medium of da’wah. It is hoped that this study contributes clarity to filmmakers regarding the concept of sharia compliance that could take center stage in da’wah film in Malaysia

scholarly journals Wacana Eksplanasi dalam Konten Cangkir Tasawuf Modern: Analisis Berdasarkan Pendekatan Teori Relevansi dan Linguistik Kognitif

Buana Bastra ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-96
Author(s):  
Taufik Nurhadi
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Constant Comparative ◽  
Constant Comparative Analysis

Model tafsir Alquran Agus Mustofa dianggap konstroversial karena tidak mengikuti prosedur standar seperti misalnya model tafsir yang merujuk pada buku Adhwa’ul Bayan fi Tafsiril Qur’ani bil Qur’an yang ditulis oleh Syaikh Muhammad Al-Amin asy-Syanqithi. Justru dalam penafsirannya, Agus Mustofa menggunakan ilmu pengetahuan sebagai dasar penafsiran terhadap ayat-ayat dalam Alquran. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, hal yang ingin dicapai dalam penelitian ini adalah untuk memperoleh deskripsi dan penjelasan terhadap konstruk tafsir Alquran  model Agus Mustofa yang terinterferensi melalui wacana eksplanasi. Penelitian ini mengambil subjek tuturan dalam konten Cangkir Tasawuf Modern yang diasuh Agus Mustofa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah deskriptif kualitatif, yang didasarkan pada dua pendekatan, teori relevansi (model Raymond Gibbs) dan linguistik kognitif. Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode simak dengan teknik dasar teknik sadap dan teknik lanjutan teknik SBLC, teknik download, dan teknik catat. Metodek analisis digunakan Constant Comparative Analysis. Hasil penelitian mengindikasikan adanya pola konstruk KWE = P>SH>KC>Pj[KC]>Pj[KC+P]>K. Pola penafsirannya mengindikasikan adanya kesamaan pendekatan relevansi kognitif dan relevansi komunikatif.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document