Is Prior Uterine Surgery a Risk Factor for Adenomyosis?

2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (5, Part 1) ◽  
pp. 1034-1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uma R. Panganamamula ◽  
Ozgur H. Harmanli ◽  
Ebru F. Isik-Akbay ◽  
Chad A. Grotegut ◽  
Vani Dandolu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Sturzenegger ◽  
Leonhard Schäffer ◽  
Roland Zimmermann ◽  
Christian Haslinger

AbstractPurpose:Uterine rupture is a rare but serious event with a median incidence of 0.09%. Previous uterine surgery is the most common risk factor. The aim of our study was to analyze retrospectively women with uterine rupture during labor and to evaluate postulated risk factors such as uterine fundal pressure (UFP).Methods:Twenty thousand one hundred and fifty-two deliveries were analyzed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were 22 weeks and 0 days–42 weeks and 0 days of gestation, singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation. Women with primary cesarean section were excluded. A logistic regression analysis adjusting for possible risk factors was conducted and a subgroup analysis of women with unscarred uterus was performed.Results:Twenty-eight cases of uterine rupture were identified (incidence: 0.14%). Uterine rupture was noticed in multipara patients only. In the multivariate analysis among all study patients, only previous cesarean section remained a statistically significant risk factor [adjusted odds ration (adj. OR) 12.52 confidence interval (CI) 95% 5.21–30.09]. In the subgroup analysis among women with unscarred uterus (n=19,415) three risk factors were associated with uterine rupture: UFP (adj. OR 5.22 CI 95% 1.07–25.55), abnormal placentation (adj. OR 20.82 CI 95% 2.48–175.16) and age at delivery >40 years (adj. OR 4.77 CI 95% 1.44–15.85).Conclusions:The main risk factor for uterine rupture in the whole study population is previous uterine surgery. Risk factors in women with unscarred uterus were UFP, abnormal placentation, and age at delivery >40 years. The only factor which can be modified is UFP. We suggest that UFP should be used with caution at least in presence of other supposed risk factors.


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Kuwata ◽  
Shigeki Matsubara ◽  
Rie Usui ◽  
Shin-ichiro Uchida ◽  
Naohiro Sata ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e0197307 ◽  
Author(s):  
An-Shine Chao ◽  
Yao-Lung Chang ◽  
Lan-Yan Yang ◽  
Angel Chao ◽  
Wei-Yang Chang ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 71 ◽  
pp. 121-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ascan Warnholtz ◽  
Maria Wendt ◽  
Michael August ◽  
Thomas Münzel

Endothelial dysfunction in the setting of cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypercholesterolaemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and chronic smoking, as well as in the setting of heart failure, has been shown to be at least partly dependent on the production of reactive oxygen species in endothelial and/or smooth muscle cells and the adventitia, and the subsequent decrease in vascular bioavailability of NO. Superoxide-producing enzymes involved in increased oxidative stress within vascular tissue include NAD(P)H-oxidase, xanthine oxidase and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in an uncoupled state. Recent studies indicate that endothelial dysfunction of peripheral and coronary resistance and conductance vessels represents a strong and independent risk factor for future cardiovascular events. Ways to reduce endothelial dysfunction include risk-factor modification and treatment with substances that have been shown to reduce oxidative stress and, simultaneously, to stimulate endothelial NO production, such as inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme or the statins. In contrast, in conditions where increased production of reactive oxygen species, such as superoxide, in vascular tissue is established, treatment with NO, e.g. via administration of nitroglycerin, results in a rapid development of endothelial dysfunction, which may worsen the prognosis in patients with established coronary artery disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document