Diagnostic Accuracy of Bone Culture Versus Biopsy in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 204-208
Author(s):  
Aroa Tardáguila-García ◽  
Irene Sanz-Corbalán ◽  
Esther García-Morales ◽  
Yolanda García-Álvarez ◽  
Raúl J. Molines-Barroso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Bone Culture ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

scholarly journals The role of remnant bone microbiological cultures in managing diabetic foot osteomyelitis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devangi Ketankumar Madani ◽  
Mujahid Ahmad Saeed ◽  
Alok Tiwari ◽  
Miruna Delia David
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Group B Streptococcus ◽  
Bone Culture ◽  
Streptococcus Group ◽  
Streptococcus Anginosus ◽  
Bone Segment ◽  
Forefoot Amputation ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Aim: Effective treatment of diabetic foot osteomyelitis can reduce the risk of major amputations. Our primary aim was to compare the yield in cultures from the proximal and distal segments of bone excised intraoperatively and the impact on antibiotic choice and duration.Methods: Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of osteomyelitis on bone culture results, where both proximal and distal bone segment samples had been collected, were retrospectively reviewed. Microbiological data were examined to identify true pathogens and studied against antimicrobial choice and duration of prescribing.Results: A total of 47 forefoot amputation cases were studied. In 89% of cases, definite or likely pathogens were isolated from the deep tissues cultured. Definite pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Group B streptococcus, Group G streptococcus and Streptococcus anginosus) were identified in 32% of cases; in 73% of these, definite pathogens were grown in both the proximal and distal bone segments.Conclusion: Sampling of remnant bone culture can help in reducing the duration of antibiotic treatment in patients (27% of cases in our series) as it is challenging to correctly estimate intraoperatively whether clear surgical margins have been adequately achieved when resecting infected bone.

scholarly journals Are surrogate markers for diabetic foot osteomyelitis remission reliable?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter A Crisologo ◽  
Matthew Malone ◽  
Javier La Fontaine ◽  
Orhan Oz ◽  
Kavita Bhavan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Bone Biopsy ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Surrogate Markers ◽  
Bone Culture ◽  
Soft Tissue Infections ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Index Site ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate surrogate markers commonly used in the literature for diabetic foot osteomyelitis remission after initial treatment for diabetic foot infections. Methods: Thirty-five patients with diabetic foot infections were prospectively enrolled and followed for 12 months. Osteomyelitis was determined from bone culture and histology initially and for recurrence. Chi square and Fischer's exact test were used for dichotomous variables and the student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables with an alpha of 0.05. Results: Twenty-four patients were diagnosed with osteomyelitis and eleven patients with soft-tissue infections. 16.7% (n=) of patients with osteomyelitis had a re-infection based on bone biopsy. The success of osteomyelitis treatment varied based on the surrogate marker used to define remission: osteomyelitis infection (16.7%), failed wound healing (8.3%), re-ulceration (20.8%), re-admission (16.7%), amputation (12.5%). There was no difference in outcomes among patients who were initially diagnosed with osteomyelitis and soft tissue infections. There were no differences in osteomyelitis re-infection (16.7% vs 45.5%, p=0.07), wounds that failed to heal (8.3% vs 9.1%, p=0.94), re-ulceration (20.8% vs 27.3%, p=0.67), re-admission for diabetic foot infections at the same site (16.7% vs 36.4%, p=0.20), amputation at the same site after discharge (12.5% vs 36.4%, p=0.10). Osteomyelitis at the index site based on bone biopsy indicated that failed therapy was 16.7%. Indirect markers demonstrated a failure rate ranging from 8.3-20.8%. Conclusions: Most osteomyelitis markers were similar to markers in soft tissue infection subjects. Commonly reported surrogate markers were not shown to be specific to identify patients that failed osteomyelitis treatment when compared with patients that had soft tissue infections. Given this, these surrogate markers are not reliable for use in practice to identify osteomyelitis treatment failure.

scholarly journals Time-to-Report of the Bone Culture and Microbiologic Adequacy of Empiric Antibiotics in Patient’s with Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S94-S95
Author(s):  
Hyun Kyung Kim ◽  
Olga Vasylyeva
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Bone Biopsy ◽  
Anaerobic Bacteria ◽  
Accurate Method ◽  
Bone Culture ◽  
Culture Result ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infection ◽  
Superficial Wound ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Abstract Background Bone cultures in diabetic foot infection is the most accurate method to identify causative pathogen, while there is only 30% concordance between superficial wound swab and bone biopsy cultures. Diabetic foot infection is commonly polymicrobial, therefore report on the bone biopsy culture may come with several updates before it is finalized. Our study is aimed to describe how often additional pathogens were identified after patients’ discharge on antibiotics therapy for diabetic foot osteomyelitis, and evaluate microbiological appropriateness of antibiotic regimen upon discharge based on the final result of the bone culture. Methods Medical records of the patients 18 years old or older, who had inpatient bone biopsy, deep tissue debridement or amputation for diabetic foot infection, were reviewed from January 2014 through Dec 2015 in Rochester Regional Health System. Antibiotic regimens for the patients discharged before final culture result were evaluated for microbiological appropriateness by two reviewers trained in infectious diseases. Results In total, 198 procedures were screened, 158 procedures met inclusion criteria, out of which 74 patients with 80 procedures (51%) were discharged before the final culture result was available. Average time from procedure to the final culture report was 6 days, and from discharge to the final culture was 3.7 days. In most of the cases (70%, 56 out of 80) the patients were discharged on empiric regimen discordant with final culture result. Predominant organisms were Gram-positive bacteria 74%, with Gram negatives 24%, and yeast 2%. Most infections were polymicrobial (81%), mixed with anaerobic bacteria in 37%. The most frequent isolates were Staphylococcus aureus (15%), Corynebacterium (14%), anaerobic Gram-positive cocci (12%), and Staphylococcus epidermidis (8%). All negative Gram stains (31%, 25 out of 80) had positive growth on culture. Conclusion Half of the patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis, who underwent bone biopsy, were discharged before final culture results were available. Most of them were discharged on empiric regimen discordant with final culture. This data suggests that careful outpatient follow-up on the final culture would likely result in modification of antibiotics therapy to target newly reported pathogen. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Medical Imaging and Laboratory Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy in 107 Consecutive Hospitalized Patients With Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis and Partial Foot Amputations

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 433-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Crystal L. Ramanujam ◽  
David Han ◽  
Thomas Zgonis
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Histopathological Examination ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Diagnostic Study ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Radiographic Findings ◽  
Preoperative Diagnostic ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

The primary aim of our study was to compare the preoperative diagnostic accuracy of plain radiographic findings with the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings for diabetic foot osteomyelitis in hospitalized patients who underwent first-time partial foot amputations with confirmed histopathological specimens positive for osteomyelitis. Second, it was desired to determine whether certain variables within the initial clinical presentation and preoperative laboratory findings were associated with more accurate diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis in this study population. Finally, it was desired to determine the most common bacterial organisms found in bone and soft-tissue cultures taken intraoperatively and to determine how often the same organism was found in both. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria to the initial 329 patients identified through chart review, the final sample size for further analysis was n =107. In this study, after adjusting for the effects of covariates such as age, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein, plain radiographs seemed to have statistically more significant power than MRI in predicting and diagnosing diabetic foot osteomyelitis. In addition, higher ESR values were confirmed to predict a higher chance of positive diagnosis for diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Furthermore, the presence of positive bacterial identification from intraoperative bone cultures did not always indicate true osteomyelitis on histopathological examination. Levels of Evidence: Level II: Diagnostic study

Corynebacterium Striatum: A Concerning Pathogen of Osteomyelitis in the Diabetic Patient

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (sp1) ◽  
pp. 9-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sneha A. Patel ◽  
Jackeline Iacovella ◽  
Rhonda S. Cornell
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Bone Culture ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Corynebacterium Striatum ◽  
Potential Pathogen ◽  
Type Ii Diabetics ◽  
And Gender ◽  
Extended Course ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis ◽  
Bone Cultures

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Corynebacterium striatum (C. striatum) is known to colonize the skin and mucous membranes of most normal human hosts. While it is frequently isolated in clinical laboratories, the clinical significance of C. striatum is often unknown with respect to diabetic foot infections with osteomyelitis. There have been very few studies published on this topic, and even fewer that report on treatment courses. To our knowledge, there has been no study published reporting diabetic foot osteomyelitis with isolation of C. striatum from bone culture. METHODS: Four patients were known to have been treated at our facility for C. striatum diabetic foot osteomyelitis. The medical records for each patient were thoroughly reviewed with close attention directed towards the past medical history, wound duration, wound and bone cultures, antimicrobial therapy and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Bone cultures of all 4 patients were notable for C. striatum. Diphtheroids were also noted on wound cultures for 3 patients which were not speciated. All bone cultures were obtained during surgical treatment of the diabetic foot infection. All patients were type II diabetics but varied with respect to age and gender. All patients were treated with an extended course of antibiotics and/or surgical resection of osteomyelitis. Patients were followed until complete wound closure. CONCLUSIONS: We report four cases of diabetic foot osteomyelitis in which C. striatum was noted and treated as a pathogen. Diphtheroids are often overlooked as a potential pathogen in diabetic foot infections and rarely treated as such. However, our findings suggest that clinicians should consider C. striatum as a possible cause of osteomyelitis, especially when patients fail to completely heal wounds in a timely manner that have previously and repeatedly displayed Diphtheroids from cultures.

Feasibility of Percutaneous Bone Biopsy as Part of the Management of Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis in a 100% Neuropathic, Grade 3 IDSA/IWGDF Population on an Outpatient Basis

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 382-387
Author(s):  
Olga Anna Kosmopoulou ◽  
Isabelle J. Dumont
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Therapy ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Bone Biopsy ◽  
Ambulatory Setting ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Bone Culture ◽  
Causative Microorganism ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of percutaneous bone biopsy in an ambulatory setting as part of the management of diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) on an outpatient basis. DFO may complicate some cases of apparently nonsevere foot infections in patients with diabetes and greatly increase the risk of a lower extremity amputation. It has been suggested that bone culture–based antibiotic therapy is a predictive factor of success in patients with diabetes treated nonsurgically for osteomyelitis of the foot. It is recommended to identify the causative microorganism(s) by the means of either a surgical or percutaneous bone biopsy taken appropriately to select the proper antibiotic therapy. Percutaneous bone biopsy in patients not requiring surgery is, however, not performed in everyday practice as it should be according to the current recommendations. In the present retrospective study, we report a series of 23 consecutive patients with a suspicion of DFO in whom 28 bone samples were collected by percutaneous biopsy at the bedside in an outpatient setting. The percentage of positive cultures was in accordance with that reported in the literature. The mean number of isolates per specimen was 1.04. After a mean 12-month follow-up, the remission was almost of 78%. No adverse event related to the bone biopsy was noted. After a 1-year follow-up, no recurrence was recorded among the patients in remission. The results of the present study suggest that bedside percutaneous bone biopsy performed in the ambulatory setting is a valuable and safe tool in the management of DFO on an outpatient basis.

scholarly journals 318. Deferring Amputation in Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Doing more Harm than Good?

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S231-S232
Author(s):  
Shiwei Zhou ◽  
Brian M Schmidt ◽  
Oryan Henig ◽  
Keith S Kaye
Keyword(s):  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Medical Management ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Complete Healing ◽  
Knee Amputation ◽  
Management Group ◽  
One Year ◽  
Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis

Abstract Background Diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO) is a leading cause of below knee amputation (BKA). Even when medical treatment is deemed unlikely to succeed, patients with DFO are often resistant to amputation. Methods An observational cohort analysis was done on patients with DFO at Michigan Medicine who were evaluated by podiatry and recommended BKA from Oct 2015 - Jun 2019. Primary outcome was mortality after BKA recommendation. Secondary outcomes were healing of affected limb, rate of BKA or above knee amputation (AKA) and total antibiotic days in the 6 months following. All intravenous antibiotics and oral courses of linezolid and fluoroquinolones were captured. Results Of 44 patients with DFO, 18 chose BKA, 26 chose medical management with wound care. Mean age of the cohort was 61, 68% male, 80% white with a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6 (IQR 4,7). The two groups were similar with regards to demographics and comorbid conditions. Those who chose medical management did so because their infection was non-life-threatening and they desired to avoid amputation. One-year mortality was greater in patients who were medically managed compared to those who had BKA (23.1% vs 0%, OR 11.7, 95% CI 0.6–222.9). Considering only the 33 patients who were followed for at least 2 years, 2-year mortality was also greater in the medically managed group compared to the BKA group (38.5% vs 5.6%, OR 10.6, 95% CI 1.2–92.7, Figure 1). Fewer patients in the medical management group had complete healing of their wound/stump compared to the BKA group (46.2% vs 88.9%, OR 9.3, 95% CI 1.8–49.1). In the medically managed group, 18 (69%) patients went on to require BKA or AKA at a median of 76.5 days compared to 2 (11%) in the BKA group who required AKA at 1 and 11 days following recommendation. Median antibiotic days were significantly greater in the medically managed group compared to the BKA group (55 IQR 42,78 vs 17 IQR 10,37, p=0.0017). Conclusion In this cohort of DFO patients where BKA was recommended, medical management was associated with increased mortality, poor healing of the affected limb, and excess antibiotic exposure compared to BKA. These findings are particularly notable as case mix and severity of illness were similar between the two groups. This study can be used to inform providers and patients in cases where BKA is recommended. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document