Guideline implementation results in a decrease of pressure ulcer incidence in critically ill patients*

2007 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 815-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik H. de Laat ◽  
Peter Pickkers ◽  
Lisette Schoonhoven ◽  
André L. Verbeek ◽  
Ton Feuth ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. A26
Author(s):  
Brenda Hixon-Vermillion ◽  
Karen Havreberg ◽  
Deb Greene ◽  
Christy Stegemiller ◽  
Jennifer Leasure ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludmila Silva Castanheira ◽  
Andreza Werli-Alvarenga ◽  
Allana Dos Reis Correa ◽  
Daniela Mascarenhas de Paula Campos

Resumo: Feridas afetam a integridade da pele, e quando não prevenidas ou tratadas podem levar a complicações decorrentes da integridade da pele prejudicada, especialmente em Unidades de Terapia Intensiva (UTIs). Atualmente, as escalas de predição de risco disponíveis para esta avaliação e validadas para o português são as de Braden, Waterlow e Norton. Objetivo: determinar qual a escala mais acurada para a avaliação de pacientes criticamente enfermos. Metodologia: Trata-se de uma revisão integrativa, cuja questão norteadora foi: qual escala para predição de risco para LP, disponível e validada para o português é mais acurada para estimar o risco de LP em pacientes criticamente enfermos internados na UTI? A busca dos estudos foi realizada na BVS, PubMed/MedLine e CINAHL. Resultados: Foram encontrados 134 artigos, elegíveis 123 e incluídos 18 na revisão. Conclusão: Os resultados apontam a necessidade da realização de estudos nesta área.Descritores: Úlcera por Pressão; Unidades de Terapia Intensiva; Cuidados Críticos; EscalasPREDICTION RISK SCALES FOR PRESSURE INJURY IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS INTEGRATIVE REVIEWSummary: Wounds affect skin integrity, and when not prevented or treated can lead to complications resulting from impaired skin integrity, especially in intensive care units (ICUs). Currently, the prediction of risk scales available for this evaluation and validated for the Portuguese are Braden, Waterlow and Norton. Objective: to determine what the more accurate scale for the assessment of critically ill. Methodology: it is an integrative review, whose guiding question was: which to scale for risk prediction for LP, available and validated to Portuguese is more accurate for estimating the risk of LP in critically ill hospitalized in ICU? The search of the studies was held at the BVS, PubMed/MedLine and CINAHL. Results: found 134 items, 123 and included 18 eligible in the review. Conclusion: the results show the need of carrying out studies in this area.Descriptors: Pressure ulcer; Intensive Care Units; Critical Care; ScalesESCALAS DE PREDICCIÓN DE RIESGO PARA LESIÓN POR PRESIÓN EN PACIENTES CRÍTICAMENTE ENFERMOS: REVISIÓN INTEGRATIVAResumen: Las heridas afectan la integridad de la piel y cuando no prevenido o Tratado pueden conducir a las complicaciones resultantes de la integridad de la piel deteriorada, especialmente en unidades de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Actualmente, la predicción de las escalas de riesgo disponibles para esta evaluación y validadas para los portugueses son Braden, Waterlow y Norton. Objetivo: determinar la escala que más precisa para la evaluación de estado crítico. Metodología: ¿ es un examen integrador, cuyo rector era: que a la escala de predicción de riesgo de LP, disponible y validado al portugués es más exacta para estimar el riesgo de LP en críticamente enfermos hospitalizados en UCI? La búsqueda de los estudios se realizó en la BVS, PubMed/MedLine y CINAHL. Resultados: elegibles 18 134 artículos encontrados, 123 e incluido en la revisión. Conclusión: los resultados muestran la necesidad de llevar a cabo estudios en esta área.Descriptores: Úlcera por Presión, Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos, Cuidados Críticos, Escalas.


2022 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30
Author(s):  
Bulbul Hossain ◽  
Abdullah Al Mamun ◽  
Habib Al Razi ◽  
Nurul Islam Raisul

Background: All over the world pressure ulcer is a significant health care problem due to high morbidity and mortality rates and also high health care cost. This study was carried out with the objectives to identify the characteristics and associated factors of pressure ulcer among the critically ill patients admitted in a tertiary military hospital. Few studies have been conducted on pressure ulcer in Bangladesh and very few in military hospitals. Methodology: This was a cross sectional study conducted among purposively selected 53 critically ill admitted pressure ulcer patients in CMH Dhaka from 01 July 2018 to 31 December 2018 and data were collected by face to face interview and checklist. Results: Among the study population half (50.9%) were aged between 61-80 years with the mean age 69.13 years. The most common anatomical site of pressure ulcer were buttock (51.9%) followed by sacrum (38.5%) and 30.2% had multiple pressure ulcer. Among the critically ill patients, 81.1% had developed pressure ulcer after admission into hospital. The most common place of pressure ulcer was geriatric HDU (30.2%) and officers ward (18.9%). Among the pressure ulcer patients 79.2% were male. Most common stage of pressure ulcer were stage II (66.0%) followed by stage I (18.9%), stage III (13.2%) and stage IV (1.9%). All of them were bedridden and half (50.9%) were completely immobile. According to Braden Scale, about half (50.9%) had high risk for development of pressure ulcer followed by moderate risk (26.4%) and there were none beyond risk. About three fourth (73.6%) of pressure ulcer patients had hypertension & cerebrovascular diseases. Age group of 60-90 years, SSC & above educational group, male sex, immobility, low Braden score group patients are statistically significant (p < 0.05), and hypertensive and cerebrovascular diseased patients are not statically significant (p > 0.05) but having clear trends to be associate factors of pressure ulcer. Conclusion: The number of pressure ulcer were increasing with the increase of age. The higher age, male sex, immobilization, low Braden score, hypertension, and cerebrovascular diseased patients were more prone for development of pressure ulcer among the critically ill patients. J Bangladesh Coll Phys Surg 2022; 40: 23-30


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document