scholarly journals 1519: IMPACT OF TIME TO INITIATION OF STRESS-DOSE STEROIDS ON VASOPRESSOR THERAPY DURATION IN SEPTIC SHOCK

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 763-763
Author(s):  
Patrick Tednes ◽  
Kevin Chang ◽  
Whitney Chaney
Author(s):  
Ryan J. Horvath ◽  
Edward Bittner

This chapter provides a summary of the landmark study known as the CORTICUS trial. Among patients suffering from septic shock, does low dose hydrocortisone improve mortality? Starting with that question, it describes the basics of the study, including funding, study location, the population studies, number of patients, study design, study intervention, follow-up, endpoints, results, and criticism and limitations. The chapter briefly reviews other relevant studies and information, discusses implications, and concludes with a relevant clinical case. The CORTICUS trial failed to demonstrate a benefit on mortality with steroid therapy among patients with septic shock. Based on CORTICUS and other studies, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines no longer recommend steroids for all patients with septic shock. Corticosteroids should be considered, however, for patients with septic shock who do not respond to fluids and vasopressor therapy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 781-802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven M. Hollenberg

Critical Care ◽  
10.1186/cc478 ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 3 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P104 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Keh ◽  
S Weber-Carstens ◽  
T Böhnke ◽  
C Schulz ◽  
M Pettersson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 764-764
Author(s):  
Brandon Boelts ◽  
klayton ryman ◽  
Vivek Kataria ◽  
Xuan Wang ◽  
Adam Hayek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Markelov ◽  
Steven DeFroda ◽  
Leopoldo Baccaro ◽  
Jamie Bastidas

We present here the case of a 70-year-old female who developed a systemic peripheral gangrene in both of her upper extremities (all fingers) and her right foot due to a severe septic shock requiring a systemic vasopressor therapy. Interestingly, the patient’s left foot remained spared from gangrenous changes possibly due to a chronic external iliac artery occlusion and thus the lower concentration of vasopressors in that extremity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 152-156
Author(s):  
Chelsey M. McPheeters ◽  
Jennifer A. Wiedmar ◽  
Christina M. Pinkston ◽  
Kyle A. Weant

Background: Pleiotropic anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects of statins have been associated with improved outcomes in the critically ill population. Objective: To evaluate the implications of prior statin use on the duration of vasopressor therapy in the setting of septic shock. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter study of adult patients who were diagnosed with septic shock. Patients were included if they were treated with any vasopressor for greater than 6 hours from the time of admission. The primary outcome was to compare the duration of vasopressor therapy in patients with septic shock with and without previous statin exposure. Results: A total of 88 statin-exposed cases and 205 unexposed controls were included in the analysis. Despite 92% of statin-exposed patients being reinitiated on therapy within 24 hours, the duration of vasopressors did not differ between groups (44 hours, statin group vs 53 hours, control group, P = .51). There were also no mortality differences between the statin group and the controls (40% vs 47%, P = .27). Conclusions: Long-term statin exposure does not impact the duration of vasopressor therapy in septic shock. The lack of differences in clinical outcomes supports the concept that sepsis involves pro- and anti-inflammatory pathways as well as other nonimmunologic pathways. Results lend further credence to the recent conceptualization of sepsis, with complications leading to organ dysfunction caused not primarily due to inflammatory responses but by a dysregulated response to infection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 79-86
Author(s):  
L. L. Plotkin

Refractory shock is the shock that does not respond to vasopressor therapy. Refractory shock with a short-term mortality rate of more than 50% is diagnosed in 6-7% of critically ill patients. There is an objective need to Investigate methods of intensive therapy for refractory septic shock.The objective of the study: to analyze literature data on the intensive care of refractory septic shock.Results. The second part of the article analyzes 37 studies, both Russian and foreign ones devoted to the intensive care of refractory shock. At present, based on the analysis of the publication, it is impossible to draw reasonable conclusions about the advantage of one or another method of intensive therapy for refractory shock (veno-venous hemofiltration, the use of angiotensin II and vasopressin, as well as methylene blue, vitamin B12, ECMO) over basic therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document