OS 14-04 NUMBER OF BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS NEEDED TO ESTIMATE LONG TERM VISIT-TO-VISIT SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY FOR PREDICTING 10-YEAR CARDIOVASCULAR RISK.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. e212-e213
Author(s):  
Hooi Min Lim ◽  
Yook Chin Chia ◽  
Siew Mooi Ching
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure Variability

Long term habitual vigorous physical activity is associated with lower visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyong Xu ◽  
Xianghong Meng ◽  
Shin-ichi Oka
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Vigorous Physical Activity ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Average Real Variability ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Objective Our work aimed to investigate the association between vigorous physical activity and visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability (BPV). Methods We conducted a post hoc analysis of SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial), a well-characterized cohort of participants randomized to intensive (<120 mmHg) or standard (<140 mmHg) SBP targets. We assessed whether patients with hypertension who habitually engage in vigorous physical activity would have lower visit-to-visit systolic BPV compared with those who do not engage in vigorous physical activity. Visit-to-visit systolic BPV was calculated by standard deviation (SD), average real variability (ARV), and standard deviation independent of the mean (SDIM) using measurements taken during the 1-, 2-, 3-, 6-, 9- and 12-month study visits. A medical history questionnaire assessed vigorous physical activity, which was divided into three categories according to the frequency of vigorous physical activity. Results A total of 7571 participants were eligible for analysis (34.8% female, mean age 67.9±9.3 years). During a follow-up of 1-year, vigorous physical activity could significantly reduce SD, ARV, and SDIM across increasing frequency of vigorous physical activity. There were negative linear trends between frequency of vigorous physical activity and visit-to-visit systolic BPV. Conclusions Long-term engagement in vigorous physical activity was associated with lower visit-to-visit systolic BPV.

scholarly journals The relationship between blood pressure variability and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with primary hypertension

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-33
Author(s):  
Annamária Magdás ◽  
I. Benedek ◽  
Boglárka Belényi ◽  
C. Carasca ◽  
Gabriella Gábos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Ambulatory Monitoring ◽  
Pressure Profile ◽  
Primary Hypertension ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure Variability

Abstract Objective: The aim of the study is to assess 24-hour blood pressure variability, circadian blood pressure profile and its relation to 24-hour blood pressure and cardiovascular risk factors in primary hypertension without any associated disease versus associated with a disease such as diabetes or chronic kidney disease. Methods: This observational study included 90 hypertensive patients, 49 with primary hypertension without associated disease and 41 patients with primary hypertension and diabetes or chronic kidney disease. Circadian blood pressure profile and 24-hour variability were assessed using ambulatory monitoring. Laboratory data regarding cardiovascular risk factors and demographic data were collected in a questionnaire. Results: The number of dipper patients was higher in the group without associated disease, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.27). In both groups a positive correlation was found between 24-hour systolic blood pressure variability and 24-hour systolic blood pressure (p=0.029) and was related to age (p=0.031). In the second group, systolic variability showed a positive correlation with serum triglycerides (p=0.006, r=0.416, CI: 0.1252 to 0.6422). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that systolic blood pressure variability is related to age, systolic blood pressure values and serum lipid levels. To prevent end organ damage in hypertension, the assessment of ambulatory monitoring derived 24-hour systolic blood pressure variability and its reduction may be at least as important as blood pressure lowering.

Abstract P037: Association Between Early Post-kidney Transplant Visit-to-Visit Systolic Blood Pressure Variability And Late Post-Transplant Systolic Blood Pressure

Hypertension ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekamol Tantisattamo ◽  
Chawit Lopimpisuth ◽  
Natnicha Leelaviwat ◽  
Sakditad Saowapa ◽  
Busara Songtanin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Immunosuppressive Medications ◽  
Donor Type ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure Variability

Background: Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability (VVBPV) results from regional or systemic circulatory factors such as stiffness or neuro-hormonal factors. Association between VVBPV and long-term post-kidney transplant (KT) blood pressure (BP) is unknown. Method: VVBPV was measured by average successive variability (ASV), which is the average absolute difference between successive BP measured at 4, 12, and 24 weeks post-KT. Association between the VVBPV and BP at 48 weeks post-KT was examined by multiple linear regression. Results: Of all 105 KT recipients, mean age±SD was 54±12 years and 64 patients (61%) was female. Mean ASV of SBP and DBP were 16±12 mmHg (range 1-58) and 11±6.3 mmHg (range 1-29.5), respectively. Mean SBP at 24 and 48 weeks post-KT were 135±19 and 133±16 mmHg, respectively. Similar to SBP, mean DBP at 24 weeks post-KT was higher than DBP at 48 weeks (DBP 24 vs 48 weeks 80±12 vs 77±11 mmHg). Every 10-mmHg increase in ASV of SBP predicts 3.4 mmHg increase in SBP at 48 weeks post-KT (p 0.01; 95%CI 0.83, 6.14; Figure 1A). However, an increase in 10 mmHg of ASV of DBP predicts a decrease in DBP of 0.12 mmHg (p 0.12, 95%CI -0.28, 0.04; Figure 1B). After adjusted for age, gender, donor type (deceased vs living), induction immunosuppressive medications, pre-KT weight-spline interaction term at 70 kg, every 10 mmHg increase in ASV of SBP was significantly associated with 2.7 mmHg increase in SBP at 48 weeks post-KT (p 0.04, 95%CI 0.15, 5.29); whereas, 10 mmHg increase in ASV of DBP predicts a decrease in DBP of 2.13 mmHg with no statistical significance (p 0.16, 95% -5.14, 0.88) Conclusion: Higher VVSBPV during early post-KT predicts a higher SBP, but not DBP, at late post-KT period.

scholarly journals Long-Term Predialysis Systolic Blood Pressure Variability and Intradialytic Cardiac Hemodynamics in Hemodialysis Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingjuan Yang ◽  
Jian Huang ◽  
Biying Yu ◽  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Shanshan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Rate Pressure Product ◽  
Intradialytic Hypotension ◽  
Cardiac Hemodynamics ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure Variability

Abstract The association in hemodialysis patients between long-term predialysis blood pressure variability and intradialytic cardiac hemodynamics was assessed prospectively in 1070 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis for more than 3 months. Predialysis blood pressure variability was assessed over 1-year intervals. Outcomes included factors were intradialytic hypotension and change in rate-pressure product. The final cohort’s mean age was 59 years, and 57% were males. Greater predialysis systolic blood pressure variability was associated with an increased risk of intradialytic hypotension (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.097; 95% confidence intervals 1.055 to 1.140) and change in rate-pressure product (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.213; 95% confidence intervals 1.163 to 1.265). Results were similar when blood pressure variability was stratified by baseline systolic blood pressure. Factors associated with higher systolic blood pressure variability were older age, female sex, longer duration of dialysis, and diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy, and lower levels of serum albumin. In conclusion, greater predialysis systolic blood pressure variability among hemodialysis patients was associated with greater intradialytic cardiac hemodynamic instability. Strategies to reduce blood pressure variability might be beneficial for hemodialysis patients.

scholarly journals Long-Term Blood Pressure Variability Across the Clinical and Biomarker Spectrum of Alzheimer’s Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 1655-1669
Author(s):  
Isabel J. Sible ◽  
Daniel A. Nation ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Cognitively Normal ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure Variability

Background: Elevated blood pressure is linked to cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) biomarker abnormality. However, blood pressure levels vary over time. Less is known about the role of long-term blood pressure variability in cognitive impairment and AD pathophysiology. Objective: Determine whether long-term blood pressure variability is elevated across the clinical and biomarker spectrum of AD. Methods: Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative participants (cognitively normal, mild cognitive impairment, AD [n = 1,421]) underwent baseline exam, including blood pressure measurement at 0, 6, and 12 months. A subset (n = 318) underwent baseline lumbar puncture to determine cerebrospinal fluid amyloid-β and phosphorylated tau levels. Clinical groups and biomarker-confirmed AD groups were compared on blood pressure variability over 12 months. Results: Systolic blood pressure variability was elevated in clinically diagnosed AD dementia (VIM: F2,1195 = 6.657, p = 0.001, η2 = 0.01) compared to cognitively normal participants (p = 0.001), and in mild cognitive impairment relative to cognitively normal participants (p = 0.01). Findings were maintained in biomarker-confirmed AD (VIM: F2,850 = 5.216, p = 0.006, η2 = 0.01), such that systolic blood pressure variability was elevated in biomarker-confirmed dementia due to AD relative to cognitively normal participants (p = 0.005) and in biomarker-confirmed mild cognitive impairment due to AD compared to cognitively normal participants (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Long-term systolic blood pressure variability is elevated in cognitive impairment due to AD. Blood pressure variability may represent an understudied aspect of vascular dysfunction in AD with potential clinical implications.

Long-term effects (>24 months) of multiple lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors among high risk subjects: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Bergum ◽  
I Sandven ◽  
TO Klemsdal
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Total Cholesterol ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
Lifestyle Intervention ◽  
Small Study ◽  
Long Term Effects

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): The Norwegian health department Background The evidence of the long-term effects of multiple lifestyle intervention on cardiovascular risk is uncertain. We aimed to summarize the evidence from randomized clinical trials examining the efficacy of lifestyle intervention on major cardiovascular risk factors in subjects at high cardiovascular risk. Methods  Eligible trials investigated the impact of lifestyle intervention versus usual care with minimum 24 months follow-up, reporting more than one major cardiovascular risk factor. A literature search updated April 15, 2020 identified 12 eligible studies. The results from individual trials were combined using fixed and random effect models, using the standardized mean difference (SMD) to estimate effect sizes. Small-study effect was evaluated, and heterogeneity between studies examined by subgroup and meta-regression analyses considering patient- and study-level variables. Results  Small-study effect was not identified. Lifestyle intervention reduced systolic blood pressure modestly with an estimated SMD of -0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.21 to -0.04, with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 59%), corresponding to a mean difference of approximately 2 mmHg (MD = -1.86, 95% CI: -3.14 to -0.57, p = 0.0046). This effect disappeared in the subgroup of trials judged at low risk of bias (SMD = 0.02, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.11). For the outcome total cholesterol SMD was -0.06, 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.00, with no heterogeneity (I² = 0%), indicating no effect of the intervention. Conclusion  Lifestyle intervention resulted in only a modest effect on systolic blood pressure and no effect on total cholesterol after 24 months. Further lifestyle trials should consider the challenge of maintaining larger long-term benefits to ensure impact on cardiovascular outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document