scholarly journals P079 (0070) GERMAN EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINE UPDATE ON DIAGNOSIS, THERAPY AND FOLLOW-UP OF ADULT HODGKIN LYMPHOMA PATIENTS

HemaSphere ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (S3) ◽  
pp. 31-32
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Evidence Based Guideline ◽  
Diagnosis Therapy

A Dutch nationwide survivorship care program for Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
Flora Van Leeuwen ◽  
Mars van 't Veer ◽  
Berthe M.P. Aleman ◽  
Nicky Dekker ◽  
John M. M. Raemaekers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Survivorship Care Plan ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Nationwide Database ◽  
Follow Up Care

6 Background: Survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are at increased risk of various late adverse effects of treatment, leading to substantial excess morbidity and mortality. Long-term follow-up care programs have been established for childhood cancer survivors, but not yet for HL survivors. The Dutch BETER consortium (Better care after Hodgkin lymphoma: Evaluation of long-term Treatment Effects and screening Recommendations) has developed a nationwide infrastructure for Survivorship Care Clinics for HL survivors. The consortium aims to: 1) establish follow-up guidelines for survivors; 2) identify survivors eligible for follow-up care; 3) educate survivors about late adverse treatment effects; and 4) provide risk-based care. Methods: Evidence-based follow-up guidelines were developed according to international standards. The guideline development group consisted of clinicians, methodological experts and patient representatives. To be eligible for follow-up care patients must have survived ≥ 5 yrs and have been treated at ages 15-70 years after 1969. Survivors were identified through the Netherlands Cancer Registry and hospital-based registries. Tracing of current addresses was done through the nationwide database of Municipal Offices. Results: We developed guidelines forsecond malignancies, cardiovascular disease, thyroid disease, osteoporosis and functional asplenia infection prophylaxis. Recommendations are given for fertility care and therapy for neck muscle weakness. We have identified and traced a cohort of 12,000 HL survivors in 23 centers, covering about 80% of HL patients in the Netherlands, of whom 8,500 appear to be eligible for follow-up care. For all survivors, treatment data were collected from the medical records to provide risk-based screening recommendations. A website and a survivorship care plan were developed to educate survivors about late effects. A nationwide database, including screening and adverse events data, is in development to evaluate the follow-up guidelines for diagnostic value and efficacy. Conclusions: We expect that the BETER project will improve healthy life expectancy of HL survivors. Evaluation of follow-up care will lead to a more evidence-based follow-up program.

scholarly journals Pancreatic cancer.Evidence based management guidelines of the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group

2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (8) ◽  
pp. 326-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richárd Szmola ◽  
Gyula Farkas ◽  
Péter Hegyi ◽  
László Czakó ◽  
Zsolt Dubravcsik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Management Guidelines ◽  
International Guidelines ◽  
Evidence Based Guideline ◽  
Cancer Network

Pancreatic cancer is a disease with a poor prognosis usually diagnosed at a late stage. Therefore, screening, diagnosis, treatment and palliation of pancreatic cancer patients require up-to-date and evidence based management guidelines. The Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group proposed to prepare an evidence based guideline based on the available scientific evidence and international guidelines. The preparatory and consultation board appointed by the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group translated and complemented/modified the recent international guidelines. 37 clinical statements in 10 major topics were defined (Risk factors and genetics, Screening, Diagnosis, Staging, Surgical care, Pathology, Systemic treatment, Radiation therapy, Palliation and supportive care, Follow-up and recurrence). Evidence was graded according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) grading system. The draft of the guideline was presented and discussed at the consensus meeting in September 12, 2014. Statements were accepted with either total (more than 95% of votes, n = 15) or strong agreement (more than 70% of votes, n = 22). The present guideline is the first evidence based pancreatic cancer guideline in Hungary that provides a solid ground for teaching purposes, offers quick reference in everyday patient care and guides patient financing options. The authors strongly believe that these guidelines will become a standard reference for pancreatic cancer treatment in Hungary. Orv. Hetil., 2015, 156(8), 326–339.

scholarly journals Basosquamous Carcinoma: A Single Centre Clinicopathological Evaluation and Proposal of an Evidence-Based Protocol

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan W. Oldbury ◽  
Richard A. J. Wain ◽  
Sameera Abas ◽  
Christopher M. Dobson ◽  
Srinivasan S. Iyer
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Metastatic Potential ◽  
Specific Information ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Skin Malignancy ◽  
Included Patient ◽  
Excision Margins ◽  
Evidence Based Guideline

Basosquamous carcinoma (BSC) is an uncommon skin malignancy with significant invasive and metastatic potential. There are currently no clear management guidelines. This study evaluates the management and outcomes of patients diagnosed with BSC over a 7-year period. We present an evidence-based unit protocol for the management of BSC. All patients treated for BSC between 2009 and 2015 were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, tumour-specific information, management strategy, presence of recurrence or metastasis, and details of follow-up. 74 patients were identified, making this one of the largest cohorts of BSC patients reported. Mean age at diagnosis was 75.4 years, with a male:female ratio of 1.6:1. The most common tumour site was the head and neck (n=43, 58.1%). All tumours were graded at pT1 (n=51) or pT2 (n=23). Inadequate excision occurred in 17 patients (23%). Mean excision margins were >4mm peripherally and deep. Inadequately excised BSCs were further treated with wide local excision (n=6) or radiotherapy (n=5), or both (n=1). There were no cases of local recurrence or metastatic disease. This study demonstrates a cohort of patients with BSCs that appear less aggressive than previously reported. Current management with surgical excision appears to produce adequate results. However, an evidence-based guideline is still lacking.

Interdisciplinary Evidence-Based Guideline for Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4230-4230
Author(s):  
Michaela Rancea ◽  
Andreas Engert ◽  
Peter Borchmann ◽  
Bastian von Tresckow ◽  
Teresa Halbsguth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Strong Consensus ◽  
Evidence Based Guideline

Abstract Abstract 4230 Background: Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) is one of the most common malignancies in young adults and has become curable for the majority of patients even in advanced stage. Nowadays, the main challenges are to develop strategies that decrease secondary malignancies and mortality, as well as to retain fertility after treatment. So far, there is no national or international evidence-based guideline giving recommendations for clinical practice in the treatment of HL patients. For this reason, various medical societies, clinical experts from the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) and methodological experts from the Cochrane Haematological Malignancies Group (CHMG) have developed and consented a clinical practice guideline to improve and standardize diagnosis, treatment and follow-up for HL patients. This project was funded by the German Program for Guidelines in Oncology Implementation. Aims: To emphasize the clinically most relevant guideline recommendations related to diagnostics, treatment and follow-up of adult HL patients. Methods: Randomized controlled trials, systeamtic reviews, cohort studies and specific sensitive data included from systematic literature searches in CENTRAL and MEDLINE were appraised for quality and summarized in evidence tables. Based on these tables and trials, guideline authors generated high quality clinical recommendation in an intensive collaboration with the methodological experts clinical experts from different multi-interdisciplinary working-groups. During the final consensus conference, a total of 160 evidence-based recommendations were consented. Results: There is a strong consensus that all patients should be treated within a clinical trial. Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for all stages of HL. The histological diagnosis should be confirmed by a reference pathologist. For early favorable stages, two cycles of ABVD followed by involved-field radiotherapy (IF-RT) at 20 Gy are strongly recommended; early unfavorable stages should be treated with 2 cycles of BEACOPP escalated followed by 2 cycles of ABVD and IF-RT of 30 Gy; for advanced stages six cycles of BEACOPP escalated followed by 30 Gy radiotherapy on PET-positive residual mass ≥ 2cm is strongly recommended. It is also recommended that patients with relapses or refractory disease, and without severe co-morbidities, receive autologous stem cell transplantation, but not myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Additionally, treatment options of subgroups, such as nodular lymphocyte predominant HL, elderly patients or those with co-morbidities such as HIV, are specified in this guideline. The additional benefit of PET remains uncertain as of the lack of high-quality evidence, therefore different recommendations have been provided for staging, interim and follow-up evaluations. It is highly important that health care professionals discuss aspects of fertility protection with female and male patients before starting any treatment. Options for preserving fertility in women have to be adopted to treatment intensity. For male patients, it is recommended to cyropreserve sperm cells before starting the therapy, independently of treatment intensity. There is strong consensus that patients have to prevent to conceive a child during treatment. Health-care professionals should encourage patients to exercise and should discuss potential harms of complementary medicine with the patient. Due to their immunomudulating effect, it is not recommended to take mistletoes at any time. It is strongly recommended to motivate patients to give up smoking, due to the strong associated increased risk of secondary tumors, especially bronchial carcinoma. Structured follow-up care should be provided and should in particular detect relapses, long-term organ toxicities and secondary malignancies. Summary/Conclusions: The first evidence-based guideline on the treatment of patients with HL translates scientific evidence and expert knowledge into precise recommendations for these patients into clinical practice. In addition to this clinical value, the guideline will enable healthcare professionals to improve patient information and quality management. Disclosures: Engert: Takeda, Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding. Borchmann:Millenium The Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding, Travel Grants Other. von Tresckow:Millenium The Takeda Oncology Company: Honoraria, Travel Grants Other.

scholarly journals Interdisciplinary Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Patients with Endometrial Cancer. Guideline (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Nummer 032/034-OL, April 2018) – Part 1 with Recommendations on the Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnosis and Hereditary Factors of Endometrial Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (10) ◽  
pp. 949-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günter Emons ◽  
Eric Steiner ◽  
Dirk Vordermark ◽  
Christoph Uleer ◽  
Nina Bock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Gynecological Cancer ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
S3 Guideline ◽  
Hereditary Factors ◽  
Diagnosis Therapy

Abstract Summary The first German interdisciplinary S3-guideline on the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of patients with endometrial cancer was published in April 2018. Funded by German Cancer Aid as part of an Oncology Guidelines Program, the lead coordinators of the guideline were the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) of the German Cancer Society (DKG). Purpose The use of evidence-based, risk-adapted therapy to treat low-risk women with endometrial cancer avoids unnecessarily radical surgery and non-useful adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. This can significantly reduce therapy-induced morbidity and improve the patientʼs quality of life as well as avoiding unnecessary costs. For women with endometrial cancer and a high risk of recurrence, the guideline defines the optimal surgical radicality together with the appropriate chemotherapy and/or adjuvant radiotherapy where required. The evidence-based optimal use of different therapeutic modalities should improve survival rates and the quality of life of these patients. The S3-guideline on endometrial cancer is intended as a basis for certified gynecological cancer centers. The aim is that the quality indicators established in this guideline will be incorporated in the certification processes of these centers. Methods The guideline was compiled in accordance with the requirements for S3-level guidelines. This includes, in the first instance, the adaptation of source guidelines selected using the DELBI instrument for appraising guidelines. Other consulted sources include reviews of evidence which were compiled from literature selected during systematic searches of literature databases using the PICO scheme. In addition, an external biostatistics institute was commissioned to carry out a systematic search and assessment of the literature for one area of the guideline. The identified materials were used by the interdisciplinary working groups to develop suggestions for Recommendations and Statements, which were then modified during structured consensus conferences and/or additionally amended online using the DELPHI method with consent being reached online. The guideline report is freely available online. Recommendations Part 1 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations on epidemiology, screening, diagnosis and hereditary factors, The epidemiology of endometrial cancer and the risk factors for developing endomentrial cancer are presented. The options for screening and the methods used to diagnose endometrial cancer including the pathology of the cancer are outlined. Recommendations are given for the prevention, diagnosis, and therapy of hereditary forms of endometrial cancer.

scholarly journals Interdisciplinary Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Patients with Endometrial Cancer. Guideline (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/034-OL, April 2018) – Part 2 with Recommendations on the Therapy and Follow-up of Endometrial Cancer, Palliative Care, Psycho-oncological/Psychosocial Care/Rehabilitation/Patient Information and Healthcare Facilities

2018 ◽  
Vol 78 (11) ◽  
pp. 1089-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Günter Emons ◽  
Eric Steiner ◽  
Dirk Vordermark ◽  
Christoph Uleer ◽  
Nina Bock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Patient Information ◽  
Adjuvant Radiotherapy ◽  
Psychosocial Care ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
S3 Guideline ◽  
Diagnosis Therapy

Abstract Summary The first German interdisciplinary S3-guideline on the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of patients with endometrial cancer was published in April 2018. Funded by German Cancer Aid as part of an Oncology Guidelines Program, the lead coordinators of the guideline were the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) of the German Cancer Society (DKG). Purpose Using evidence-based, risk-adapted therapy to treat low-risk women with endometrial cancer avoids unnecessarily radical surgery and non-useful adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. This can significantly reduce therapy-induced morbidity and improve the patientʼs quality of life as well as avoiding unnecessary costs. For women with endometrial cancer and a high risk of recurrence, the guideline defines the optimal extent of surgical radicality together with the appropriate chemotherapy and/or adjuvant radiotherapy if required. An evidence-based optimal use of different therapeutic modalities should improve the survival rates and quality of life of these patients. This S3-guideline on endometrial cancer is intended as a basis for certified gynecological cancer centers. The aim is that the quality indicators established in this guideline will be incorporated in the certification processes of these centers. Methods The guideline was compiled in accordance with the requirements for S3-level guidelines. This includes, in the first instance, the adaptation of source guidelines selected using the DELBI instrument for appraising guidelines. Other consulted sources included reviews of evidence, which were compiled from literature selected during systematic searches of literature databases using the PICO scheme. In addition, an external biostatistics institute was commissioned to carry out a systematic search and assessment of the literature for one part of the guideline. Identified materials were used by the interdisciplinary working groups to develop suggestions for Recommendations and Statements, which were then subsequently modified during structured consensus conferences and/or additionally amended online using the DELPHI method, with consent between members achieved online. The guideline report is freely available online. Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents recommendations for the therapy of endometrial cancer including precancers and early endometrial cancer as well as recommendations on palliative medicine, psycho-oncology, rehabilitation, patient information and healthcare facilities to treat endometrial cancer. The management of precancers of early endometrial precancerous conditions including fertility-preserving strategies is presented. The concept used for surgical primary therapy of endometrial cancer is described. Radiotherapy and adjuvant medical therapy to treat endometrial cancer and uterine carcinosarcomas are described. Recommendations are given for the follow-up care of endometrial cancer, recurrence and metastasis. Palliative medicine, psycho-oncology including psychosocial care, and patient information and rehabilitation are presented. Finally, the care algorithm and quality assurance steps for the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of patients with endometrial cancer are outlined.

Uveal Melanoma – Standardised Procedure in Diagnosis, Therapy and Surveillance

2021 ◽  
Vol 238 (07) ◽  
pp. 761-772
Author(s):  
Nikolaos E. Bechrakis ◽  
Norbert Bornfeld ◽  
Ludwig M. Heindl ◽  
Nicole Skoetz ◽  
Serge Leyvraz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Uveal Melanoma ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Standard Operating Procedure ◽  
Multistage Process ◽  
Consensus Process ◽  
Standard Operating ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Evidence Based Guideline ◽  
Diagnosis Therapy

Abstract Background Uveal melanoma is a rare intraocular tumour, for which there is currently no national evidence-based guideline in Germany. The aim of this project was to provide a common standard operating procedure (SOP) for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up care of uveal melanoma, within the network of German leading oncology centres funded by German Cancer Aid. The SOP was created as part of a moderated consensus process. Results and Conclusion In a multistage process, a common SOP was developed for the diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of uveal melanoma, as based on current knowledge of the subject.

What Does Evidence-Based Practice Mean to You? A Follow-Up Study Examining School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists' Perspectives on Evidence-Based Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 688-704
Author(s):  
Katrina Fulcher-Rood ◽  
Anny Castilla-Earls ◽  
Jeff Higginbotham
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
School Based ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Ebp Implementation

Purpose The current investigation is a follow-up from a previous study examining child language diagnostic decision making in school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs). The purpose of this study was to examine the SLPs' perspectives regarding the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) in their clinical work. Method Semistructured phone interviews were conducted with 25 school-based SLPs who previously participated in an earlier study by Fulcher-Rood et al. 2018). SLPs were asked questions regarding their definition of EBP, the value of research evidence, contexts in which they implement scientific literature in clinical practice, and the barriers to implementing EBP. Results SLPs' definitions of EBP differed from current definitions, in that SLPs only included the use of research findings. SLPs seem to discuss EBP as it relates to treatment and not assessment. Reported barriers to EBP implementation were insufficient time, limited funding, and restrictions from their employment setting. SLPs found it difficult to translate research findings to clinical practice. SLPs implemented external research evidence when they did not have enough clinical expertise regarding a specific client or when they needed scientific evidence to support a strategy they used. Conclusions SLPs appear to use EBP for specific reasons and not for every clinical decision they make. In addition, SLPs rely on EBP for treatment decisions and not for assessment decisions. Educational systems potentially present other challenges that need to be considered for EBP implementation. Considerations for implementation science and the research-to-practice gap are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document