Decreasing the Surgical Stress Response and an Initial Experience from the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Colorectal Surgery Program at an Academic Institution

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 163-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anathea C. Powell ◽  
Matthias Stopfkuchen-Evans ◽  
Richard D. Urman ◽  
Ronald Bleday
Author(s):  
I.V. KYSELOVA ◽  
A.V. BILIAIEV

Surgical stress response, fluid and nutritional balance, and pain management are among the key factors influencing on the postoperative period. These areas are reflected in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) concept, which is based on a set of measures aimed at minimizing the surgical stress response. The lack of ERAS recommendations for the pediatric population of surgical patients prompts to search for a solution of adaptation and implementation of the ERAS programs in children. The aim of the study. To determine the effectiveness of the complex application of the enhanced recovery after surgery by studying its influence on the factors of the surgical stress response in pediatric patients undergoing limp surgery. Materials and methods. The prospective randomized study included 47 patients aged 1 to 17 years. In the study group (n = 22), the ERAS program was used, which consisted of 14 components of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative measures. In the control group (n = 25), the complex of all ERAS components was not purposefully applied. We compared glycaemic stress index (GSI) and length of hospital stay after surgery (LOS) as a primary outcome; secondary outcomes were fasting time after drinking fluids before induction of anesthesia, estimated fluid deficiency just before induction of anesthesia, hemodynamic parameters, the need for opioids during and after surgery, blood glucose and beta-hydroxybutyrate in the beginning and in the end of the surgery and next day morning after surgery, postoperative nausea and vomiting. Results. GSI was significantly less in the study group (1,62 ± 0,78 vs 2,12 ± 0,93, р=0,046). LOS in the study group was 37.5% less than in the control group (p = 0.002). The period of preoperative fasting and fluid deficit in the patients of the study group were shorter. The needs of fentanyl intraoperatively in the study group was 47% less (p<0.001). At the beginning of surgery, the study group had a higher blood glucose concentration and a higher systolic blood pressure. At the end of surgery, blood glucose and beta-hydroxybutyrate in the study group was lower than in the control group. In the postoperative period, 9% of patients in the study group and 36% of patients in the control group complained of nausea (p = 0.041). Linear regression analysis showed a linear relationship between the LOS after surgery and the GSI (R=0,515, R2=0,266, B=2,156, 95% CI 1,04 – 3,27, p<0,001). Results. The implementation of the ERAS program to children 1-17 years old undergoing elective limp surgery may reduce the effect of the surgical stress reaction by reducing the period of preoperative fasting, fluid deficiency, the needs of opioids and postoperative nausea. Minimizing the surgical stress response may facilitate the achievement of hospital discharge criteria and shorten the length of hospital stay in the postoperative period.


2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (9) ◽  
pp. 345-349

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) concept is a complex of strategies intended to reduce the perioperative stress response and achieve faster postoperative convalescence and rapid recovery of normal physiological functions. Adherence to ERAS should reduce the length of stay and postoperative complications, and it should improve the physical condition of the patient after dimission. This article is focused on those ERAS guidelines that apply to preadmission care.


Chirurgia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacopo Crippa ◽  
Gulio M. Mari ◽  
Angelo Miranda ◽  
Andrea T.M. Costanzi ◽  
Dario Maggioni

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Ripollés-Melchor ◽  
José M. Ramírez-Rodríguez ◽  
Rubén Casans-Francés ◽  
César Aldecoa ◽  
Ane Abad-Motos ◽  
...  

BJS Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Gonvers ◽  
J Jurt ◽  
G -R Joliat ◽  
N Halkic ◽  
E Melloul ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The clinical and economic impacts of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes have been demonstrated extensively. Whether ERAS protocols also have a biological effect remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the biological impact of an ERAS programme in patients undergoing liver surgery. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing liver surgery (2010–2018) was undertaken. Patients operated before and after ERAS implementation in 2013 were compared. Surrogate markers of surgical stress were monitored: white blood cell count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, albumin concentration, and haematocrit. Their perioperative fluctuations were defined as Δvalues, calculated on postoperative day (POD) 0 for Δalbumin and Δhaematocrit and POD 2 for ΔWBC and ΔCRP. Results A total of 541 patients were included, with 223 and 318 patients in non-ERAS and ERAS groups respectively. Groups were comparable, except for higher rates of laparoscopy (24.8 versus 11.2 per cent; P &lt; 0.001) and major resection (47.5 versus 38.1 per cent; P = 0.035) in the ERAS group. Patients in the ERAS group showed attenuated ΔWBC (2.00 versus 2.75 g/l; P = 0.013), ΔCRP (60 versus 101 mg/l; P &lt;0.001) and Δalbumin (12 versus 16 g/l; P &lt; 0.001) compared with those in the no-ERAS group. Subgroup analysis of open resection showed similar results. Multivariable analysis identified ERAS as the only independent factor associated with high ΔWBC (odds ratio (OR) 0.65, 95 per cent c.i. 0.43 to 0.98; P = 0.038), ΔCRP (OR 0.41, 0.23 to 0.73; P = 0.003) and Δalbumin (OR 0.40, 95 per cent c.i. 0.22 to 0.72; P = 0.002). Conclusion Compared with conventional management, implementation of ERAS was associated with an attenuated stress response in patients undergoing liver surgery.


Author(s):  
Oliver J. Harrison ◽  
Neil J. Smart ◽  
Paul White ◽  
Adela Brigic ◽  
Elinor R. Carlisle ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan C. Gómez-Izquierdo ◽  
Alessandro Trainito ◽  
David Mirzakandov ◽  
Barry L. Stein ◽  
Sender Liberman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Inadequate perioperative fluid therapy impairs gastrointestinal function. Studies primarily evaluating the impact of goal-directed fluid therapy on primary postoperative ileus are missing. The objective of this study was to determine whether goal-directed fluid therapy reduces the incidence of primary postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program. Methods Randomized patient and assessor-blind controlled trial conducted in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program. Patients were assigned randomly to receive intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy (goal-directed fluid therapy group) or fluid therapy based on traditional principles (control group). Primary postoperative ileus was the primary outcome. Results One hundred twenty-eight patients were included and analyzed (goal-directed fluid therapy group: n = 64; control group: n = 64). The incidence of primary postoperative ileus was 22% in the goal-directed fluid therapy and 22% in the control group (relative risk, 1; 95% CI, 0.5 to 1.9; P = 1.00). Intraoperatively, patients in the goal-directed fluid therapy group received less intravenous fluids (mainly less crystalloids) but a greater volume of colloids. The increase of stroke volume and cardiac output was more pronounced and sustained in the goal-directed fluid therapy group. Length of hospital stay, 30-day postoperative morbidity, and mortality were not different. Conclusions Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy compared with fluid therapy based on traditional principles does not reduce primary postoperative ileus in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the context of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program. Its previously demonstrated benefits might have been offset by advancements in perioperative care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document