scholarly journals Validation of the Berlin Questionnaire and American Society of Anesthesiologists Checklist as Screening Tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Surgical Patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 108 (5) ◽  
pp. 822-830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Chung ◽  
Balaji Yegneswaran ◽  
Pu Liao ◽  
Sharon A. Chung ◽  
Santhira Vairavanathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Berlin Questionnaire ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
Stop Questionnaire

Background Because of the high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and its adverse impact on perioperative outcome, a practical screening tool for surgical patients is required. This study was conducted to validate the Berlin questionnaire and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) checklist in surgical patients and to compare them with the STOP questionnaire. Methods After hospital ethics approval, preoperative patients aged 18 yr or older and without previously diagnosed OSA were recruited. The scores from the Berlin questionnaire, ASA checklist, and STOP questionnaire were evaluated versus the apnea-hypopnea index from in-laboratory polysomnography. The perioperative data were collected through chart review. Results Of 2,467 screened patients, 33, 27, and 28% were respectively classified as being at high risk of OSA by the Berlin questionnaire, ASA checklist, and STOP questionnaire. The performance of the screening tools was evaluated in 177 patients who underwent polysomnography. The sensitivities of the Berlin questionnaire, ASA checklist, and STOP questionnaire were 68.9-87.2, 72.1-87.2, and 65.6-79.5% at different apnea-hypopnea index cutoffs. There was no significant difference between the three screening tools in the predictive parameters. The patients with an apnea-hypopnea index greater than 5 and the patients identified as being at high risk of OSA by the STOP questionnaire or ASA checklist had a significantly increased incidence of postoperative complications. Conclusions Similar to the STOP questionnaire, the Berlin questionnaire and ASA checklist demonstrated a moderately high level of sensitivity for OSA screening. The STOP questionnaire and the ASA checklist were able to identify the patients who were likely to develop postoperative complications.

Abstract 41: Stroke Unit Evaluation of Sleep Apnea: Validity of Screening Tools and Use of a Portable Sleep Study

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo J Aparicio ◽  
Tudor Sturzoiu ◽  
Helena W Lau ◽  
Judith Clark ◽  
Julie Grimes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Central Sleep Apnea ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Berlin Questionnaire ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Sleep Study ◽  
Obstructive Sleep

Background: Despite high prevalence in the stroke population, sleep apnea is underdiagnosed. Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes and treatment with continuous positive airway pressure has been shown to lower blood pressure. No standard exists for screening patients who present to the hospital with acute stroke. We assessed three screening tools, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Berlin Questionnaire (BQ), and STOP-BANG Questionnaire (STOP-BANG), along with the use of a portable sleep study device for evaluation of sleep apnea. Overnight polysomnography (PSG) was performed on a subset of patients on outpatient follow up. Methods: Patients admitted to the stroke unit at our hospital, over nine months, were screened for sleep apnea using the three instruments, ESS, BQ, and STOP-BANG. The patients were evaluated with a portable sleep study device, ApneaLink Air (ResMed, USA), prior to discharge. Respiratory effort, respiratory flow, pulse oximetry, and oxygen saturation were recorded and sleep apnea was determined by apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5. Predictions from the screening tools were compared to the portable sleep study and overnight PSG results. Sensitivity and specificity testing were used to assess the validity and reliability of the tools. Results: Sleep questionnaires were administered on 37 patients who underwent an overnight sleep study. Portable studies were used to evaluate 33 patients, and 13 PSGs were performed. Obstructive sleep apnea was diagnosed in 20 (69%) and central sleep apnea in 9 (31%). Cheyne-Stokes pattern breathing was observed in 2 (5%). Mean AHI was 18.3 + 21.8/hr and maximum AHI was 105.8/hr. Sensitivity for the ESS, BQ, and STOP-BANG were 0.39, 0.66, and 0.83 and specificity for these tools were 0.26, 0.33, and 0.29, respectively. In patients who underwent the portable sleep study and overnight PSG, 9/10 (90%) of the studies were concordant. Conclusions: The STOP-BANG questionnaire, administered to hospitalized stroke patients, had high sensitivity and low-moderate specificity in our study, compared to two other commonly used screening tools. Further, the feasibility of using an unattended inpatient portable sleep study on stroke inpatients is demonstrated.

scholarly journals Cardiorespiratory Polygraphy for Detection of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiel Delesie ◽  
Lieselotte Knaepen ◽  
Johan Verbraecken ◽  
Karolien Weytjens ◽  
Paul Dendale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Apnea Hypopnea Index ◽  
Automated Algorithm ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
At Home

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a modifiable risk factor of atrial fibrillation (AF) but is underdiagnosed in these patients due to absence of good OSA screening pathways. Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for diagnosing OSA but too resource-intensive as a screening tool. We explored whether cardiorespiratory polygraphy (PG) devices using an automated algorithm for Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) determination can meet the requirements of a good screening tool in AF patients.Methods: This prospective study validated the performance of three PGs [ApneaLink Air (ALA), SOMNOtouch RESP (STR) and SpiderSAS (SpS)] in consecutive AF patients who were referred for PSG evaluation. Patients wore one of the three PGs simultaneously with PSG, and a different PG during each of three consecutive nights at home. Severity of OSA was classified according to the AHI during PSG (<5 = no OSA, 5–14 = mild, 15–30 = moderate, >30 = severe).Results: Of the 100 included AF patients, PSG diagnosed at least moderate in 69% and severe OSA in 33%. Successful PG execution at home was obtained in 79.1, 80.2 and 86.8% of patients with the ALA, STR and SpS, respectively. For the detection of clinically relevant OSA (AHI ≥ 15), an area under the curve of 0.802, 0.772 and 0.803 was calculated for the ALA, STR and SpS, respectively.Conclusions: This study indicates that home-worn PGs with an automated AHI algorithm can be used as OSA screening tools in AF patients. Based on an appropriate AHI cut-off value for each PG, the device can guide referral for definite PSG diagnosis.

The importance of screening questionnaires in detecting the severity of obstructive sleep apnea

2021 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-81
Author(s):  
Šárka Solecká ◽  
Jan Betka ◽  
Karel Matler ◽  
Hana Tomášková
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index ◽  
Neck Circumference ◽  
Berlin Questionnaire ◽  
Hip Circumference ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Screening Questionnaires ◽  
Stop Questionnaire

ntroduction: The aim of this study is to compare the importance of screening questionnaires and risk factors in detecting the severity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Methods: The study included 47 patients with suspected OSA. The patients completed 5 screening questionnaires – the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the STOP BANG questionnaire, the STOP questionnaire, the Berlin questionnaire (BQ) and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Subsequently, they were examined by the limited polygraphy. AHI (number of apneas/ hypopneas per 1 hour), t90 desaturation (percentage of sleep time spent in desaturations below 90%) and ODI (number of desaturations ≥ 3% within 1 hour) were compared with questionnaire scores and selected risk factors for OSA (BMI, male gender, hypertension, age, neck circumference, abdominal circumference and abdominal/ hip circumference ratio). Results: The achieved score of any of the monitored questionnaires does not correlate with the value of AHI. BQ, STOP and STOP BANG questionnaires have the relatively highest sensitivity for OSA detection, while the sensitivity of PSQI and ESS is low. The correlation of the ESS, STOP BANG and BQ scores with the t90 desaturation, as well as the ESS and STOP BANG scores with the ODI is statistically signifi cant. The relationship of any of the selected risk factors with the AHI value has not been demonstrated. Desaturation values of t90 and ODI correlated best with BMI, neck circumference and abdominal/ hip circumference ratio. Conclusion: None of the monitored questionnaires is suitable for determining the severity of OSA, it is always necessary to perform a polygraphic or polysomnographic examination of sleep. BQ and STOPBANG are relatively most suitable for OSA screening. They both have high sensitivity and, at the same time, their score correlates with the value of nocturnal hypoxemia. Parameters measuring nocturnal hypoxemia (t90 desaturation, ODI) correlate better with risk factors than AHI. The most important parameters associated with hypoxemia are BMI, neck circumference and abdominal/ hip circumference ratio and it is appropriate to include them in the screening for OSA. Keywords: obstructive sleep apnea – Berlin questionnaire – STOP-Bang questionnaire – STOP questionnaire – Epworth sleepiness scale – Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

scholarly journals High risk for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with acute myocardial infarction

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 797-805
Author(s):  
Carla Renata Silva Andrechuk ◽  
Maria Filomena Ceolim
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Berlin Questionnaire ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Modifiable Factors ◽  
Tertiary Teaching ◽  
Clinical Worsening

Objectives: to stratify the risk for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with acute myocardial infarction, treated at a public, tertiary, teaching hospital of the state of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify related sociodemographic and clinical factors.Method: cross-sectional analytical study with 113 patients (mean age 59.57 years, 70.8% male). A specific questionnaire was used for the sociodemographic and clinical characterization and the Berlin Questionnaire for the stratification of the risk of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.Results: the prevalence of high risk was 60.2% and the outcome of clinical worsening during hospitalization was more frequent among these patients. The factors related to high risk were body mass index over 30 kg/m2, arterial hypertension and waist circumference indicative of cardiovascular risk, while older age (60 years and over) constituted a protective factor.Conclusion: considering the high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea and its relation to clinical worsening, it is suggested that nurses should monitor, in their clinical practice, people at high risk for this syndrome, guiding control measures of modifiable factors and aiming to prevent the associated complications, including worsening of cardiovascular diseases.

High Risk for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Truck Drivers Estimated by the Berlin Questionnaire: Prevalence and Associated Factors

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 871-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. R. C. Moreno ◽  
F. A. Carvalho ◽  
C. Lorenzi ◽  
L. S. Matuzaki ◽  
S. Prezotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Truck Drivers ◽  
Berlin Questionnaire ◽  
Obstructive Sleep
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document