The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Surgical Stages I-II Serous and Clear Cell Carcinomas and Carcinosarcoma of the Endometrium: A Collaborative Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 332-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Vandenput ◽  
Jone Trovik ◽  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
Philippe Moerman ◽  
Karin Leunen ◽  
...  

Objective:To assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in early surgically staged type II endometrial cancer (serous [S], clear cell carcinoma [CC]) and carcinosarcomas (CS) on recurrence and survival.Materials and Methods:Patients diagnosed with stages I-II S-CC and CS after comprehensive surgical staging were retrospectively collected. Surgical staging was defined as pelvic lymphadenectomy of more than 11 nodes harvested and exploration of the upper abdomen, with our without omentectomy. Groups with (group A) and without (group B) platinum-based chemotherapy were compared.Results:We identified 69 patients with a mean age of 66 years (range, 48-88 years). Both groups showed similar baseline characteristics. Group A consisted of 34 patients (23 S-CC, 11 CS) with 10 (29%) recurrences outside the pelvis (7 S-CC, 3 CS). Group B included 35 patients (28 S-CC, 7 CS) of which 10 (29%) developed recurrence outside the pelvis (7 S-CC, 3 CS). The median recurrence-free survival was 22 months (range, 13-51 months) for group A versus 10 months (range, 1-59 months) for group B (P= 0.437). Five patients (15%) of group A and 9 (26%) of group B died of disease after a median follow-up of 29 months (range, 20-59 months) and 17 months (range, 4-64 months), respectively (P= 0.168).Conclusion:Recurrences in early-stage type II endometrial cancer and carcinosarcomas occur irrespective of adjuvant chemotherapy, but recurrence-free survival is prolonged when adjuvant chemotherapy is administered. Only prospective randomized intergroup trials can address the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1143-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika Mizuno ◽  
Hiroaki Kajiyama ◽  
Kiyosumi Shibata ◽  
Kimio Mizuno ◽  
Osamu Yamamuro ◽  
...  

BackgroundIt is controversial whether patients with stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. This study was designed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes associated with the inclusion or exclusion of adjuvant therapy in these patients.MethodsA total of 185 patients who were treated for stage I CCC between 1991 and 2007 were retrospectively evaluated. All of the patients had received comprehensive surgical staging, and their condition had been diagnosed by a central pathological review system. Only one patient with stage IB was excluded from this study.ResultsMedian follow-up time was 62 months (range 7–191 months). Median age was 52 years (30–75 years). There were 41, 93, and 50 patients in stage IA, intraoperative capsule ruptured IC (rupture-IC), and all other-IC groups, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for the substage were 97.6%, 87.8%, and 70.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. Among 134 patients consisting of those in the stage IA and rupture-IC groups, 91 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and 43 patients did not (non-AC). There was no significant survival difference in each substage group between the non-AC and AC groups in 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (stage IA, 100% vs 93.8%; rupture-IC, 94.1% vs 86.6%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that there was no significant prognostic factor for both recurrence and survival among the IA and rupture-IC groups. Postoperative therapy, regimen, and chemotherapy cycles were not significantly affected.ConclusionsThis study indicates that adjuvant chemotherapy does not contribute to the improving prognosis of stage IA ovarian CCC. Whereas the histological type is CCC, the routine adjuvant chemotherapy after comprehensive surgical staging may be unnecessary for patients with at least stage IA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-544
Author(s):  
Francesco Multinu ◽  
Simone Garzon ◽  
Amy L Weaver ◽  
Michaela E. McGree ◽  
Enrico Sartori ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe role of adjuvant chemotherapy as an addition or alternative to radiotherapy for early-stage high-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage high-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer.MethodsWe identified patients with stage I or II endometrioid grade 2 or 3 endometrial cancer with myometrial invasion >50% and negative lymph nodes after pelvic with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy at four institutions (USA and Italy). Associations between chemotherapy and cause-specific and recurrence-free survival were assessed with Cox proportional hazards models. Hematogenous, peritoneal, and lymphatic recurrences were defined as 'non-vaginal'.ResultsWe identified 329 patients of mean (SD) age 66.4 (9.8) years. The median follow-up among those alive was 84 (IQR 44–133) months. The 5-year cause-specific survival was 86.1% (95% CI 82.0% to 90.4%) and the 5-year recurrence-free survival was 82.2% (95% CI 77.9% to 86.8%). Stage II (vs stage IB) was associated with poorer cause-specific and recurrence-free survival. A total of 58 (90.6%) of 64 patients who had chemotherapy had 4–6 cycles of platinum-based regimen. In adjusted analysis, we did not observe a statistically significant improvement in cause-specific survival (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.11 to 1.03; p=0.06) or non-vaginal recurrence-free survival (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.12 to 1.08; p=0.07) with adjuvant chemotherapy. Sixteen of 18 lymphatic recurrences (88.9%; 3/5 pelvic, all 13 para-aortic) were observed in the 265 patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Among stage II patients, no deaths (100% 5-year recurrence-free survival) were observed in the eight patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 66% 5-year recurrence-free survival in the 34 patients who did not.ConclusionAlthough we observed that adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved oncologic outcomes in early-stage high-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer, the associations did not meet conventional levels of statistical significance. Further research is warranted in this relatively uncommon subgroup of patients.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 832-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
John K. Chan ◽  
Alexander E. Sherman ◽  
Daniel S. Kapp ◽  
Ruxi Zhang ◽  
Kathryn E. Osann ◽  
...  

Purpose Despite a lack of evidence for survival benefit, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology has recommendations for referral to gynecologic oncologists for the treatment of endometrial cancer. Therefore, we propose to determine the influence of gynecologic oncologists on the treatment and survival of patients with endometrial cancer. Patients and Methods Data were obtained from Medicare and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) databases from 1988 to 2005. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods were used for analyses. Results Of 18,338 women, 21.4% received care from gynecologic oncologists (group A) while 78.6% were treated by others (group B). Women in group A were older (age > 71 years: 49.6% v 44%; P < .001), had more lymph nodes (> 16) removed (22% v 17%; P < .001), presented with more advanced (stages III to IV) cancers (21.9% v 14.6%; P < .001), had higher-grade tumors (P < .001), and were more likely to receive chemotherapy for advanced disease (22.6% v 12.4%; P < .001). In those with stages II to IV disease, the 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) of group A was 79% versus 73% in group B (P = .001). Moreover, in advanced-stage (III to IV) disease, group A had 5-year DSS of 72% versus 64% in group B (P < .001). However, no association with DSS was identified in stage I cancers. On multivariable analysis, younger age, early stage, lower grade, and treatment by gynecologic oncologists were independent prognostic factors for improved survival. Conclusion Patients with endometrial cancer treated by gynecologic oncologists were more likely to undergo staging surgery and receive adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced disease. Care provided by gynecologic oncologists improved the survival of those with high-risk cancers.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 67-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adi Diab ◽  
Stephen Barnett Solomon ◽  
Christopher Comstock ◽  
Majid Maybody ◽  
Virgilio Sacchini ◽  
...  

67 Background: Intratumoral cryo combined with immune modulation generates a potent systemic anti-tumor immune response that might improve recurrence free survival in ESBC. In this study, we evaluate the safety of pre-op cryo and/or ipi (10mg/kg) in pts with ESBC. Radiographic correlates and intratumoral/serologic immune responses are also explored. Methods: Eligible pts are ≥18y of age with operable ≥1.5 cm invasive ESBC, no history of autoimmune disease and planned mastectomy. Pts are sequentially assigned to receive pre-op: cryo alone (Group-A), ipi alone (B), or ipi with cryo (C). Cryo is administered 7-10d prior to surgery. Ipi is administered 8-15d prior to surgery (1-5d prior to cryo). If at least 5/6 pts in each group proceed with surgery without delay, the regimen will be considered safe/tolerable. Toxicity evaluation continues for 12 wks after ipi administration for Groups B and C. Results: As of May 1, 2013, 7/7 pts were enrolled to Group-A (expanded after a possible technical failure in 1 pt) and 6/6 pts were enrolled to Group-B. The median age was 45y (range 39-69y). All 13 pts in Groups A and B underwent mastectomy without delay. Group C is now accruing with 1/6 patients enrolled and awaiting surgery. 6/7 pts in Group-A and none in Group-B had ischemic tumor necrosis/infarction in the mastectomy tissue. Overall, pre-op cryo or ipi alone have been well tolerated with no study related grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) reported (Table). Conclusions: To date, pre-op cryo or ipi is safe and tolerable in pts with ESBC. A Phase II study of pre-op ipi and cryo in ESBC is planned. Clinical trial information: NCT01502592. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 242-242
Author(s):  
Michael C. Burns ◽  
Kristen Carroll ◽  
Ryan Jones ◽  
Masha Kocherginsky ◽  
Kirsten Bell Burdett ◽  
...  

242 Background: While the 5-year recurrence rate in early stage CRC is low (12%) and there is currently limited role of adjuvant chemotherapy in such cases, a unique subset of patients (pts) will have late recurrences. To identify molecular signatures predictive of late recurrence after pts undergo intended curative resection, we employed a 22 targeted gene NGS panel in pts with early CRC. Association between mutation status and recurrence free survival (RFS) was analyzed. Methods: Pts with stage I-II CRC had their tumor prospectively sequenced between 09/2015-12/2018 by an ion torrent targeted 22 gene hotspot NGS panel, including KRAS, EGFR, BRAF, PIK3CA, AKT1, ERBB2/4, PTEN, NRAS, STK11, MAP2K1, ALK, DDR2, CTNNB1, MET, TP53, SMAD4, FBX7, NOTCH1, and FGFR1/2/3. Associations were analyzed with unadjusted p-values (p) and Benjamini & Hochberg adjusted (BHp) shown. Results: Clinical and pathologic data from 180 pts were analyzed: median age 66 (range 24-86), male (47%), stage I (41%), stage II (69%), left (54%) vs right (36%) sided primary tumors, and microsatellite stable (85%). 35 (19%) pts had adjuvant therapy (n = 21 rectal, n = 14 colon). Pathological mutations were found in 160 (89%) of pts, including TP53 (56%), KRAS (44%), PIK3CA (22%), BRAF (12%), SMAD4 (8%), MET (6%) and NRAS (3%). There was only 1 case of ERBB2 mutation. 33 pts (18%) had evidence of recurrence. 36 month RFS was 82%. Common sites of recurrence included liver (13 pts, 39%), lung (10 pts, 30%), and bone (2 pts, 6%). Alterations in MET cDNA and protein were associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 4.1; p =0.0026, BHp= 0.057). Interestingly, while TP53 mutations are typically associated with worse prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancers, it was not associated with RFS (HR = 0.8; p = 0.55, BHp= 0.98). There was also no association between the number of gene alterations and RFS (p = 0.45). Conclusions: These data highlight that targeted NGS tumor profiling of early stage CRC, including sequencing MET among other genes, may be utilized alongside known prognostic pathological factors to predict pts with a higher risk of recurrence and may facilitate tailored adjuvant chemotherapy to mitigate this risk.


2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2021-002536
Author(s):  
Gabriela Alban ◽  
Teresa Cheng ◽  
Jenna Adleman ◽  
Ivan Buzurovic ◽  
Jennifer Pretz ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate clinical outcomes, prognostic factors, and toxicity in patients with vaginal recurrence of early-stage endometrial cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy.MethodsRetrospective review identified 62 patients with stage I–II endometrial cancer and vaginal recurrence treated with external beam radiotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy with definitive intent from November 2004 to July 2017. All patients had prior hysterectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy and >3 months follow-up. Mismatch repair (MMR) status was determined by immunohistochemical staining of the four mismatch repair proteins (MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, and MSH6) when available in the pathology record. Rates of vaginal control, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival were calculated by Kaplan–Meier. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by Cox proportional hazards.ResultsMost patients had endometrioid histology (55, 89%), grade 1 or 2 tumor (53, 85%), and vaginal-only recurrence (55, 89%). With a median follow-up of 39 months (range, 3–167), 3- and 5-year rates of vaginal control, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival were 86% and 82%, 69% and 55%, and 80% and 61%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, non-endometrioid histology (HR 12.5, P<0.01) was associated with relapse when adjusted for chemotherapy use. Patients with non-endometrioid histology also had a 4.5-fold higher risk of death when adjusted for age (P=0.02). Twenty patients had known MMR status, all with grade 1–2 endometrioid tumors and 10 (50%) with MMR deficiency. The 3-year recurrence-free survival was 100% for MMR-proficient tumors and 52% for MMR-deficient (P=0.03). Late grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal, genitourinary and vaginal toxicity was reported in 27% and 3%, 15% and 2%, and 16% and 2% of patients, respectively.ConclusionDefinitive radiotherapy with image-guided brachytherapy resulted in 5-year local control rates exceeding 80% and late severe toxicity rates were under 3%. Distant recurrence was common and highest for those with grade 3 or non-endometrioid tumors and MMR deficient grade 1–2 disease.


2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Motoko Kanno ◽  
Mayu Yunokawa ◽  
Makoto Nakabayashi ◽  
Makiko Omi ◽  
Ai Ikki ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study evaluated the influence of positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) on the prognosis of patients with stage IA endometrial cancer, and the usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy in their treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with stage IA endometrial cancer admitted in our hospital between 2005 and 2015. Among 989 patients who underwent peritoneal cytology, 135 (13.7%) had PPC. Multivariate analysis extracted several independent risk factors for recurrence in stage IA patients, including those with PPC. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not cause a significant difference in the 5-year relapse-free survival rate in patients with PPC (p = 0.78). Similarly, the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate with or without chemotherapy was not different among type II cancer patients (p = 0.11). However, the baseline risk of 5-year relapse-free survival without chemotherapy in patients with PPC and type II was very low (66.7%). While PPC was an independent risk factor for recurrence in stage IA endometrial cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy did not influence the survival rate in patients with PPC. While it is controversial whether adjuvant chemotherapy should be administered in stage IA uterine cancer with only PPC as a prognostic factor, it should be considered for early-stage patients who have multiple risk factors for recurrence.


2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamdullah Sozen ◽  
Rumeysa Çiftçi ◽  
Dogan Vatansever ◽  
Samet Topuz ◽  
Ahmet Cem Iyibozkurt ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 114-114
Author(s):  
Seiichi Nakamura ◽  
Shigeru Tatebe ◽  
Tetsu Shimizu ◽  
Nariyuki Yamane ◽  
Hideaki Nishidoi ◽  
...  

114 Background: Based on the results of ACTS-GC, oral administration of S-1 for 1 year is considered standard postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer in Japan. However, the 1-year treatment completion rate was only 65.8%, and completion of the treatment is a problem to be solved. On the other hand, we experienced in clinical practice that the alternate-day administration of S-1 reduced adverse effects and was tolerable for advanced gastric cancer patients unwilling to continue the standard daily administration. We therefore conducted a multi-center cooperative prospective study to compare daily with alternate-day administration of S-1 as postoperative adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with Stage II or III gastric cancer who underwent curative surgery were randomly assigned to receive standard daily administration (group A: S-1 80-120 mg/day according to BSA, days 1 to 28, every 6weeks, for 1 year) or alternate-day administration of S-1 (group B: S-1 80-120 mg/day according to BSA, every other day, for 15 months). The primary endpoints were treatment completion rate and relative dose intensity. Secondary endpoints were safety, overall survival, and relapse-free survival. Results: A total of 73 patients were enrolled. As of August 30, 2011 analysis of the compliance data of 62 cases had been completed. The results showed a treatment completion rate of 74.2% in group A and 93.5% in group B and relative dose intensity of 72.1% in group A and 85.6% in group B, and compliance tended to be better in group B. Assessment of survival time showed a median follow-up time of 545 days, a 1-year survival rate of 93.8% in group A and 96.9% in group B and 1-year relapse-free survival rate of 79.5% in group A and 90.7% in group B. Digestive system adverse events were less frequent in group B than in group A. Conclusions: We will report the data from the final analysis at this meeting. The current data show improved compliance and mitigation of adverse effects with alternate-day administration of S-1, and it appears to be a more sustainable option for adjuvant chemotherapy for Stage II and III gastric cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document