Prognosis and adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with positive peritoneal cytology in stage IA endometrial cancer

This study evaluated the influence of positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) on the prognosis of patients with stage IA endometrial cancer, and the usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy in their treatment. We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with stage IA endometrial cancer admitted in our hospital between 2005 and 2015. Among 989 patients who underwent peritoneal cytology, 135 (13.7%) had PPC. Multivariate analysis extracted several independent risk factors for recurrence in stage IA patients, including those with PPC. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not cause a significant difference in the 5-year relapse-free survival rate in patients with PPC (p = 0.78). Similarly, the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate with or without chemotherapy was not different among type II cancer patients (p = 0.11). However, the baseline risk of 5-year relapse-free survival without chemotherapy in patients with PPC and type II was very low (66.7%). While PPC was an independent risk factor for recurrence in stage IA endometrial cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy did not influence the survival rate in patients with PPC. While it is controversial whether adjuvant chemotherapy should be administered in stage IA uterine cancer with only PPC as a prognostic factor, it should be considered for early-stage patients who have multiple risk factors for recurrence.

Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy as Adjuvant or Perioperative Chemotherapy for Patients with Type 4 Scirrhous Gastric Cancer: PHOENIX-GC2 Trial

The prognosis of patients with type 4 scirrhous gastric cancer remains poor due to a high risk of peritoneal metastasis. We have previously developed combined chemotherapy regimens of intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel (PTX) and systemic chemotherapy, and promising clinical efficacy was reported in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Herein, a randomized, phase III study is proposed to verify the efficacy of IP PTX to prevent peritoneal recurrence. Gastric cancer patients with type 4 tumors and without apparent distant metastasis, including peritoneal metastasis, will be randomized for standard systemic chemotherapy or combined IP and systemic chemotherapy based on peritoneal lavage cytology findings. Those with negative peritoneal cytology will receive radical gastrectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy of S-1 plus docetaxel (control arm), or S-1 plus intravenous and IP PTX (experimental arm). Those with positive peritoneal cytology will receive three courses of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (control arm), or S-1 plus oxaliplatin and IP PTX (experimental arm). Subsequently, they undergo gastrectomy and receive postoperative chemotherapy of S-1 plus docetaxel (control arm), or S-1 plus intravenous and IP PTX (experimental arm). The primary endpoint is disease free survival after a 3-year follow-up period. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, survival without peritoneal metastasis, safety, completion rate, curative resection rate, and histological response of preoperative chemotherapy. A total of 300 patients are to be enrolled.

Predictive factors of lymph node metastasis and pattern of repartition in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

Aim: To determine the rate, repartition and risk factors of lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: We reviewed retrospectively the pathological and clinical data of 184 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer at a tertiary care center in Beirut, Lebanon. Results: 88% of patients received a pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. 70% of patients presented LN metastases at both pelvic and para-aortic levels, while isolated pelvic or para-aortic LN metastases were seen in 16 and 14% of cases, respectively. In a univariate analysis, the rate of positive LNs was higher in patients with serous histology (65 vs 33%; p < 0.001), high-grade tumors (68 vs 26%; p < 0.001), bilateral adnexal involvement (74 vs 27%; p < 0.001), advanced clinical stage (p < 0.001), interval debulking surgery (63.2 vs 36.8%; p = 0.003) and positive peritoneal cytology (79 vs 26%; p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the rate of LN involvement was significantly higher in patients with higher grade, advanced clinical stage and positive peritoneal cytology. Conclusion: Serous histology, grade 3 tumors, positive peritoneal cytology, advanced clinical stage, interval surgery and bilateral adnexal involvement can predict LN metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Significance of peritoneal washing cytology in the accurate staging of malignant ovarian tumors

Objectives: To identify the percentage of ovarian cancers with positive peritoneal cytology and to correlate the positive cytology with the prognostic factors. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study, evaluated the data of surgical specimens of malignant ovarian tumors, received in the Department of Pathology, Dow University of Health Sciences over a period of three years. The peritoneal cytology was correlated with these prognostic parameters: the size of the tumor, stage, capsular invasion, omental, and lymph node metastasis. Results: Eighty malignant ovarian tumors were diagnosed. Serous carcinoma was the most common ovarian tumor, diagnosed in 24 (30.0%) cases, followed by endometrioid carcinoma in 17 (21.25%) and Granulosa cell tumor in 11 (13.75%) cases. The mean age of the patients was 41.91 years (range 7-71 years). The mean size of the tumors was 10.03 cm (SD 5.62 cm). The ovarian capsular invasion was present in 27 (33.75%) tumors. Peritoneal cytology was positive in 10/24 cases, with a detection rate of 41.66%. Omentum was involved in 12/34 (35.29%) cases. Lymph node dissection was performed in three cases, two were reported as positive for metastasis. Peritoneal cytology significantly correlated with the tumor size (p=0.045), and with ovarian capsular invasion (p=0.054) and omental metastasis (p=0.052). Most of the tumors were staged as FIGO stage IA. Conclusion: Peritoneal cytology correlates with the tumor size, stage, and omental metastasis of the malignant ovarian tumors. It should be routinely performed at the time of surgery for the optimal staging of the patients. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.1.4393 How to cite this:Gulzar R, Shahid R, Mumtaz S, Hassan JA. Significance of peritoneal washing cytology in the accurate staging of malignant ovarian tumors. Pak J Med Sci. 2022;38(1):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.38.1.4393 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Conversion Surgery for Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Background. Patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) usually have poor outcomes and high mortality risk, even with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). This study analyzed the prognostic factors of AGC with PC and evaluated laparoscopic HIPEC (LHIPEC) plus neoadjuvant intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy (NIPS) as a conversion surgery for AGC patients with PC with a poor initial prognosis. Patient and Methods. We retrospectively evaluated 127 patients with AGC and PC from January 1, 2012, to March 1, 2020. After the exclusion of 32 ineligible patients, the conversion group comprised 34 patients who underwent LHIPEC + NIPS as a conversion surgery followed by CRS plus HIPEC. The CRS + HIPEC group included 15 patients who underwent CRS with HIPEC alone. Additionally, the C/T group comprised 23 patients who received systemic chemotherapy, and the palliative group comprised 23 patients who received only conservative therapy or palliative gastrectomy. Results. The conversion group demonstrated a significantly better mean overall survival compared to the CRS + HIPEC, C/T, and palliative groups ( p < 0.001 ). Patients in the conversion group who underwent LHIPEC + NIPS had significantly decreased peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores ( p < 0.001 ) and ascites ( p = 0.003 ). Malignant ascites amount also significantly decreased after treatment in the LHIPEC + NIPS group ( p < 0.001 ). Conclusions. LHIPEC + NIPS can significantly improve the overall survival, the PCI score, and malignant ascites amount in peritoneal cytology-positive gastric cancer with PC, and an initially high PCI score. Therefore, it may be a feasible conversion strategy for AGC patients with PC.

Ultrastaging of ‘negative’ pelvic lymph nodes in patients with low- and intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer who developed non-vaginal recurrences

ObjectiveEvidence on micrometastases and isolated tumor cells as factors associated with non-vaginal recurrence in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer is limited. The goal of our study was to investigate risk factors for non-vaginal recurrence in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.MethodsRecords of all patients with endometrial cancer surgically managed at the Mayo Clinic before sentinel lymph node implementation (1999–2008) were reviewed. We identified all patients with endometrioid low-risk (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I, grade 1 or 2 with myometrial invasion <50% and negative peritoneal cytology) or intermediate-risk (FIGO stage I, grade 1 or 2 with myometrial invasion ≥50% or grade 3 with myometrial invasion <50% and negative peritoneal cytology) endometrial cancer at definitive pathology after pelvic and para-aortic lymph node assessment. All pelvic lymph nodes of patients with non-vaginal recurrence (any recurrence excluding isolated vaginal cuff recurrences) underwent ultrastaging.ResultsAmong 1303 women, we identified 321 patients with low-risk (n=236) or intermediate-risk (n=85) endometrial cancer (median age 65.4 years; 266 (82.9%) stage IA; 55 (17.1%) stage IB). Of the total of 321, 13 patients developed non-vaginal recurrence (Kaplan–Meier rate 4.7% by 60 months; 95% CI 2.1% to 7.2%): 11 hematogenous/peritoneal and two para-aortic and distant lymphatic. Myometrial invasion and lymphovascular space invasion were univariately associated with non-vaginal recurrence. In these patients, the original hematoxylin/eosin slides review confirmed all 646 pelvic and para-aortic removed lymph nodes as negative. The ultrastaging of 463 pelvic lymph nodes did not identify any occult metastases (prevalence 0%; 95% CI 0% to 22.8% considering 13 patients; 95% CI 0% to 0.8% considering 463 pelvic lymph nodes).ConclusionThere were no occult metastases in pelvic lymph nodes of patients with low- or intermediate-risk endometrial cancer with non-vaginal recurrence. Myometrial invasion and lymphovascular space invasion appear to be associated with non-vaginal recurrence.

TP6.2.15 Staging Laparoscopy and Peritoneal Cytology for Gastric and Gastro-oesophageal Junction Malignancy: an Audit from a Single Oesophagogastric Resection Centre

Aims AUGIS recommends staging laparoscopy in all gastric cancers and selected gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) cancers. We previously audited our practice of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology and found that in a cohort of 158 consecutive patients, no tumours less than T3 with negative nodes had positive cytology, resulting in change in practice to selectively use peritoneal cytology in patients with a T-stage of 3 and above or N+ disease. Our aim was to assess the impact of this audit on current practice. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the notes of patients undergoing staging laparoscopy and oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) identified by MDT from January 2019 to December 2019. Patients who underwent resection on the same day were excluded. Results 63 patients underwent staging laparoscopy and OGD, 54 for GOJ and 9 for gastric disease. The majority were staged as T3 or T4a (81%). As a result of staging laparoscopy and OGD, 4 (6%) patients were changed from curative to palliative pathway, 2 (3%) of whom had positive cytology. No patients had positive peritoneal cytology for a T stage of 2 and below with no positive nodes, further demonstrating the safety of the recommendation. Conclusions Peritoneal cytology has a low yield in changing the clinical course of patients but can upstage up to 6% of patients. The re-audit backs up the previous guidance in the safety of using our current threshold for recommending peritoneal cytology and potentially prevents delaying treatment while waiting for cytology results.