scholarly journals Clinical Impact of Plasma Metagenomic Next-generation Sequencing in a Large Pediatric Cohort

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Denver T. Niles ◽  
Paula A. Revell ◽  
Daniel Ruderfer ◽  
Lucila Marquez ◽  
J. Chase McNeil ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S840-S841
Author(s):  
M. Garcia Pardo ◽  
I. Martinez Delfrade ◽  
I. Aparicio Salcedo ◽  
M. Arregui Valles ◽  
M. Alva Bianchi ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. e0181874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebun Omoyinmi ◽  
Ariane Standing ◽  
Annette Keylock ◽  
Fiona Price-Kuehne ◽  
Sonia Melo Gomes ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Catherine A Hogan ◽  
Shangxin Yang ◽  
Omai B Garner ◽  
Daniel A Green ◽  
Carlos A Gomez ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of plasma cell-free DNA has emerged as an attractive diagnostic modality allowing broad-range pathogen detection, noninvasive sampling, and earlier diagnosis. However, little is known about its real-world clinical impact as used in routine practice. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients for whom plasma mNGS (Karius test) was performed for all indications at 5 United States institutions over 1.5 years. Comprehensive records review was performed, and standardized assessment of clinical impact of the mNGS based on the treating team’s interpretation of Karius results and patient management was established. Results A total of 82 Karius tests were evaluated from 39 (47.6%) adults and 43 (52.4%) children and a total of 53 (64.6%) immunocompromised patients. Karius positivity rate was 50 of 82 (61.0%), with 25 (50.0%) showing 2 or more organisms (range, 2–8). The Karius test results led to positive impact in 6 (7.3%), negative impact in 3 (3.7%), and no impact in 71 (86.6%), and was indeterminate in 2 (2.4%). Cases with positive Karius result and clinical impact involved bacteria and/or fungi but not DNA viruses or parasites. In 10 patients who underwent 16 additional repeated tests, only 1 was associated with clinical impact. Conclusions The real-world impact of the Karius test as currently used in routine clinical practice is limited. Further studies are needed to identify high-yield patient populations, define the complementary role of mNGS to conventional microbiological methods, and discern how best to integrate mNGS into current testing algorithms.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S338
Author(s):  
Kazuki Nozawa ◽  
Masaya Hattori ◽  
Daiki Takatsuka ◽  
Syoko Sakamoto ◽  
Yuka Endo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 258-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Belilovski Rozenblum ◽  
Maya Ilouze ◽  
Elizabeth Dudnik ◽  
Addie Dvir ◽  
Lior Soussan-Gutman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine A. Hogan ◽  
Shangxin Yang ◽  
Omai B. Garner ◽  
Daniel A. Green ◽  
Carlos A. Gomez ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundMetagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of plasma cell-free DNA has emerged as an attractive diagnostic modality allowing broad-range pathogen detection, noninvasive sampling, and earlier diagnosis. However, little is known about its real-world clinical impact as used in routine practice.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients for whom plasma mNGS (Karius test) was performed for all indications at 5 U.S. institutions over 1.5 years. Comprehensive chart review was performed, and standardized assessment of clinical impact of the mNGS based on the treating team’s interpretation of Karius results and patient management was established.ResultsA total of 82 Karius tests were evaluated, from 39 (47.6%) adults and 43 (52.4%) children and a total of 53 (64.6%) immunocompromised patients. Karius positivity rate was 50/82 (61.0%), with 24 (48.0%) showing two or more organisms (range, 2-8). The Karius test results led to positive impact in 6 (7.3%), negative impact in 3 (3.7%), no impact in 70 (85.4%), and was indeterminate in 3 (3.7%). Cases with positive Karius result and clinical impact involved bacteria and/or fungi but not DNA viruses or parasites. In 10 patients who underwent 16 additional repeated tests, only one was associated with clinical impact.ConclusionsThe real-world impact of the Karius test as currently used in routine clinical practice is limited. Further studies are needed to identify high-yield patient populations, define the complementary role of mNGS to conventional microbiological methods, and how best to integrate mNGS into current testing algorithms.SummaryIn a multicenter retrospective cohort study, we show that the real-world clinical impact of plasma metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for the noninvasive diagnosis of infections is limited (positive impact 7.3%). Further studies are needed to optimize the impact of mNGS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S432-S433
Author(s):  
Myint M Noe ◽  
Akira A Shishido ◽  
Kapil Saharia ◽  
Paul Luethy

Abstract Background Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) allows for non-invasive broad-range pathogen detection from plasma. The Karius® test that emerged in 2016 made mNGS widely available. However, there is little data describing the optimal role for this assay in clinical decision making. Methods We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of adult patients for whom a Karius test was sent between May 2019 and February 2021 to assess clinical utility. We predefined criteria for clinical impact categories (Table 1) and stratified data by patient comorbidities, infectious syndromes, duration of antimicrobial therapy prior to Karius testing, reasons for sending the test, and final clinical diagnoses. Clinical impact was arbitrated by all authors after review and discussion of each case. Results A total of 80 patients were included. 45 patients (56%) were immunocompromised, and 14 (18%) had prosthetic hardware or grafts. The most common clinical syndrome was pneumonia/respiratory failure (31%), followed by sepsis/septic shock (15%) and endocarditis (13%). 72 patients (90%) received antibiotics prior to sending the Karius assay. The most common reason for sending the assay was unknown microbiologic diagnosis (78%), followed by avoiding invasive procedures (14%). The test was consistent with the final diagnosis in 65% of cases and had a positive impact in 34 (43%), a negative impact in 2 (3%), and uncertain or no impact in 44 (55%) (Table 2). A positive impact was observed in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR, 71.4%, p=0.003), sepsis (71.4%, p=0.003), and those receiving antimicrobial agents for less than 7 days prior to Karius testing (i.e., 61.8%, p=0.004) (Table 3). Conclusion In our cohort, clinical utility of Karius testing was highest in SOTR and in patients with sepsis. Prolonged antimicrobial use ( > 7 days) prior to Karius testing limited the utility of the assay. Prospective studies evaluating the utility of mNGS mcfDNA assays should be performed to further clarify its role in clinical management. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document