The Relationship Between Serum Uric Acid Concentration and Metabolic Syndrome in University Freshmen

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuan-Pin Lin
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ranya A. Ghamri ◽  
Tala A. Qalai ◽  
Raghad A. Ismail ◽  
Joud M. Aljehani ◽  
Dina S. Alotaibi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Hyperuricemia is a metabolic defect caused by high purine consumption, overproduction of uric acid, or reduced uric acid excretion. Hyperuricemia is the second most common metabolic disease after diabetes mellitus and can mediate proinflammatory endocrine imbalance in adipose tissue, which contributed to dyslipidemia. Furthermore, several studies have associated uric acid with dyslipidemia. However, no previous studies have examined patients without chronic illness. Thus, we aimed to assess the relationship between serum uric acid concentration and lipid profile parameters and to estimate the prevalence of hyperuricemia in the city of Jeddah. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among 1206 patients without chronic illness after applying the exclusion criteria. Patients had undergone laboratory blood testing over a 3-year period (2018–2020) at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, which was ethically approved. We used a predesigned checklist to collect data from electronic hospital records using Google Forms. Bivariate analysis, tables, and graphs were used to represent and identify the relationships between variables. A P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.Results: Our study revealed a prevalence of 12% for hyperuricemia in the study population. Males were more frequently affected than females (8.13% vs. 3.73%, respectively). There was no association between serum uric acid concentration and lipid profile parameters, including total cholesterol (P = 0.92), triglyceride (P = 0.42), high-density lipoprotein (P = 0.47), and low-density lipoprotein (P = 0.66). There was a strong association between serum uric acid concentration and high body mass index (P < 0.001), older age (P = 0.002), male sex (P < 0.001), and nationality (P < 0.001). Furthermore, there was an association between sex and mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P = 0.02) and mean triglyceride concentration (P = 0.02).Conclusion: We observed a low prevalence of hyperuricemia, and our results indicate no association between serum uric acid concentration and lipid profile parameters.


1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Kiyohara ◽  
S. Kono ◽  
S. Honjo ◽  
I. Todoroki ◽  
Y. Sakurai ◽  
...  

Consumption of caffeine-rich beverages, which have diuretic properties, may decrease serum uric acid concentrations. We examined cross-sectionally the relationship of coffee and green tea consumption to serum uric acid concentrations in 2240 male self-defence officials who received a pre-retirement health examination at four hospitals of the Self-Defence Forces between 1993 and 1994. The mean levels of coffee and green tea consumption were 2·3 and 3·1 cups/d respectively. There was a clear inverse relationship between coffee consumption and serum uric acid concentration. When adjusted for hospital only, those consuming less than one cup of coffee daily had a mean serum uric acid concentration of 60 mg/l, while that of those drinking five or more cups of coffee daily was 56 mg/l (P < 0·0001). No such relationship was observed for green tea, another major dietary source of caffeine in Japan. The relationship between coffee consumption and serum uric acid concentration was independent of age, rank in the Self-Defence Forces, BMI, systolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, serum total cholesterol and serum HDL-cholesterol concentrations, smoking status, alcohol use, beer consumption and intake of dairy products. These findings suggest that coffee drinking may be associated with lower concentrations of serum uric acid, and further studies are needed to confirm the association.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Anna Masajtis-Zagajewska ◽  
Jacek Majer ◽  
Michał Nowicki

Introduction. Excessive intake of fructose increases serum uric acid concentration. Hyperuricemia induces a negative effect on atherosclerosis and inflammation. Hyperuricemia is common in patients with arterial hypertension. Several antihypertensive drugs including diuretics increase serum uric acid concentration. In contrast, the angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB) losartan was found to lower serum uric acid though it may increase renal excretion while other ARBs showed mostly a neutral effect. In this study, effects of two AT1 receptor antagonists losartan and eprosartan on serum uric acid changes induced by oral fructose load were directly compared. Methods. The randomized, crossover, head-to-head comparative study comprised 16 ambulatory patients (mean age 64.5 ± 9.8 years). The patients fulfilled AHA/NHLBI 2005 criteria of metabolic syndrome. A daily single morning dose of each study drug (50 mg of losartan or 600 mg of eprosartan) was given during two 3-month periods in a random order separated by 2-week washout time. The oral fructose tolerance test (OFTT) was performed at baseline and after each two 3-onth treatment periods. Before and during OFTT, urine excretion of uric acid and creatinine was assessed in the first morning portion of urine. Blood samples for the measurement of serum uric acid and lipids were taken at baseline and 30, 60, and 120 minutes after oral intake of 75 g of fructose. Results. After 3-month treatment with eprosartan and losartan, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly and to a similar extent. After the treatment, serum uric acid and its baseline and postfructose urine excretion were unchanged. No significant changes of plasma lipids before and after OFTT were observed throughout the study. Conclusions. The study showed that in patients with hypertension and metabolic syndrome, both losartan and eprosartan have a neutral effect on fasting and postfructose load serum uric acid concentration and its urinary excretion. This trial is registered with NCT04954560.


2005 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 928-933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Woo Yoo ◽  
Ki Chul Sung ◽  
Hun Sub Shin ◽  
Byung Jin Kim ◽  
Bum Soo Kim ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo M. Porchia ◽  
M. Elba Gonzalez-Mejia ◽  
Enrique Torres-Rasgado ◽  
Guadalupe Ruiz-Vivanco ◽  
Ricardo Pérez-Fuentes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document