The Role of Postoperative Imaging after Ventral Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Bulbar Urethroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 204 (6) ◽  
pp. 1270-1274
Author(s):  
Nathan Y. Hoy ◽  
Hadley M. Wood ◽  
Kenneth W. Angermeier
Medic ro ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (143) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Piroska Csergő ◽  
Alexandra Martin-Stoica ◽  
Liviu Moraru ◽  
Marian Pop

Author(s):  
Vedamurthy Reddy Pogula ◽  
Ershad Hussain Galeti ◽  
Venkatesh Velivela ◽  
Bhargava Reddy Kanchi

Background: Treatment of the urethral strictures is challenging and with appropriate evaluation preoperatively and surgery planning it is possible to achieve good results. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in treating long anterior urethral strictures.Methods: Between August 2018 to July 2019 a total of 25 patients with anterior urethral stricture were treated with dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty. Age, etiology of the stricture, stricture length (≤ 7 cm, and > 7 cm), and site of the stricture were assessed as the factors affecting the success rate.Results: The clinical outcome as Success was defined as the patient not needing any form of urethral instrumentation postoperatively. The mean follow-up period was 18 months. Of 25 patients, 22 (92%) were successful and 3 (8%) were a failure. There was no statistically significant difference between the age groups, etiology of the stricture and success rate (p=0.21 and p=0.444). The statistical difference was significant for the site and length of the stricture by means of success (p=0.005 and p=0.025).Conclusions: Our results show stricture length and localization are the most important variables for good success. Because of less failure rate, single-stage dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty may be offered as an alternative to staged urethroplasty in case of long urethral strictures.  


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eira S. Roth ◽  
David G. Buck ◽  
Vijay S. Gorantla ◽  
Joseph E. Losee ◽  
Daniel E. Foust ◽  
...  

Objective. To describe the role of imaging in vascular composite allotransplantation based on one institution’s experience with upper extremity allotransplant patients.Methods. The institutional review board approved this review of HIPAA-compliant patient data without the need for individual consent. A retrospective review was performed of imaging from 2008 to 2011 on individuals undergoing upper extremity transplantation. This demonstrated that, of the 19 patients initially considered, 5 patients with a mean age of 37 underwent transplantation. Reports were correlated clinically to delineate which preoperative factors lead to patient selection versus disqualification and what concerns dictated postoperative imaging. Findings were subdivided into musculoskeletal and vascular imaging criterion.Results. Within the screening phase, musculoskeletal exclusion criterion included severe shoulder arthropathy, poor native bone integrity, and marked muscular atrophy. Vascular exclusion criterion included loss of sufficient arterial or venous supply and significant distortion of the native vascular architecture. Postoperative imaging was used to document healing and hardware integrity. Postsurgical angiography and ultrasound were used to monitor for endothelial proliferation or thrombosis as signs of rejection and vascular complication.Conclusion. Multimodality imaging is an integral component of vascular composite allotransplantation surgical planning and surveillance to maximize returning form and functionality while minimizing possible complications.


2020 ◽  
Vol 162 (10) ◽  
pp. 2353-2360
Author(s):  
Katherine E. Kunigelis ◽  
Gregory Arnone ◽  
Gregoire Chatain ◽  
Jessa Hoffman ◽  
Oscar Chatain ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Carpenter ◽  
Ronnie Shammas ◽  
Adam Honeybrook ◽  
C.Scott Brown ◽  
Nikita Chapurin ◽  
...  

Obtaining postoperative images of maxillofacial fractures does not affect the clinical management of asymptomatic patients; however, few studies have evaluated the role of postoperative imaging in the context of orbital floor fractures. In this study, we evaluate current practice techniques and the role of postoperative imaging in the management of orbital floor fractures in isolation and with concomitant facial fractures. Retrospective review of patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of orbital floor fractures between 2005 and 2015 at a single medical institution. Operative and perioperative records were reviewed to characterize postoperative imaging as routine or as indicated by concerning clinical symptoms, and to correlate clinical outcomes to postoperative imaging patterns across all identified orbital floor fractures. A total of 139 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation of orbital floor fractures. Of these, 75 (54%) had zygomaticomaxillary (ZMC) involvement. The remaining 64 (46%) were isolated orbital floor fractures. Overall, 54 (39%) patients underwent postoperative imaging. Of these, 38 (70%) had postoperative imaging in the absence of concerning clinical symptoms. There was no observed difference in complication rates in those who underwent postoperative imaging, and those who did not. Patients with orbital + ZMC fractures underwent a significantly higher number of postoperative imaging studies ( p < 0.001); however, there was no observed difference in complications between isolated orbital and orbital + ZMC fractures. Routine postoperative imaging is not warranted in the absence of persistent clinical symptoms following open reduction and internal fixation of orbital floor fractures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document