scholarly journals Comparison of 4 sinus augmentation techniques for implant placement with residual alveolar bone height ≤3 mm

Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (46) ◽  
pp. e23180
Author(s):  
Chia-Fang Tsai ◽  
Whei-Lin Pan ◽  
Yi-Ping Pan ◽  
Chiu-Po Chan ◽  
Yuh-Ren Ju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Augmentation Techniques ◽  
Bone Height

scholarly journals Indirect Sinus Lift with Implant Placement in Maxillary Premolar Region

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-34
Author(s):  
Priya S Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Sinus Lift ◽  
Effective Solution ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Bone Width ◽  
Bone Deficiency ◽  
Bone Height

ABSTRACT The maxilla is made up of spongy bone and has one of the least dense bones in oral cavity. Periodontal disease-stimulated teeth loss causes accentuated bone deficiency, both in height and in width by significant resorption of the alveolar bone. Bone remodeling in the region is further complicated by postextraction bone resorption, pneumatization of maxillary sinus, and poor quality of residual alveolar bone. Indirect sinus augmentation is an effective solution for this problem. This case report presents the rehabilitation of maxillary premolar by using indirect sinus lift with implant placement where the bone height and bone width was compromised. How to cite this article Reddy PS. Indirect Sinus Lift with Implant Placement in Maxillary Premolar Region. J Health Sci Res 2016;7(1):32-34.

Different Techniques for Sinus Floor Elevation: A Review Part I – Direct Techniques

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-35
Author(s):  
Vivek Jadhav ◽  
Nitin Kothari ◽  
Babita Yeshwante ◽  
Nazish Baig ◽  
Snigdha Patil
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Bone Volume ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Augmentation Techniques ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Bone Height

Insufficient bone volume is a common problem encountered in the rehabilitation of the edentulous posteriormaxilla with implant?supported prostheses. Although adequate bone height can be achieved using variousmaxillary sinus augmentation techniques, these procedures have been practiced successfully. However,significant complications occur such as perforations or tearing. To maintain the integrity of Schneiderianmembrane subsequently increasing the success rate a retrospective analysis is carried out on varioustechniques with complications which occur during and after treatment. This review will help the readers tounderstand the intricacies of sinus augmentation by using direct techniques.

Implant Bone Rings. One-Stage Three-Dimensional Bone Transplant Technique: A Case Report

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark R. Stevens ◽  
Hany A. Emam ◽  
Mahmoud E. L. Alaily ◽  
Mohamed Sharawy
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Socket Preservation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Basal Bone ◽  
Augmentation Techniques ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Teeth Extraction

Abstract A variety of techniques and materials has been used to provide the structural base of bone and soft tissue support for dental implants. Alveolar bone augmentation techniques include different surgical approaches such as guided bone regeneration, onlay grafting, interpositional grafting, distraction osteogenesis, ridge splitting, and socket preservation. In the case presented, a technique was used to augment the alveolar bone three-dimensionally with autologous “bone rings” and immediate implant placement in a 1-stage procedure following teeth extraction. Bone rings (circular osteotomies) were outlined at the symphysis area using trephine burs, and a central osteotomy for implant placement was done before its removal. The rings were then removed and sculptured to fit the extraction socket; this was followed by screwing the implant through the ring, gaining its primary stability from the prepared basal bone.

scholarly journals Different Techniques For Sinus Floor Elevation: A Review Part II – Indirect Techniques

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Nitin Kothari ◽  
Vivek Jadhav ◽  
Snigdha Patil
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Effective Solution ◽  
Sinus Floor Elevation ◽  
Less Invasive ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Bone Height

The bone available for implant placement may be limited by the presence of the maxillary sinus togetherwith loss of alveolar bone height and it may be increased by augmentation. Minimally invasive sinusaugmentation is an effective solution for this problem. This review explains indirect sinus augmentationprocedures which are less invasive and highly successful if done using prescribed technique.

scholarly journals Preliminary Study with the Use of a Titanium Mesh as Space Maker and Implant Primary Stabilization for One-Stage Sinus Lift in Cases with Less Than 1.5 mm Residual Bone

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (21) ◽  
pp. 4853
Author(s):  
Iulian Filipov ◽  
Federico Bolognesi ◽  
Lucian Chirila ◽  
Corina Marilena Cristache ◽  
Giuseppe Corinaldesi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Healing Period ◽  
Sinus Lifting ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Preliminary Study ◽  
Bone Height

(1) Background: In the lateral area of the maxilla, the alveolar bone can lose significant volume due to maxillary sinus pneumatization following teeth extractions. This preliminary study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel technique for one-stage sinus lifting and simultaneous implant placement in cases with less than 1.5 mm residual alveolar bone. The subsequent survival rate at 1-year post-occlusal loading was assessed. (2) Methods: 15 patients were selected, the main inclusion criteria were the partially edentulous area in the posterior maxilla with alveolar bone height of less than 1.5 mm below the sinus. All of the patients underwent one-stage sinus lifting, along with simultaneous implant placement using a “butterfly” anchorage device to optimize the primary stability and xenograft bone as graft material. At 6 to 9 months after surgery, the anchorage device was removed and implants were loaded. Panoramic x-ray images were used to assess the new bone formation, while the biological stability was measured using resonance frequency analysis. (3) Results: 15 implants were inserted. The mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) value was 71.3 (SD = ±2.51) and the mean healing period was 7.3 (SD = ±1.23) months. The mean bone height after the healing period was 14.4 (SD = ±2.05). A statistically significant correlation was found between the healing period and the ISQ value (Spearman rho = 0.684, sig. = 0.005). No statistically significant correlation was found between the ISQ value and the new regenerated bone height (Person r = 0.389, sig. = 0.152). Smoking was identified as a risk factor involved in postoperative complications. (4) Conclusions: The results of the present preliminary study demonstrated that the proposed “butterfly” technique was effective when performing one-stage sinus lifting and simultaneous implant placement in cases with less than 1.5 mm of residual alveolar bone. The survival rate was 100% at 1-year post occlusal loading.

Prevalence of Sinus Augmentation Associated With Maxillary Posterior Implants

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 680-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wook-Jin Seong ◽  
Michael Barczak ◽  
Jae Jung ◽  
Saonli Basu ◽  
Paul S Olin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
Implant Failure ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Implant Position ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Posterior Maxilla ◽  
American Society ◽  
Bone Height ◽  
Augmentation Procedure

Pneumatization of the maxillary sinus limits the quantity of alveolar bone available for implant placement and may result in a lack of primary stability and difficulty in achieving osseointegration. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively analyze a group of patients who had implants placed in the posterior maxilla, calculate the prevalence of sinus augmentation, and identify factors related to sinus augmentation. With institutional review board approval, dental records from a population of patients who had implants placed in the maxillary posterior region between January 2000 and December 2004 were used to create a database. Independent variables were classified as continuous (age of the patient at stage 1 implant surgery [S1], time between extraction and S1, time between extraction and sinus augmentation, and time between sinus augmentation and S1) and categorical (gender, implant failure, American Society of Anesthesiologists system classification, smoking, osteoporosis, residual crestal bone height, implant position, implant proximity, prostheses type, and implant diameter and length). The dependent variable was the incidence of a sinus augmentation procedure. Simple logistic regression was used to assess the influence of each factor on the presence of sinus augmentation (P < .05). The final database included 502 maxillary posterior implants with an overall survival rate of 93.2% over a mean follow-up period of 35.7 months. Of 502 implants, 272 (54.2%) were associated with a sinus augmentation procedure. Among variables, residual crestal bone height (P < .001), implant position (P < .001), implant proximity (P < .001), prosthesis type (P < .001), implant failure (P < .01), and implant diameter (P < .01), were statistically associated with sinus augmentation. Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the results suggest that more than half (54.2%) of the maxillary posterior implants were involved with a sinus augmentation procedure. The prevalence of sinus augmentation increased with decreased residual crestal bone height, more posterior implant locations, and complete or partial edentulism. Sinus augmentation was significantly associated with implant failure and wide implants.

scholarly journals Management of Short Alveolar Bone with Implant Retained Splinted Crown

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Primanda Nur Rahmania ◽  
Bambang Agustono ◽  
Nike Hendrijantini ◽  
Muhammad Dimas Aditya Ari
Keyword(s):  
Bone Density ◽  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Posterior Region ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Low Bone Density ◽  
History Of ◽  
Bone Height ◽  
Short Implant

Implant placement on maxillary posterior region has some limitations because of limited bone height, low bone density, and anatomical consideration involving the floor of the maxillary sinus. A 56-year-old male with a history of hypertension and stroke, consulted for edentulous in teeth 25 and 26 with limited bone height. A short implant for 26 (Ø 4.8 mm; 4 mm) and 25 (Ø 4.1 mm; 10 mm) were placed and splint crown was performed after 6 months.

scholarly journals Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using a Titanium Mesh: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalid Bahaa-Eldin ◽  
Basma Mostafa ◽  
Sherine Nasry ◽  
Ahmed Reda ◽  
Mona Shoeib
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Titanium Mesh ◽  
Sinus Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Maxillary Sinus Floor ◽  
Sinus Floor ◽  
Bone Height ◽  
Sinus Membrane Elevation ◽  
Sinus Membrane ◽  
Average Bone

BACKGROUND: Various attempts have been implemented using different materials and techniques to augment the maxillary sinus floor for prospect dental implant positioning.AIM: This contemplate was conducted to assess the osteogenic capability of the maxillary sinus in a two-step sinus membrane elevation using titanium mesh to keep the formed space to place dental implants in atrophic ridges.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Titanium micromesh was customized and positioned into the sinus on one side to preserve the elevated membrane in position. On the other side xenograft was applied. Instant and 6-months postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was done to assess the gained bone height and density. Bone core biopsies were obtained during implant placement for histological and histomorphometric evaluation.RESULTS: The average bone height values increased in both groups. Meanwhile the average bone density value was higher at the graft group than the titanium mesh group. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation presented the average bone volume of the newly formed bone in the graft group which is superior to that of the titanium mesh group.CONCLUSION: The use of the titanium micromesh as a space-maintaining device after Schneiderian membrane elevation is a trustworthy technique to elevate the floor of the sinus without grafting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document