Silva et al: Repair of Cranial Bone Defects With Calcium Phosphate Ceramic Implant or Autogenous Bone Graft

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 675-677
Author(s):  
Raimy R. Amasha ◽  
Matthew D. Kwan ◽  
Michael T. Longaker
2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosane Vieira da Silva ◽  
Celso Aparecido Bertran ◽  
Elizabete Yoshie Kawachi ◽  
Jos?? Angelo Camilli

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 341-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Carlos Garcia de Mendonça ◽  
Rafael De Rossi ◽  
Celso Massaschi Inouye ◽  
Diego Rodrigo Paulillo Bazan ◽  
João Carlos Castro Monteiro ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Morphological study comparing castor oil polyurethane and autogenous bone graft to repair bone defect in zygomatic bone of rabbits. METHODS: Twenty-four adult, male New Zealand rabbits were randomly distributed between two groups of twelve. Bone defects of 5mm in diameter were cut through the zygomatic bone and filled with polyurethane discs in the experimental group or autogenous bone harvested from the tibia in the control group. Animals were sacrificed after 30, 60 or 90 days, and the zygomatic bones were macro- and microscopically analyzed. Student's, Fisher's, chi-squared and McNemar's tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Both the castor oil polyurethane and the autograft adapted well to the defect, with no need for fixation. Fibrous connective tissue encapsulated the polyurethane, but no inflammation or giant cell reaction was observed. Acidophilic and basophilic areas were observed inside the micropores of the polyurethane, suggesting cell nuclei. After 90 days, bone repair with a lamellar pattern of organization was observed in the control group. CONCLUSION: The castor oil polyurethane was biocompatible and did not cause inflammation. It may be considered an alternative to fill bone defects.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edela Puricelli ◽  
Adriana Corsetti ◽  
Deise Ponzoni ◽  
Gustavo L. Martins ◽  
Mauro G. Leite ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikael Starecki ◽  
John A. Schwartz ◽  
Daniel A. Grande

Introduction. Autogenous bone graft is the gold standard in reconstruction of bone defects. The use of autogenous bone graft is problematic because of limited bone as well as donor site morbidity. This study evaluates a novel biomaterial as an alternative to autogenous bone graft. The biomaterial is amniotic membrane, rich in growth factors. Methods. Twenty-one adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were implanted with biomaterial using the rat critical size femoral gap model. After creation of the critical size femoral gap animals were randomized to one of the following groups: Group 1 (control): gap left empty and received no treatment; Group 2 (experimental): the gap was filled with commercially available bone graft; Group 3 (experimental): the gap was filled with bone graft plus NuCel amniotic tissue preparation. Results. The experimental groups demonstrated new bone formation compared to controls. The results were evident on radiographs and histology. Histology showed Group 1 controls to have 11.1% new bone formation, 37.8% for Group 2, and 49.2% for Group 3. These results were statistically significant. Conclusions. The study demonstrates that amniotic membrane products have potential to provide bridging of bone defects. Filling bone defects without harvesting autogenous bone would provide a significant improvement in patient care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document