Isolated Low-Grade Solid Organ Injuries in Children Following Blunt Abdominal Trauma

2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Leah Plumblee ◽  
Regan Williams ◽  
Dennis Vane ◽  
Jingwen Zhang ◽  
Aaron Jensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Solid Organ

Is Hypaque Dangerous?

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 650-650
Author(s):  
ROBERT SCHLECHTER ◽  
ABRAHAM BESSERMAN
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Abdominal Ct ◽  
Injured Child ◽  
Gastric Distention ◽  
Close Observation

Concerning the use of diatrizoate sodium (Hypaque) in abdominal CT scans described by Kane et al (Pediatrics 1988;82:11-15), we agree that there is certainly much to be gained from CT scanning in blunt abdominal trauma. We question the routine use of diatrizoate sodium in an injured child predisposed to gastric distention and vomiting. This is particularly dangerous when he or she is prone and restrained and close observation at the bedside is not possible. Solid organ injuries are well demonstrated without contrast, and injury to a viscus can be evaluated clinically and by routine roentgenographic procedures.

Intra-abdominal Free Fluid without Solid Organ Injury in Blunt Abdominal Trauma: An Indication for Laparotomy

2002 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1134-1140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander K. T. Ng ◽  
Richard K. Simons ◽  
William C. Torreggiani ◽  
Stephen G. F. Ho ◽  
Andrew W. Kirkpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Solid Organ Injury

scholarly journals 90 Penetrating Abdominal Trauma: Comperative Study Between Operative and Conservative Management

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Shalaby ◽  
M Ibrahim ◽  
T El Faioumy ◽  
M Elmessiry
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
The Other ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Penetrating Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Non Operative Management

Abstract Aim to Assess the feasibility and safety of selective non-operative management in penetrating abdominal injuries and to identify a protocol for selection of patient’s candidates for non-operative management. Method In this comparative study 40 abdominal stab victims (admitted to Emergency Department of Alexandria Main University Hospital) were selected during 6 months period where 20 patients were suitable for non-operative management according to strict selection criteria whereas the other 20 patients were operated according to clinical and/or radiological indications or on basis of department protocol, the results were compared in view of final outcome. Results In our study, 15 patients were assigned for operative management according to selected clinical and/or radiological indications only 3 of them (20%) had non-therapeutic laparotomies, On the other hand, five patients were explored on basis of department protocol in violation of our indications for exploration; four of them (80%) were non-therapeutic. So, the rate of non-therapeutic laparotomies was significantly higher when done mandatory without selected clinical and radiological indications. Conclusions Assessment of vital signs together with abdominal examination are the most important and dependable tools in decision making in penetrating abdominal trauma patients. Patients with shock on admission (but responding to resuscitation), proved low grade solid organ injury (by CT), and proved intraperitoneal collection (by US or CT) could be managed conservatively regarding that they remain vitally and clinically stable. If failure of conservation occurs, it is usually during the 1st 24 hours after admission.

scholarly journals Challenges in management of blunt abdominal trauma: a prospective study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 3298
Author(s):  
Rajkumar P. N. ◽  
Kushal Kumar T. R. ◽  
Deepak G.
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Study ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Motor Vehicle Accident ◽  
Imaging Modality ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Vehicle Accident

Background: Trauma meets the pandemic criteria, with a daily worldwide mortality as high as 16000. Abdominal trauma remains a leading cause of mortality in all age groups. Blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) mainly results from motor vehicle accident, fall from height and assaults. The commonest organ injured is the spleen, followed by the liver and small bowel. Lately, the management of BAT has changed from operative to non-operative management. This study was done to analyse the incidence, patterns, current management practiced, and challenges encountered in BAT treated operatively.Methods: This Prospective study was conducted in tertiary care centre in Bangalore during August 2015 to December 2017. 475 patients with blunt abdominal injuries who reported to emergency department were selected for the study based on following inclusion and exclusion criteria.Results: A total of 475 cases of BAT were assessed with a mean age of males and females was 32.6 and 28.3year respectively. Most patients (65%) were between 21 to 30 years of life. Most common mode of injury was motor vehicle accident (57.68%), 60% patients presented to hospital within the initial 4 hours. Abdominal CT had highest accuracy. Most common solid organ injury being spleen (26.5%). 80.84% patients were selected for SNOM and 15.62% had Failed SNOM. 28.48% patients had complications with most common complication wound infection followed by aspiration pneumonia and 7 patients had mortality.Conclusions: Initial resuscitation with thorough clinical examination with correct usage of imaging modalities with timely and proper decision making is the key of management of patients with BAT and there is a need to identify newer imaging modality/procedure which helps to determine better management scheme in all blunt trauma patients. 

scholarly journals Lactate clearance: its relationship with the success of non-operative management in patient with blunt abdominal trauma

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1738
Author(s):  
Reno Rudiman ◽  
Nova Saragih ◽  
Andriana Purnama
Keyword(s):  
Hemorrhagic Shock ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Lactate Clearance ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
History Of ◽  
Non Operative Management

Background: Occult ongoing bleeding has become the second highest cause of death in blunt abdominal trauma. Undetected abdominal injury has caused morbidity and mortality in patients at the early phases of trauma. Non-operative Management (NOM) in solid organ trauma is safe and effective, and this strategy has become widely used. Lactate clearance (LC) has important clinical benefits in patients with acute trauma that is superior to initial lactate examination.  Methods: This study was a prospective cohort study of patients with history of hemorrhagic shock caused by blunt abdominal trauma that came to emergency room of Hasan Sadikin Hospital Bandung from August 2015 to July 2016. The tests were including initial blood lactate, 2 hours, and 4 hours post-resuscitation and then calculation of LC. Analysis using SPSS with chi square for the significance of relationships and Spearman correlation to determine the strength of the relationship between variables. Comparison test between LC2 and LC4 were calculated using Mann-Whitney tests.Results: During one year period, from August 2015 to July 2016, there were 34 patients. Age was in the range of 15-65 years, with a range of 15-25 years were 19 (55.8%), 25-50 years were 11 (32.4%), and >50 years as many as four (11.8%). By sex, there were 28 (82.4%) male gender and 6 (17.6%) women. Based on the type of trauma, there were 11 (32.4%) single trauma patients and 23 (67.6%) multiple trauma patients. Based on the results of statistical analysis with chi square, there was a significant correlation between lactate clearance 2 hours (LC2) and lactate clearance 4 hours (LC4) with the success of NOM (p <0.001) with the Odds Ratio (OR) are 3.750 and 6.500 respectively. Based on non-parametric test (Mann Whitney) showed that there were no significant differences between the LC2 and LC4 in determining the successful of NOM (p>0.05).Conclusions: There was a significant relationship between lactate clearance 2 hours (LC2) and lactate clearance 4 hours (LC4) in determining the success of non-operative management (NOM) in patients with history of hemorrhagic shock caused by blunt abdominal trauma. In addition, there are no significant differences between the LC2 and LC4 in determining the success of the NOM, so that either LC2 or LC4 may be used in predicting the success of NOM, as LC4 is the first preference. The low level of lactate clearance may be used as one of indicators to terminate non-operative management and proceed with surgery right before all symptoms of hemorrhagic shock arise.

scholarly journals Management of solid organ injury in patient of blunt abdominal trauma

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 2361
Author(s):  
Aafrin S. Baldiwala ◽  
Vipul C. Lad
Keyword(s):  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Road Traffic ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Free Fluid ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Initial Resuscitation

Background: In this ongoing era of 21st century, trauma is the leading cause of death in individuals between age 1 and 44. In trauma, also road traffic accidents (RTAs) are the major cause of death. Blunt abdominal trauma is a frequent emergency and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.Methods: A prospective analysis of 50 patients of blunt abdominal trauma admitted in SMIMER hospital Surat within a span of 12 months was done. Unstable patients with initial resuscitation underwent focused assessment sonography for trauma (FAST). Failed resuscitation with free fluid in abdomen confirmed by FAST immediately shifted to operation theatre for laparotomy and proceed. Hemodynamically stable patients underwent computerized tomography of abdomen.Results: Most of the patients in our study were in the age group of 21-45 years with M:F ratio of 4:1. RTAs (62%) was the most common mechanism of injury. Spleen (38%) was the commonest organ injured and the most common surgery performed was splenectomy. In total non-operative management (NOM) was done in 58% of cases and surgical management was done in 42% of cases.Conclusions: Appropriate patient selection, early diagnosis and repeated clinical examination and use of appropriate investigations forms the key in management of blunt abdominal trauma. To conclude, initial resuscitation measures and correct diagnosis forms the most vital part of blunt abdominal trauma management.

scholarly journals Blunt abdominal trauma: a tertiary care experience

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 975
Author(s):  
Vikram Trehan ◽  
Sukumar S. Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Hemodynamic Instability ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Management Options ◽  
Solid Organ Injury

Background: Blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) is one of the common causes of admission in surgical ward in any hospital. It requires high level of suspicion, urgent evaluation and timely management to decrease morbidity and mortality. Aim of present study was to find out demographic details, causes of injury, management options and treatment outcomes of BAT.Methods: Retrospective study of cases of BAT was carried out at a tertiary care hospital of India spanning five years, between June 2012 to June 2017. Authors analyzed the demographic profile of the trauma victims, etiological factors of BAT, the abdominal organs involved, the treatment modalities adopted and the final outcome.Results: There were 231 cases of BAT. Most common age group was 11 to 30 years which accounted for 42.42% of the total. The study had 181 (78.35%) males and 50 (21.64%) females. Road traffic accident was the most common cause of BAT and it accounted for 67.97%. Liver (34.20%) was the most commonly involved organ followed by spleen (22.51%), bowel (15.58%), mesentery (8.23%), kidney (7.36%), pancreaticoduodenal injuries (3.46%) and diaphragm (3.46%). 56.71% underwent non-operative management (NOM), 3.90% underwent angio-embolization and 39.39% eventually required operative treatment. Mortality occurred in 31 patients (13.41%) because of septicemia, renal failure, shock, acute coronary event or respiratory complications.Conclusions: NOM for BAT was found to be successful in haemodynamically stable patient with solid organ injury. Along with sophisticated infrastructure like ultrasound or CT Scan, close supervision with repeated examination by a treating surgeon were the sheet anchors of NOM. Angio-embolization is a feasible modality of treatment in solid organ injury and can avoid surgery in an appropriate patient. Definitive indications for laparotomy were hemodynamic instability and perforation-peritonitis. Initial hemodynamic instability, haemorrhagic shock, and associated injuries influenced morbidity and mortality in BAT. 

TO STUDY MODALITIES FOR EVALUATING THE ABDOMEN AFTER BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Ishant Kumar Chaurasia ◽  
Dr. Muffazzal Rassiwala
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Blunt Abdominal Trauma ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Medical College ◽  
The Social ◽  
Fall From Height ◽  
Overall Mortality

Background: This Study carried out in the Department of Surgery, Index Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Indore both retrospectively and prospectively in patients with Blunt abdominal trauma. Result: Table shows overall mortality 14.6% in the period of study. Out of those patients who were discharged or had improved, 214, i.e. 85.6%of cases were improved. Mortality maximum in patient BAT due to RTA 64.52% and Mortality minimum in patient BAT due to fall from height 20%. In 116 laparotomy patients in blunt abdomen injury there were 219 internal organ injuries founded. Among these injuries hemoperitoneum, 94 cases i.e.37.6% was the most common, intr-op finding in BAT patient. Small intestine (ileal >jejunal) injury 45 cases i.e.18% was most common hollow viscous injury in BAT patient and pancreas is least common 1 cases. i.e. 0.4%. Involved organ in BAT. In solid organ injury there were maximum incidence of liver injury 34 cases. I.e. 13.6% followed by spleen 26 cases i.e.10.4%and kidney & ureter 11 cases. i.e. 4.4%. Conclusion: Improving the social morale of people especially the younger generation by providing Good education, Employment, Preventing Alcohol Abuse Proper law enforcement and some form of penalty regarding proper vehicle driving. Keywords: Modality, Abdomen & Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document