scholarly journals Aurora at the pole and equator: overlapping functions of Aurora kinases in the mitotic spindle

Open Biology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 120185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helfrid Hochegger ◽  
Nadia Hégarat ◽  
Jose B. Pereira-Leal
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Aurora Kinase ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Aurora A ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Aurora Kinases ◽  
Mitotic Kinases ◽  
Chromosome Alignment ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

The correct assembly and timely disassembly of the mitotic spindle is crucial for the propagation of the genome during cell division. Aurora kinases play a central role in orchestrating bipolar spindle establishment, chromosome alignment and segregation. In most eukaryotes, ranging from amoebas to humans, Aurora activity appears to be required both at the spindle pole and the kinetochore, and these activities are often split between two different Aurora paralogues, termed Aurora A and B. Polar and equatorial functions of Aurora kinases have generally been considered separately, with Aurora A being mostly involved in centrosome dynamics, whereas Aurora B coordinates kinetochore attachment and cytokinesis. However, double inactivation of both Aurora A and B results in a dramatic synergy that abolishes chromosome segregation. This suggests that these two activities jointly coordinate mitotic progression. Accordingly, recent evidence suggests that Aurora A and B work together in both spindle assembly in metaphase and disassembly in anaphase. Here, we provide an outlook on these shared functions of the Auroras, discuss the evolution of this family of mitotic kinases and speculate why Aurora kinase activity may be required at both ends of the spindle microtubules.

scholarly journals The nucleoporin ALADIN regulates Aurora A localization to ensure robust mitotic spindle formation

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (19) ◽  
pp. 3424-3438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Carvalhal ◽  
Susana Abreu Ribeiro ◽  
Miguel Arocena ◽  
Taciana Kasciukovic ◽  
Achim Temme ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Nuclear Pore ◽  
Aurora A Kinase ◽  
Aurora A ◽  
Triple A Syndrome ◽  
Mitotic Kinases ◽  
Nuclear Pore Protein ◽  
Complex Process ◽  
Chromosome Alignment

The formation of the mitotic spindle is a complex process that requires massive cellular reorganization. Regulation by mitotic kinases controls this entire process. One of these mitotic controllers is Aurora A kinase, which is itself highly regulated. In this study, we show that the nuclear pore protein ALADIN is a novel spatial regulator of Aurora A. Without ALADIN, Aurora A spreads from centrosomes onto spindle microtubules, which affects the distribution of a subset of microtubule regulators and slows spindle assembly and chromosome alignment. ALADIN interacts with inactive Aurora A and is recruited to the spindle pole after Aurora A inhibition. Of interest, mutations in ALADIN cause triple A syndrome. We find that some of the mitotic phenotypes that we observe after ALADIN depletion also occur in cells from triple A syndrome patients, which raises the possibility that mitotic errors may underlie part of the etiology of this syndrome.

scholarly journals Aurora A contributes to p150glued phosphorylation and function during mitosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 189 (4) ◽  
pp. 651-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Romé ◽  
Emilie Montembault ◽  
Nathalie Franck ◽  
Aude Pascal ◽  
David M. Glover ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Aurora A Kinase ◽  
Aurora A ◽  
Microtubule Binding ◽  
Microtubule Binding Domain ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
And Function

Aurora A is a spindle pole–associated protein kinase required for mitotic spindle assembly and chromosome segregation. In this study, we show that Drosophila melanogaster aurora A phosphorylates the dynactin subunit p150glued on sites required for its association with the mitotic spindle. Dynactin strongly accumulates on microtubules during prophase but disappears as soon as the nuclear envelope breaks down, suggesting that its spindle localization is tightly regulated. If aurora A's function is compromised, dynactin and dynein become enriched on mitotic spindle microtubules. Phosphorylation sites are localized within the conserved microtubule-binding domain (MBD) of the p150glued. Although wild-type p150glued binds weakly to spindle microtubules, a variant that can no longer be phosphorylated by aurora A remains associated with spindle microtubules and fails to rescue depletion of endogenous p150glued. Our results suggest that aurora A kinase participates in vivo to the phosphoregulation of the p150glued MBD to limit the microtubule binding of the dynein–dynactin complex and thus regulates spindle assembly.

The role of gamma-tubulin in mitotic spindle formation and cell cycle progression in Aspergillus nidulans

1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (5) ◽  
pp. 623-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Martin ◽  
S.A. Osmani ◽  
B.R. Oakley
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Microtubule Assembly ◽  
Cytoplasmic Microtubule ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
Gamma Tubulin

gamma-Tubulin has been hypothesized to be essential for the nucleation of the assembly of mitotic spindle microtubules, but some recent results suggest that this may not be the case. To clarify the role of gamma-tubulin in microtubule assembly and cell-cycle progression, we have developed a novel variation of the gene disruption/heterokaryon rescue technique of Aspergillus nidulans. We have used temperature-sensitive cell-cycle mutations to synchronize germlings carrying a gamma-tubulin disruption and observe the phenotypes caused by the disruption in the first cell cycle after germination. Our results indicate that gamma-tubulin is absolutely required for the assembly of mitotic spindle microtubules, a finding that supports the hypothesis that gamma-tubulin is involved in spindle microtubule nucleation. In the absence of functional gamma-tubulin, nuclei are blocked with condensed chromosomes for about the length of one cell cycle before chromatin decondenses without nuclear division. Our results indicate that gamma-tubulin is not essential for progression from G1 to G2, for entry into mitosis nor for spindle pole body replication. It is also not required for reactivity of spindle pole bodies with the MPM-2 antibody which recognizes a phosphoepitope important to mitotic spindle formation. Finally, it does not appear to be absolutely required for cytoplasmic microtubule assembly but may play a role in the formation of normal cytoplasmic microtubule arrays.

scholarly journals A quantitative analysis of cohesin decay in mitotic fidelity

2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (10) ◽  
pp. 3343-3353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Carvalhal ◽  
Alexandra Tavares ◽  
Mariana B. Santos ◽  
Mihailo Mirkovic ◽  
Raquel A. Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Force Balance ◽  
Chromosome Organization ◽  
Centromeric Chromatin ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosome Alignment

Sister chromatid cohesion mediated by cohesin is essential for mitotic fidelity. It counteracts spindle forces to prevent premature chromatid individualization and random genome segregation. However, it is unclear what effects a partial decline of cohesin may have on chromosome organization. In this study, we provide a quantitative analysis of cohesin decay by inducing acute removal of defined amounts of cohesin from metaphase-arrested chromosomes. We demonstrate that sister chromatid cohesion is very resistant to cohesin loss as chromatid disjunction is only observed when chromosomes lose >80% of bound cohesin. Removal close to this threshold leads to chromosomes that are still cohered but display compromised chromosome alignment and unstable spindle attachments. Partial cohesin decay leads to increased duration of mitosis and susceptibility to errors in chromosome segregation. We propose that high cohesin density ensures centromeric chromatin rigidity necessary to maintain a force balance with the mitotic spindle. Partial cohesin loss may lead to chromosome segregation errors even when sister chromatid cohesion is fulfilled.

scholarly journals Bub1, Sgo1, and Mps1 mediate a distinct pathway for chromosome biorientation in budding yeast

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1473-1485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuzana Storchová ◽  
Justin S. Becker ◽  
Nicolas Talarek ◽  
Sandra Kögelsberger ◽  
David Pellman
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Mitotic Kinase ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromosome Alignment ◽  
Chromosomal Passenger

The conserved mitotic kinase Bub1 performs multiple functions that are only partially characterized. Besides its role in the spindle assembly checkpoint and chromosome alignment, Bub1 is crucial for the kinetochore recruitment of multiple proteins, among them Sgo1. Both Bub1 and Sgo1 are dispensable for growth of haploid and diploid budding yeast, but they become essential in cells with higher ploidy. We find that overexpression of SGO1 partially corrects the chromosome segregation defect of bub1Δ haploid cells and restores viability to bub1Δ tetraploid cells. Using an unbiased high-copy suppressor screen, we identified two members of the chromosomal passenger complex (CPC), BIR1 (survivin) and SLI15 (INCENP, inner centromere protein), as suppressors of the growth defect of both bub1Δ and sgo1Δ tetraploids, suggesting that these mutants die due to defects in chromosome biorientation. Overexpression of BIR1 or SLI15 also complements the benomyl sensitivity of haploid bub1Δ and sgo1Δ cells. Mutants lacking SGO1 fail to biorient sister chromatids attached to the same spindle pole (syntelic attachment) after nocodazole treatment. Moreover, the sgo1Δ cells accumulate syntelic attachments in unperturbed mitoses, a defect that is partially corrected by BIR1 or SLI15 overexpression. We show that in budding yeast neither Bub1 nor Sgo1 is required for CPC localization or affects Aurora B activity. Instead we identify Sgo1 as a possible partner of Mps1, a mitotic kinase suggested to have an Aurora B–independent function in establishment of biorientation. We found that Sgo1 overexpression rescues defects caused by metaphase inactivation of Mps1 and that Mps1 is required for Sgo1 localization to the kinetochore. We propose that Bub1, Sgo1, and Mps1 facilitate chromosome biorientation independently of the Aurora B–mediated pathway at the budding yeast kinetochore and that both pathways are required for the efficient turnover of syntelic attachments.

scholarly journals Reductionism at the vertebrate kinetochore

2012 ◽  
Vol 200 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Stankovic ◽  
Lars E.T. Jansen
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Large Structure ◽  
Cell Biol ◽  
Spindle Microtubules ◽  
The Creation

The kinetochore forms the site of attachment for mitotic spindle microtubules driving chromosome segregation. The interdependent protein interactions in this large structure have made it difficult to dissect the function of its components. In this issue, Hori et al. (2013. J. Cell Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201210106) present a novel and powerful methodology to address the sufficiency of individual proteins for the creation of a functional de novo centromere.

scholarly journals Aurora A kinase phosphorylates Hec1 to regulate metaphase kinetochore–microtubule dynamics

2017 ◽  
Vol 217 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith F. DeLuca ◽  
Amanda Meppelink ◽  
Amanda J. Broad ◽  
Jeanne E. Mick ◽  
Olve B. Peersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Microtubule Dynamics ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Aurora A Kinase ◽  
Aurora A ◽  
Tail Domain ◽  
Mitotic Chromosomes ◽  
Metaphase Chromosomes ◽  
Mitotic Kinases ◽  
Microtubule Attachment

Precise regulation of kinetochore–microtubule attachments is essential for successful chromosome segregation. Central to this regulation is Aurora B kinase, which phosphorylates kinetochore substrates to promote microtubule turnover. A critical target of Aurora B is the N-terminal “tail” domain of Hec1, which is a component of the NDC80 complex, a force-transducing link between kinetochores and microtubules. Although Aurora B is regarded as the “master regulator” of kinetochore–microtubule attachment, other mitotic kinases likely contribute to Hec1 phosphorylation. In this study, we demonstrate that Aurora A kinase regulates kinetochore–microtubule dynamics of metaphase chromosomes, and we identify Hec1 S69, a previously uncharacterized phosphorylation target site in the Hec1 tail, as a critical Aurora A substrate for this regulation. Additionally, we demonstrate that Aurora A kinase associates with inner centromere protein (INCENP) during mitosis and that INCENP is competent to drive accumulation of the kinase to the centromere region of mitotic chromosomes. These findings reveal that both Aurora A and B contribute to kinetochore–microtubule attachment dynamics, and they uncover an unexpected role for Aurora A in late mitosis.

scholarly journals TPX2 phosphorylation maintains metaphase spindle length by regulating microtubule flux

2015 ◽  
Vol 210 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyan Fu ◽  
Minglei Bian ◽  
Guangwei Xin ◽  
Zhaoxuan Deng ◽  
Jia Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Microtubule Dynamics ◽  
Flux Rate ◽  
Aurora A ◽  
Null Mutant ◽  
Constant Length ◽  
Microtubule Polymerization ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

A steady-state metaphase spindle maintains constant length, although the microtubules undergo intensive dynamics. Tubulin dimers are incorporated at plus ends of spindle microtubules while they are removed from the minus ends, resulting in poleward movement. Such microtubule flux is regulated by the microtubule rescue factors CLASPs at kinetochores and depolymerizing protein Kif2a at the poles, along with other regulators of microtubule dynamics. How microtubule polymerization and depolymerization are coordinated remains unclear. Here we show that TPX2, a microtubule-bundling protein and activator of Aurora A, plays an important role. TPX2 was phosphorylated by Aurora A during mitosis. Its phospho-null mutant caused short metaphase spindles coupled with low microtubule flux rate. Interestingly, phosphorylation of TPX2 regulated its interaction with CLASP1 but not Kif2a. The effect of its mutant in shortening the spindle could be rescued by codepletion of CLASP1 and Kif2a that abolished microtubule flux. Together we propose that Aurora A–dependent TPX2 phosphorylation controls mitotic spindle length through regulating microtubule flux.

scholarly journals SUMO proteases SENP3 and SENP5 spatiotemporally regulate the kinase activity of Aurora A

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Yu ◽  
Qiaoyu Lin ◽  
Chao Huang ◽  
Boyan Zhang ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
In Vitro Assays ◽  
Aurora A ◽  
Sumo Proteases ◽  
Spatiotemporal Control ◽  
Early Mitosis

Precise chromosome segregation is mediated by a well-assembled mitotic spindle, which requires balance of the kinase activity of Aurora A (AurA). However, how this kinase activity is regulated remains largely unclear. Here, using in vivo and in vitro assays, we report that conjugation of SUMO2 with AurA at K258 in early mitosis promotes the kinase activity of AurA and facilitates the binding with its activator, Bora. Knockdown of the SUMO proteases SENP3 and SENP5 disrupted the deSUMOylation of AurA, leading to an increased kinase activity and abnormalities in spindle assembly and chromosomes segregation which could be rescued by suppressing the kinase activity of AurA. Collectively, these results demonstrate that SENP3 and SENP5 deSUMOylate AurA to render a spatiotemporal control on its kinase activity in mitosis.

scholarly journals Interactions between N-Terminal Modules in MPS1 Enable Spindle Checkpoint Silencing

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spyridon T. Pachis ◽  
Yoshitaka Hiruma ◽  
Anastassis Perrakis ◽  
Geert J.P.L. Kops
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Intramolecular Interactions ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Regulatory Input ◽  
Tpr Domain

ABSTRACTFaithful chromosome segregation relies on the ability of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) to delay anaphase onset until all chromosomes are attached to the mitotic spindle via their kinetochores. MPS1 kinase is recruited to unattached kinetochores to initiate SAC signaling, and is removed from kinetochores once stable microtubule attachments have been formed to allow normal mitotic progression. Here we show that a helical fragment within the kinetochore-targeting NTE module of MPS1 is required for interactions with kinetochores, and also forms intramolecular interactions with its adjacent TPR domain. Bypassing this NTE-TPR interaction results in high MPS1 levels at kinetochores due to loss of regulatory input into MPS1 localization, ineffecient MPS1 delocalization from kinetochores upon microtubule attachment, and SAC silencing defects. These results show that SAC responsiveness to attachments relies on regulated intramolecular interactions in MPS1 and highlight the sensitivity of mitosis to perturbations in the dynamics of the MSP1-NDC80-C interactions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document