Interference due to walls of a wind-tunnel
This paper arose out of a discussion with Mr. Glauert on the validity of certain results on wind-tunnel interference given in a recent paper by Theodorsen, and I am greatly indebted to him for several very valuable suggestions. In his paper Theodorsen investigated, on the lines of the approximate theory laid down by Glauert, the interference factors due to rectangular tunnels in the following five conditions: (1) tunnel entirely enclosed; (2) free jet; (3) horizontal boundaries only, the vertical sides being free surfaces; (4) vertical boundaries only, the horizontal sides being free surfaces; (5) bottom boundary only, the remaining sides being free surfaces. Apart from one or two minor errors, Theodorsen's paper has to face a more serious objection on the score that the approximate method employed is not always valid. This objection to the approximate method was raised rather briefly in a previous paper, but at that time all the cases discussed, using the approximate method, were those due to Glauert, and they were such that the approximate method did not come into conflict with the exact theory. The more complicated method was, however, of some practical importance as it enabled additional refinements to be introduced into tire numerical evaluation of the interference factors, and it enabled Glauert to show that there is an appreciable drop in the interference factor in the Duplex Tunnel (height/breadth equal to one half) as the span of the aerofoil increases. Some of the cases discussed by Theodorsen are such that they must be considered according to the exact theory. The crux of the matter is as follows:— The basis of the theory of wind-tunnel interference is due to Prandtl, and he investigated several cases himself. On the assumption that trailing vortices spring from the aerofoil and extend downstream without distortion, Prandtl showed that the whole problem can be converted into one dealing with the flow in a transverse section of the wake far behind the aerofoil, the necessary boundary conditions being that the velocity potential is constant over the surface of the free jet, and the stream function constant over the rigid boundary. The theory was extended by Glauert and others, and applied particularly to the case of the small aerofoil in a rectangular tunnel. When the aerofoil is very small the exact distribution of vorticity is not of extreme importance as, to a first approximation, they all give the same result.