scholarly journals A relativistic basis of the quantum theory.—II

The paper is a continuation of the last paper communicated to these 'Proceedings.' In that paper, which we shall refer to as the first paper, a more general expression for space curvature was obtained than that which occurs in Riemannian geometry, by a modification of the Riemannian covariant derivative and by the use of a fifth co-ordinate. By means of a particular substitution (∆ μσ σ = 1/ψ ∂ψ/∂x μ ) it was shown that this curvature takes the form of the second order equation of quantum mechanics. It is not a matrix equation, however but one which has the character of the wave equation as it occurred in the earlier form of the quantum theory. But it contains additional terms, all of which can be readily accounted for in physics, expect on which suggested an identification with energy of the spin.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron C.H. Davey

The father of quantum mechanics, Erwin Schrodinger, was one of the most important figures in the development of quantum theory. He is perhaps best known for his contribution of the wave equation, which would later result in his winning of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1933. The Schrodinger wave equation describes the quantum mechanical behaviour of particles and explores how the Schrodinger wave functions of a system change over time. This project is concerned about exploring the one-dimensional case of the Schrodinger wave equation in a harmonic oscillator system. We will give the solutions, called eigenfunctions, of the equation that satisfy certain conditions. Furthermore, we will show that this happens only for particular values called eigenvalues.


1—Wave matrices became important in wave theory as the result of the use of them made by Dirac to express the operator of the second order wave equation as the square of a linear one, and hence obtain a first order equation. Thus, p 2 representing the second order operator, the equation p 2 Ψ = 0, may be factorized, and written (∑ E α p α ) (∑ E α p α ) Ψ = 0, (α = 1, 2, . . . , n ), giving the first order equation ∑ E α p α Ψ = 0, (1) if the p α commute with themselves and with the E α , and if the E α are matrix roots of +1 or of —1, which satisfy E α E β = — E β E a (β ≠ α). (2)


2021 ◽  
pp. 161-177
Author(s):  
Steven L. Goldman

Ontology is integral to the two most fundamental scientific theories of the twentieth century: quantum theory and the special and general theories of relativity. Issues that drove the development of quantum theory include the reality of quanta, the simultaneous wave- and particle-like nature of matter and energy, determinism, probability and randomness, Schrodinger’s wave equation, and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. So did the reality of the predictions about space, time, matter, energy, and the universe itself that were deduced from the special and general theories of relativity. Dirac’s prediction of antimatter based solely on the mathematics of his theory of the electron and Pauli’s prediction of the neutrino based on his belief in quantum mechanics are cases in point. Ontological interpretations of the uncertainty principle, of quantum vacuum energy fields, and of Schrodinger’s probability waves in the form of multiple universe theories further illustrate this point.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (22) ◽  
pp. 4157-4167 ◽  
Author(s):  
VICTOR L. MIRONOV ◽  
SERGEY V. MIRONOV

We demonstrate a generalization of relativistic quantum mechanics using eight-component octonic wave function and octonic spatial operators. It is shown that the second-order equation for octonic wave function describing particles with spin 1/2 can be reformulated in the form of a system of first-order equations for quantum fields, which is analogous to the system of Maxwell equations for the electromagnetic field. It is established that for the special types of wave functions the second-order equation can be reduced to the single first-order equation analogous to the Dirac equation. At the same time it is shown that this first-order equation describes particles, which do not have quantum fields.


The quantum theory of the meson (Kemmer 1938; Fröhlich, Heitler and Kemmer 1938; Bhabha 1938; Yukawa, Sakata and Taketani 1938; Stueckelberg 1938), in spite of its great similarity to the quantum theory of radiation, differs from it in certain important respects. The total Hamiltonian for the system of protons or neutrons and mesons contains terms in the interaction energy of mesons with the heavy particles which increase with increasing energy of the mesons. This has brought physicists to the prevalent view that for high energies this theory leads to large probabilities for multiple processes, and to explosions of the type first investigated by Heisenberg (1936). Indeed, the possibility of such processes has recently caused Heisenberg (1938) to take the position that they set a limit to the applicability of quantum mechanics. Connected with the same behaviour of the interaction is the fact that many effects, such for example as the perturbation of the self-energy of a proton calculated to the second order in the interaction, diverge more acutely than in ordinary radiation theory, and this has led Heitler (1938) and others to doubt the correctness of the fundamental equations even for mesons of energy comparable with their rest mass. All the above views are in essence based on the results of second-order perturbation calculations. There is, however, another approach to the problem. Using the commutation rules for the observables and the well-known equations of motion of quantum mechanics, we can derive exactly from the same Hamiltonian on the one hand the Dirac equation for the proton or neutron under the influence of a given meson field, and on the other hand the equations of the meson field influenced by the presence of neutrons. (For brevity we shall henceforth only speak of neutrons, whereas our remarks will apply equally well to protons, since the two are on the same footing as far as this theory is concerned.) Treating the Hamiltonian “classically”, that is, treating all the observables occurring in it as commuting variables, we can as usual again derive the same two sets of equations. In this paper, as a first step in the problem, we shall deal with classical equations, since it is possible either to solve them exactly, or at least to give approximate solutions the errors of which can be strictly estimated.


In a previous paper by the author* it is shown that the general theory of quantum mechanics together with relativity require the wave equation for an electron moving in an arbitrary electromagnetic field of potentials, A 0 , A 1 , A 2 , A 3 to be of the form FΨ ≡ [p 0 e / c A 0 + α 1 (p 1 + e / c A 1 ) + α 2 (p 2 + e / c A 2 ) + α 3 (p 3 + e / c A 3 ) + α 4 mc] Ψ = 0. (1) The α’s are new dynamical variables which it is necessary to introduce in order to satisfy the conditions of the problem. They may be regarded as describing some internal motion of the electron, which for most purposes may be taken to be the spin of the electron postulated in previous theories. We shall call them the spin variables.


The form of the wave equation for a non-rotating electron suggests that it enters into the theory very much in the same way as the wave equation associated with electromagnetic theory. It would be expected to be derivable from equations of the first order corresponding to Maxwell's equations. It has been suggested that the function Ψ might enter by means of a relation such as s = grad Ψ (1) where s replaces the current four vector of the electromagnetic theory. The difficulty in connection with this procedure is to account for the phenomena associated with electronic rotation. Dirac has shown how to overcome this difficulty and has derived first order equations which can be derived from generalisations of Maxwell's equations. There are certain difficulties with regard to the form of Dirac's results which have been much discussed and some of them have been removed. There are two unsatisfactory points in the treatment of this question. One is the introduction of an operator ( h /2 πi ∂/∂ x α - eϕ α ) into the equations when it is desired to pass from a non-electromagnetic problem to one in which an electromagnetic field is present. The second difficulty lies in the occurrence of a term in mc . Darwin has pointed out this difficulty and considers that it is due to our inability to calculate electromagnetic mass in the quantum theory.


Author(s):  
Craig Callender

Two of quantum mechanics’ more famed and spooky features have been invoked in defending the idea that quantum time is congenial to manifest time. Quantum non-locality is said by some to make a preferred foliation of spacetime necessary, and the collapse of the quantum wavefunction is held to vindicate temporal becoming. Although many philosophers and physicists seek relief from relativity’s assault on time in quantum theory, assistance is not so easily found.


Author(s):  
Frank S. Levin

Surfing the Quantum World bridges the gap between in-depth textbooks and typical popular science books on quantum ideas and phenomena. Among its significant features is the description of a host of mind-bending phenomena, such as a quantum object being in two places at once or a certain minus sign being the most consequential in the universe. Much of its first part is historical, starting with the ancient Greeks and their concepts of light, and ending with the creation of quantum mechanics. The second part begins by applying quantum mechanics and its probability nature to a pedagogical system, the one-dimensional box, an analog of which is a musical-instrument string. This is followed by a gentle introduction to the fundamental principles of quantum theory, whose core concepts and symbolic representations are the foundation for most of the subsequent chapters. For instance, it is shown how quantum theory explains the properties of the hydrogen atom and, via quantum spin and Pauli’s Exclusion Principle, how it accounts for the structure of the periodic table. White dwarf and neutron stars are seen to be gigantic quantum objects, while the maximum height of mountains is shown to have a quantum basis. Among the many other topics considered are a variety of interference phenomena, those that display the wave properties of particles like electrons and photons, and even of large molecules. The book concludes with a wide-ranging discussion of interpretational and philosophic issues, introduced in Chapters 14 by entanglement and 15 by Schrödinger’s cat.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document