Tectonics and evolution of the central sector of the Himalaya

Following the India-Asia collision, intracrustal movements along the Main Central Thrust (MCT) and Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) in a piggy-back-style, thrust duplexes developed that uplifted the Vaikrita (Central) crystallines of the basement to more than 8000 m elevation. Blocking of subduction on the suture and slowing down of movement on the MCT led to the formation of the Trans-Himadri (Malari) Thrust between the Vaikrita basement and the Tethyan cover sediments, and to gravity-induced backfolds and backthrusts in the latter. The Vaikrita crystallines underwent upper amphibolite to lower granulite facies metamorphism at 600-650 °C and more than 5 kbar (1 kbar = 101 *8 Pa) and migmatistation associated with 28-20 Ma old S-type granites that formed at 15-30 km depth during the culmination of metamorphism and thrust deformation. Delimited by the MCT and MBT, the Lesser Himalaya is made of Proterozoic sediments beneath the Almora nappe constituted of low- to medium-grade metamorphics and 1900+ 100 Ma old granitic gneisses and 560 + 20 Ma old granites. The Lesser Himilaya underwent considerable neotectonic rejuvenation during differential movements along the MBT. The frontal Siwalik molasse below the MBT was severely thrusted and folded in the late Holocene, and continued underthrusting of the Indian Shield beneath the Himalaya is manifest in the development and activation of the deep Himalayan Front Fault (HFF), which separates the Siwalik from the subRecent-Recent alluvial plain of the Ganga Basin.

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 15-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lalu Prasad Paudel

Geological field survey and structural analysis were carried out in the Tansen-Pokhara section of central Nepal in an attempt to unravel the thin-skinned tectonic geometry of the Lesser Himalaya. The Lesser Himalaya in the area forms a foreland-propagating duplex structure, each tectonic unit being a horse bounded by imbricate faults. The Upper Main Central Thrust and the Main Boundary Thrust are the roof and floor thrusts, respectively. The Bari Gad-Kali Gandaki Fault is an out-of-sequence fault. The Pindi Khola Fault is an antithetic back-thrust developed on the hangingwall of the Bari Gad-Kali Gandaki Fault, and the Kusma Fault is a splay-off of the Phalebas Thrust. Deformation of the Lesser Himalaya occurred in distinct three phases namely pre-Himalayan, Eohimalayan and Neohimalayan. The duplex structure was formed in the Neohimlayan stage in the period between Middle Miocene and Early Pleistocene. J. Nat. Hist. Mus. Vol. 26, 2012: 15-28


2001 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santa Man Rai

A multidisciplinary study was carried out in the Lesser Himalaya (LH), the Kathmandu Crystalline Nappe (KCN) and the Gosainkund Crystalline Nappe (GCN) in central Nepal Himalaya. Two principal deformations are recorded in both the crystalline nappes and the Lesser Himalaya: ductile, syn-MCTor syn-MT metamorphic deformation marked by microstructures (stretching lineation, S-C structures, and isoclinal folding) and post-MCT/or post-MT metamorphic deformation recorded by a major EW-directed Likhu Khola anticline and by NNE-SSW-directed folds. The Upper Lesser Himalayan rocks close to the Main Central Thrust (MCT) record syn-MCT metamorphic conditions at 750 MPa and 566 °C. The rocks of the KCN record P-T condition from 900 to 720 MPa and 700 to 484 °C, while the GCN rocks were equilibrated at upper amphibolite- to granulite-facies conditions from 890 to 583 MPa and 754 to 588 °C. The P-T conditions and field observations exhibit well-preserved inverted metamorphism between the Upper Lesser Himalaya and the Gosainkund Crystalline Nappe. The augen gneisses from the GCN yielding 486±9Ma U-Pb zircon age and the granites of similar age in the KCN bear similar petrographic and geochemical characteristics and suggest a similar magmatic origin although they belong to different tectonic units. The chemical analyses of the Proterozoic Ulleri augen gneiss of the LH and the granites of the KCN fall within the same compositional field, indicating a magmatic origin of these augen gneisses. 40Ar/39Ar datings on muscovite indicate cooling ages younging systematically from south to north: 22 to 14 Ma in the KCN, 16 to 5 Ma in the GCN, and 12 to 6 Ma in the LH. This systematic younging of muscovite ages does not have any correlation with the present elevation, lithology and tectonic unit and is interpreted as a result of the exhumation of the rock units on the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT) ramp situated to the north of Kathmandu Valley. Both the KCN and the GCN record a late emplacement history, but the KCN was exhumed earlier than the GCN. The two crystalline nappes presently form a single tectonic block, and the combined uplift of the two nappes occurs on a ramp of a major decollement developed in the upper part of the Indian crust.


Early cratonal development of the Arabian Shield of southwestern Saudi Arabia began with the deposition of calcic to calc-alkalic, basaltic to dacitic volcanic rocks, and immature sedimentary rocks that subsequently were moderately deformed, metamorphosed, and intruded about 960 Ma ago by dioritic batholiths of mantle derivation (87Sr/86Sr = 0.7029). A thick sequence of calc-alkalic andesitic to rhyodacitic volcanic rocks and volcanoclastic wackes was deposited unconformably on this neocraton. Regional greenschistfacies metamorphism, intensive deformation along north-trending structures, and intrusion of mantle-derived (87Sr/86Sr = 0.7028) dioritic to granodioritic batholiths occurred about 800 Ma. Granodiorite was emplaced as injection gneiss about 785 Ma (87Sr/86Sr = 0.7028- 0.7035) in localized areas of gneiss doming and amphibolite to granulite facies metamorphism. Deposition of clastic and volcanic rocks overlapped in time and followed orogeny at 785 Ma. These deposits, together with the older rocks, were deformed, metamorphosed to greenschist facies, and intruded by calc-alkalic plutons (87Sr/86Sr = 0.7035) between 600 and 650 Ma. Late cratonal development between 570 and 550 Ma involved moderate pulses of volcanism, deformation, metamorphism to greenschist facies, and intrusion of quartz monzonite and granite. Cratonization appears to have evolved in an intraoceanic, island-arc environment of comagmatic volcanism and intrusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document