Propulsive jets and their acoustics

Author(s):  
Alexander N Secundov ◽  
Stanley F Birch ◽  
Paul G Tucker

The complex flow physics challenges and asks questions regarding these challenges a wide range of jet flows found in aerospace engineering. Hence, the daunting task facing Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) technology, for which the time average of the turbulent flow field is solved, is set out. Despite the clear potential of large eddy simulation (LES)-related methods and hybrid forms involving some RANS modelling, numerous current deficiencies, mostly related to the limitations of computational resources, are identified. It is concluded that currently, these limitations make LES and hybrids most useful for understanding flow physics and refining RANS technology. The use of LES in conjunction with a ray-tracing model to elucidate the physics of acoustic wave transmission in jets and thus improved RANS technology is described. It is argued that, as a stopgap measure, pure RANS simulations can be a valuable part of the design process and can now predict acoustics spectra and directivity diagrams with useful accuracy. Ultimately, hybrid RANS–LES-type methods, and then pure LES, will dominate, but the time-scales for this transition suggests that improvements to RANS technology should not be ignored.

Author(s):  
James Tyacke ◽  
Richard Jefferson-Loveday ◽  
Paul Tucker

Nine Large Eddy Simulation (LES) methods are used to simulate flow through two labyrinth seal geometries and are compared with a wide range of Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) solutions. These involve one-equation, two-equation and Reynolds Stress RANS models. Also applied are linear and nonlinear pure LES models, hybrid RANS-Numerical-LES (RANS-NLES) and Numerical-LES (NLES). RANS is found to have a maximum error and a scatter of 20%. A similar level of scatter is also found among the same turbulence model implemented in different codes. In a design context, this makes RANS unusable as a final solution. Results show that LES and RANS-NLES is capable of accurately predicting flow behaviour of two seals with a scatter of less than 5%. The complex flow physics gives rise to both laminar and turbulent zones making most LES models inappropriate. Nonetheless, this is found to have minimal tangible results impact. In accord with experimental observations, the ability of LES to find multiple solutions due to solution non-uniqueness is also observed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (03) ◽  
pp. 184-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Alin ◽  
R.E. Bensow ◽  
C. Fureby ◽  
T. Huuva ◽  
U. Svennberg

The flow around an axisymmetric hull, with and without appendages, is investigated using large eddy simulation (LES), detached eddy simulation (DES), and Reynolds averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) models. The main objectives of the study is to investigate the effect of the different simulation methods and to demonstrate the feasibility of using DES and LES on relatively coarse grids for submarine flows, but also to discuss some generic features of submarine hydrodynamics. For this purpose the DARPA Suboff configurations AFF1 (bare hull) and AFF8 (fully appended model) are used. The AFF1 case is interesting because it is highly demanding, in particular for LES and DES, due to the long midship section on which the boundary layer is developed. The AFF8 case represents the complex flow around a fully appended submarine with sail and aft rudders. An actuator disc model is used to emulate some of the effects of the propulsor for one of the AFF8 cases studied. Results for the AFF8 model are thus presented for both "towed" and "self-propelled" conditions, where as for the bare hull, only a "towed" condition is considered. For the AFF1 and the "towed" AFF8 cases experimental data are available for comparison, and the results from both configurations show that all methods give good results for first-order statistical moments although LES gives a better representation of structures and second-order statistical moments in the complex flow in the AFF8 case.


2007 ◽  
Vol 111 (1117) ◽  
pp. 153-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Nayyar ◽  
G. N. Barakos ◽  
K. J. Badcock

Numerical analysis of the flow in weapon bays modelled as open rectangular cavities of length-to-depth (L/D) ratio of 5 and width-to-depth (W/D) ratio of 1 with doors-on and doors-off is presented. Flow conditions correspond to Mach and Reynolds numbers (based on cavity length) of 0·85 and 6·783m respectively. Results from unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS), large-eddy simulation (LES) and detached-eddy simulation (DES) are compared with the simulation methods demonstrating the best prediction of this complex flow. It was found that URANS was not able to predict the change of flow characteristics between the doors-on and doors-off configurations. In addition, the energy content of the cavity flow modes was much better resolved with DES and LES. Further, the DES was found to be quite capable for this problem giving accurate results (within 3dB of) experiments and appears to be a promising alternative to LES for modelling massively separated flows.


Atmosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1107
Author(s):  
Akshay A. Gowardhan ◽  
Dana L. McGuffin ◽  
Donald D. Lucas ◽  
Stephanie J. Neuscamman ◽  
Otto Alvarez ◽  
...  

Fast and accurate predictions of the flow and transport of materials in urban and complex terrain areas are challenging because of the heterogeneity of buildings and land features of different shapes and sizes connected by canyons and channels, which results in complex patterns of turbulence that can enhance material concentrations in certain regions. To address this challenge, we have developed an efficient three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code called Aeolus that is based on first principles for predicting transport and dispersion of materials in complex terrain and urban areas. The model can be run in a very efficient Reynolds average Navier–Stokes (RANS) mode or a detailed large eddy simulation (LES) mode. The RANS version of Aeolus was previously validated against field data for tracer gas and radiological dispersal releases. As a part of this work, we have validated the Aeolus model in LES mode against two different sets of data: (1) turbulence quantities measured in complex terrain at Askervein Hill; and (2) wind and tracer data from the Joint Urban 2003 field campaign for urban topography. As a third set-up, we have applied Aeolus to simulate cloud rise dynamics for buoyant plumes from high-temperature explosions. For all three cases, Aeolus LES predictions compare well to observations and other models. These results indicate that Aeolus LES can be used to accurately simulate turbulent flow and transport for a wide range of applications and scales.


2011 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Tucker ◽  
Simon Eastwood ◽  
Christian Klostermeier ◽  
Hao Xia ◽  
Prasun Ray ◽  
...  

A hybrid large eddy simulation (LES) related technique is used to explore some key turbomachinery relevant flows. Near wall Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) modeling is used to cover over especially small scales, the LES resolution of which is generally intractable with current computational power. Away from walls, large eddy type simulation is used but with no LES model (numerical LES (NLES)). Linking of the two model zones through a Hamilton–Jacobi equation is explored. The hybrid strategy is used to predict turbine and compressor end wall flows, flow around a fan blade section, jet flows, and a cutback trailing edge. Also, application of NLES to the flow in an idealized high pressure compressor drum cavity is considered. Generally, encouraging results are found. However, challenges remain, especially for flows where transition modeling is important.


Author(s):  
Kevin Menzies

The gas turbine presents significant challenges to any computational fluid dynamics techniques. The combination of a wide range of flow phenomena with complex geometry is difficult to model in the context of Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) solvers. We review the potential for large eddy simulation (LES) in modelling the flow in the different components of the gas turbine during a practical engineering design cycle. We show that while LES has demonstrated considerable promise for reliable prediction of many flows in the engine that are difficult for RANS it is not a panacea and considerable application challenges remain. However, for many flows, especially those dominated by shear layer mixing such as in combustion chambers and exhausts, LES has demonstrated a clear superiority over RANS for moderately complex geometries although at significantly higher cost which will remain an issue in making the calculations relevant within the design cycle.


2021 ◽  
pp. 2150384
Author(s):  
Bo Luo ◽  
Wuli Chu ◽  
Song Yan ◽  
Zhengjing Shen ◽  
Haoguang Zhang

Unsteady flows in the field of engineering are usually calculated by the Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) owing to the low requirements for computational efforts. However, the numerical resolution of URANS, especially in predicting the unsteady wake flows and sound, is still questionable. In this work, unsteady flow and sound calculations of a circular cylinder are carried out using Improved Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation (IDDES) and the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings (FW-H) analogy. The predicted results of this calculation are compared with those from the previous studies in the literature in terms of the mean and RMS of the velocity components as well as the sound pressure. The results show that IDDES retains much of the numerical accuracy of the Large Eddy Simulation (LES) approach in predicting unsteady flows and noise while requiring a reduced computational resources in comparison to LES. It is believed that the IDDES can be applied to calculate the complex unsteady flows and flow generated sound with reasonable accuracy in engineering field, which can be used as a promising method for scale-resolving simulations to avoid the expensive computational requirements of LES.


2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sagar Saroha ◽  
Krishnendu Chakraborty ◽  
Sawan S. Sinha ◽  
Sunil Lakshmipathy

Abstract The partially averaged Navier–Stokes (PANS) approach has emerged as a viable scale-resolving bridging method over the last decade. Conventional PANS method, based on the linear eddy viscosity closure, overcomes the scale-resolving inadequacies of Reynolds-averaging but still suffers from limitations arising from linear constitutive modeling of turbulent stresses. Linear PANS has been evaluated in a variety of complex flow fields, including the benchmark case of flow around a sphere. In this work, the authors assess the potential of nonlinear eddy viscosity closure and further extend the evaluation of nonlinear closure in predicting thermal characteristics (besides hydrodynamics) of flow past a sphere. The presented evaluation has been performed on the basis of various surface-related and wake-related quantities. Our results are compared against available experimental and direct numerical simulation (DNS)/large eddy simulation studies. Our study shows that for the same value of the filter-control parameters, nonlinear PANS performs significantly better than linear PANS.


Author(s):  
N M Nouri ◽  
S M H Mirsaeedi ◽  
M Moghimi

Large eddy simulation (LES) is used here to model the cavitating flow at a Venturi-type section. Cavitating flows can occur in a wide range of applications. The flow is represented here by means of LES, which compared to Reynolds-averaged Navier—Stokes (RANS) has the advantage that in it the large, energy-containing structures are resolved directly, whereas most of these structures are modelled in RANS. This gives LES an improved fidelity over RANS, although, due to the time averaging, the required computational time is considerably lower for RANS than for LES. The conclusion of this work shows that the qualitative comparisons with earlier preliminary data and the simulated general cavitation behaviour correlate reasonably well with experimental observations and that the simulations have the ability to predict cavitation cycle in more detail.


Author(s):  
Alexander Brandl ◽  
Michael Pfitzner

The intention of this work is to combine Large-Eddy-Simulation (LES) for the prediction of flow and mixture fraction fields with a Reynolds-Averaged-Navier-Stokes (RANS) transported probability density function (TPDF) method for the prediction of turbulent non-premixed flames. The motivation for this work is based upon the property of LES to provide a better description of complex flow fields than most current RANS methods can offer, while TPDF-methods excel in predicting the reacting species fields. However, using the straight forward extension of PDF methods for LES, the filtered density function (FDF) approach requires a large number of PDF particles in each LES cell and is thus computationally expensive. Therefore, a method is proposed to use the time-averaged LES flow field, mixture fraction field and mixture fraction PDF as a turbulence model for a RANS TPDF method operating on a much coarser grid. A projection of the mixture fraction conditioned PDF to evaluate the instantaneous LES density field is proposed as coupling device. The reconstruction of mixture fraction PDF from a LES simulation and the coupling to the TPDF method in postprocessing mode is validated using the TNF Sandia D flame, showing good agreement with experiment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document