wall flows
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

157
(FIVE YEARS 23)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyler R. Hendrickson ◽  
Pramod Subbareddy ◽  
Graham V. Candler

2021 ◽  
Vol 933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Cao ◽  
Tetsuro Tamura ◽  
Dai Zhou ◽  
Yan Bao ◽  
Zhaolong Han

This study topologically describes near-wall flows around a surface-mounted cylinder at a high Reynolds number ( $Re$ ) of $5\times 10^4$ and in a very thick boundary layer, which were partially measured or technically approximated from the literature. For complete and rational flow construction, we use high-resolution simulations and critical-point theory. The large-scale near-wake vortex is composed of two connected segments rolled up from the sides of the cylinder and from the free end. Another large-scale side vortex clearly roots on two notable foci on the lower side wall. In the junction region, the side vortex moves upwards with a curved trajectory, which induces the formation of nodes on the ground surface. In the free-end region, the side vortex is compressed, which results in a smaller trailing-edge vortex and its downstream movement. Only tip vortices are observed in the far wake. The origin of the tip vortices and their distinction from the near-wake vortex are discussed. Further analyses suggest that $Re$ independence should be treated with high caution when $Re$ increases from 500 to ${O}(10^4)$ . The occurrence of upwash flow behind the cylinder strongly depends on the increase in $Re$ , the mechanism of which is also provided. The separation–reattachment process in the junction region and the trailing-edge vortices are discovered only at a high $Re$ . The former should significantly affect the strength of the side vortex in the junction region and the latter should cause a sharp drop in pressure near the trailing edge.


2021 ◽  
Vol 933 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Chen ◽  
Katepalli R. Sreenivasan

The dominant paradigm in turbulent wall flows is that the mean velocity near the wall, when scaled on wall variables, is independent of the friction Reynolds number $Re_\tau$ . This paradigm faces challenges when applied to fluctuations but has received serious attention only recently. Here, by extending our earlier work (Chen & Sreenivasan, J. Fluid Mech., vol. 908, 2021, p. R3) we present a promising perspective, and support it with data, that fluctuations displaying non-zero wall values, or near-wall peaks, are bounded for large values of $Re_\tau$ , owing to the natural constraint that the dissipation rate is bounded. Specifically, $\varPhi _\infty - \varPhi = C_\varPhi \,Re_\tau ^{-1/4},$ where $\varPhi$ represents the maximum value of any of the following quantities: energy dissipation rate, turbulent diffusion, fluctuations of pressure, streamwise and spanwise velocities, squares of vorticity components, and the wall values of pressure and shear stresses; the subscript $\infty$ denotes the bounded asymptotic value of $\varPhi$ , and the coefficient $C_\varPhi$ depends on $\varPhi$ but not on $Re_\tau$ . Moreover, there exists a scaling law for the maximum value in the wall-normal direction of high-order moments, of the form $\langle \varphi ^{2q}\rangle ^{{1}/{q}}_{max}= \alpha _q-\beta _q\,Re^{-1/4}_\tau$ , where $\varphi$ represents the streamwise or spanwise velocity fluctuation, and $\alpha _q$ and $\beta _q$ are independent of $Re_\tau$ . Excellent agreement with available data is observed. A stochastic process for which the random variable has the form just mentioned, referred to here as the ‘linear $q$ -norm Gaussian’, is proposed to explain the observed linear dependence of $\alpha _q$ on $q$ .


2021 ◽  
Vol 927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Camporeale ◽  
Fabio Cannamela ◽  
Claudio Canuto ◽  
Costantino Manes

This paper presents some results coming from a linear stability analysis of turbulent depth-averaged open-channel flows (OCFs) with secondary currents. The aim was to identify plausible mechanisms underpinning the formation of large-scale turbulence structures, which are commonly referred to as large-scale motions (LSMs) and very-large-scale motions (VLSMs). Results indicate that the investigated flows are subjected to a sinuous instability whose longitudinal wavelength compares very well with that pertaining to LSMs. In contrast, no unstable modes at wavelengths comparable to those associated with VLSMs could be found. This suggests that VLSMs in OCFs are triggered by nonlinear mechanisms to which the present analysis is obviously blind. We demonstrate that the existence of the sinuous instability requires two necessary conditions: (i) the circulation of the secondary currents $\omega$ must be greater than a critical value $\omega _c$ ; (ii) the presence of a dynamically responding free surface (i.e. when the free surface is modelled as a frictionless flat surface, no instabilities are detected). The present paper draws some ideas from the work by Cossu, Hwang and co-workers on other wall flows (i.e. turbulent boundary layers, pipe, channel and Couette flows) and somewhat supports their idea that LSMs and VLSMs might be governed by an outer-layer cycle also in OCFs. However, the presence of steady secondary flows makes the procedure adopted herein much simpler than that used by these authors.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rina Perven ◽  
Jimmy Philip ◽  
Joseph Klewicki

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco De Vanna ◽  
Alberto Benato ◽  
Francesco Picano ◽  
Ernesto Benini

AbstractThe work presents a general strategy to design high-order conservative co-located finite-difference approximations of viscous/diffusion terms for flows featuring extreme variations of diffusive properties. The proposed scheme becomes equivalent to central finite-difference derivatives with corresponding order in the case of uniform flow properties, while in variable viscosity/diffusion conditions it grants a strong preservation and a proper telescoping of viscous/diffusion terms. Presented tests show that standard co-located discretisation of the viscous terms is not able to describe the flow when the viscosity field experiences substantial variations, while the proposed method always reproduces the correct behaviour. Thus, the process is recommended for such flows whose viscosity field highly varies, in both laminar and turbulent conditions, relying on a more robust approximation of diffuse terms in any situation. Hence, the proposed discretisation should be used in all these cases and, for example, in large eddy simulations of turbulent wall flows where the eddy viscosity abruptly changes in the near-wall region.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Subrahmanyam ◽  
Brian J. Cantwell ◽  
Juan J. Alonso

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document