scholarly journals Effect of Putting Grip on Eye and Head Movements During the Golf Putting Stroke

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 122-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
George K. Hung
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Sampling Rate ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Experimental Session ◽  
Forward Stroke ◽  
Different Types ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The One ◽  
Head Rotations

The objective of this article is to determine the effect of three different putting grips (conventional, cross-hand, and one-handed) on variations in eye and head movements during the putting stroke. Seven volunteer novice players, ranging in age from 21 to 22 years, participated in the study. During each experimental session, the subject stood on a specially designed platform covered with artificial turf and putted golf balls towards a standard golf hole. The three different types of grips were tested at two distances: 3 and 9 ft. For each condition, 20 putts were attempted. For each putt, data were recorded over a 3-s interval at a sampling rate of 100 Hz. Eye movements were recorded using a helmet-mounted eye movement monitor. Head rotation about an imaginary axis through the top of the head and its center-of-rotation was measured by means of a potentiometer mounted on a fixed frame and coupled to the helmet. Putter-head motion was measured using a linear array of infrared phototransistors embedded in the platform. The standard deviation (STD, relative to the initial level) was calculated for eye and head movements over the duration of the putt (i.e., from the beginning of the backstroke, through the forward stroke, to impact). The averaged STD for the attempted putts was calculated for each subject. Then, the averaged STDs and other data for the seven subjects were statistically compared across the three grip conditions. The STD of eye movements were greater (p < 0.1) for conventional than cross-hand (9 ft) and one-handed (3 and 9 ft) grips. Also, the STD of head movements were greater (p < 0.1; 3 ft) for conventional than cross-hand and one-handed grips. Vestibulo-ocular responses associated with head rotations could be observed in many 9 ft and some 3 ft putts. The duration of the putt was significantly longer (p < 0.05; 3 and 9 ft) for the one-handed than conventional and cross-hand grips. Finally, performance, or percentage putts made, was significantly better (p <0.05; 9 ft) for cross-hand than conventional grip. The smaller variations, both in eye movements during longer putts and head movements during shorter putts, using cross-hand and one-handed grips may explain why some golfers, based on their playing experience, prefer these over the conventional grip. Also, the longer duration for the one-handed grip, which improves tempo, may explain why some senior players prefer the long-shaft (effectively one-handed grip) putter.

Quantitative assessment of self-treated canalith repositioning procedures using inertial measurement unit sensors

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Chiheon Kwon ◽  
Yunseo Ku ◽  
Shinhye Seo ◽  
Eunsook Jang ◽  
Hyoun-Joong Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Large Error ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
The Self ◽  
Measurement Unit ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Epley Maneuver ◽  
Head Rotations

BACKGROUND: Low success and high recurrence of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) after home-based self-treated Epley and Barbeque (BBQ) roll maneuvers is an important issue. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the cause of low success rate of self-treated Epley and BBQ roll maneuvers and provide a clinically acceptable criterion to guide self-treatment head rotations. METHODS: Twenty-five participants without active BPPV wore a custom head-mount rotation monitoring device for objective measurements. Self-treatment and specialist-assisted maneuvers were compared for head rotation accuracy. Absolute differences between the head rotation evaluation criteria (American Academy of Otolaryngology guidelines) and measured rotation angles were considered as errors. Self-treatment and specialist-treated errors in maneuvers were compared. Between-trial variations and age effects were evaluated. RESULTS: A significantly large error and between-trial variation occurred in step 4 of the self-treated Epley maneuver, with a considerable error in the second trial. The cumulative error of all steps of self-treated BBQ roll maneuver was significantly large. Age effect occurred only in the self-treated BBQ roll maneuver. Errors in specialist-treated maneuvers ranged from 10 to 20 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time feedback of head movements during simultaneous head-body rotations could increase success rates of self-treatments. Specialist-treated maneuvers can be used as permissible rotation margin criteria.

scholarly journals Electrical Stimulation of the Frontal Eye Field in a Monkey Produces Combined Eye and Head Movements

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 1103-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyson A. Tu ◽  
E. Gregory Keating
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Eye Movements ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Frontal Eye Field ◽  
Gaze Shifts ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Eye Field ◽  
A Site ◽  
Head Rotations ◽  
Stimulation Of

The frontal eye field (FEF), an area in the primate frontal lobe, has long been considered important for the production of eye movements. Past studies have evoked saccade-like movements from the FEF using electrical stimulation in animals that were not allowed to move their heads. Using electrical stimulation in two monkeys that were free to move their heads, we have found that the FEF produces gaze shifts that are composed of both eye and head movements. Repeated stimulation at a site evoked gaze shifts of roughly constant amplitude. However, that gaze shift could be accomplished with varied amounts of head and eye movements, depending on their (head and eye) respective starting positions. This evidence suggests that the FEF controls visually orienting movements using both eye and head rotations rather than just shifting the eyes as previously thought.

scholarly journals Blind footballers direct their head towards an approaching ball during ball trapping

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takumi Mieda ◽  
Masahiro Kokubu
Keyword(s):  
Rotation Angle ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Early Time ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Football Players ◽  
Trunk Rotation ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Head Rotations ◽  
Egocentric Direction

AbstractIn blind football, players predict the sound location of a ball to underpin the success of ball trapping. It is currently unknown whether blind footballers use head movements as a strategy for trapping a moving ball. This study investigated characteristics of head rotations in blind footballers during ball trapping compared to sighted nonathletes. Participants performed trapping an approaching ball using their right foot. Head and trunk rotation angles in the sagittal plane, and head rotation angles in the horizontal plane were measured during ball trapping. The blind footballers showed a larger downward head rotation angle, as well as higher performance at the time of ball trapping than did the sighted nonathletes. However, no significant differences between the groups were found with regards to the horizontal head rotation angle and the downward trunk rotation angle. The blind footballers consistently showed a larger relative angle of downward head rotation from an early time point after ball launching to the moment of ball trapping. These results suggest that blind footballers couple downward head rotation with the movement of an approaching ball, to ensure that the ball is kept in a consistent egocentric direction relative to the head throughout ball trapping.

scholarly journals Partial Ablations of the Flocculus and Ventral Paraflocculus in Monkeys Cause Linked Deficits in Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements and Adaptive Modification of the VOR

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 912-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Rambold ◽  
A. Churchland ◽  
Y. Selig ◽  
L. Jasmin ◽  
S. G. Lisberger
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Large Fraction ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Image Motion ◽  
Smooth Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Vor Adaptation ◽  
Ventral Paraflocculus

The vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) generates compensatory eye movements to stabilize visual images on the retina during head movements. The amplitude of the reflex is calibrated continuously throughout life and undergoes adaptation, also called motor learning, when head movements are persistently associated with image motion. Although the floccular-complex of the cerebellum is necessary for VOR adaptation, it is not known whether this function is localized in its anterior or posterior portions, which comprise the ventral paraflocculus and flocculus, respectively. The present paper reports the effects of partial lesions of the floccular-complex in five macaque monkeys, made either surgically or with stereotaxic injection of 3-nitropropionic acid (3-NP). Before and after the lesions, smooth pursuit eye movements were tested during sinusoidal and step-ramp target motion. Cancellation of the VOR was tested by moving a target exactly with the monkey during sinusoidal head rotation. The control VOR was tested during sinusoidal head rotation in the dark and during 30°/s pulses of head velocity. VOR adaptation was studied by having the monkeys wear ×2 or ×0.25 optics for 4–7 days. In two monkeys, bilateral lesions removed all of the flocculus except for parts of folia 1 and 2 but did not produce any deficits in smooth pursuit, VOR adaptation, or VOR cancellation. We conclude that the flocculus alone probably is not necessary for either pursuit or VOR learning. In two monkeys, unilateral lesions including a large fraction of the ventral paraflocculus produced small deficits in horizontal and vertical smooth pursuit, and mild impairments of VOR adaptation and VOR cancellation. We conclude that the ventral paraflocculus contributes to both behaviors. In one monkey, a bilateral lesion of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus produced severe deficits smooth pursuit and VOR cancellation, and a complete loss of VOR adaptation. Considering all five cases together, there was a strong correlation between the size of the deficits in VOR learning and pursuit. We found the strongest correlation between the behavior deficits and the size of the lesion of the ventral paraflocculus, a weaker but significant correlation for the full floccular complex, and no correlation with the size of the lesion of the flocculus. We conclude that 1) lesions of the floccular complex cause linked deficits in smooth pursuit and VOR adaptation, and 2) the relevant portions of the structure are primarily in the ventral paraflocculus, although the flocculus may participate.

Ocular Responses to Head Rotations During Mirror Viewing

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 2323-2329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanning Han ◽  
Jeffrey T. Somers ◽  
Jae I. Kim ◽  
Arun N. Kumar ◽  
R. John Leigh
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Control Experiment ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Contextual Cues ◽  
Motion Vision ◽  
Stationary Target ◽  
Vestibular Response ◽  
Geometric Relationship ◽  
Head Rotations

The gain of the human vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) is influenced by the proximity of the object of regard. In six human subjects, we measured the eye rotations induced by passive, sinusoidal, horizontal head rotations at 2.0 Hz during binocular fixation of a stationary far target at 7 m; a stationary target close to the subject's near point of fixation (<15 cm); and the bridge of the subject's own nose, viewed through a mirror positioned so that, for each subject, the angle of vergence was similar to that during viewing of the near target. The median gain of compensatory eye movements for the group of subjects during far viewing was 0.99 (range 0.80–1.04), during near viewing was 1.21 (range 0.88–1.47), and during mirror viewing was 0.85 (range 0.71–1.01). The gain during near and mirror viewing was significantly different for each subject ( P < 0.001) even though the vergence angles were similar. The lower gain values during mirror viewing can be attributed to the geometric relationship between the head rotation, the position of the eyes in the head, and the movement of the subject's virtual image in the mirror. To determine whether visually mediated eye movements were responsible for the observed gain values, we conducted a control experiment in which subjects were rotated using a sum-of-sines stimulus that minimized the effects of predictive visual tracking; differences of gain values between near- and mirror-viewing conditions were similar to those during rotation at 2 Hz. We conclude that, in these experiments, target proximity and vergence angle were not the key determinants of gain of the visuo-vestibular response during head rotation while viewing a near target but that contextual cues from motion vision were more important in generating the appropriate response.

scholarly journals Two distinct types of eye-head coupling in freely moving mice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arne F. Meyer ◽  
John O’Keefe ◽  
Jasper Poort
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Ground Plane ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Head Tilt ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Head Motion ◽  
List Type ◽  
Visually Guided ◽  
Freely Moving

SummaryAnimals actively interact with their environment to gather sensory information. There is conflicting evidence about how mice use vision to sample their environment. During head restraint, mice make rapid eye movements strongly coupled between the eyes, similar to conjugate saccadic eye movements in humans. However, when mice are free to move their heads, eye movement patterns are more complex and often non-conjugate, with the eyes moving in opposite directions. Here, we combined eye tracking with head motion measurements in freely moving mice and found that both observations can be explained by the existence of two distinct types of coupling between eye and head movements. The first type comprised non-conjugate eye movements which systematically compensated for changes in head tilt to maintain approximately the same visual field relative to the horizontal ground plane. The second type of eye movements were conjugate and coupled to head yaw rotation to produce a “saccade and fixate” gaze pattern. During head initiated saccades, the eyes moved together in the same direction as the head, but during subsequent fixation moved in the opposite direction to the head to compensate for head rotation. This “saccade and fixate” pattern is similar to that seen in humans who use eye movements (with or without head movement) to rapidly shift gaze but in mice relies on combined eye and head movements. Indeed, the two types of eye movements very rarely occurred in the absence of head movements. Even in head-restrained mice, eye movements were invariably associated with attempted head motion. Both types of eye-head coupling were seen in freely moving mice during social interactions and a visually-guided object tracking task. Our results reveal that mice use a combination of head and eye movements to sample their environment and highlight the similarities and differences between eye movements in mice and humans.HighlightsTracking of eyes and head in freely moving mice reveals two types of eye-head couplingEye/head tilt coupling aligns gaze to horizontal planeRotational eye and head coupling produces a “saccade and fixate” gaze pattern with head leading the eyeBoth types of eye-head coupling are maintained during visually-guided behaviorsEye movements in head-restrained mice are related to attempted head movements

scholarly journals Enhancement of the Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex by Prior Eye Movements

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 2884-2892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vallabh E. Das ◽  
Louis F. Dell’Osso ◽  
R. John Leigh
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Smooth Pursuit ◽  
Initial Perturbation ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Gaze Shift ◽  
Stationary Target ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex ◽  
Head Rotations ◽  
Horizontal Head

Enhancement of the vestibulo-ocular reflex by prior eye movements. We investigated the effect of visually mediated eye movements made before velocity-step horizontal head rotations in eleven normal human subjects. When subjects viewed a stationary target before and during head rotation, gaze velocity was initially perturbed by ∼20% of head velocity; gaze velocity subsequently declined to zero within ∼300 ms of the stimulus onset. We used a curve-fitting procedure to estimate the dynamic course of the gain throughout the compensatory response to head rotation. This analysis indicated that the median initial gain of compensatory eye movements (mainly because of the vestibulo-ocular reflex, VOR) was 0.8 and subsequently increased to 1.0 after a median interval of 320 ms. When subjects attempted to fixate the remembered location of the target in darkness, the initial perturbation of gaze was similar to during fixation of a visible target (median initial VOR gain 0.8); however, the period during which the gain increased toward 1.0 was >10 times longer than that during visual fixation. When subjects performed horizontal smooth-pursuit eye movements that ended (i.e., 0 gaze velocity) just before the head rotation, the gaze velocity perturbation at the onset of head rotation was absent or small. The initial gain of the VOR had been significantly increased by the prior pursuit movements for all subjects ( P < 0.05; mean increase of 11%). In four subjects, we determined that horizontal saccades and smooth tracking of a head-fixed target (VOR cancellation with eye stationary in the orbit) also increased the initial VOR gain (by a mean of 13%) during subsequent head rotations. However, after vertical saccades or smooth pursuit, the initial gaze perturbation caused by a horizontal head rotation was similar to that which occurred after fixation of a stationary target. We conclude that the initial gain of the VOR during a sudden horizontal head rotation is increased by prior horizontal, but not vertical, visually mediated gaze shifts. We postulate that this “priming” effect of a prior gaze shift on the gain of the VOR occurs at the level of the velocity inputs to the neural integrator subserving horizontal eye movements, where gaze-shifting commands and vestibular signals converge.

Eye movement responses to active, high-frequency pitch and yaw head rotations in subjects with unilateral vestibular loss or posterior semicircular canal occlusion

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 131-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire C. Gianna-Poulin ◽  
Valerie Stallings ◽  
F. Owen Black
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movement ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Fixed Target ◽  
Posterior Semicircular Canal ◽  
Vestibular Loss ◽  
Semicircular Canal Occlusion ◽  
Eye Velocity ◽  
Head Rotations

This study assessed the eye movement responses to active head rotation in six subjects with complete unilateral vestibular loss (UVL), five subjects with posterior canal plugging (PCP) and age- and sex-matched normal subjects. Subjects performed head rotations in the pitch and yaw planes at frequencies ranging from 2 to 6 Hz, while looking at an earth-fixed target. Vertical eye movement gains obtained in UVL, PCP and normal subjects were not significantly different. Vertical phases decreased with increasing head movement frequencies in both UVL and PCP subjects. Although this decrease produced significantly different vertical phases between UVL and normal subjects for head movements above 3.9 Hz, vertical phases in some normal subjects were similar to those obtained in UVL subjects. We conclude that active head oscillations in the pitch plane are not clinically useful for the detection of vertical canal impairment limited to one ear. As expected, UVL subjects showed reduced horizontal gains, and eye velocity asymmetries during active head rotation in the yaw plane. Results in some PCP subjects suggested possible minor impairments of horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflexes.

Eye Movements of Stuttering and Nonstuttering Children during Silent Reading

1984 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 562-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Brutten ◽  
K. Bakker ◽  
P. Janssen ◽  
S. Van Der Meulen
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Frame Analysis ◽  
Silent Reading ◽  
Reading Level ◽  
Eye Fixations ◽  
Reading Errors ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Age Appropriate ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Computer Controlled

During the silent reading of a 320-word passage, the eye movements of 22 grade school stutterers and 22 nonstutterers were recorded by means of a computer-controlled eye-marker. The recordings were made as a means of determining if the eye movements of the two groups differed and if the differences suggested that the young stutterers showed evidence of word-specific expectancy. Frame-by-frame analysis of the recordings revealed that the stuttering children displayed significantly more eye fixations and eye regressions than the nonstuttering children. The correlations among the different types of eye measures also varied between the subject groups. The differences observed were present despite the fact that the reading level of the two groups was age appropriate and the subjects sampled did not differ significantly in either reading errors or comprehension. These findings are like those previously found when stuttering and nonstuttering adults were similarly tested. They imply that expectancy is not the response province of older stutterers.

Visual-Vestibular Interaction with Telescopic Spectacles

1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.L. Demer ◽  
J. Goldberg ◽  
F.I. Porter ◽  
H.A. Jenkins ◽  
K. Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Retinal Image ◽  
Head Rotation ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Head Movements ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Ocular Reflex ◽  
Clear Vision ◽  
Visual Vestibular Interaction ◽  
Vestibulo Ocular Reflex

Vestibularly and visually driven eye movements interact to compensate for head movements to maintain the necessary retinal image stability for clear vision. The wearing of highly magnifying telescopic spectacles requires that such compensatory visual-vestibular interaction operate in a quantitative regime much more demanding than that normally encountered. We employed electro-oculography to investigate the effect of wearing of 2×, 4×, and 6× binocular telescopic spectacles on visual-vestibular interactions during sinusoidal head rotation in 43 normal subjects. All telescopic spectacle powers produced a large, immediate increase in the gain (eye velocity/head velocity) of compensatory eye movements, called the visual-vestibulo-ocular reflex (VVOR). However, the amount of VVOR gain augmentation became limited as spectacle magnification and the amplitude of head velocity increased. Optokinetic responses during wearing of telescopic spectacles exhibited a similar nonlinearity with respect to stimulus amplitude and spectacle magnification. Computer simulation was used to demonstrate that the nonlinear response of the VVOR with telescopic spectacles is a result of nonlinearities in visually guided tracking movements. Immediate augmentation of VVOR gain by telescopic spectacles declined significantly with increasing age in the subject pool studied. Presentation of unmagnified visual field peripheral to the telescopic spectacles reduced the immediate VVOR gain-enhancing effect of central magnified vision. These results imply that the VVOR may not be adequate to maintain retinal image stability during head movements when strongly magnifying telescopic spectacles are worn.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document