scholarly journals Stress-induced translation inhibition through rapid displacement of scanning initiation factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Bresson ◽  
Vadim Shchepachev ◽  
Christos Spanos ◽  
Tomasz Turowski ◽  
Juri Rappsilber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Shock ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Degradation ◽  
Common Mechanism ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Proteomic Approach

SUMMARYCellular responses to environmental stress are frequently mediated by RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Here, we examined global RBP dynamics in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to glucose starvation and heat shock. Each stress induced rapid remodeling of the RNA-protein interactome, without corresponding changes in RBP abundance. Consistent with general translation shutdown, ribosomal proteins contacting the mRNA showed decreased RNA-association. Among translation components, RNA-association was most reduced for initiation factors involved in 40S scanning (eIF4A, eIF4B, and Ded1), indicating a common mechanism of translational repression. In unstressed cells, eIF4A, eIF4B, and Ded1 primarily targeted the 5′-ends of mRNAs. Following glucose withdrawal, 5’-binding was abolished within 30sec, explaining the rapid translation shutdown, but mRNAs remained stable. Heat shock induced progressive loss of 5’ RNA-binding by initiation factors over ∼16min. Translation shutoff provoked selective 5′-degradation of mRNAs encoding translation-related factors, mediated by Xrn1. These results reveal mechanisms underlying translational control of gene expression during stress.HighlightsA quantitative proteomic approach reveals rapid stress-induced changes in RNA-binding Translation shutdown is driven by loss of mRNA binding by scanning initiation factors eIF4B and Ded1 have key but separate roles in driving the stress response Heat shock invokes rapid RNA degradation by Xrn1, selective for translation machinery

scholarly journals Expanding Role of Ubiquitin in Translational Control

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon E. Dougherty ◽  
Austin O. Maduka ◽  
Toshifumi Inada ◽  
Gustavo M. Silva
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Protein Quality ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Ubiquitin Chain ◽  
Molecular Aspects ◽  
And Function

The eukaryotic proteome has to be precisely regulated at multiple levels of gene expression, from transcription, translation, and degradation of RNA and protein to adjust to several cellular conditions. Particularly at the translational level, regulation is controlled by a variety of RNA binding proteins, translation and associated factors, numerous enzymes, and by post-translational modifications (PTM). Ubiquitination, a prominent PTM discovered as the signal for protein degradation, has newly emerged as a modulator of protein synthesis by controlling several processes in translation. Advances in proteomics and cryo-electron microscopy have identified ubiquitin modifications of several ribosomal proteins and provided numerous insights on how this modification affects ribosome structure and function. The variety of pathways and functions of translation controlled by ubiquitin are determined by the various enzymes involved in ubiquitin conjugation and removal, by the ubiquitin chain type used, by the target sites of ubiquitination, and by the physiologic signals triggering its accumulation. Current research is now elucidating multiple ubiquitin-mediated mechanisms of translational control, including ribosome biogenesis, ribosome degradation, ribosome-associated protein quality control (RQC), and redox control of translation by ubiquitin (RTU). This review discusses the central role of ubiquitin in modulating the dynamism of the cellular proteome and explores the molecular aspects responsible for the expanding puzzle of ubiquitin signals and functions in translation.

scholarly journals Abstract P-22: Enhanced Crosslinking and Immunoprecipitation (Eclip) Data Reveal Interactions of RNA Binding Proteins with the Human Ribosome

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (Suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S21-S21
Author(s):  
Andrey Buyan ◽  
Ivan Kulakovskiy ◽  
Sergey Dmitriev
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Nuclear Export ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Repetitive Sequences ◽  
Structural Data

Background: The ribosome is a protein-synthesizing molecular machine composed of four ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) and dozens of ribosomal proteins. In mammals, the ribosome has a complicated structure with an additional outer layer of rRNA, including large tentacle-like extensions. A number of RNA binding proteins (RBPs) interact with this layer to assist ribosome biogenesis, nuclear export and decay, or to modulate translation. Plenty of methods have been developed in the last decade in order to study such protein-RNA interactions, including RNA pulldown and crosslinking-immunoprecipitation (CLIP) assays. Methods: In the current study, using publicly available data of the enhanced CLIP (eCLIP) experiments for 223 proteins studied in the ENCODE project, we found a number of RBPs that bind rRNAs in human cells. To locate their binding sites in rRNAs, we used a newly developed computational protocol for mapping and evaluation of the eCLIP data with the respect to the repetitive sequences. Results: For two proteins with known ribosomal localization, uS3/RPS3 and uS17/RPS11, the identified sites were in good agreement with structural data, thus validating our approach. Then, we identified rRNA contacts of overall 22 RBPs involved in rRNA processing and ribosome maturation (DDX21, DDX51, DDX52, NIP7, SBDS, UTP18, UTP3, WDR3, and WDR43), translational control during stress (SERBP1, G3BP1, SND1), IRES activity (PCBP1/hnRNPE1), and other translation-related functions. In many cases, the identified proteins interact with the rRNA expansion segments (ES) of the human ribosome pointing to their important role in protein synthesis. Conclusion: Our study identifies a number of RBPs as interacting partners of the human ribosome and sheds light on the role of rRNA expansion segments in translation.

scholarly journals Essential PBP1-associated proteins of Trypanosoma brucei

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Nascimento ◽  
M. Terrao ◽  
KK. Marucha ◽  
B. Liu ◽  
F. Egler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
A Minor

AbstractControl of gene expression in kinetoplastids depends heavily on RNA-binding proteins that influence mRNA decay and translation. We previously showed that MKT1 interacts with PBP1, which in turn recruits LSM12 and poly(A) binding protein. MKT1 is recruited to mRNA by sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins, resulting in stabilisation of mRNA. We here show that PBP1, LSM12 and an additional 117-residue protein, XAC1 (Tb927.7.2780), are present in complexes that contain either MKT1 or MKT1L (Tb927.10.1490). All five proteins are present predominantly in the complexes, and there was evidence for a minor subset of complexes that contained both MKT1 and MKT1L. MKT1 appeared to be associated with many mRNAs, with the exception of those encoding ribosomal proteins. XAC1-containing complexes reproducibly contained RNA-binding proteins that were previously found associated with MKT1. In addition, however, XAC1- or MKT1-containing complexes specifically recruit one of the six translation initiation complexes, EIF4E6-EIF4G5; and yeast 2-hybrid assay results indicated that MKT1 interacts with EIF4G5. The C-terminus of MKT1L resembles MKT1: it contains MKT1 domains and a PIN domain that is probably not active as an endonuclease. MKT1L, however, also has an N-terminal extension with regions of low-complexity. Although MKT1L depletion inhibited cell proliferation, we found no evidence for specific interactions with RNA-binding proteins or mRNA. Deletion of the N-terminal extension, however, enabled MKT1L to interact with EIF4E6. We speculate that MKT1L may either enhance or inhibit the functions of MKT1-containing complexes.

scholarly journals Small Trypanosome RNA-Binding Proteins TbUBP1 and TbUBP2 Influence Expression of F-Box Protein mRNAs in Bloodstream Trypanosomes

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 1964-1978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Hartmann ◽  
Corinna Benz ◽  
Stefanie Brems ◽  
Louise Ellis ◽  
Van-Duc Luu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Degradation ◽  
Rna Recognition Motif ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
F Box Protein ◽  
Cyclin F

ABSTRACT In the African trypanosome Trypanosoma brucei nearly all control of gene expression is posttranscriptional; sequences in the 3′-untranslated regions of mRNAs determine the steady-state mRNA levels by regulation of RNA turnover. Here we investigate the roles of two related proteins, TbUBP1 and TbUBP2, containing a single RNA recognition motif, in trypanosome gene expression. TbUBP1 and TbUBP2 are in the cytoplasm and nucleus, comprise ca. 0.1% of the total protein, and are not associated with polysomes or RNA degradation enzymes. Overexpression of TbUBP2 upregulated the levels of several mRNAs potentially involved in cell division, including the CFB1 mRNA, which encodes a protein with a cyclin F-box domain. CFB1 regulation was mediated by the 3′-untranslated region and involved stabilization of the mRNA. Depletion of TbUBP2 and TbUBP1 inhibited growth and downregulated expression of the cyclin F box protein gene CFB2; trans splicing was unaffected. The results of pull-down assays indicated that all tested mRNAs were bound to TbUBP2 or TbUBP1, with some preference for CFB1. We suggest that TbUBP1 and TbUBP2 may be relatively nonspecific RNA-binding proteins and that specific effects of overexpression or depletion could depend on competition between various different proteins for RNA binding.

scholarly journals The RNA-associated proteins MKT1 and MKT1L form alternative PBP1-containing complexes in Trypanosoma brucei

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (32) ◽  
pp. 10940-10955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa Melo do Nascimento ◽  
Monica Terrao ◽  
Kevin Kamanyi Marucha ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
Franziska Egler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Associated Proteins ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Two Hybrid

Control of gene expression in kinetoplastids such as trypanosomes depends heavily on RNA-binding proteins that influence mRNA decay and translation. We previously showed that the trypanosome protein MKT1 forms a multicomponent protein complex: MKT1 interacts with PBP1, which in turn recruits LSM12 and poly(A)-binding protein. MKT1 is recruited to mRNAs by sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins, resulting in stabilization of the bound mRNA. We here show that PBP1, LSM12, and a 117-residue protein, XAC1 (Tb927.7.2780), are present in complexes that contain either MKT1 or an MKT1-like protein, MKT1L (Tb927.10.1490). All five proteins are present predominantly in the complexes, and we found evidence for a minor subset of complexes containing both MKT1 and MKT1L. XAC1-containing complexes reproducibly contained RNA-binding proteins that were previously found associated with MKT1. Moreover, XAC1- or MKT1-containing complexes specifically recruited one of the two poly(A)-binding proteins, PABP2, and one of the six cap-binding translation initiation complexes, EIF4E6–EIF4G5. Yeast two-hybrid assay results indicated that MKT1 directly interacts with EIF4G5. MKT1–PBP1 complexes can therefore interact with mRNAs via their poly(A) tails and caps, as well as through sequence-specific RNA-binding proteins. Correspondingly, MKT1 is associated with many mRNAs, although not with those encoding ribosomal proteins. Meanwhile, MKT1L resembles MKT1 at the C terminus but additionally features an N-terminal extension with low-complexity regions. Although MKT1L depletion inhibited cell proliferation, we found no evidence that it specifically interacts with RNA-binding proteins or mRNA. We speculate that MKT1L may compete with MKT1 for PBP1 binding and thereby modulate the function of MKT1-containing complexes.

scholarly journals Positive mRNA Translational Control in Germ Cells by Initiation Factor Selectivity

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Friday ◽  
Brett D. Keiper
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Positive Function ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Initiation Factors

Ultimately, the production of new proteins in undetermined cells pushes them to new fates. Other proteins hold a stem cell in a mode of self-renewal. In germ cells, these decision-making proteins are produced largely from translational control of preexisting mRNAs. To date, all of the regulation has been attributed to RNA binding proteins (RBPs) that repress mRNAs in many models of germ cell development (Drosophila, mouse,C. elegans, andXenopus). In this review, we focus on the selective, positive function of translation initiation factors eIF4E and eIF4G, which recruit mRNAs to ribosomes upon derepression. Evidence now shows that the two events are not separate but rather are coordinated through composite complexes of repressors and germ cell isoforms of eIF4 factors. Strikingly, the initiation factor isoforms are themselves mRNA selective. The mRNP complexes of translation factors and RBPs are built on specific populations of mRNAs to prime them for subsequent translation initiation. Simple rearrangement of the partners causes a dormant mRNP to become synthetically active in germ cells when and where they are required to support gametogenesis.

scholarly journals Cytosolic aspartate aminotransferase moonlights as a ribosome binding modulator of Gcn2 activity during oxidative stress

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Crawford ◽  
Mark P. Ashe ◽  
Simon J. Hubbard ◽  
Graham D. Pavitt
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Aspartate Aminotransferase ◽  
Ribosomal Proteins ◽  
Translational Regulation ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Stress Sensitivity ◽  
Yeast Cells

AbstractRegulation of translation is a fundamental facet of the cellular response to rapidly changing external conditions. Specific RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) co-ordinate the translational regulation of distinct mRNA cohorts during stress. To identify RBPs with previously under-appreciated roles in translational control, we used polysome profiling and mass spectrometry to identify and quantify proteins associated with translating ribosomes in unstressed yeast cells and during oxidative stress and amino acid starvation, which both induce the integrated stress response (ISR). Over 800 proteins were identified across polysome gradient fractions, including ribosomal proteins, translation factors and many others without previously described translation-related roles, including numerous metabolic enzymes. We identified variations in patterns of polysome enrichment in both unstressed and stressed cells and identified proteins enriched in heavy polysomes during stress. Genetic screening of polysome-enriched RBPs identified the cytosolic aspartate aminotransferase, Aat2, as a ribosome-associated protein whose deletion conferred growth sensitivity to oxidative stress. Loss of Aat2 caused aberrantly high activation of the ISR via enhanced eIF2α phosphorylation and GCN4 activation. Importantly, non-catalytic AAT2 mutants retained polysome association and did not show heightened stress sensitivity. Aat2 therefore has a separate ribosome-associated translational regulatory or ‘moonlighting’ function that modulates the ISR independent of its aspartate aminotransferase activity.

scholarly journals Compendium of Methods to Uncover RNA-Protein Interactions In Vivo

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Mrinmoyee Majumder ◽  
Viswanathan Palanisamy
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Protein Nucleic Acid

Control of gene expression is critical in shaping the pro-and eukaryotic organisms’ genotype and phenotype. The gene expression regulatory pathways solely rely on protein–protein and protein–nucleic acid interactions, which determine the fate of the nucleic acids. RNA–protein interactions play a significant role in co- and post-transcriptional regulation to control gene expression. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a diverse group of macromolecules that bind to RNA and play an essential role in RNA biology by regulating pre-mRNA processing, maturation, nuclear transport, stability, and translation. Hence, the studies aimed at investigating RNA–protein interactions are essential to advance our knowledge in gene expression patterns associated with health and disease. Here we discuss the long-established and current technologies that are widely used to study RNA–protein interactions in vivo. We also present the advantages and disadvantages of each method discussed in the review.

scholarly journals The endoplasmic reticulum-associated mRNA-binding proteins ERBP1 and ERBP2 interact in bloodstream-form Trypanosoma brucei

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathrin Bajak ◽  
Kevin Leiss ◽  
Christine Clayton ◽  
Esteban Erben
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Trypanosoma Brucei ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Bloodstream Form ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Mrna Binding Proteins ◽  
Mrna Binding

AbstractKinetoplastids rely heavily on post-transcriptional mechanisms for control of gene expression, and on RNA-binding proteins that regulate mRNA splicing, translation and decay. Trypanosoma brucei ERBP1 (Tb927.10.14150) and ERBP2 (Tb927.9.9550) were previously identified as mRNA binding proteins that lack canonical RNA-binding domains. We here show that ERBP1 is associated with the endoplasmic reticulum, like ERBP2, and that the two proteins interact in vivo. Loss of ERBP1 from bloodstream-form T. brucei initially resulted in a growth defect but proliferation was restored after more prolonged cultivation. Results from a pull-down of tagged ERBP1 suggest that it preferentially binds to ribosomal protein mRNAs. The ERBP1 sequence resembles that of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Bfr1, which also localises to the endoplasmic reticulum and binds to ribosomal protein mRNAs. However, unlike Bfr1, ERBP1 does not bind to mRNAs encoding secreted proteins, and it is also not recruited to stress granules after starvation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document