scholarly journals Compendium of Methods to Uncover RNA-Protein Interactions In Vivo

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Mrinmoyee Majumder ◽  
Viswanathan Palanisamy
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Protein Nucleic Acid

Control of gene expression is critical in shaping the pro-and eukaryotic organisms’ genotype and phenotype. The gene expression regulatory pathways solely rely on protein–protein and protein–nucleic acid interactions, which determine the fate of the nucleic acids. RNA–protein interactions play a significant role in co- and post-transcriptional regulation to control gene expression. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a diverse group of macromolecules that bind to RNA and play an essential role in RNA biology by regulating pre-mRNA processing, maturation, nuclear transport, stability, and translation. Hence, the studies aimed at investigating RNA–protein interactions are essential to advance our knowledge in gene expression patterns associated with health and disease. Here we discuss the long-established and current technologies that are widely used to study RNA–protein interactions in vivo. We also present the advantages and disadvantages of each method discussed in the review.

scholarly journals RNA-Centric Approaches to Profile the RNA–Protein Interaction Landscape on Selected RNAs

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
André P. Gerber
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory Networks ◽  
Technological Advances

RNA–protein interactions frame post-transcriptional regulatory networks and modulate transcription and epigenetics. While the technological advances in RNA sequencing have significantly expanded the repertoire of RNAs, recently developed biochemical approaches combined with sensitive mass-spectrometry have revealed hundreds of previously unrecognized and potentially novel RNA-binding proteins. Nevertheless, a major challenge remains to understand how the thousands of RNA molecules and their interacting proteins assemble and control the fate of each individual RNA in a cell. Here, I review recent methodological advances to approach this problem through systematic identification of proteins that interact with particular RNAs in living cells. Thereby, a specific focus is given to in vivo approaches that involve crosslinking of RNA–protein interactions through ultraviolet irradiation or treatment of cells with chemicals, followed by capture of the RNA under study with antisense-oligonucleotides and identification of bound proteins with mass-spectrometry. Several recent studies defining interactomes of long non-coding RNAs, viral RNAs, as well as mRNAs are highlighted, and short reference is given to recent in-cell protein labeling techniques. These recent experimental improvements could open the door for broader applications and to study the remodeling of RNA–protein complexes upon different environmental cues and in disease.

Abstract P104: Reactivation of Embryonic Gene Program due to CUG Repeat RNA Expression in Myotonic Dystrophy

2011 ◽  
Vol 109 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Auinash Kalsotra ◽  
Ravi Singh ◽  
Chad Creighton ◽  
Thomas Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Myotonic Dystrophy ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Causative Mutation ◽  
Inherited Disease ◽  
Aberrant Expression ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
General Response

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is a dominantly inherited disease that affects multiple organ systems. Cardiac involvement, which is characterized by conduction defects and arrhythmias, is the second leading cause of death in DM1 patients. The causative mutation is a CTG expansion in the 3' untranslated region of DMPK gene resulting in aberrant expression of CUG repeat RNA that accumulates into nuclear foci and causes misregulation in alternative splicing. Here we show that heart-specific and inducible expression of CUG repeat RNA in a DM1 mouse model results in global reactivation of embryonic gene expression program in adult heart that is distinct from a general hypertrophic stress response. Using q-PCR TaqMan arrays, we identified 54 miRNAs that were differentially expressed in DM1 mouse hearts one week following induction of CUG repeat RNA. Interestingly, 83% (45/54) of them exhibited a developmental shift in expression towards the embryonic pattern. Because over 90% (41/45) of them were down regulated within 72 hr after induction of repeat RNA and only 2/22 examined decreased in two unrelated mouse models of heart disease, we conclude their reduced expression is specific to DM1 and not simply a general response to cardiac injury. Microarray studies revealed a developmental switch not only in the miRNA expression patterns but also a pervasive shift in mRNA steady state levels of a number of genes to embryonic stage. Intriguingly, we found that loss of MBNL1 or gain of CELF1 activity, two major RNA binding proteins disrupted in DM1, are not driving the miRNA misregulation since their expression is indistinguishable between wild type, MBNL1 knock out and CELF1 over expressing mice. Moreover, comparable decrease in ten out of ten primary miRNA transcripts examined suggests loss of expression is not due to a processing defect. Instead, we discovered that adult-to-embryonic shift in expression of select micro- and messenger RNAs in DM1 heart occurs due to specific inactivation of a Mef2 transcriptional program. We are currently determining causal contributions of this Mef2-miRNA circuitry in the developmental reprogramming of gene expression in DM1 as well as its direct role in cardiac manifestations of this disease.

238 RNA BINDING PROTEIN EXPRESSION IN CULTURED EARLY BOVINE EMBRYOS

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 277
Author(s):  
L. A. Favetta ◽  
E. Van de Laar ◽  
W. A. King ◽  
J. LaMarre
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Expression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Bovine Embryo ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Morula Stage ◽  
Bovine Oocytes

The control of gene expression in the early embryo requires a highly regulated turnover of specific mRNA, particularly those of maternal origin, as the embryo becomes transcriptionally autonomous. In cattle, the period during which maternal transcripts persist can last 72 to 96 h or longer, suggesting a dynamic, regulated interplay between factors that protect transcripts before this point and those that subsequently facilitate decay. Some decay pathways for specific embryonic transcripts are now known, but many are not. In somatic cells, mRNA decay is often mediated by interactions between defined sequence elements (ARE) in the 3′ untranslated region of important target genes and specific RNA-binding proteins (AUBP) that promote or inhibit decay of the associated transcript. These have not been extensively characterized in embryos. We hypothesized that changes in the pattern of expression of one or several AUBP in the developing bovine embryo would support a role for these proteins in mRNA turnover and the control of gene expression. We, therefore, evaluated the expression of different AUBP (HuR, AUF1, TTP) in bovine oocytes and early embryos in vitro. Bovine oocytes obtained at slaughter were matured, fertilized, and cultured using standard protocols. Oocytes and embryos from different stages were either placed in Trizol for subsequent RNA isolation and RT-PCR analysis or fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and subsequently processed for immunohistochemical detection of AUBP. Analysis by RT-PCR revealed that AUF1, an mRNA destabilizing protein, was expressed at all stages examined (immature oocyte, mature oocyte, 2 to 4 cells, 8 to 16 cells, morulae, and blastocyst) except in morulae. Another mRNA destabilizing protein, TTP, was expressed at the morula stage only. An mRNA stabilizing factor, HuR, was expressed at all stages except the morula. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the pattern of protein expression for AUF1 and TTP essentially mirrored that observed at the RNA level as detected by RT-PCR. Together, these results show that AUBP expression in the early bovine embryo is dynamic, with RNA-binding proteins present at all times during development and changes in expression evident at the morula stage. This suggests that modification of presynthesized (i.e. maternal) AUBP is likely to control mRNA decay during the maternal to embryonic transition (8-cell stage) and that the expression of TTP at the morula stage might mark the onset of embryonic control of mRNA stability. Research was supported by NSERC, OMAFRA, and the Canada Research Chairs Program.

scholarly journals Posttranscriptional gene regulation by RNA-binding proteins during oxidative stress: implications for cellular senescence

2008 ◽  
Vol 389 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kotb Abdelmohsen ◽  
Yuki Kuwano ◽  
Hyeon Ho Kim ◽  
Myriam Gorospe
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cellular Senescence ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Oxidant Damage ◽  
Regulated Gene Expression

AbstractTo respond adequately to oxidative stress, mammalian cells elicit rapid and tightly controlled changes in gene expression patterns. Besides alterations in the subsets of transcribed genes, two posttranscriptional processes prominently influence the oxidant-triggered gene expression programs: mRNA turnover and translation. Here, we review recent progress in our knowledge of theturnover andtranslationregulatory (TTR) mRNA-bindingproteins (RBPs) that influence gene expression in response to oxidative damage. Specifically, we identify oxidant damage-regulated mRNAs that are targets of TTR-RBPs, we review the oxidant-triggered signaling pathways that govern TTR-RBP function, and we examine emerging evidence that TTR-RBP activity is altered with senescence and aging. Given the potent influence of TTR-RBPs upon oxidant-regulated gene expression profiles, we propose that the senescence-associated changes in TTR-RBPs directly contribute to the impaired responses to oxidant damage that characterize cellular senescence and advancing age.

scholarly journals Cip1 and Cip2 Are Novel RNA-Recognition-Motif Proteins That Counteract Csx1 Function during Oxidative Stress

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 1176-1183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Martín ◽  
Miguel A. Rodríguez-Gabriel ◽  
W. Hayes McDonald ◽  
Stephen Watt ◽  
John R. Yates ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Stress Response ◽  
Protein Identification ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Bzip Transcription Factor ◽  
Rna Recognition Motif ◽  
Rna Recognition ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression

Eukaryotic cells reprogram their global patterns of gene expression in response to stress. Recent studies in Schizosaccharomyces pombe showed that the RNA-binding protein Csx1 plays a central role in controlling gene expression during oxidative stress. It does so by stabilizing atf1+ mRNA, which encodes a subunit of a bZIP transcription factor required for gene expression during oxidative stress. Here, we describe two related proteins, Cip1 and Cip2, that were identified by multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT) as proteins that coprecipitate with Csx1. Cip1 and Cip2 are cytoplasmic proteins that have RNA recognition motifs (RRMs). Neither protein is essential for viability, but a cip1Δ cip2Δ strain grows poorly and has altered cellular morphology. Genetic epistasis studies and whole genome expression profiling show that Cip1 and Cip2 exert posttranscriptional control of gene expression in a manner that is counteracted by Csx1. Notably, the sensitivity of csx1Δ cells to oxidative stress and their inability to induce expression of Atf1-dependent genes are partially rescued by cip1Δ and cip2Δ mutations. This study emphasizes the importance of a modulated mRNA stability in the eukaryotic stress response pathways and adds new information to the role of RNA-binding proteins in the oxidative stress response.

scholarly journals iSUMO - integrative prediction of functionally relevant SUMOylation events

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaotong Yao ◽  
Shuvadeep Maity ◽  
Shashank Gandhi ◽  
Marcin Imielenski ◽  
Christine Vogel
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
False Positive Rate ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Positive Rate ◽  
Protein Nucleic Acid ◽  
Scale Experiment

AbstractPost-translational modifications by the Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO) are essential for diverse cellular functions. Large-scale experiment and sequence-based predictions have identified thousands of SUMOylated proteins. However, the overlap between the datasets is small, suggesting many false positives with low functional relevance. Therefore, we integrated ~800 sequence features and protein characteristics such as cellular function and protein-protein interactions in a machine learning approach to score likely functional SUMOylation events (iSUMO). iSUMO is trained on a total of 24 large-scale datasets, and it predicts 2,291 and 706 SUMO targets in human and yeast, respectively. These estimates are five times higher than what existing sequence-based tools predict at the same 5% false positive rate. Protein-protein and protein-nucleic acid interactions are highly predictive of protein SUMOylation, supporting a role of the modification in protein complex formation. We note the marked prevalence of SUMOylation amongst RNA-binding proteins. We validate iSUMO predictions by experimental or other evidence. iSUMO therefore represents a comprehensive tool to identify high-confidence, functional SUMOylation events for human and yeast.

scholarly journals Multivalent interactions with RNA drive RNA binding protein recruitment and dynamics in biomolecular condensates in Xenopus oocytes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah E Cabral ◽  
Kimberly Mowry
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Multivalent Interactions

RNA localization and biomolecular condensate formation are key biological strategies for organizing the cytoplasm and generating cellular and developmental polarity. While enrichment of RNAs and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) is a hallmark of both processes, the functional and structural roles of RNA-RNA and RNA-protein interactions within condensates remain unclear. Recent work from our laboratory has shown that RNAs required for germ layer patterning in Xenopus oocytes localize in novel biomolecular condensates, termed Localization bodies (L-bodies). L-bodies are composed of a non-dynamic RNA phase enmeshed in a more dynamic protein-containing phase. However, the interactions that drive the biophysical characteristics of L-bodies are not known. Here, we test the role of RNA-protein interactions using an L-body RNA-binding protein, PTBP3, which contains four RNA-binding domains (RBDs). We find that binding of RNA to PTB is required for both RNA and PTBP3 to be enriched in L-bodies in vivo. Importantly, while RNA binding to a single RBD is sufficient to drive PTBP3 localization to L-bodies, interactions between multiple RRMs and RNA tunes the dynamics of PTBP3 within L-bodies. In vitro, recombinant PTBP3 phase separates into non-dynamic structures in an RNA-dependent manner, supporting a role for RNA-protein interactions as a driver of both recruitment of components to L-bodies and the dynamics of the components after enrichment. Our results point to a model where RNA serves as a concentration-dependent, non-dynamic substructure and multivalent interactions with RNA are a key driver of protein dynamics.

scholarly journals RsmV a small non-coding regulatory RNA in Pseudomonas aeruginosa that sequesters RsmA and RsmF from target mRNAs

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kayley H. Janssen ◽  
Manisha R. Diaz ◽  
Cindy J. Gode ◽  
Matthew C. Wolfgang ◽  
Timothy L. Yahr
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Secretion System ◽  
Transcriptional Level ◽  
Type Vi Secretion System ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Target Mrnas

ABSTRACTThe Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa has distinct genetic programs that favor either acute or chronic virulence gene expression. Acute virulence is associated with twitching and swimming motility, expression of a type III secretion system (T3SS), and the absence of alginate, Psl, or Pel polysaccharide production. Traits associated with chronic infection include growth as a biofilm, reduced motility, and expression of a type VI secretion system (T6SS). The Rsm post-transcriptional regulatory system plays an important role in the inverse control of phenotypes associated with acute and chronic virulence. RsmA and RsmF are RNA-binding proteins that interact with target mRNAs to control gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. Previous work found that RsmA activity is controlled by at least three small, non-coding regulatory RNAs (RsmW, RsmY, and RsmZ). In this study, we took an in-silico approach to identify additional sRNAs that might function in the sequestration of RsmA and/or RsmF and identified RsmV, a 192 nt transcript with four predicted RsmA/RsmF consensus binding sites. RsmV is capable of sequestering RsmA and RsmF in vivo to activate translation of tssA1, a component of the T6SS, and to inhibit T3SS gene expression. Each of the predicted RsmA/RsmF consensus binding sites contribute to RsmV activity. Electrophoretic mobility shifts assays show that RsmF binds RsmV with >10-fold higher affinity than RsmY and RsmZ. Gene expression studies revealed that the temporal expression pattern of RsmV differs from RsmW, RsmY, and RsmZ. These findings suggest that each sRNA may play distinct roles in controlling RsmA and RsmF activity.IMPORTANCEThe role of RsmF in post-transcriptional control of gene expression remains enigmatic. While numerous rsmA-dependent phenotypes are more pronounced in an rsmAF double mutant, deletion of rsmF alone has only modest effects. Understanding mechanisms that control RsmF activity will provide insight into additional roles for RsmF. In the current study we identify RsmV as an sRNA that controls RsmA and RsmF activity, and show that RsmV, RsmW, RsmY, and RsmZ are differentially expressed during growth.

scholarly journals Substrate Specificity of the TRAMP Nuclear Surveillance Complexes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clémentine Delan-Forino ◽  
Christos Spanos ◽  
Juri Rappsilber ◽  
David Tollervey
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Helicase ◽  
Nuclear Rna ◽  
Rna Exosome

ABSTRACTDuring nuclear surveillance in yeast, the RNA exosome functions together with the TRAMP complexes. These include the DEAH-box RNA helicase Mtr4 together with an RNA-binding protein (Air1 or Air2) and a poly(A) polymerase (Trf4 or Trf5). To better determine how RNA substrates are targeted, we analyzed protein and RNA interactions for TRAMP components. Mass spectrometry identified three distinct TRAMP complexes formed in vivo. These complexes preferentially assemble on different classes of transcripts. Unexpectedly, on many substrates, including pre-rRNAs and pre-mRNAs, binding specificity was apparently conferred by Trf4 and Trf5. Clustering of mRNAs by TRAMP association showed co-enrichment for mRNAs with functionally related products, supporting the significance of surveillance in regulating gene expression. We compared binding sites of TRAMP components with multiple nuclear RNA binding proteins, revealing preferential colocalization of subsets of factors. TRF5 deletion reduced Mtr4 recruitment and increased RNA abundance for mRNAs specifically showing high Trf5 binding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document