scholarly journals Sexually Dimorphic DNA Damage Responses and Mutation Avoidance in the Mouse Germline

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordana C. Bloom ◽  
John C. Schimenti
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Sex Determination ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Primordial Germ Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Genetic Rescue ◽  
Exogenous Dna ◽  
Germ Cell Differentiation ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Pregnant Mice

AbstractGerm cells specified during fetal development form the foundation of the mammalian germline. These primordial germ cells (PGCs) undergo rapid proliferation, yet the germline is highly refractory to mutation accumulation compared to somatic cells. Importantly, while the presence of endogenous or exogenous DNA damage has the potential to impact PGCs, there is little known about how these cells respond to stressors. To better understand the DNA damage response (DDR) in these cells, we exposed pregnant mice to ionizing radiation (IR) at specific gestational time points and assessed the DDR in PGCs. Our results show that PGCs prior to sex determination lack a G1 cell cycle checkpoint. Additionally, the response to IR-induced DNA damage differs between female and male PGCs post-sex determination. IR of female PGCs caused uncoupling of germ cell differentiation and meiotic initiation, while male PGCs exhibited repression of piRNA metabolism and transposon de-repression. We also used whole genome single-cell DNA sequencing to reveal that genetic rescue of DNA repair-deficient germ cells (Fancm-/-) leads to increased mutation incidence and biases. Importantly, our work uncovers novel insights into how PGCs exposed to DNA damage can become developmentally defective, leaving only those genetically fit cells to establish the adult germline.

A Reporter Mouse for In Vivo Detection of DNA Damage in Embryonic Germ Cells

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordana C. Bloom ◽  
John C. Schimenti
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Primordial Germ Cells ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Exogenous Dna ◽  
Embryonic Germ Cells

AbstractMaintaining genome integrity in the germline is essential for survival and propagation of a species. In both mouse and human, germ cells originate during fetal development and are hypersensitive to both endogenous and exogenous DNA damaging agents. Currently, mechanistic understanding of how primordial germ cells respond to DNA damage is limited in part by the tools available to study these cells. We developed a mouse transgenic reporter strain expressing a 53BP1-mCherry fusion protein under the control of the Oct4ΔPE embryonic germ cell-specific promoter. This reporter binds sites of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) on chromatin, forming foci. Using ionizing radiation as a DNA double strand break-inducing agent, we show that the transgenic reporter expresses specifically in the embryonic germ cells of both sexes and forms DNA damage induced foci in both a dose- and time-dependent manner. The dynamic time-sensitive and dose-sensitive DNA damage detection ability of this transgenic reporter, in combination with its specific expression in embryonic germ cells, makes it a versatile and valuable tool for increasing our understanding of DNA damage responses in these unique cells.

scholarly journals Acceleration or Brakes: Which Is Rational for Cell Cycle-Targeting Neuroblastoma Therapy?

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 750
Author(s):  
Kiyohiro Ando ◽  
Akira Nakagawara
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Malignant Neoplasms ◽  
Checkpoint Kinases ◽  
Molecular Features ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint

Unrestrained proliferation is a common feature of malignant neoplasms. Targeting the cell cycle is a therapeutic strategy to prevent unlimited cell division. Recently developed rationales for these selective inhibitors can be subdivided into two categories with antithetical functionality. One applies a “brake” to the cell cycle to halt cell proliferation, such as with inhibitors of cell cycle kinases. The other “accelerates” the cell cycle to initiate replication/mitotic catastrophe, such as with inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinases. The fate of cell cycle progression or arrest is tightly regulated by the presence of tolerable or excessive DNA damage, respectively. This suggests that there is compatibility between inhibitors of DNA repair kinases, such as PARP inhibitors, and inhibitors of cell cycle checkpoint kinases. In the present review, we explore alterations to the cell cycle that are concomitant with altered DNA damage repair machinery in unfavorable neuroblastomas, with respect to their unique genomic and molecular features. We highlight the vulnerabilities of these alterations that are attributable to the features of each. Based on the assessment, we offer possible therapeutic approaches for personalized medicine, which are seemingly antithetical, but both are promising strategies for targeting the altered cell cycle in unfavorable neuroblastomas.

scholarly journals DNase II mediates a parthanatos-like developmental cell death pathway in Drosophila primordial germ cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lama Tarayrah-Ibraheim ◽  
Elital Chass Maurice ◽  
Guy Hadary ◽  
Sharon Ben-Hur ◽  
Alina Kolpakova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Nuclear Translocation ◽  
Primordial Germ Cells ◽  
Nuclear Accumulation ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Dnase Ii ◽  
Cell Death Pathway ◽  
Parp 1

AbstractDuring Drosophila embryonic development, cell death eliminates 30% of the primordial germ cells (PGCs). Inhibiting apoptosis does not prevent PGC death, suggesting a divergence from the conventional apoptotic program. Here, we demonstrate that PGCs normally activate an intrinsic alternative cell death (ACD) pathway mediated by DNase II release from lysosomes, leading to nuclear translocation and subsequent DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs activate the DNA damage-sensing enzyme, Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) and the ATR/Chk1 branch of the DNA damage response. PARP-1 and DNase II engage in a positive feedback amplification loop mediated by the release of PAR polymers from the nucleus and the nuclear accumulation of DNase II in an AIF- and CypA-dependent manner, ultimately resulting in PGC death. Given the anatomical and molecular similarities with an ACD pathway called parthanatos, these findings reveal a parthanatos-like cell death pathway active during Drosophila development.

scholarly journals PEA15 Regulates the DNA Damage-Induced Cell Cycle Checkpoint and Oncogene-Directed Transformation

2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 2264-2282 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Nagarajan ◽  
S. K. Dogra ◽  
A. Y. Liu ◽  
M. R. Green ◽  
N. Wajapeyee
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Directed Transformation

An ultrastructural study of primordial germ cells, oogonia and early oocytes in Xenopus laevis

Development ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-217
Author(s):  
Kawakib A. K. Al-Mukhtar ◽  
Andrew C. Webb
Keyword(s):  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Granular Material ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Primordial Germ Cells ◽  
Cell Diameter ◽  
Oocyte Diameter ◽  
Nuclear Pores ◽  
Synaptonemal Complexes ◽  
Balbiani Body ◽  
Germ Cell Differentiation

Electron-microscope observations on the differentiation of germ cells in Xenopus laevis have revealed that the Balbiani body, cytoplasmic nucleolus-like bodies and groups of mitochondria associated with granular material previously reported only in older amphibian oocytes, are also present in the primordial germ cells, oogonia and early meiotic (pre-diplotene) oocytes of this species. Although there is considerable morphological reorganization of the gonad as a whole at the time of sex determination, little visible change in the ultrastructure of the primordial germ cells appears to take place during their transition to oogonia. Both primordial germ cells and oogonia have highly lobed nuclei and their cytoplasm contains a conspicuous, juxtanuclear organelle aggregate (consisting for the most part of mitochondria), which is considered to represent the precursor of the Balbiani body. In marked contrast, the transition from oogonium to oocyte in Xenopus is characterized by a distinctive change in nuclear shape (from lobed to round) associated with the onset of meiosis. During leptotene the oocyte chromatin becomes visibly organized into electron-dense axial elements (representing the single unpaired chromosomes) which are surrounded by a fibrillar network. Towards the end of leptotene, these axial elements become attached to the inner surface of the nuclear membrane in a localized region adjacent to the juxtanuclear mitochondrial aggregate. Zygotene is marked by the initiation of axial element pairing over short regions, resulting in the typical synaptonemal complex configuration of paired homologous chromosomes. The polarization of these tripartite ribbons within the nucleus becomes more pronounced in late zygotene, producing the familiar Bouquet arrangement. The synaptonemal complexes are more extensive as synapsis reaches a climax during pachytene, whereas the polarization is to some extent lost. The fine structure of synaptonemal complexes in the Xenopus oocyte is essentially the same as that described in numerous other plant and animal meiocytes. It is not until the beginning of the extended diplotene phase that any appreciable increase in cell diameter takes place. During early diplotene (oocyte diameter approximately 50 µm), the compact Balbiani body characteristic of the pre-vitellogenic anuran oocyte is formed by condensation of the juxtanuclear mitochondrial aggregate. Electron-dense, granular material appears to pass between nucleus and cytoplasm via nuclear pores in all stages of Xenopus germ cell differentiation studied. There is a distinct similarity in electron density and granular content between this ‘nuage material’ associated with the nuclear pores and the cytoplasmic aggregates of granular material in association with mitochondria or in the form of nucleolus-like bodies.

scholarly journals WIP1 Promotes Homologous Recombination and Modulates Sensitivity to PARP Inhibitors

Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamila Burdova ◽  
Radka Storchova ◽  
Matous Palek ◽  
Libor Macurek
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Lesion ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
G2 Cells

Genotoxic stress triggers a combined action of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Protein phosphatase 2C delta (referred to as WIP1) is involved in timely inactivation of DNA damage response by suppressing function of p53 and other targets at chromatin. Here we show that WIP1 promotes DNA repair through homologous recombination. Loss or inhibition of WIP1 delayed disappearance of the ionizing radiation-induced 53BP1 foci in S/G2 cells and promoted cell death. We identify breast cancer associated protein 1 (BRCA1) as interactor and substrate of WIP1 and demonstrate that WIP1 activity is needed for correct dynamics of BRCA1 recruitment to chromatin flanking the DNA lesion. In addition, WIP1 dephosphorylates 53BP1 at Threonine 543 that was previously implicated in mediating interaction with RIF1. Finally, we report that inhibition of WIP1 allowed accumulation of DNA damage in S/G2 cells and increased sensitivity of cancer cells to a poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib. We propose that inhibition of WIP1 may increase sensitivity of BRCA1-proficient cancer cells to olaparib.

DNA damage checkpoint kinases in cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah L. Smith ◽  
Harriet Southgate ◽  
Deborah A. Tweddle ◽  
Nicola J. Curtin
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Integrated Network ◽  
Checkpoint Kinases ◽  
G1 Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
High Level

Abstract DNA damage response (DDR) pathway prevents high level endogenous and environmental DNA damage being replicated and passed on to the next generation of cells via an orchestrated and integrated network of cell cycle checkpoint signalling and DNA repair pathways. Depending on the type of damage, and where in the cell cycle it occurs different pathways are involved, with the ATM-CHK2-p53 pathway controlling the G1 checkpoint or ATR-CHK1-Wee1 pathway controlling the S and G2/M checkpoints. Loss of G1 checkpoint control is common in cancer through TP53, ATM mutations, Rb loss or cyclin E overexpression, providing a stronger rationale for targeting the S/G2 checkpoints. This review will focus on the ATM-CHK2-p53-p21 pathway and the ATR-CHK1-WEE1 pathway and ongoing efforts to target these pathways for patient benefit.

scholarly journals Undamaged DNA Transmits and Enhances DNA Damage Checkpoint Signals in Early Embryos

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (19) ◽  
pp. 6852-6862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimin Peng ◽  
Andrea L. Lewellyn ◽  
James L. Maller
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Nuclear Dna ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Response ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Damaged Dna

ABSTRACT In Xenopus laevis embryos, the midblastula transition (MBT) at the 12th cell division marks initiation of critical developmental events, including zygotic transcription and the abrupt inclusion of gap phases into the cell cycle. Interestingly, although an ionizing radiation-induced checkpoint response is absent in pre-MBT embryos, introduction of a threshold amount of undamaged plasmid or sperm DNA allows a DNA damage checkpoint response to be activated. We show here that undamaged threshold DNA directly participates in checkpoint signaling, as judged by several dynamic changes, including H2AX phosphorylation, ATM phosphorylation and loading onto chromatin, and Chk1/Chk2 phosphorylation and release from nuclear DNA. These responses on physically separate threshold DNA require γ-H2AX and are triggered by an ATM-dependent soluble signal initiated by damaged DNA. The signal persists in egg extracts even after damaged DNA is removed from the system, indicating that the absence of damaged DNA is not sufficient to end the checkpoint response. The results identify a novel mechanism by which undamaged DNA enhances checkpoint signaling and provide an example of how the transition to cell cycle checkpoint activation during development is accomplished by maternally programmed increases in the DNA-to-cytoplasm ratio.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document