Intrathecal Nicardipine for Cerebral Vasospasm Post Subarachnoid Hemorrhage–a Retrospective Propensity-Based Analysis
AbstractObjectivesCerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) contribute to poor outcome following subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). With the paucity of effective treatments, we describe our experience with intrathecal (IT) nicardipine for this indication.MethodsPatients admitted to Emory University Hospital Neuroscience ICU between 2012-2017 with non-traumatic SAH, either aneurysmal or idiopathic, were included in the analysis. This patient cohort was compared using a propensity-score model to patients in the SAH international trialist (SAHIT) repository who did not receive intrathecal nicardipine. The primary outcome was DCI. Secondary outcomes were long-term functional outcome and adverse events.ResultsThe analysis included 1,351 patients, 422 of whom were diagnosed with cerebral vasospasm and treated with IT nicardipine. When compared with patients with no vasospasm (n=859) the treated group was younger (51.1±12.4 vs. 56.7±14.1, p<0.01), had a higher World Federation of Neurological Surgeons score (WFNS), modified Fisher grade, and more likely to undergo clipping of the ruptured aneurysm as compared to endovascular treatment (30.3% vs. 11.3%, p<0.01). Treatment with IT nicardipine decreased daily mean transcranial Doppler velocities in 77.3% of the treated patients. When compared to patients not receiving IT nicardipine, treatment was not associated with an increase rate of bacterial ventriculitis (3.1% compared with 2.7%, p>0.1) yet higher rates of ventriculoperitoneal shunting were noted (19.9% vs. 8.8%, p<0.01). In a propensity score comparison to the SAHIT database, the odds ratio to develop DCI with IT nicardipine treatment was 0.61 with 95% CI[0.44-0.84], and to have a favorable functional outcome (mRS≤2) was 2.17[1.61-2.91].ConclusionsIT nicardipine was associated with improved outcome and reduced DCI compared with propensity matched controls. There was an increased need for permanent CSF diversion but no other safety issues. This data should be considered when selecting medications and treatments to study in future randomized controlled clinical trial for SAH.