scholarly journals Reciprocal Priming between RTKs within Recycling Endosomes Orchestrates Cellular Signaling Outputs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Smith ◽  
Harriet R. Ferguson ◽  
Jennifer Ferguson ◽  
Egor Zindy ◽  
Katarzyna M. Kowalczyk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors ◽  
Recycling Endosomes ◽  
Phosphorylation Event ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Cellular Behaviour ◽  
Fine Tune

SUMMARYIntegration of signaling downstream from individual Receptor Tyrosine Kinases (RTKs) is crucial to fine tune cellular homeostasis during development and in pathological conditions, including breast cancer. However, how signalling integration is regulated and whether the endocytic fate of single receptors controls such signalling integration still remain poorly elucidated. Focusing on distinct Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) we generated a detailed picture of recycling-dependent FGF signalling in breast cancer cells by combining quantitative phosphoproteomics and targeted assays. We discovered reciprocal priming between FGFRs and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) within recycling endosomes. FGFR recycling ligands induce EGFR phosphorylation on threonine 693. This phosphorylation event alters both FGFR and EGFR trafficking and primes FGFR-mediated cell cycle but not cell invasion. In turn, FGFR signaling primes EGF-mediated outputs. The discovery of reciprocal priming between distict families of RTKs within recycling endosomes will transform our understanding of signalling integration by pointing to recycling endosomes as crucial signalling hubs for orchestrating cellular behaviour. Therefore, targeting reciprocal priming rather than individual receptors may improve personalized therapies in breast and other cancers.

scholarly journals Fibroblast growth factor receptors in breast cancer

Tumor Biology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 101042831769837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuwei Wang ◽  
Zhongyang Ding
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Fibroblast Growth Factor ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptors ◽  
Fibroblast Growth ◽  
Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors ◽  
Genetic Studies ◽  
The Common

Fibroblast growth factor receptors are growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, exerting their roles in embryogenesis, tissue homeostasis, and development of breast cancer. Recent genetic studies have identified some subtypes of fibroblast growth factor receptors as strong genetic loci associated with breast cancer. In this article, we review the recent epidemiological findings and experiment results of fibroblast growth factor receptors in breast cancer. First, we summarized the structure and physiological function of fibroblast growth factor receptors in humans. Then, we discussed the common genetic variations in fibroblast growth factor receptors that affect breast cancer risk. In addition, we also introduced the potential roles of each fibroblast growth factor receptors isoform in breast cancer. Finally, we explored the potential therapeutics targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors for breast cancer. Based on the biological mechanisms of fibroblast growth factor receptors leading to the pathogenesis in breast cancer, targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors may provide new opportunities for breast cancer therapeutic strategies.

Recent Advances on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor as a Molecular Target for Breast Cancer Therapeutics

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swathi R. Shetty ◽  
Ragini Yeeravalli ◽  
Tanya Bera ◽  
Amitava Das
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Type I ◽  
Egfr Inhibition ◽  
Epidermal Growth

: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a type-I transmembrane protein with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity is activated by peptide growth factors such as EGF, epigen, amphiregulin, etc. EGFR plays a vital role in regulating cell growth, migration, and differentiation in various tissue-specific cancers. It has been reported to be overexpressed in lung, head, and neck, colon, brain, pancreatic, and breast cancer that trigger tumor progression and drug resistance. EGFR overexpression alters the signaling pathway and induces cell division, invasion, and cell survival. Our prior studies demonstrated that EGFR inhibition modulates chemosensitivity in breast cancer stem cells thereby serving as a potential drug target for breast cancer mitigation. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Lapatinib, Neratinib) and monoclonal antibodies (Trastuzumab) targeting EGFR have been developed and approved by the US FDA for clinical use against breast cancer. This review highlights the critical role of EGFR in breast cancer progression and enumerates the various approaches being undertaken to inhibit aggressive breast cancers by suppressing the downstream pathways. Further, the mechanisms of action of potential molecules at various stages of drug development as well as clinically approved drugs for breast cancer treatment are illustrated.

scholarly journals HER2-positive breast cancer and tyrosine kinase inhibitors: the time is now

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilana Schlam ◽  
Sandra M. Swain
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

AbstractHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer accounts for 20–25% of all breast cancers. Multiple HER2-targeted therapies have been developed over the last few years, including the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) lapatinib, neratinib, tucatinib, and pyrotinib. These drugs target HER2 and other receptors of the epidermal growth factor receptor family, therefore each has unique efficacy and adverse event profile. HER2-directed TKIs have been studied in the early stage and advanced settings and have shown promising responses. There is increasing interest in utilizing these drugs in combination with chemotherapy and /or other HER2-directed agents in patients with central nervous system involvement, TKIs have shown to be effective in this setting for which treatment options have been previously limited and the prognosis remains poor. The aim of this review is to summarize currently approved TKIs for HER2+ breast, key clinical trials, and their use in current clinical practice.

scholarly journals Japanese subpopulation analysis of MONARCH 2: phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant for treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy

Breast Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenichi Inoue ◽  
Norikazu Masuda ◽  
Hiroji Iwata ◽  
Masato Takahashi ◽  
Yoshinori Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Abstract Background This was a Japanese subpopulation analysis of MONARCH 2, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods Eligible women had progressed on (neo)adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET), ≤ 12 months from end of adjuvant ET, or on first-line ET for ABC, and had not received chemotherapy for ABC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive abemaciclib or placebo plus fulvestrant. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), pharmacokinetics (PK), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and safety. Results In Japan, 95 patients were randomized (abemaciclib, n = 64; placebo, n = 31). At final PFS analysis (February 14, 2017), median PFS was 21.2 and 14.3 months, respectively, in the abemaciclib and placebo groups (hazard ratio: 0.672; 95% confidence interval: 0.380–1.189). Abemaciclib had a higher objective response rate (37.5%) than placebo (12.9%). PK and safety profiles for Japanese patients were consistent with those of the overall population, without clinically meaningful differences across most HRQoL dimensions evaluated. The most frequent adverse events in the abemaciclib versus placebo groups were diarrhea (95.2 versus 25.8%), neutropenia (79.4 versus 0%), and leukopenia (66.7 versus 0%). At a second data cutoff (June 20, 2019), median OS was not reached with abemaciclib and 47.3 months with placebo (hazard ratio: 0.755; 95% confidence interval: 0.390–1.463). Conclusions Results of the Japanese subpopulation were consistent with the improved clinical outcomes and manageable safety profile observed in the overall population. Clinical trial registration NCT02107703; U.S. National Library of Medicine: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02107703.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document