scholarly journals How coiled-coil assemblies accommodate multiple aromatic residues

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guto G. Rhys ◽  
William M. Dawson ◽  
Joseph L. Beesley ◽  
Freddie J. O. Martin ◽  
R. Leo Brady ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTRational protein design requires understanding the contribution of each amino acid to a targeted protein fold. For a subset of protein structures, namely the α;-helical coiled coils (CCs), knowledge is sufficiently advanced to allow the rational de novo design of many structures, including entirely new protein folds. However, current CC design rules center on using aliphatic hydrophobic residues predominantly to drive the folding and assembly of amphipathic α helices. The consequences of using aromatic residues—which would be useful for introducing structural probes, and binding and catalytic functionalities—into these interfaces is not understood. There are specific examples of designed CCs containing such aromatic residues, e.g., phenylalanine-rich sequences, and the use of polar aromatic residues to make buried hydrogen-bond networks. However, it is not known generally if sequences rich in tyrosine can form CCs, or what CC assemblies these would lead to. Here we explore tyrosine-rich sequences in a general CC-forming background and resolve new CC structures. In one of these, an antiparallel tetramer, the tyrosine residues are solvent accessible and pack at the interface between the core and the surface. In the other more-complex structure, the residues are buried and form an extended hydrogen-bond network.

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 240-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan M. Fletcher ◽  
Aimee L. Boyle ◽  
Marc Bruning ◽  
Gail J. Bartlett ◽  
Thomas L. Vincent ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 111-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Walshaw ◽  
Jennifer M. Shipway ◽  
Derek N. Woolfson

The coiled coil is a ubiquitous motif that guides many different protein-protein interactions. The accepted hallmark of coiled coils is a seven-residue (heptad) sequence repeat. The positions of this repeat are labelled a-b-c-d-e-f-g, with residues at a and d tending to be hydrophobic. Such sequences form amphipathic α-helices, which assemble into helical bundles via knobs-into-holes interdigitation of residues from neighbouring helices. We wrote an algorithm, SOCKET, to identify this packing in protein structures, and used this to gather a database of coiled-coil structures from the Protein Data Bank. Surprisingly, in addition to commonly accepted structures with a single, contiguous heptad repeat, we identified sequences with multiple, offset heptad repeats. These 'new' sequence patterns help to explain oligomer-state specification in coiled coils. Here we focus on the structural consequences for sequences with two heptad repeats offset by two residues, i.e. a/f′-b/g′-c/a′-d/b′-e/c′-f/d′-g/e′. This sets up two hydrophobic seams on opposite sides of the helix formed. We describe how such helices may combine to bury these hydrophobic surfaces in two different ways and form two distinct structures: open 'α-sheets' and closed 'α-cylinders'. We highlight these with descriptions of natural structures and outline possibilities for protein design.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guto G. Rhys ◽  
Christopher W. Wood ◽  
Joseph L. Beesley ◽  
Nathan R. Zaccai ◽  
Antony J. Burton ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe association of amphipathic α helices in water leads to α-helical-bundle protein structures. However, the driving force for this—the hydrophobic effect—is not specific and does not define the number or the orientation of helices in the associated state. Rather, this is achieved through deeper sequence-to-structure relationships, which are increasingly being discerned. For example, for one structurally extreme but nevertheless ubiquitous class of bundle—the α-helical coiled coils—relationships have been established that discriminate between all-parallel dimers, trimers and tetramers. Association states above this are known, as are antiparallel and mixed arrangements of the helices. However, these alternative states are less-well understood. Here, we describe a synthetic-peptide system that switches between parallel hexamers and various up-down-up-down tetramers in response to single-amino-acid changes and solution conditions. The main accessible states of each peptide variant are characterized fully in solution and, in most cases, to high-resolution X-ray crystal structures. Analysis and inspection of these structures helps rationalize the different states formed. This navigation of the structural landscape of α-helical coiled coils above the dimers and trimers that dominate in nature has allowed us to design rationally a well-defined and hyperstable antiparallel coiled-coil tetramer (apCC-Tet). This robust de novo protein provides another scaffold for further structural and functional designs in protein engineering and synthetic biology.


The structural features required for the formation of two- versus three-stranded coiled coils have been explored using de novo protein design. Peptides with leucine at the ‘a’ and ‘d’ positions of a coiled-coil (general sequence: Leu a Xaa b Xaa c Leu d Glu e Xaa f Lys g ) exist in a non-cooperative equilibrium between unstructured monomers and helical dimers and helical trimers. Substituting valine into each ‘a’ position produces peptides which still form trimers at high concentrations, whereas substitution of a single asparagine at the ‘a’ position of the third heptad yields a dimer. During the course of this work, we also re-investigated a helical propensity scale derived using a series of coiled-coil peptides previously believed to exist in a monomer-dimer equilibrium (O’Neil & DeGrado 1990). Detailed analysis of the concentration dependence of ellipticity at 222 nm reveals that they exist in a non-cooperative monomer-dimer-trimer equilibrium. However, the concentration of trimer near the midpoint of the concentration-dependent transition is small, so the previously determined values of ΔΔG α using the approximate monomer-dimer scheme are indistinguishable from the values obtained employing the complete monomer-dimer-trimer equilibrium.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (17) ◽  
pp. e2021899118
Author(s):  
Andreja Majerle ◽  
San Hadži ◽  
Jana Aupič ◽  
Tadej Satler ◽  
Fabio Lapenta ◽  
...  

Coiled-coil (CC) dimers are widely used in protein design because of their modularity and well-understood sequence–structure relationship. In CC protein origami design, a polypeptide chain is assembled from a defined sequence of CC building segments that determine the self-assembly of protein cages into polyhedral shapes, such as the tetrahedron, triangular prism, or four-sided pyramid. However, a targeted functionalization of the CC modules could significantly expand the versatility of protein origami scaffolds. Here, we describe a panel of single-chain camelid antibodies (nanobodies) directed against different CC modules of a de novo designed protein origami tetrahedron. We show that these nanobodies are able to recognize the same CC modules in different polyhedral contexts, such as isolated CC dimers, tetrahedra, triangular prisms, or trigonal bipyramids, thereby extending the ability to functionalize polyhedra with nanobodies in a desired stoichiometry. Crystal structures of five nanobody-CC complexes in combination with small-angle X-ray scattering show binding interactions between nanobodies and CC dimers forming the edges of a tetrahedron with the nanobody entering the tetrahedral cavity. Furthermore, we identified a pair of allosteric nanobodies in which the binding to the distant epitopes on the antiparallel homodimeric APH CC is coupled via a strong positive cooperativity. A toolbox of well-characterized nanobodies specific for CC modules provides a unique tool to target defined sites in the designed protein structures, thus opening numerous opportunities for the functionalization of CC protein origami polyhedra or CC-based bionanomaterials.


2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1726) ◽  
pp. 20160213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ai Niitsu ◽  
Jack W. Heal ◽  
Kerstin Fauland ◽  
Andrew R. Thomson ◽  
Derek N. Woolfson

The rational ( de novo ) design of membrane-spanning proteins lags behind that for water-soluble globular proteins. This is due to gaps in our knowledge of membrane-protein structure, and experimental difficulties in studying such proteins compared to water-soluble counterparts. One limiting factor is the small number of experimentally determined three-dimensional structures for transmembrane proteins. By contrast, many tens of thousands of globular protein structures provide a rich source of ‘scaffolds’ for protein design, and the means to garner sequence-to-structure relationships to guide the design process. The α-helical coiled coil is a protein-structure element found in both globular and membrane proteins, where it cements a variety of helix–helix interactions and helical bundles. Our deep understanding of coiled coils has enabled a large number of successful de novo designs. For one class, the α-helical barrels—that is, symmetric bundles of five or more helices with central accessible channels—there are both water-soluble and membrane-spanning examples. Recent computational designs of water-soluble α-helical barrels with five to seven helices have advanced the design field considerably. Here we identify and classify analogous and more complicated membrane-spanning α-helical barrels from the Protein Data Bank. These provide tantalizing but tractable targets for protein engineering and de novo protein design. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Membrane pores: from structure and assembly, to medicine and technology’.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Julia Skokowa ◽  
Mohammad Elgamacy ◽  
Patrick Müller

Protein therapeutics are clinically developed and used as minorly engineered forms of their natural templates. This direct adoption of natural proteins in therapeutic contexts very frequently faces major challenges, including instability, poor solubility, and aggregation, which may result in undesired clinical outcomes. In contrast to classical protein engineering techniques, de novo protein design enables the introduction of radical sequence and structure manipulations, which can be used to address these challenges. In this work, we test the utility of two different design strategies to design novel granulopoietic proteins, using structural information from human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (hG-CSF) as a template. The two strategies are: (1) An epitope rescaffolding where we migrate a tertiary structural epitope to simpler, idealised, proteins scaffolds (Fig. 1A-C), and (2) a topological refactoring strategy, where we change the protein fold by rearranging connections across the secondary structures and optimised the designed sequence of the new fold (Fig. 1A,D,E). Testing only eight designs, we obtained novel granulopoietic proteins that bind to the G-CSF receptor, have nanomolar activity in cell-based assays, and were highly thermostable and protease-resistant. NMR structure determination showed three designs to match their designed coordinates within less than 2.5 Å. While the designs possessed starkly different sequence and structure from the native G-CSF, they showed very specific activity in differentiating primary human haematopoietic stem cells into fully mature granulocytes. Morever, one design shows significant and specific activity in vivo in zebrafish and mice. These results are prospectively directing us to investigate the role of dimerisation geometry of G-GCSF receptor on activation magnitude and downstream signalling pathways. More broadly, the results also motivate our ongoing work on to design other heamatopoietic agents. In conclusion, our findings highlight the utility of computational protein design as a highly effective and guided means for discovering nover receptor modulators, and to obtain new mechanistic information about the target molecule. Figure 1. Two different strategies to generate superfolding G-CSF designs. (A) X-ray structure of G-CSF (orange) bound to its cognate receptor (red) through its binding epitope (blue). According to the epitope rescaffolding strategy, (B) the critical binding epitope residues were disembodied and used as a geometric search query against the entire Protein Data Bank (PDB) to retrieve structurally compatible scaffolds. The top six compatible scaffolds structures are shown in cartoon representation. (C) The top two templates chosen for sequence design, were a de novo designed coiled-coil and a four-helix bundle with unknown function. The binding epitopes were grafted, and the scaffolds were optimised to rigidly host the guest epitope. (D-E) According to the topological refactoring strategy (D) the topology of the native G-CSF was rewired from around the fixed binding epitope, and then was further mutated to idealise the core residues (blue volume (E)) and residues distal from the binding epitope (orange crust (E)). Both strategies aimed at simplifying the topology, reducing the size, and rigidifying the bound epitope conformation through alternate means. Figure 1 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (8) ◽  
pp. 1410-1412
Author(s):  
Weijie Zhao ◽  
Chu Wang

Abstract Search ‘de novo protein design’ on Google and you will find the name David Baker in all results of the first page. Professor David Baker at the University of Washington and other scientists are opening up a new world of fantastic proteins. Protein is the direct executor of most biological functions and its structure and function are fully determined by its primary sequence. Baker's group developed the Rosetta software suite that enabled the computational prediction and design of protein structures. Being able to design proteins from scratch means being able to design executors for diverse purposes and benefit society in multiple ways. Recently, NSR interviewed Prof. Baker on this fast-developing field and his personal experiences.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 16-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek N Woolfson ◽  
Gail J Bartlett ◽  
Antony J Burton ◽  
Jack W Heal ◽  
Ai Niitsu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document