scholarly journals Efficacy, safety, and lot to lot immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BBV152): a double-blind, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raches Ella ◽  
Siddharth Reddy ◽  
William Blackwelder ◽  
Varsha Potdar ◽  
Pragya Yadav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Vaccine Efficacy ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Case Definition ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Multicentre Phase ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Placebo Recipients

Background: We report the clinical efficacy against COVID 19 infection of BBV152, a whole virion inactivated SARS CoV 2 vaccine formulated with a Toll like receptor 7/8 agonist molecule adsorbed to alum (Algel IMDG). Methods: We did a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial in 25 Indian hospitals to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunological lot consistency of BBV152. Healthy adults (age 18 to 98 years) randomised 1:1 using a sponsor-supplied randomisation scheme received two intramuscular doses of vaccine or placebo administered four weeks apart. The primary outcome was laboratory confirmed symptomatic COVID 19, occurring at least 14 days after the second dose. Secondary outcomes were efficacy in subgroups for age (18 to < 60 years and >=60 years) and in participants with pre-existing stable medical conditions. We also evaluated safety, reactogenicity, and consistency of immune responses for three consecutive manufacturing lots. Findings: Between November 16, 2020 and January 7, 2021 we recruited 25,798 participants who were randomised to BBV152 or placebo groups; 24,419 received two doses of BBV152 (n = 12,221) or placebo (n = 12,198). In a case-driven analysis, 130 cases of symptomatic COVID-19 were reported in 16,973 (0.77%) participants with follow-up at least two weeks after the second vaccination; 24 occurred in the vaccine group and 106 in placebo recipients giving an overall vaccine efficacy of 77.8% (95% CI: 65.2,86.4). Sixteen cases, one vaccinee and 15 placebo recipients, met the severe symptomatic COVID-19 case definition giving a vaccine efficacy of 93.4% (57.1,99.8). Efficacy against asymptomatic COVID 19 was 63.6% (29.0, 82.4). BBV152 conferred 65.2% (95% CI: 33.1, 83.0) protection against the SARS CoV 2 Variant of Concern, B.1.617.2 (Delta). BBV152 was well tolerated with no clinically or statistically significant differences in the distributions of solicited, unsolicited, or serious adverse events between vaccine and placebo groups. No cases of anaphylaxis or vaccine-related deaths were reported. Interpretation: BBV152 was immunogenic and highly efficacious against symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID 19 variant associated disease, particularly against severe disease in adults. Vaccination was well tolerated with an overall incidence of adverse events observed over a median of 146 days that was lower than that observed with other COVID-19 vaccines.

scholarly journals Pomaglumetad Methionil (LY2140023 Monohydrate) and Aripiprazole in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Double-Blind Comparison

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Adams ◽  
Lu Zhang ◽  
Brian A. Millen ◽  
Bruce J. Kinon ◽  
Juan-Carlos Gomez
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Long Term Treatment ◽  
Blind Comparison

We tested the hypothesis that long-term treatment with pomaglumetad methionil would demonstrate significantly less weight gain than aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia. In this 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study, 678 schizophrenia patients were randomized to either pomaglumetad methionil (n=516) or aripiprazole (n=162). Treatment groups were also compared on efficacy and various safety measures, including serious adverse events (SAEs), discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), and suicide-related thoughts and behaviors. The pomaglumetad methionil group showed significantly greater weight loss at Week 24 (Visit 12) compared with the aripiprazole group (−2.8 ± 0.4 versus 0.4 ± 0.6;P<0.001). However, change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores for aripiprazole was significantly greater than for pomaglumetad methionil (−15.58 ± 1.58 versus −12.03 ± 0.99;P=0.045). The incidences of SAEs (8.2% versus 3.1%;P=0.032) and discontinuation due to AEs (16.2% versus 8.7%;P=0.020) were significantly higher for pomaglumetad methionil compared with aripiprazole. No statistically significant differences in the incidence of TEAEs, EPS, or suicidal ideation or behavior were noted between treatment groups. In conclusion, long-term treatment with pomaglumetad methionil resulted in significantly less weight gain than aripiprazole. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.govNCT01328093.

scholarly journals Safety findings from CENTURION, a phase 3 consistency study of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of migraine

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Tassorelli ◽  
S Bragg ◽  
JH Krege ◽  
EG Doty ◽  
PA Ardayfio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Acute Treatment ◽  
Motor Vehicle ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Vehicle Accidents

Abstract Background Lasmiditan (LTN) is a selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist for the acute treatment of migraine in adults. We present detailed safety findings from the placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 3 study, of LTN treatment across 4 attacks (CENTURION). Methods Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to LTN 200 mg (LTN200), LTN100, or a control group that received placebo for 3 attacks and LTN50 for either the 3rd or 4th attack (1:1). Safety analyses were conducted for patients who took ≥1 dose of study drug and, in some cases, those who took all 4 doses. Results Overall, 1471 patients treated 4494 attacks. The incidences of treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) were - placebo, n=2 (0.4 %); LTN100, n=1 (0.2 %); LTN200, n=2 (0.4 %); no specific treatment-emergent SAE was reported in more than one patient. The most common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) with lasmiditan were dizziness, paresthesia, fatigue, nausea, vertigo, and somnolence; the vast majority were mild or moderate in severity. The incidences of these TEAEs were highest during the first attack and decreased during subsequent attacks. For patients who experienced a common TEAE with the first attack, less than 45 % experienced the same event in subsequent attacks. Patients who did not experience an event in the 1st attack infrequently experienced the same event in subsequent attacks. The time of onset of the common TEAE ranged from ~40 min to 1 h (dependent upon TEAE) and, for individual TEAE, the onset was similar across attacks. Duration was dependent upon TEAE and attack. It was shortest for paresthesia (< 2 h for all attacks); it ranged from 1.8 to 5.5 h for other common TEAEs and was generally similar across attacks. Serotonin syndrome was reported for 2 patients post LTN dosing; there were no meaningful differences across treatment groups in suicidality; there was no evidence of an increase in motor vehicle accidents. Conclusion In this blinded, controlled, multiple-attack study, LTN was associated with generally mild or moderate CNS-related TEAEs of short duration. TEAEs tended to decrease in frequency across the 4 attacks. Trial registration NCT03670810

scholarly journals Tocilizumab in early progressive rheumatoid arthritis: FUNCTION, a randomised controlled trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 1081-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerd R Burmester ◽  
William F Rigby ◽  
Ronald F van Vollenhoven ◽  
Jonathan Kay ◽  
Andrea Rubbert-Roth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectivesThe efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, has not previously been evaluated in a population consisting exclusively of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsIn a double-blind randomised controlled trial (FUNCTION), 1162 methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with early progressive RA were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to one of four treatment groups: 4 mg/kg TCZ+MTX, 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX, 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo and placebo+MTX (comparator group). The primary outcome was remission according to Disease Activity Score using 28 joints (DAS28–erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) <2.6) at week 24. Radiographic and physical function outcomes were also evaluated. We report results through week 52.ResultsThe intent-to-treat population included 1157 patients. Significantly more patients receiving 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX and 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo than receiving placebo+MTX achieved DAS28-ESR remission at week 24 (45% and 39% vs 15%; p<0.0001). The 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX group also achieved significantly greater improvement in radiographic disease progression and physical function at week 52 than did patients treated with placebo+MTX (mean change from baseline in van der Heijde–modified total Sharp score, 0.08 vs 1.14 (p=0.0001); mean reduction in Health Assessment Disability Index, −0.81 vs −0.64 (p=0.0024)). In addition, the 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo and 4 mg/kg TCZ+MTX groups demonstrated clinical efficacy that was at least as effective as MTX for these key secondary endpoints. Serious adverse events were similar among treatment groups. Adverse events resulting in premature withdrawal occurred in 20% of patients in the 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX group.ConclusionsTCZ is effective in combination with MTX and as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with early RA.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01007435

scholarly journals Analysis of serious adverse events in a paediatric fast breathing pneumonia clinical trial in Malawi

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000415
Author(s):  
Evangelyn Nkwopara ◽  
Robert Schmicker ◽  
Tisungane Mvalo ◽  
Melda Phiri ◽  
Ajib Phiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionPneumonia is the leading infectious killer of children. We conducted a double-blind, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing placebo to amoxicillin treatment for fast breathing pneumonia in HIV-negative children aged 2–59 months in Malawi. Occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) during the trial were examined to assess disease progression, co-morbidities, recurrence of pneumonia and side effects of amoxicillin.MethodsEnrolled children with fast breathing for age and a history of cough <14 days or difficult breathing were randomised to either placebo or amoxicillin for 3 days, and followed for 14 days to track clinical characteristics and outcomes. Medical history, physical exam, laboratory results and any chest radiographs collected at screening, enrolment and during hospitalisation were evaluated. All SAE reports were reviewed for additional information regarding hospitalisation, course of treatment and outcome.ResultsIn total, 102/1126 (9.0%) enrolled children with fast breathing pneumonia were reported to have a SAE. Seventy-five per cent (n=77) of SAEs were pneumonia-related (p<0.01). Children<2 years of age represented the greatest proportion (61/77, 79.2%) of those with a pneumonia-related SAE. In the amoxicillin group, there were 46 SAEs and 5 (10.9%) cases were identified as possibly related to study drug (4 gastroenteritis and 1 fever). There were no life-threatening pneumonia SAEs or deaths in either group, and by the time of exit from the study, all children recovered without sequelae.DiscussionIn this fast breathing pneumonia clinical trial, SAEs occurred infrequently in both the amoxicillin and placebo groups, and amoxicillin was well tolerated.Trial registration numberNCT02760420. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02760420?term=ginsburg&rank=9.

scholarly journals Safety findings from Phase 3 lasmiditan studies for acute treatment of migraine: Results from SAMURAI and SPARTAN

Cephalalgia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 957-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H Krege ◽  
Paul B Rizzoli ◽  
Emily Liffick ◽  
Erin G Doty ◽  
Sherie A Dowsett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Integrated Treatment ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Acute Therapy ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Migraine Pain ◽  
Safety Population ◽  
Ischemic Events

Background We assessed the safety profile of lasmiditan, a selective 5-HT1F receptor agonist without vasoconstrictive activity being developed as an acute therapy for migraine. Methods SAMURAI and SPARTAN were Phase 3 double-blind studies of patients with migraine, randomized to oral lasmiditan 50 mg (SPARTAN only), 100 mg, 200 mg, or placebo to be taken within 4 hours of onset of migraine pain. Safety data from the studies were integrated. Treatment-emergent adverse events (occurring within 48 hours of first dose) were considered in the analyses. Results The safety population comprised 1262 patients assigned placebo, and 654, 1265, and 1258 assigned lasmiditan 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg, respectively. There were no deaths; serious adverse events were reported for seven patients (placebo, n = 2 [0.2%]; lasmiditan 50 mg, n = 1 [0.2%]; lasmiditan 100 mg, n = 1 [0.2%]; lasmiditan 200 mg, n = 3 [0.2%]). Patients reporting ≥ 1 treatment-emergent adverse events were: Placebo, n = 174 (13.5%); lasmiditan 50 mg, n = 166 (25.4%); lasmiditan 100 mg, n = 458 (36.2%); and lasmiditan 200 mg, n = 510 (40.6%). Treatment-emergent adverse events were generally mild or moderate in severity. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events with lasmiditan were dizziness, paresthesia, somnolence, fatigue, nausea, muscular weakness and hypoesthesia. There were no ischemic events. Conclusions As a centrally-penetrant drug, lasmiditan use was associated with neurologic treatment-emergent adverse events; most were mild or moderate in severity and self-limiting. Trial registration at clinicaltrials.gov SAMURAI (NCT02439320) and SPARTAN (NCT02605174).

Randomised controlled trial of escitalopram for cervical dystonia with dystonic jerks/tremor

2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 579-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelien Zoons ◽  
Jan Booij ◽  
Catherine C S Delnooz ◽  
Joke M Dijk ◽  
Yasmine E M Dreissen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cervical Dystonia ◽  
Rating Scales ◽  
Psychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectiveTrials for additional or alternative treatments for cervical dystonia (CD) are scarce since the introduction of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT). We performed the first trial to investigate whether dystonic jerks/tremor in patients with CD respond to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) escitalopram.MethodsIn a randomised, double-blind, crossover trial, patients with CD received escitalopram and placebo for 6 weeks. Treatment with BoNT was continued, and scores on rating scales regarding dystonia, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life (QoL) were compared. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients that improved at least one point on the Clinical Global Impression Scale for jerks/tremor scored by independent physicians with experience in movement disorders.ResultsFifty-threepatients were included. In the escitalopram period, 14/49 patients (29%) improved on severity of jerks/tremor versus 11/48 patients (23%) in the placebo period (P=0.77). There were no significant differences between baseline and after treatment with escitalopram or placebo on severity of dystonia or jerks/tremor. Psychiatric symptoms and QoL improved significantly in both periods compared with baseline. There were no significant differences between treatment with escitalopram and placebo for dystonia, psychiatric or QoL rating scales. During treatment with escitalopram, patients experienced slightly more adverse events, but no serious adverse events occurred.ConclusionIn this innovative trial, no add-on effect of escitalopram for treatment of CD with jerks was found on motor or psychiatric symptoms. However, we also did not find a reason to withhold patients treatment with SSRIs for depression and anxiety, which are common in dystonia.Trial registration numberNTR2178.

scholarly journals Upadacitinib in patients with psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to non-biological therapy: 56-week data from the phase 3 SELECT-PsA 1 study

RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e001838
Author(s):  
Iain B McInnes ◽  
Koji Kato ◽  
Marina Magrey ◽  
Joseph F Merola ◽  
Mitsumasa Kishimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
American College Of Rheumatology ◽  
Acr Criteria ◽  
Minimal Disease

BackgroundIn SELECT-PsA 1, a randomised double-blind phase 3 study, upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg were superior to placebo and non-inferior to adalimumab in ≥20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria at 12 weeks in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here, we report 56-week efficacy and safety in patients from SELECT-PsA 1.MethodsPatients received upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg once daily, adalimumab 40 mg every other week for 56 weeks or placebo through week 24 switched thereafter to upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg until week 56. Efficacy endpoints included the proportion of patients achieving ≥20%/50%/70% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20/50/70), ≥75%/90%/100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75/90/100), minimal disease activity (MDA) and change from baseline in modified total Sharp/van der Heijde Score. Treatment-emergent adverse events per 100 patient years (PY) were summarised.ResultsConsistent with results through week 24, ACR20/50/70, PASI75/90/100 and MDA responses were maintained with upadacitinib through week 56 and were generally numerically higher than with adalimumab; inhibition of radiographic progression was also maintained. Patients who switched from placebo to upadacitinib exhibited comparable improvements at week 56 as patients originally randomised to upadacitinib. The rates of serious adverse events were 9.1 events/100 PY with upadacitinib 15 mg and 12.3 events/100 PY with upadacitinib 30 mg. Two deaths were reported in each of the upadacitinib groups.ConclusionEfficacy across various domains of PsA were maintained with upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg through week 56 with no new safety signals observed.

scholarly journals Ivermectin in mild and moderate COVID-19 (RIVET-COV): a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anant Mohan ◽  
Pawan Tiwari ◽  
Tejas Suri ◽  
Saurabh Mittal ◽  
Ankit Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Treat Population

Abstract Introduction: Till date, no drug has shown definite benefit in non-severe COVID-19. Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug which has in-vitro efficacy in reducing coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) load in severe disease. Objectives: To determine if a single oral administration of Ivermectin to patients with mild and moderate COVID-19 is effective in converting SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR to negative result and in reducing viral load.Methods: In this double-blind trial, patients were randomized to elixir formulation of Ivermectin in 24 mg, 12 mg or placebo in 1:1:1 ratio. The co-primary outcomes were conversion of RT-PCR to negative result and the decline of viral load at day 5 of enrolment and were assessed in patients with positive RT-PCR at enrolment (modified intention-to-treat population). Safety outcomes included total and serious adverse events and were assessed in all patients who received the trial drug (intention-to-treat population). Results: Among 157 patients randomized, 125 patients were included in mITT analysis. Forty patients each were assigned to Ivermectin 24 mg and 12 mg, and 45 patients to placebo. The RT-PCR negativity at day 5 was higher in the two Ivermectin arms but failed to attain statistical significance (Ivermectin 24 mg, 47.5%; 12 mg, 35.0%; and placebo, 31.1%; p= 0.30). The decline of viral load at day 5 was similar in the three arms. No serious adverse events were encountered.Conclusion: In patients with mild and moderate COVID-19, a single administration of Ivermectin elixir (either 24 mg or 12 mg) demonstrated a trend towards higher proportion of RT-PCR negativity at day 5 of enrolment. The protocol was registered in the Clinical Trial Registry – India (CTRI) vide ref No CTRI/2020/06/026001.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document