scholarly journals networkGWAS: A network-based approach for genome-wide association studies in structured populations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Muzio ◽  
Leslie O'Bray ◽  
Laetitia Meng-Papaxanthos ◽  
Juliane Klatt ◽  
Karsten Borgwardt

While the search for associations between genetic markers and complex traits has discovered tens of thousands of trait-related genetic variants, the vast majority of these only explain a tiny fraction of observed phenotypic variation. One possible strategy to detect stronger associations is to aggregate the effects of several genetic markers and to test entire genes, pathways or (sub)networks of genes for association to a phenotype. The latter, network-based genome-wide association studies, in particular suffers from a huge search space and an inherent multiple testing problem. As a consequence, current approaches are either based on greedy feature selection, thereby risking that they miss relevant associations, and/or neglect doing a multiple testing correction, which can lead to an abundance of false positive findings. To address the shortcomings of current approaches of network-based genome-wide association studies, we propose <tt>networkGWAS</tt>, a computationally efficient and statistically sound approach to gene-based genome-wide association studies based on mixed models and neighborhood aggregation. It allows for population structure correction and for well-calibrated p-values, which we obtain through a block permutation scheme. <tt>networkGWAS</tt> successfully detects known or plausible associations on simulated rare variants from H. sapiens data as well as semi-simulated and real data with common variants from A. thaliana and enables the systematic combination of gene-based genome-wide association studies with biological network information.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Richardson

Genome wide association studies (GWAS) are being increasingly used to identify genetic markers of variation in complex traits such as intelligence and education. However, GWAS are compromised by population stratification (PS) leading to spurious associations, and attempts to correct for them statistically are also proving to be inadequate. This suggests the need for a deeper understanding of the sources of such PS and how its roots in complex social and historical dynamics can seriously mislead interpretations from GWAS/PGS to social policy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinesh K. Saini ◽  
Yuvraj Chopra ◽  
Jagmohan Singh ◽  
Karansher S. Sandhu ◽  
Anand Kumar ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong ◽  
Sahin Naqvi ◽  
Manuel Rivas ◽  
Jonathan K Pritchard

SummaryGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been used to study the genetic basis of a wide variety of complex diseases and other traits. However, for most traits it remains difficult to interpret what genes and biological processes are impacted by the top hits. Here, as a contrast, we describe UK Biobank GWAS results for three molecular traits—urate, IGF-1, and testosterone—that are biologically simpler than most diseases, and for which we know a great deal in advance about the core genes and pathways. Unlike most GWAS of complex traits, for all three traits we find that most top hits are readily interpretable. We observe huge enrichment of significant signals near genes involved in the relevant biosynthesis, transport, or signaling pathways. We show how GWAS data illuminate the biology of variation in each trait, including insights into differences in testosterone regulation between females and males. Meanwhile, in other respects the results are reminiscent of GWAS for more-complex traits. In particular, even these molecular traits are highly polygenic, with most of the variance coming not from core genes, but from thousands to tens of thousands of variants spread across most of the genome. Given that diseases are often impacted by many distinct biological processes, including these three, our results help to illustrate why so many variants can affect risk for any given disease.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Howard ◽  
Mark J. Adams ◽  
Toni-Kim Clarke ◽  
Jonathan D. Hafferty ◽  
Jude Gibson ◽  
...  

AbstractMajor depression is a debilitating psychiatric illness that is typically associated with low mood, anhedonia and a range of comorbidities. Depression has a heritable component that has remained difficult to elucidate with current sample sizes due to the polygenic nature of the disorder. To maximise sample size, we meta-analysed data on 807,553 individuals (246,363 cases and 561,190 controls) from the three largest genome-wide association studies of depression. We identified 102 independent variants, 269 genes, and 15 gene-sets associated with depression, including both genes and gene-pathways associated with synaptic structure and neurotransmission. Further evidence of the importance of prefrontal brain regions in depression was provided by an enrichment analysis. In an independent replication sample of 1,306,354 individuals (414,055 cases and 892,299 controls), 87 of the 102 associated variants were significant following multiple testing correction. Based on the putative genes associated with depression this work also highlights several potential drug repositioning opportunities. These findings advance our understanding of the complex genetic architecture of depression and provide several future avenues for understanding aetiology and developing new treatment approaches.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan A. Freudenthal ◽  
Markus J. Ankenbrand ◽  
Dominik G. Grimm ◽  
Arthur Korte

AbstractMotivationGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) are one of the most commonly used methods to detect associations between complex traits and genomic polymorphisms. As both genotyping and phenotyping of large populations has become easier, typical modern GWAS have to cope with massive amounts of data. Thus, the computational demand for these analyses grew remarkably during the last decades. This is especially true, if one wants to implement permutation-based significance thresholds, instead of using the naïve Bonferroni threshold. Permutation-based methods have the advantage to provide an adjusted multiple hypothesis correction threshold that takes the underlying phenotypic distribution into account and will thus remove the need to find the correct transformation for non Gaussian phenotypes. To enable efficient analyses of large datasets and the possibility to compute permutation-based significance thresholds, we used the machine learning framework TensorFlow to develop a linear mixed model (GWAS-Flow) that can make use of the available CPU or GPU infrastructure to decrease the time of the analyses especially for large datasets.ResultsWe were able to show that our application GWAS-Flow outperforms custom GWAS scripts in terms of speed without loosing accuracy. Apart from p-values, GWAS-Flow also computes summary statistics, such as the effect size and its standard error for each individual marker. The CPU-based version is the default choice for small data, while the GPU-based version of GWAS-Flow is especially suited for the analyses of big data.AvailabilityGWAS-Flow is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/Joyvalley/GWAS_Flow) and is released under the terms of the MIT-License.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document