scholarly journals Contextual control of conditioned pain tolerance and endogenous analgesic systems: Evidence for sex-based differences in endogenous opioid engagement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sydney Trask ◽  
Jeffrey S. Mogil ◽  
Fred J. Helmstetter ◽  
Cheryl L. Stucky ◽  
Katelyn E. Sadler

AbstractThe mechanisms underlying the transition from acute to chronic pain are unclear but may involve the persistence or strengthening of pain memories acquired in part through associative learning. Contextual cues, which comprise the surrounding environment where events occur, were recently described as a critical regulator of pain memory; both rodents and humans exhibit increased pain sensitivity in environments recently associated with a single painful experience. It is unknown, however, how repeated exposure to an acute painful unconditioned stimulus in a distinct context modifies pain sensitivity or the expectation of pain in that environment. To answer this question, we conditioned mice to associate distinct contexts with either repeated administration of a mild visceral pain stimulus (intraperitoneal injection of acetic acid) or vehicle injection over the course of three days. On the final day of experiments animals received either an acid injection or vehicle injection prior to being placed into both contexts. In this way, contextual control of pain sensitivity and pain expectation could be tested respectively. Both male and female mice developed context-dependent conditional pain tolerance, a phenomenon mediated by endogenous opioid signaling. However, when expecting the presentation of a painful stimulus in a given context, males exhibited conditional hypersensitivity whereas females exhibited endogenous opioid-mediated conditional analgesia. Successful determination of the brain circuits involved in this sexually dimorphic anticipatory response may allow for the manipulation of pain memories, which may contribute to the development of chronic pain states.

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 813-822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens-Christian Trojel Hviid ◽  
Jonas Bloch Thorlund ◽  
Henrik Bjarke Vaegter

Abstract Background and aims Exercise is commonly used as treatment for chronic pain with positive long-term effects on pain and pain-related disability. In pain-free subjects, hypoalgesia following an acute bout of exercise compared with a control condition has consistently been demonstrated also known as exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH). Walking exercise, a low intensity aerobic exercise, is frequently used in clinical practice as an easily applicable intervention for patients with chronic pain. Walking exercise is furthermore recommended as an effective treatment for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions to alleviate pain and reduce disability, however, the effect of walking on pain sensitivity is currently unknown. The aims of the present study were to investigate (1) the acute effect of walking on pain sensitivity, and (2) the relative (between-subjects) and absolute (within-subject) test-retest reliability of the hypoalgesic response across two sessions separated by 1 week. Methods In this randomised experimental cross-over study including two identical sessions, 35 pain-free subjects performed a standardized 6 min walking test and a duration-matched quiet rest condition in a randomized and counterbalanced order in each session. Before and after both conditions, handheld pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were assessed at the thigh and shoulder, and pressure pain thresholds (cPPT) and pain tolerance (cPTT) were assessed with computer-controlled cuff algometry at the lower leg. Change in the pain sensitivity measures were analysed with repeated-measures ANOVAs, and test-retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and agreements in classification of EIH responders/non-responders between the two sessions. Results All subjects completed the walking conditions in both session 1 and session 2. The perceived intensity of walking assessed with rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and walking distance did not differ significantly between session 1 (distance: 632.5 ± 75.2 meters, RPE: 10.9 ± 1.9) and session 2 (distance: 642.1 ± 80.2 meters, RPE: 11.0 ± 2.4) (p > 0.11). Moreover, RPE showed excellent relative reliability with an ICC value of 0.95 [95%CI: 0.90–0.97]. Walking increased pain tolerance (mean difference: 2.6 kPa [95%CI: 0.5–4.9 kPa; p = 0.02]), but not pain thresholds compared with rest in both sessions. Hypoalgesia after walking demonstrated fair to good relative reliability (ICC = 0.61), however the agreement in classification of EIH responders/non-responders (absolute reliability) across sessions was low and not significant (κ = 0.19, p = 0.30). Conclusions Walking consistently increased pain tolerance but not pain thresholds compared with a duration-matched control condition with fair to good relative reliability between sessions. Based on classification of EIH responders/non-responders the absolute reliability between the two sessions was low indicating individual variance in the EIH response. Future studies should investigate the hypoalgesic effect of a walking exercise in a clinical pain population.


2020 ◽  
pp. jrheum.200872
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Mogard ◽  
Tor Olofsson ◽  
Stefan Bergman ◽  
Ann Bremander ◽  
Lars-Erik Kristensen ◽  
...  

Objective To study differences in pain reports between patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA), and to assess how pain sensitivity measures associate with disease and health outcomes. Methods Consecutive patients with axial SpA (axSpA) were enrolled in the populationbased SPARTAKUS cohort (2015‒2017), and classified as AS (n=120) or nr-axSpA (n=55). Pain was assessed with questionnaires (intensity/duration/distribution) and computerized cuff pressure algometry to measure pain sensitivity (pain threshold/pain tolerance/temporal summation of pain). Linear regression models were used to compare pain measures between AS and nr-axSpA patients, and to assess associations between pain sensitivity measures and disease and health outcomes. Results Of 175 axSpA patients, 44% reported chronic widespread pain, with no significant differences in any questionnaire-derived or algometry-assessed pain measures between AS and nr-axSpA patients. Lower pain tolerance was associated with longer symptom duration, worse ASDAS-CRP, BASFI, and BASMI, more pain regions, unacceptable pain, worse MASES, fatigue, anxiety, and health-related quality of life. Furthermore, lower pain threshold was associated with worse ASDAS-CRP and MASES, while higher temporal summation was associated with longer symptom duration, unacceptable pain and worse BASMI. Conclusion Chronic pain is common in axSpA, with no observed differences in any pain measures between patients with AS and nr-axSpA. Furthermore, higher pain sensitivity is associated with having worse disease and health outcomes. The results indicate that patients with AS and nr-axSpA, in line with most clinical characteristics, have a similar pain burden and they highlight large unmet needs regarding individualized pain management, regardless of axSpA subgroup.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 278-279
Author(s):  
M Defaye ◽  
N Abdullah ◽  
M Iftinca ◽  
C Altier

Abstract Background Long-lasting changes in neural pain circuits precipitate the transition from acute to chronic pain in patients living with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). While significant improvement in IBD therapy has been made to reduce inflammation, a large subset of patients continues to suffer throughout quiescent phases of the disease, suggesting a high level of plasticity in nociceptive circuits during acute phases. The establishment of chronic visceral pain results from neuroplasticity in nociceptors first, then along the entire neural axis, wherein microglia, the resident immune cells of the central nervous system, are critically involved. Our lab has shown that spinal microglia were key in controlling chronic pain state in IBD. Using the Dextran Sodium Sulfate (DSS) model of colitis, we found that microglial G-CSF was able to sensitize colonic nociceptors that express the pain receptor TRPV1. While TRPV1+ nociceptors have been implicated in peripheral sensitization, their contribution to central sensitization via microglia remains unknown. Aims To investigate the role of TRPV1+ visceral afferents in microglial activation and chronic visceral pain. Methods We generated DREADD (Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs) mice in which TRPV1 sensory neurons can be inhibited (TRPV1-hM4Di) or activated (TRPV1-hM3Dq) in a time and tissue specific manner using the inert ligand Clozapine-N-Oxide (CNO). To test the inhibition of TRPV1 neurons in DSS-induced colitis, TRPV1-hM4Di mice were treated with DSS 2.5% or water for 7 days and received vehicle or CNO i.p. injection twice daily. To activate TRPV1 visceral afferents, TRPV1-hM3Dq mice received vehicle or CNO daily for 7 days, by oral gavage. After 7 days of treatment, visceral pain was evaluated by colorectal distension and spinal cords tissues were harvested to measure microglial activation. Results Our data validated the nociceptor specific expression and function of the DREADD in TRPV1-Cre mice. Inhibition of TRPV1 visceral afferents in DSS TRPV1-hM4Di mice was able to prevent the colitis-induced microglial activation and thus reduce visceral hypersensitivity. In contrast, activation of TRPV1 visceral afferents in TRPV1-hM3Dq mice was sufficient to drive microglial activation in the absence of colitis. Analysis of the proalgesic mediators derived from activated TRPV1-hM3Dq neurons identified ATP as a key factor of microglial activation. Conclusions Overall, these data provide novel insights into the mechanistic understanding of the gut/brain axis in chronic visceral pain and suggest a role of purinergic signaling that could be harnessed for testing effective therapeutic approaches to relieve pain in IBD patients. Funding Agencies CCCACHRI (Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute) and CSM (Cumming School of Medicine) postdoctoral fellowship


2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (S1) ◽  
pp. 243-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Benson ◽  
V. Kotsis ◽  
C. Rosenberger ◽  
U. Bingel ◽  
M. Schedlowski ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Benedetti ◽  
James Burnett ◽  
Meredith Degnan ◽  
Danielle Horne ◽  
Andres Missair ◽  
...  

The neuronal, chemical, and electrical transmission of pain is a complex and intricate subject that continues to be studied and expounded. This review discusses the relevant physiology and influential factors contributing to the experience and subjective variation in a variety of acute and chronic pain presentations. This review contains 4 figures, 4 tables, and 30 references Keywords: acute pain, chronic pain, somatic pain, neuropathic pain, visceral pain, nociception, pain perception, gender-related pain, cancer pain, spine pain


2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. e13-e18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob M Vigil ◽  
Lauren N Rowell ◽  
Joe Alcock ◽  
Randy Maestes

BACKGROUND: There is no standardized method for cold pressor pain tasks across experiments. Temperature, apparatus and aspects of experimenters vary widely among studies. It is well known that experimental pain tolerance is influenced by setting as well as the sex of the experimenter. It is not known whether other contextual factors influence experimental pain reporting.OBJECTIVES: The present two-part experiment examines whether minimizing and standardizing interactions with laboratory personnel (eg, limiting interaction with participants to consenting and questions and not during the actual pain task) eliminates the influence of examiner characteristics on subjective pain reports and whether using different cold pain apparatus (cooler versus machine) influences reports.METHODS:The present experiment manipulated the gender of the experimenter (male, female and transgender) and the type of cold pressor task (CPT) apparatus (ice cooler versus refrigerated bath circulator). Participants conducted the CPT at one of two pain levels (5°C or 16°C) without an experimenter present.RESULTS:Men and women showed lower pain sensitivity when they were processed by biological male personnel than by biological female personnel before the CPT. Women who interacted with a transgendered researcher likewise reported higher pain sensitivity than women processed by biological male or female researchers. The type of CPT apparatus, despite operating at equivalent temperatures, also influenced subjective pain reports.DISCUSSION: The findings show that even minimal interactions with laboratory personnel who differ in gender, and differences in laboratory materials impact the reliable measurement of pain.CONCLUSION: More standardized protocols for measuring pain across varying research and clinical settings should be developed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragna Rosseland ◽  
Ståle Pallesen ◽  
Inger Hilde Nordhus ◽  
Dagfinn Matre ◽  
Tone Blågestad

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
Pratik Akhani ◽  
Samir Mendpara ◽  
Bhupendra Palan

Background: Pain is one of the most common reasons for patients to seek medical attention and it causes considerable human suffering. Pain is a complex perception that differs enormously among individual patients. Gender plays an important role in how pain is experienced, coped with and treated. Even young healthy individuals often differ in how they perceive and cope with pain. This study was done to investigate gender differences in response to experimental pain among medical students from a western state in India. Methods: A total of 150 medical students (86 males and 64 females) participated in this interventional study. The Cold Pressor Test was used to exert experimental pain. To study the response, cardiovascular measures (radial pulse, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure) and pain sensitivity parameters (pain threshold, pain tolerance and pain rating) were assessed. Results: No significant difference was found in cardiovascular response to experimental pain between both the genders (p>0.05). Pain threshold and pain tolerance were found to be significantly higher in males whereas pain rating was found to be significantly higher in females (p<0.01). Pulse reactivity showed a negative relationship with pain threshold and pain tolerance whereas a positive relationship with pain rating, however no statistically significant relation was found between these measures. Conclusion: Females display greater pain sensitivity than males. Different pain perception might account for gender difference in pulse reactivity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document