scholarly journals First and Second Wave Dynamics of Emergency Department Utilization during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robi Dijk ◽  
Patricia Plaum ◽  
Stan Tummers ◽  
Frits van Osch ◽  
Dennis Barten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Emergency Department Utilization ◽  
Reference Period ◽  
Wave Dynamics ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
High Urgency ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Second Wave ◽  
Insight Into

Background: Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a decrease in emergency department(ED) utilization. Although this has been thoroughly characterized for the first wave(FW), studies during the second wave(SW) are limited. We examined the changes in ED utilization between the FW and SW, compared to 2019 reference periods. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of ED utilization in 3 Dutch hospitals in 2020. The FW and SW (March until June and September until December, respectively) were compared to the reference periods in 2019. ED visits were labeled as (non)COVID suspected. Findings: During the FW and SW ED visits decreased by 20.3% and 15.3%, respectively, when compared to reference periods in 2019. During both waves high urgency visits significantly increased with 3.1% and 2.1%, and admission rates (ARs) increased with 5.0% and 10.4%. Trauma related visits decreased by 5.2% and 3.4%. During the SW we observed less COVID-related visits compared to the FW (4,407 vs 3,102 patients). COVID related visits were significantly more often in higher need of urgent care and ARs where at least 24.0% higher compared to non COVID visits. Interpretation: During both COVID-19 waves ED visits were significantly reduced, with the most distinct decline during the FW. ED patients were more often triaged as high urgent and the ARs were increased compared to the reference period in 2019, reflecting a high burden on ED resources. These findings indicate the need to gain more insight into motives of patients to delay or avoid emergency care during pandemics and prepare EDs for future pandemics.

scholarly journals Treat-and-Release Emergency Department Utilization by Patients With Gynecologic Cancers

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. e428-e438
Author(s):  
Benjamin B. Albright ◽  
Mucio K. Delgado ◽  
Nawar A. Latif ◽  
Robert L. Giuntoli ◽  
Emily M. Ko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Low Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Gynecologic Cancer ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Emergency Department Utilization ◽  
Gynecologic Cancers ◽  
Therapeutic Procedures ◽  
Ed Visits

PURPOSE: Seventeen percent of patients with cancer visit the emergency department (ED) annually, often with nonemergent complaints. We sought to describe the burden of treat-and-release ED utilization by patients with gynecologic cancers and to identify opportunities for improved triage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with gynecologic cancer diagnoses who were treated and released were identified within the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, a stratified sample of US hospital-based ED visits, from 2009 to 2013. Sample weights were applied to generate national estimates. Associations with visit charges were assessed with weighted multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2013, there were an estimated 174,092 annual treat-and-release ED visits by patients with gynecologic cancer (95% CI, 163,480 to 184,703 visits), which corresponded to $736 million in annual charges with an average visit charge of $4,232 (95% CI, $4,099 to $4,366). Annual visits and total charges increased significantly over the 5 years under study. Visits were more frequent for patients with cervical cancer (44.1%) versus ovarian (27.8%) and uterine (24.6%) cancer. These patients were younger and more likely to be from low socioeconomic status areas. The most common primary diagnoses were similar across cancers, including abdominal pain (10.5%), chest pain (6.1%), and urinary tract infection (5.2%). The most frequent diagnostics were culture/smear, computed tomography scan, and x-ray, and the most frequent therapeutic procedures included wound care, transfusion, and paracentesis. CONCLUSION: Patients with gynecologic cancers, and cervical cancer in particular, are frequently seen in the ED with issues that could be less expensively managed in an outpatient clinic or urgent care setting. Visit frequency, but not per-visit cost, is increasing over time.

scholarly journals First and Second Wave Dynamics of Emergency Department Utilization During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robi Dijk ◽  
Patricia Plaum ◽  
Stan Tummers ◽  
Frits H. M. van Osch ◽  
Dennis G. Barten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Emergency Department Utilization ◽  
Wave Dynamics ◽  
Second Wave

scholarly journals Reduced Emergency Department Utilization During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Viral Fear or Lockdown Effect?

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Dennis G. Barten ◽  
Gideon H.P. Latten ◽  
Frits H.M. van Osch
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Early Phase ◽  
Emergency Department Utilization ◽  
Primary Care System ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Frontline Workers ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Care System

ABSTRACT Objective: Since the beginning of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, several frontline workers have expressed their concerns about reduced emergency department (ED) utilization. We aimed to examine the changes in ED utilization during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, in a country with a well-developed primary care system. Methods: A retrospective analysis of ED utilization was performed in 3 Dutch hospitals during a 60-day period, starting on February 15, 2020. The identical period in 2019 was used as a reference. ED visits were labeled as COVID-related (defined as COVID-19 suspected) or non-COVID-related. Admission rates were compared using chi-square tests, and the reduction in ED visits was assessed descriptively. Results: During the study period, daily ED volume was 18% lower compared to that of 2019. ED utilization further declined (-29%) during lockdown. Combined admission rates were higher in 2020 compared to those in 2019 (P < 0.001), and they were higher for COVID-19 versus non-COVID-19 ED visits (P < 0.001). Conclusions: ED utilization was markedly reduced during the local rise of COVID-19 in a region with a well-developed primary care system and relatively low ED self-referral rates. Although it cannot directly be concluded from the findings of our study, this observation likely reflects a complex interaction between pure lockdown effects and viral fear, which warrants further research.

Assessment of a multi-center tele-urgent care program to decrease emergency department referral rates in the Veterans Health Administration

2021 ◽  
pp. 1357633X2110248
Author(s):  
Charlie M Wray ◽  
Myla Junge ◽  
Salomeh Keyhani ◽  
Janeen E Smith
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Department Visit ◽  
Care Program ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Emergency Department Utilization ◽  
Emergency Department Care ◽  
Referral Rates ◽  
Care Assessment ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Care Evaluation

The use of emergency departments for non-emergent issues has led to overcrowding and decreased the quality of care. Telemedicine may be a mechanism to decrease overutilization of this expensive resource. From April to September 2020, we assessed (a) the impact of a multi-center tele-urgent care program on emergency department referral rates and (b) the proportion of individuals who had a subsequent emergency department visit within 72 h of tele-urgent care evaluation when they were not referred to the emergency department. We then performed a chart review to assess whether patients presented to the emergency department for the same reason as was stated for their tele-urgent care evaluation, whether subsequent hospitalization was needed during that emergency department visit, and whether death occurred. Among the 2510 patients who would have been referred to in-person emergency department care, but instead received tele-urgent care assessment, one in five (21%; n = 533) were subsequently referred to the emergency department. Among those not referred following tele-urgent care, 1 in 10 (11%; n = 162) visited the emergency department within 72 h. Among these 162 individuals, most (91%) returned with the same or similar complaint as what was assessed during their tele-urgent care visit, with one in five requiring hospitalization (19%, n = 31) with one individual (0.01%) dying. In conclusion, tele-urgent care may safely decrease emergency department utilization.

Effects of Hurricanes on Emergency Department Utilization: An Analysis Across 7 US Storms

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Kevin C Heslin ◽  
Marguerite L Barrett ◽  
Molly Hensche ◽  
Gary Pickens ◽  
Jeanne S Ringel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Preparedness ◽  
Emergency Department Utilization ◽  
Disease Category ◽  
Preparedness Planning ◽  
Emergency Managers ◽  
Planning Processes ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Population Rate

ABSTRACT Objective: Emergency departments (EDs) are critical sources of care after natural disasters such as hurricanes. Understanding the impact on ED utilization by subpopulation and proximity to the hurricane’s path can inform emergency preparedness planning. This study examines changes in ED utilization for residents of 344 counties after the occurrence of 7 US hurricanes between 2005 and 2016. Methods: This retrospective observational study used ED data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases and State Emergency Department Databases. ED utilization rates for weeks during and after hurricanes were compared with pre-hurricane rates, stratified by the proximity of the patient county to the hurricane path, age, and disease category. Results: The overall population rate of weekly ED visits changed little post-hurricane, but rates by disease categories and age demonstrated varying results. Utilization rates for respiratory disorders exhibited the largest post-hurricane increase, particularly 2–3 weeks following the hurricane. The change in population rates by disease categories and age tended to be larger for people residing in counties closer to the hurricane path. Conclusions: Changes in ED utilization following hurricanes depend on disease categories, age, and proximity to the hurricane path. Emergency managers could incorporate these factors into their planning processes.

scholarly journals P035: Impact of EMS direct referral to community care on emergency department utilization

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S75
Author(s):  
A. Dukelow ◽  
M. Lewell ◽  
J. Loosley ◽  
S. Pancino ◽  
K. Van Aarsen
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Home Care ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Home Care Services ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Emergency Department Utilization ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: The Community Referral by Emergency Medical Services (CREMS) program was implemented in January 2015 in Southwestern Ontario. The program allows Paramedics interacting with a patient to directly refer those in need of home care support to their local Community Care Access Centre (CCAC) for needs assessment. If indicated, subsequent referrals are made to specific services (e.g. nursing, physiotherapy and geriatrics) by CCAC. Ideally, CREMS connects patients with appropriate, timely care, supporting individual needs. Previous literature has indicated CREMS results in an increase of home care services provided to patients. Methods: The primary objective of this project is to evaluate the impact of the CREMS program on Emergency Department utilization. Data for all CCAC referrals from London-Middlesex EMS was collected for a thirteen month period (February 2015-February 2016). For all patients receiving a new or increased service from CCAC the number of Emergency Department visits 2 years before referral and 2 years after referral were calculated. A related samples Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was performed to examine the difference in ED visits pre and post referral to CCAC. Results: There were 213 individuals who received a new or increased service during the study timeframe. Median [IQR] patient age was 77 [70-85.5]. 113/213 (53%) of patients were female. The majority of patients 135/213 (63.4%) were a new referral to CCAC. The median [IQR] number of hospital visits before referral was 3 [1-5] and after referral was 2 [0-4]. There was no significant difference in the overall number of ED visits before versus after referral (955 vs 756 visits, p = 0.051). Conclusion: Community based care can improve patient experience and health outcomes. Paramedics are in a unique position to assess patients in their home to determine who might benefit from home care services. CREMS referrals for this patient group showed a trend towards decreased ED visits after referral but the trend was not statistically significant.

Reduction of emergency department utilization via access to outpatient cancer care.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 128-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. Bishop ◽  
Mary Anne Fenton ◽  
Tara Szymanski ◽  
Megan Begnoche
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Education ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Emergency Department Utilization ◽  
Primary Tumor Site ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Oncology Nurse ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Education Process

128 Background: Emergency department (ED) utilization for non-emergent medical problems is an inefficient use of medical resources. During calendar year 2013, 224 RIH adult cancer patients presented to the RIH ED. Retrospective review indicated up to 50% of these ED visits were avoidable. Methods: This project was developed for the ASCO Quality Training Program. A multidisciplinary team was assembled to address ED utilization. Retrospective chart review of ED visits included time and reason for visit and primary tumor site. The team selected the Lung Cancer as the target group, developed a cause-and-effect analysis for ED visits, administered a patient survey, and implemented a series of Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. The team implemented a patient education process of nurse sick-line symptom management and same-day sick visits at RIH CCC as well as developing a single-page patient “sick-line tool” with oncology nurse sick-line contact telephone numbers. A patient navigator introduced the sick-line tool at the first visit and its usage was reinforced at subsequent visits. Results: For RIH CCC lung cancer patients, a standardized symptom-control education process correlated with 30% decrease in ED visits for any presenting complaint (42 visits vs. 60 visits) and 32% decrease in ED visits with presenting complaint of pain (13 visits vs. 19 visits) during January/February 2014 compared to January/February 2013. We did not find significant differences between the proportion of ED visits during Cancer Center business hours, evenings, or weekends. Sick-line calls were found to increase by 53% during January 2014 compared to December 2013 with an additional 35% increase in February 2014. Conclusions: A standardized patient education process resulted in a significant decrease in ED visits, concurrent with an increase in outpatient sick-line utilization. This may reflect an improvement in efficiency of outpatient cancer patient care in a single-institution setting. Given other reports of increased ED utilization by lung cancer patients for similar presenting reasons, these improvements may be generalizable to other institutions.

Relationship of emergency department use pre- and post-cancer diagnosis in safety-net adults.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6626-6626
Author(s):  
Arthur Hong ◽  
Navid Sadeghi ◽  
John Vernon Cox ◽  
Simon Craddock Lee ◽  
Ethan Halm
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Seeking Behavior ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Advanced Stage Cancer

6626 Background: Safety-net adults generate a high rate of emergency department (ED) visits within the 180 days after a new cancer diagnosis, many of which could be alternatively triaged to an urgent care clinic. It is unclear how much of this ED use is attributable to the cancer and treatment vs. ED-seeking behavior. To identify patients at risk of frequent ED use, we explored whether a patient’s pre-cancer ED visit use predicted ED use after diagnosis. Methods: We identifiably linked adults from the tumor registry in the Dallas County safety-net health system to a regional hospital database with claims-like data for all patients from 98% of non-federal hospitals in North Texas. We applied a mixed-effects multivariate logit model, using frequent ED use (≥4 visits) in the 6-12 months or 12-18 months before diagnosis to predict frequent ED use after diagnosis, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities; cancer type, stage, initial treatment modalities; and grouping visits at the patient level. Results: Of 8,610 adults diagnosed from 2012-2016, 76.2% had Medicaid or were uninsured, 30.9% had lung, breast, or colorectal cancer, and 25.9% had advanced-stage cancer at diagnosis. In the 180 days after diagnosis, 42.5% of patients had zero ED visits, 45.7% had 1-3 visits, and 11.8% were frequent ED users (≥4). In multivariate analysis, patients with frequent ED use in the 6-12 months before a cancer diagnosis had 6.7 higher odds (95% CI: 4.8, 9.3) of having frequent ED use after diagnosis, compared to patients who had zero ED visits prior to diagnosis. This compared to 1.3 higher odds (95% CI: 1.1, 1.5) of frequent ED use if the patient had advanced-stage cancer, and 2.1 higher odds (95% CI: 1.8, 2.4) if chemotherapy was part of initial treatment. Although most post-diagnosis frequent ED users generated zero visits (62.2%) or 1-3 visits (30.7%) in the 6-12 months prior to diagnosis, 38% of patients with frequent ED use pre-diagnosis continued frequent ED visits after diagnosis. Results were similar for ED use 12-18 months prior to diagnosis. Conclusions: Among safety-net adults, prior ED-seeking behavior strongly predicted ED use after a new cancer diagnosis. This may represent a high-risk group that might benefit from care delivery innovation.

Patterns and Results of Triage Advice Before Emergency Department Visits Made by Patients With Cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00617
Author(s):  
Arthur S. Hong ◽  
Hannah Chang ◽  
D. Mark Courtney ◽  
Hannah Fullington ◽  
Simon J. Craddock Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Telephone Triage ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Oncology Care ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The University

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer undergoing treatment frequently visit the emergency department (ED) for commonly anticipated complaints (eg, pain, nausea, and vomiting). Nearly all Medicare Oncology Care Model (OCM) participants prioritized ED use reduction, and the OCM requires that patients have 24-hour telephone access to a clinician, but actual reductions in ED visits have been mixed. Little is known about the use of telephone triage for acute care. METHODS: We identified adults aged 18+ years newly diagnosed with cancer, linked to ED visits from a single institution within 6 months after diagnosis, and then analyzed the telephone and secure electronic messages in the preceding 24 hours. We coded interactions to classify the reason for the call, the main ED referrer, and other attempted management. We compared the acuity of patient self-referred versus clinician-referred ED visits by modeling hospitalization and ED visit severity. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2018, 3,247 adults made 5,371 ED visits to the university hospital and self-referred to the ED 58.5% of the time. Clinicians referred to outpatient or oncology urgent care for 10.3% of calls but referred to the ED for 61.3%. Patient self-referred ED visits were likely to be hospitalized (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR], 0.89, 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.22) and were not more severe (aOR, 0.75, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02) than clinician referred. CONCLUSION: Although patients self-referred for six of every 10 ED visits, self-referred visits were not more severe. When patients called for advice, clinicians regularly recommended the ED. More should be done to understand barriers that patients and clinicians experience when trying to access non-ED acute care.

scholarly journals Emergency department utilization for substance use disorders and mental health conditions during COVID-19

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0262136
Author(s):  
Arjun K. Venkatesh ◽  
Alexander T. Janke ◽  
Jeremy Kinsman ◽  
Craig Rothenberg ◽  
Pawan Goyal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Substance Use ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Health Conditions ◽  
Emergency Department Utilization ◽  
Mental Health Conditions ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
National Emergency

Background As the emergency department (ED) has evolved into the de-facto site of care for a variety of substance use disorder (SUD) presentations, trends in ED utilization are an essential public health surveillance tool. Changes in ED visit patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic may reflect changes in access to outpatient treatment, changes in SUD incidence, or the unintended effects of public policy to mitigate COVID-19. We use a national emergency medicine registry to describe and characterize trends in ED visitation for SUDs since 2019. Methods We included all ED visits identified in a national emergency medicine clinical quality registry, which included 174 sites across 33 states with data from January 2019 through June 2021. We defined SUD using ED visit diagnosis codes including: opioid overdose and opioid use disorder (OUD), alcohol use disorders (AUD), and other SUD. To characterize changes in ED utilization, we plotted the 3-week moving average ratio of visit counts in 2020 and 2021 as compared to visit counts in 2019. Findings While overall ED visits declined in the early pandemic period and had not returned to 2019 baseline by June 2021, ED visit counts for SUD demonstrated smaller declines in March and April of 2020, so that the proportion of overall ED visits that were for SUD increased. Furthermore, in the second half of 2020, ED visits for SUD returned to baseline, and increased above baseline for OUD ever since May 2020. Conclusions We observe distinct patterns in ED visitation for SUDs over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly for OUD for which ED visitation barely declined and now exceeds previous baselines. These trends likely demonstrate the essential role of hospital-based EDs in providing 24/7/365 care for people with SUDs and mental health conditions. Allocation of resources must be directed towards the ED as a de-facto safety net for populations in crisis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document