scholarly journals Live cell monitoring of double strand breaks in S. cerevisiae

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Waterman ◽  
Cheng-Sheng Lee ◽  
Michael Tsabar ◽  
Felix Zhou ◽  
Vinay V. Eapen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Live Cell ◽  
Protein Markers ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Recombination Protein ◽  
Single Focus

AbstractWe have used two different live-cell fluorescent protein markers to monitor the formation and localization of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in budding yeast. Using GFP derivatives of the Rad51 recombination protein or the Ddc2 checkpoint protein, we find that cells with three site-specific DSBs, on different chromosomes, usually display 2 or 3 foci that coalesce and dissociate. Rad51-GFP, by itself, is unable to repair DSBs by homologous recombination in mitotic cells, but is able to form foci and allow repair when heterozygous with a wild type Rad51 protein. The kinetics of disappearance of Rad51-GFP foci parallels the completion of DSB repair. However, in meiosis, Rad51-GFP is proficient when homozygous. Using Ddc2-GFP, we conclude that co-localization of foci following 3 DSBs does not represent formation of a homologous recombination "repair center," as the same distribution of Ddc2-GFP foci was found in the presence or absence of the Rad52 protein. The maintenance of separate DSB foci and much of their dynamics depend on functional microtubules, as addition of nocodazole resulted in a greater population of cells displaying a single focus.Author SummaryDouble strand breaks (DSBs) pose the greatest threat to the fidelity of an organism’s genome. While much work has been done on the mechanisms of DSB repair, the arrangement and interaction of multiple DSBs within a single cell remain unclear. Using two live-cell fluorescent DSB markers, we show that cells with 3 site-specific DSBs usually form 2 or 3 foci what can coalesce into fewer foci but also dissociate. The aggregation of DSBs into a single focus does not depend on the Rad52 recombination protein, suggesting that there is no “repair center” for homologous recombination. DSB foci are highly dynamic and their dynamic nature is dependent on microtubules.

Double-strand-break-induced homologous recombination in mammalian cells

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Johnson ◽  
M. Jasin
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks

In mammalian cells, the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occurs by both homologous and non-homologous mechanisms. Indirect evidence, including that from gene targeting and random integration experiments, had suggested that non-homologous mechanisms were significantly more frequent than homologous ones. However, more recent experiments indicate that homologous recombination is also a prominent DSB repair pathway. These experiments show that mammalian cells use homologous sequences located at multiple positions throughout the genome to repair a DSB. However, template preference appears to be biased, with the sister chromatid being preferred by 2–3 orders of magnitude over a homologous or heterologous chromosome. The outcome of homologous recombination in mammalian cells is predominantly gene conversion that is not associated with crossing-over. The preference for the sister chromatid and the bias against crossing-over seen in mitotic mammalian cells may have developed in order to reduce the potential for genome alterations that could occur when other homologous repair templates are utilized. In attempts to understand further the mechanism of homologous recombination, the proteins that promote this process are beginning to be identified. To date, four mammalian proteins have been demonstrated conclusively to be involved in DSB repair by homologous recombination: Rad54, XRCC2, XRCC3 and BRCAI. This paper summarizes results from a number of recent studies.

Detecting, signalling and repairing DNA double-strand breaks

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 655-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Recombination Processes

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can be generated by a variety of genotoxic agents, including ionizing radiation and radiomimetic chemicals. They can also occur when DNA replication complexes encounter other forms of DNA damage, and are produced as intermediates during certain site-specific recombination processes. It is crucial that cells recognize DSBs and bring about their efficient repair, because a single unrepaired cellular DSB can induce cell death, and defective DSB repair can lead to mutations or the loss of significant segments of chromosomal material. Eukaryotic cells have evolved a variety of systems to detect DNA DSBs, repair them, and signal their presence to the transcription, cell cycle and apoptotic machineries. In this review, I describe how work on mammalian cells and also on model organisms such as yeasts has revelaed that such systems are highly conserved throughout evolution, and has provided insights into the molecular mechanisms by which DNA DSBs are recognized, signalled and repaired. I also explain how defects in the proteins that function in these pathways are associated with a variety of human pathological states.

scholarly journals DEAD Box 1 Facilitates Removal of RNA and Homologous Recombination at DNA Double-Strand Breaks

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (22) ◽  
pp. 2794-2810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Li ◽  
Devon R. Germain ◽  
Ho-Yin Poon ◽  
Matthew R. Hildebrandt ◽  
Elizabeth A. Monckton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dead Box ◽  
End Resection

Although RNA and RNA-binding proteins have been linked to double-strand breaks (DSBs), little is known regarding their roles in the cellular response to DSBs and, if any, in the repair process. Here, we provide direct evidence for the presence of RNA-DNA hybrids at DSBs and suggest that binding of RNA to DNA at DSBs may impact repair efficiency. Our data indicate that the RNA-unwinding protein DEAD box 1 (DDX1) is required for efficient DSB repair and cell survival after ionizing radiation (IR), with depletion of DDX1 resulting in reduced DSB repair by homologous recombination (HR). While DDX1 is not essential for end resection, a key step in homology-directed DSB repair, DDX1 is required for maintenance of the single-stranded DNA once generated by end resection. We show that transcription deregulation has a significant effect on DSB repair by HR in DDX1-depleted cells and that RNA-DNA duplexes are elevated at DSBs in DDX1-depleted cells. Based on our combined data, we propose a role for DDX1 in resolving RNA-DNA structures that accumulate at DSBs located at sites of active transcription. Our findings point to a previously uncharacterized requirement for clearing RNA at DSBs for efficient repair by HR.

scholarly journals Repair of site-specific double-strand breaks in a mammalian chromosome by homologous and illegitimate recombination.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 267-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
R G Sargent ◽  
M A Brenneman ◽  
J H Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Repair Process ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Illegitimate Recombination ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Strand Breaks

In mammalian cells, chromosomal double-strand breaks are efficiently repaired, yet little is known about the relative contributions of homologous recombination and illegitimate recombination in the repair process. In this study, we used a loss-of-function assay to assess the repair of double-strand breaks by homologous and illegitimate recombination. We have used a hamster cell line engineered by gene targeting to contain a tandem duplication of the native adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) gene with an I-SceI recognition site in the otherwise wild-type APRT+ copy of the gene. Site-specific double-strand breaks were induced by intracellular expression of I-SceI, a rare-cutting endonuclease from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I-SceI cleavage stimulated homologous recombination about 100-fold; however, illegitimate recombination was stimulated more than 1,000-fold. These results suggest that illegitimate recombination is an important competing pathway with homologous recombination for chromosomal double-strand break repair in mammalian cells.

scholarly journals SPO16 binds SHOC1 to promote homologous recombination and crossing-over in meiotic prophase I

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. eaau9780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianting Zhang ◽  
Shu-Yan Ji ◽  
Kiran Busayavalasa ◽  
Chao Yu
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Meiotic Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Recombination Nodules ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved

Segregation of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I is tightly regulated by their physical links, or crossovers (COs), generated from DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through meiotic homologous recombination. In budding yeast, three ZMM (Zip1/2/3/4, Mer3, Msh4/5) proteins, Zip2, Zip4, and Spo16, form a “ZZS” complex, functioning to promote meiotic recombination via a DSB repair pathway. Here, we identified the mammalian ortholog of Spo16, termed SPO16, which interacts with the mammalian ortholog of Zip2 (SHOC1/MZIP2), and whose functions are evolutionarily conserved to promote the formation of COs. SPO16 localizes to the recombination nodules, as SHOC1 and TEX11 do. SPO16 is required for stabilization of SHOC1 and proper localization of other ZMM proteins. The DSBs formed in SPO16-deleted meiocytes were repaired without COs formation, although synapsis is less affected. Therefore, formation of SPO16-SHOC1 complex–associated recombination intermediates is a key step facilitating meiotic recombination that produces COs from yeast to mammals.

scholarly journals Coupling crossover and synaptonemal complex in meiosis

2022 ◽  
Vol 36 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Corinne Grey ◽  
Bernard de Massy
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes

During meiosis, a molecular program induces DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and their repair by homologous recombination. DSBs can be repaired with or without crossovers. ZMM proteins promote the repair toward crossover. The sites of DSB repair are also sites where the axes of homologous chromosomes are juxtaposed and stabilized, and where a structure called the synaptonemal complex initiates, providing further regulation of both DSB formation and repair. How crossover formation and synapsis initiation are linked has remained unknown. The study by Pyatnitskaya and colleagues (pp. 53–69) in this issue of Genes & Development highlights the central role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ZMM protein Zip4 in this process.

scholarly journals Resection is responsible for loss of transcription around a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Manfrini ◽  
Michela Clerici ◽  
Maxime Wery ◽  
Chiara Vittoria Colombo ◽  
Marc Descrimes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Transcriptional Silencing ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Transcriptional Inhibition ◽  
In Cis

Emerging evidence indicate that the mammalian checkpoint kinase ATM induces transcriptional silencing in cis to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) through a poorly understood mechanism. Here we show that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae a single DSB causes transcriptional inhibition of proximal genes independently of Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR. Since the DSB ends undergo nucleolytic degradation (resection) of their 5′-ending strands, we investigated the contribution of resection in this DSB-induced transcriptional inhibition. We discovered that resection-defective mutants fail to stop transcription around a DSB, and the extent of this failure correlates with the severity of the resection defect. Furthermore, Rad9 and generation of γH2A reduce this DSB-induced transcriptional inhibition by counteracting DSB resection. Therefore, the conversion of the DSB ends from double-stranded to single-stranded DNA, which is necessary to initiate DSB repair by homologous recombination, is responsible for loss of transcription around a DSB in S. cerevisiae.

scholarly journals Multiple Pathways for Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Mammalian Chromosomes

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 8353-8360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunfu Lin ◽  
Tamas Lukacsovich ◽  
Alan S. Waldman
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Base Pairs ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Annealing ◽  
Strand Annealing

ABSTRACT To study repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in mammalian chromosomes, we designed DNA substrates containing a thymidine kinase (TK) gene disrupted by the 18-bp recognition site for yeast endonuclease I-SceI. Some substrates also contained a second defective TK gene sequence to serve as a genetic donor in recombinational repair. A genomic DSB was induced by introducing endonuclease I-SceI into cells containing a stably integrated DNA substrate. DSB repair was monitored by selection for TK-positive segregants. We observed that intrachromosomal DSB repair is accomplished with nearly equal efficiencies in either the presence or absence of a homologous donor sequence. DSB repair is achieved by nonhomologous end-joining or homologous recombination, but rarely by nonconservative single-strand annealing. Repair of a chromosomal DSB by homologous recombination occurs mainly by gene conversion and appears to require a donor sequence greater than a few hundred base pairs in length. Nonhomologous end-joining events typically involve loss of very few nucleotides, and some events are associated with gene amplification at the repaired locus. Additional studies revealed that precise religation of DNA ends with no other concomitant sequence alteration is a viable mode for repair of DSBs in a mammalian genome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document