scholarly journals Genotype-by-environment interactions for seminal fluid expression and sperm competitive ability

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bahar Patlar ◽  
Steven A. Ramm
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Natural Variation ◽  
Competitive Ability ◽  
Seminal Fluid ◽  
Expression Level ◽  
Mating Partner ◽  
Genotype By Environment Interactions ◽  
Genotype By Environment ◽  
Genetic And Environmental Factors ◽  
Paternity Success

AbstractSperm competition commonly occurs whenever females mate multiply, leading to variation in male paternity success. This can be due to variation in the various traits that might affect sperm competitive ability, which itself depends on both genetic and environmental factors, as well as on genotype-by-environment interactions (GEI). Seminal fluid is a major component of the male ejaculate that is often expected to mediate sperm competition, where different genotypes can differ in their seminal fluid expression as a response to different level of sperm competition (i.e., exhibit GEI). We therefore here focussed on testing for GEI in expression of two recently identified seminal fluid transcripts,suckless-1andsuckless-2, which potentially modulate sperm competitive ability in the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatwormMacrostomum lignanovia their effects on manipulating post-mating partner behaviour and ultimately the fate of transferred ejaculates. In addition, we sought to test for GEI in sperm competitive ability, to investigate the relationship between natural variation in the expression of these seminal fluid transcripts generated through GEI and relative paternity success. To do so, we manipulated social group size, which has been shown to successfully alter sperm competition level inM. lignano, in a set of inbred lines (genotypes) and then measured both the expression level ofsuckless-1andsuckless-2in focal worms together with their relative paternity success in a standardised sperm competition (P1&P2) assay. We found GEI for the expression level ofsuckless-1andsuckless-2, as well as for sperm competitive ability. Moreover, we found a positive relation between the expression ofsuckless-1and paternity success. This suggests that natural variation in the expression of this seminal fluid transcript indeed can influence sperm competition outcomes inM. lignano.

scholarly journals Sperm competition games: optimal sperm allocation in response to the size of competing ejaculates

2006 ◽  
Vol 274 (1607) ◽  
pp. 209-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leif Engqvist ◽  
Klaus Reinhold
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Negative Correlation ◽  
Competitive Ability ◽  
Sperm Storage ◽  
Competition Intensity ◽  
Mating Partner ◽  
Storage Model ◽  
Sperm Allocation ◽  
Competition Theory ◽  
Different Levels

Sperm competition theory predicts that when males are certain of sperm competition, they should decrease sperm investment in matings with an increasing number of competing ejaculates. How males should allocate sperm when competing with differently sized ejaculates, however, has not yet been examined. Here, we report the outcomes of two models assuming variation in males' sperm reserves and males being faced with different amounts of competing sperm. In the first ‘spawning model’, two males compete instantaneously and both are able to assess the sperm competitive ability of each other. In the second ‘sperm storage model’, males are sequentially confronted with situations involving different levels of sperm competition, for instance different amounts of sperm already stored by the female mating partner. In both of the models, we found that optimal sperm allocation will strongly depend on the size of the male's sperm reserve. Males should always invest maximally in competition with other males that are equally strong competitors. That is, for males with small sperm reserves, our model predicts a negative correlation between sperm allocation and sperm competition intensity, whereas for males with large sperm reserves, this correlation is predicted to be positive.

scholarly journals Seminal fluid and accessory male investment in sperm competition

2020 ◽  
Vol 375 (1813) ◽  
pp. 20200068
Author(s):  
Steven A. Ramm
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Seminal Fluid ◽  
Complex Mixture ◽  
Internal Fertilization ◽  
Animal Evolution ◽  
Male Investment ◽  
Trade Offs ◽  
Fluid Production ◽  
Alternative Routes ◽  
Paternity Success

Sperm production and allocation strategies have been a central concern of sperm competition research for the past 50 years. But during the ‘sexual cascade’ there may be strong selection for alternative routes to maximizing male fitness. Especially with the evolution of internal fertilization, a common and by now well-studied example is the accessory ejaculate investment represented by seminal fluid, the complex mixture of proteins, peptides and other components transferred to females together with sperm. How seminal fluid investment should covary with sperm investment probably depends on the mechanism of seminal fluid action. If seminal fluid components boost male paternity success by directly enhancing sperm function or use, we might often expect a positive correlation between the two forms of male investment, whereas trade-offs seem more likely if seminal fluid acts independently of sperm. This is largely borne out by a broad taxonomic survey to establish the prevailing patterns of seminal fluid production and allocation during animal evolution, in light of which I discuss the gaps that remain in our understanding of this key ejaculate component and its relationship to sperm investment, before outlining promising approaches for examining seminal fluid-mediated sperm competitiveness in the post-genomic era. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Fifty years of sperm competition’.

scholarly journals Delineating the roles of males and females in sperm competition

2013 ◽  
Vol 280 (1772) ◽  
pp. 20132047 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Evans ◽  
Patrice Rosengrave ◽  
Clelia Gasparini ◽  
Neil J. Gemmell
Keyword(s):  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Chinook Salmon ◽  
Competitive Ability ◽  
Oncorhynchus Tshawytscha ◽  
Fertilization Success ◽  
Interactive Effects ◽  
Swimming Velocity ◽  
Ovarian Fluid ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Paternity Success

Disentangling the relative roles of males, females and their interactive effects on competitive fertilization success remains a challenge in sperm competition. In this study, we apply a novel experimental framework to an ideally suited externally fertilizing model system in order to delineate these roles. We focus on the chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha , a species in which ovarian fluid (OF) has been implicated as a potential arbiter of cryptic female choice for genetically compatible mates. We evaluated this predicted sexually selected function of OF using a series of factorial competitive fertilization trials. Our design involved a series of 10 factorial crosses, each involving two ‘focal’ rival males whose sperm competed against those from a single ‘standardized’ (non-focal) rival for a genetically uniform set of eggs in the presence of OF from two focal females. This design enabled us to attribute variation in competitive fertilization success among focal males, females (OF) and their interacting effects, while controlling for variation attributable to differences in the sperm competitive ability of rival males, and male-by-female genotypic interactions. Using this experimental framework, we found that variation in sperm competitiveness could be attributed exclusively to differences in the sperm competitive ability of focal males, a conclusion supported by subsequent analyses revealing that variation in sperm swimming velocity predicts paternity success. Together, these findings provide evidence that variation in paternity success can be attributed to intrinsic differences in the sperm competitive ability of rival males, and reveal that sperm swimming velocity is a key target of sexual selection.

scholarly journals Evolution of sperm competition: Natural variation and genetic determinants of Caenorhabditis elegans sperm size

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clotilde Gimond ◽  
Anne Vielle ◽  
Nuno Silva-Soares ◽  
Stefan Zdraljevic ◽  
Patrick T. McGrath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Natural Variation ◽  
Competitive Ability ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Genetic Determinants ◽  
Heritable Variation ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Male Sperm ◽  
Sperm Size

ABSTRACTSperm morphology is critical for sperm competition and thus for reproductive fitness. In the male-hermaphrodite nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, sperm size is a key feature of sperm competitive ability. Yet despite extensive research, the molecular mechanisms regulating C. elegans sperm size and the genetic basis underlying its natural variation remain unknown. Examining 97 genetically distinct C. elegans strains, we observe significant heritable variation in male sperm size but genome-wide association mapping did not yield any QTL (Quantitative Trait Loci). While we confirm larger male sperm to consistently outcompete smaller hermaphrodite sperm, we find natural variation in male sperm size to poorly predict male fertility and competitive ability. In addition, although hermaphrodite sperm size also shows significant natural variation, male and hermaphrodite sperm size do not correlate, implying a sex-specific genetic regulation of sperm size. To elucidate the molecular basis of intraspecific sperm size variation, we focused on recently diverged laboratory strains, which evolved extreme sperm size differences. Using mutants and quantitative complementation tests, we demonstrate that variation in the gene nurf-1 – previously shown to underlie the evolution of improved hermaphrodite reproduction – also explains the evolution of reduced male sperm size. This result illustrates how adaptive changes in C. elegans hermaphrodite function can cause the deterioration of a male-specific fitness trait due to a sexually antagonistic variant, representing an example of intralocus sexual conflict with resolution at the molecular level. Our results further provide first insights into the genetic determinants of C. elegans sperm size, pointing at an involvement of the NURF chromatin remodelling complex.

scholarly journals Genetic coordination of sperm morphology and seminal fluid proteins promotes male reproductive success in Drosophila melanogaster

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jake Galvin ◽  
Erica Larson ◽  
Sevan Yedigarian ◽  
Mohammad Rahman ◽  
Kirill Borziak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Reproductive Success ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Seminal Fluid ◽  
Fertilization Success ◽  
Male Reproductive Success ◽  
Sperm Length ◽  
Seminal Fluid Proteins ◽  
Female Remating ◽  
Paternity Success

Spermatozoal morphology is highly variable both among and within species and in ways that can significantly impact fertilization success. In Drosophila melanogaster, paternity success depends on sperm length of both competing males and length of the female's primary sperm storage organ. We found that genes upregulated in long sperm testes are enriched for lncRNAs and seminal fluid proteins (Sfps). Transferred in seminal fluid to the female during mating, Sfps are secreted by the male accessory glands (AG) and affect female remating rate, physiology, and behavior with concomitant advantages for male reproductive success. Despite being upregulated in long sperm testes, they have no known function in testis tissue. We found that Sex Peptide and ovulin (Acp26Aa) knockouts resulted in shorter sperm, suggesting that Sfps may regulate sperm length during spermatogenesis. However, knockout of AG function did not affect sperm length, suggesting that AG expression has no influence on spermatogenic processes. We also found that long sperm males are better able to delay female remating, suggesting higher Sfp expression in AG. These results might suggest that long sperm males have a double advantage in sperm competition by both delaying female remating, likely through transfer of more Sfps, and by resisting sperm displacement. However, we also found that this extra advantage does not necessarily translate to more progeny or higher paternity success. Thus, we found that multiple components of the ejaculate coordinate to promote male reproductive success at different stages of reproduction, but the realized fitness advantages in sperm competition are uncertain.

scholarly journals Effects of two seminal fluid proteins on post-mating behavior in the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatwormMacrostomum lignano

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Weber ◽  
Bahar Patlar ◽  
Steven A. Ramm
Keyword(s):  
Reproductive Success ◽  
Sperm Competition ◽  
Mating Behavior ◽  
Competitive Ability ◽  
Seminal Fluid ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Complex Mixture ◽  
Mating Frequency ◽  
Seminal Fluid Proteins ◽  
Knock Down

AbstractAlong with sperm, in many taxa male ejaculates also contain a complex mixture of proteins, peptides and other substances found in seminal fluid. Once seminal fluid proteins (SFPs) are transferred to the mating partner, they play crucial roles in mediating post-mating sexual selection, since they can modulate the partner’s behavior and physiology in ways that influence the reproductive success of both partners. One way in which sperm donors can maximize their own reproductive success is by changing the partners’ (sperm recipient’s) postcopulatory behavior to prevent or delay re-mating, thereby decreasing the likelihood or intensity of sperm competition. We therefore adopted a quantitative genetic approach combining gene expression and behavioral data to identify candidates that could mediate such a response in the simultaneously hermaphroditic flatwormMacrostomum lignano. We identified two putative SFPs - Mlig-pro46 and Mlig-pro63 - that exhibit a negative genetic correlation between transcript expression and mating frequency. Importantly, however, in one of the two different group sizes, differing in their sperm competition level, in which we measured genetic correlations, these same two transcripts are also linked to a second post-mating behavior inM. lignano, namely the ‘suck’ behavior of recipients in which, upon ejaculate receipt, the worm places its pharynx over its female genital opening and appears to attempt to remove ejaculate components. To therefore investigate directly whether these two candidates manipulate partner behavior, and test whether this impacts on competitive fertilization success, we performed a manipulative experiment using RNA interference-induced knockdown to ask how loss of Mlig-pro46 and Mlig-pro63 expression, singly and in combination, affects mating frequency, partner suck propensity and both defensive and offensive sperm competitive ability (P1andP2, respectively). None of the knock-down treatments impacted strongly on mating frequency or sperm competitive ability, but the knock-down of Mlig-pro63 resulted in a significantly decreased ‘suck’ propensity of mating partners. This suggests that Mlig-pro63 may normally act as a cue in the ejaculate to trigger recipient suck behavior, though the functional and adaptive significance of these two seminal proteins from a donor perspective remains enigmatic.

Genotype by environment interactions and combining ability for strawberry families grown in diverse environments

Euphytica ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 213 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan M. Mathey ◽  
Sonali Mookerjee ◽  
Lise L. Mahoney ◽  
Kazim Gündüz ◽  
Umesh Rosyara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combining Ability ◽  
Genotype By Environment Interactions ◽  
Genotype By Environment

Genetic Parameters and Genotype-by-Environment Interactions in Regional Progeny Tests of Pinus taeda L. in the Southern USA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin Lauer ◽  
Andrew Sims ◽  
Steven McKeand ◽  
Fikret Isik
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Variation ◽  
Pinus Taeda ◽  
Genetic Parameters ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Breeding Program ◽  
Model Fit ◽  
Genotype By Environment Interactions ◽  
Genotype By Environment ◽  
Progeny Tests ◽  
Pinus Taeda L

Abstract Genetic parameters were estimated using a five-series multienvironment trial of Pinus taeda L. in the southern USA. There were 324 half-sib families planted in five test series across 37 locations. A set of six variance/covariance matrices for the genotype-by-environment (G × E) effect for tree height and diameter were compared on the basis of model fit. In single-series analysis, extended factor analytical models provided generally superior model fit to simpler models for both traits; however, in the combined-series analysis, diameter was optimally modeled using simpler variance/covariance structures. A three-way compound term for modeling G × E interactions among and within series yielded substantial improvements in terms of model fit and standard errors of predictions. Heritability of family means ranged between 0.63 and 0.90 for both height and diameter. Average additive genetic correlations among sites were 0.70 and 0.61 for height and diameter, respectively, suggesting the presence of some G × E interaction. Pairs of sites with the lowest additive genetic correlations were located at opposite ends of the latitude range. Latent factor regression revealed a small number of parents with large factor scores that changed ranks significantly between southern and northern environments. Study Implications Multienvironmental progeny tests of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) were established over 10 years in the southern United States to understand the genetic variation for the traits of economic importance. There was substantial genetic variation between open-pollinated families, suggesting that family selection would be efficient in the breeding program. Genotype-by-environment interactions were negligible among sites in the deployment region but became larger between sites at the extremes of the distribution. The data from these trials are invaluable in informing the breeding program about the genetic merit of selection candidates and their potential interaction with the environment. These results can be used to guide deployment decisions in the southern USA, helping landowners match germplasm with geography to achieve optimal financial returns and conservation outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document